Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Question - Problem with link

Is there vlan configured on the up down switch port? Does that vlan exist in the database. If you recently removed a vlan database from a switch and a vlan configured on the switchport doesn't exist in the DB you will see this issue. From: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [c-nsp] 6503-E with Sup720-3BXL?

This particular verbiage refers only to the 6, 9, & 13 slot systems. Tim At 10:14 PM 10/23/2007 -0500, mack observed: >I have seen several compatibility notes that state that the Sup720 >requires a 2500W PS. >However, It is also listed as compatible with the 6503-E. >Can the Sup720-3BXL be used

[c-nsp] 6503-E with Sup720-3BXL?

I have seen several compatibility notes that state that the Sup720 requires a 2500W PS. However, It is also listed as compatible with the 6503-E. Can the Sup720-3BXL be used in a 6503-E with the 1400W PS? Or does it require combined mode 1400W PSes? Or does this limitation only apply to 6,9 and 13

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and BGP question

Daryl, It never occurred to me. I couldn't figure out why the routes were not being passed to each other. The replies I am getting here are helping me to understand where I need to go. I appreciate all the responses I have received. So now I am reading up on this part of BGP and MPLS. I just nee

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Question - Problem with link

Pete Templin wrote: > Paul Stewart wrote: > >> Just looking for a thought - ethernet cable from switch to switch. One side >> is up/up but other side is up/down >> >> Cabling problem? It's a new connection... > > The problem(s) could be: > > 1: Transmitter on up/up side. > 2: Cabling pro

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Question - Problem with link

> Just looking for a thought - ethernet cable from switch to switch. One side > is up/up but other side is up/down What does a: # sh int x/x ...say for each relevant interface on both switches say? Steve ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Question - Problem with link

Paul Stewart wrote: > Just looking for a thought - ethernet cable from switch to switch. One side > is up/up but other side is up/down > > Cabling problem? It's a new connection... The problem(s) could be: 1: Transmitter on up/up side. 2: Cabling problem. 3: Receiver on up/down side. 4

[c-nsp] Ethernet Question - Problem with link

Hi folks... Just looking for a thought - ethernet cable from switch to switch. One side is up/up but other side is up/down Both sides configured properly (access port, no trunking). 6500 on one side and 3560 on the other Cabling problem? It's a new connection... Thanks, Paul

Re: [c-nsp] Risk of enabling ip accounting

Ip accounting is not supported on platforms that do forwarding in hardware and you cannot install a netflow card on a 4948 either since this is a fixed config box , so to answer your question , ip accounting wont work on a 4948 switch. Thanks Salman. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and BGP question

"Don Hickey" 10/23/07 7:55 PM GMT+2: > On the example above do I need to have a router reflector for this > to work? You either need to have all your iBGP speakers have all the others configured manually (pref. via peer-group) or use a route reflector. If you network is small and will stay sm

[c-nsp] Risk of enabling ip accounting

Hi, what is the level of risk involved in enabling IP accounting on an interface? More specifically, this is about a Catalyst 4948 doing L2/L3 and switching a total of 100 Mbits in and out (CPU is around 15%). I believe it should be OK, but before turning it on I'd feel more confortable with

[c-nsp] RBE ppoe DSL on the same pvc

Hi, we acquired a customer that has an ATM circuit that is doing RBE dsl on a 7200. To save money we wanted to combine our existing DSL customers on the same ATM, our customers are mostly pppoe with some FRASI lines. Hi is there a way, or is if even possible, to have RBE VC's mixed with pppoe V

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and BGP question

This may be obvious, but have you fully meshed BGP between all of your routers? Is PE1 peering with PE3? If fully meshed, you should not have to bother with route reflectors in this setup. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Hickey Sent: Tu

Re: [c-nsp] ADSL WIC, no ppp auth

aaa new-model aaa authentication ppp default none aaa authorization network NOAUTH none interface Virtual-Template1 ppp authorization NOAUTH b r y a n king | Senior Network Engineer InLine> Solutions Through Technology 600 Lakeshore Pkwy Birmingham AL, 35209 205-278-8139 [p] 205-941-1934[f]

Re: [c-nsp] mpls and BGP question

Well, The reasons the pings were timing out was due to the load on the computer running dynamips. I moved it to a quicker computer and my pings go through. I still have questions about need a Route Reflector, or maybe someone could suggest a better way to accomplish this. Thanks Don Hickey

Re: [c-nsp] BFD feedback?

BFD is a lifesaver where you have circuits such as metro ethernet links that don't lose link state when something in the middle blocks connectivity. It's less useful across WAN links that depend on end-to- end connectivity to maintain line protocol. As Arie, said, the hardest part of implemen

Re: [c-nsp] GE-WAN x SIP-x00 + n-Gig port-adapter

I'll preface this with "What are you using the box for?" , but if you really need the WAN type GigE ports go with the SIP/GigE SPAs. If you need higher density, take a look at the ES-20. Phil On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: > Folks, > > For 7600 routers, what are your th

[c-nsp] GE-WAN x SIP-x00 + n-Gig port-adapter

Folks, For 7600 routers, what are your thoughts about GE-WAN (4x Gig-E OSM) or using a SIP host (-200,-400 or -600) with 2, 4, 5 GigE port-adapters ? I'm considering price, performance, features and future IOS support. Rubens ___ cisco-nsp mailing lis

[c-nsp] ADSL WIC, no ppp auth

I cannot find a good sample config for the ADSL WIC using PPP but no PPP auth. I have a static IP. I have tried doing no ppp auth within the Virtual-Template and Dialer interface, and placing the IP on ATM0/0, Dialer 0 and VT-1. Any clues ? Config: interface ATM0/0 ip address 1.2.3.4 255.255.255

[c-nsp] MGX , RPMXF-P12-M 12.4(6)T5 and PBR

Hello, Is there anyone using policy base routing on the RPM to solve asymmetric routing? I have been told that this is not supported on the RPM. Thanks, Cory ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listin

[c-nsp] Switch interface, the difference between multicast and ... erm, multicast

#show interface gig0/4 GigabitEthernet0/4 is up, line protocol is up (connected) [snip] Received 41847785 broadcasts (0 multicast) 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 watchdog, 41727204 multicast, 1 pause input What's the difference between these t

Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1, compact flash

Yes. I expect you could use much larger sizes without any issue as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to use a 512MB compact flash on a NPE-G1 ? Cisco CFs for > NPE-G1 are listed as 64,128 and 256MB. > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] NPE-G1, compact flash

Hi, Is it possible to use a 512MB compact flash on a NPE-G1 ? Cisco CFs for NPE-G1 are listed as 64,128 and 256MB. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Video Backbone Design

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:49:20AM +0800, Dracul wrote: > Hi Justin, thanks for the quick reply. We're doing both. So throughput must > be stable for a cisco switch and also when > its stacked. We use 3750-12S as the distribution layer in our FTTH network which does both multicast and unicast vide

Re: [c-nsp] BFD feedback?

The technology is very useful. You can get to 150ms detection time for link failures where sometimes it takes much longer. On some platforms (like GSR) it also increases the scale as opposed to tuning down IGP timers. One thing to look for is not to be too aggressive with the timers as on CPU bas