At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
The only mentions of routing:
IP routing and multicast: Supports state-of-the-art implementations
of IPv4 and IPv6 services, routing protocols, and IP Multicast
features to optimize and enhance data center scalability and
performance, reducing capital
At 02:41 PM 1/29/2008 +0900, Daniel Hooper observed:
Microsoft is currently performing rigorous testing of the Nexus 7000
Series for security, manageability and performance in a lab environment
I doubt Microsoft would be doing any type of WAN/mpls/backbone testing
on it, just from the small
At 02:33 PM 1/29/2008 +1030, Tom Storey observed:
Call me crazy, but I got no sense that this new thingy can route, from
the little video or any of the data sheets. They'd be spouting the pps
of IPv6 hardware routing, if it could.
I saw mention of VRFs, OSPFv2 and 3, and mentions of IPv4
Unfortunately, in this 10G blade, the SFP+ will be 10G only.
Tim
At 11:07 PM 1/28/2008 -0500, David Prall observed:
It uses SFP+'s, they supposedly will be available in both 1GE and 10GE.
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
At 06:51 AM 1/29/2008 +0100, hjan observed:
Lincoln Dale (ltd) ha scritto:
mack wrote:
with initial I/O modules chassis, up to 240M PPS IPv6 h/w switched
goodness.
What about NX-OS ?
Is it built upon qnx ?
No. It is a linux kernel. The core system management HA
infrastructure is
On Tue, January 29, 2008 10:33 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having some problems with a C7600 unto which I created several VRFs.
One of these VRFs also contains a Tacacs server that I use for
authenticating several devices inside that VRF.
I also would like to
The 60mpps (30mpps) forwarding rate per slot is pretty anemic considering a
6704-10GE w/ DFC will do 48mpps per slot.
This is obviously for heavy duty back end applications and not satisfactory for
front end delivery to the internet.
The 6500/7600 is still the obvious sweet spot for data centers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Hooper) wrote:
Microsoft is currently performing rigorous testing of the Nexus 7000
Series for security, manageability and performance in a lab environment
I doubt Microsoft would be doing any type of WAN/mpls/backbone testing
on it,
I bet, Doug would love to get
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:07:13PM -0500, David Prall wrote:
It uses SFP+'s, they supposedly will be available in both 1GE and 10GE.
While the move to SFP+ for the Nexus7000 is clearly the only solution
(datacenter needs high density low cost 10GE links and Nexus has
the potential for 500 Gbps
At 02:38 AM 1/29/2008 -0600, mack observed:
The 60mpps (30mpps) forwarding rate per slot is pretty anemic
considering a 6704-10GE w/ DFC will do 48mpps per slot.
True. But, after the pps is removed as the bottleneck, this system
will do 8 10G ports at line rate per slot vs ~4.
Tim
This is
Dear all,
I did some research in different OSPF literature, and couldn't find any
solution for the following simple-looking issue:
Let's assume you have a broadcast multi-access network(e.g. ethernet)
with a subnet living on it, and having multiple OSPF routers connected
to it. Let's go
Hello all,
I'm having some problems with a C7600 unto which I created several VRFs.
One of these VRFs also contains a Tacacs server that I use for
authenticating several devices inside that VRF.
I also would like to authenticate the C7600 to it.
How can I accomplish this or what suggestions
Ok that math doesn't make sense.
60/48=1 1/3 not 2.
Even at that 32 ports with 80gbps forwarding is still an oversubscription of 4:1
Of course real world will probably allow forwarding of more than 80gbps at
60mpps.
The performance listed jives pretty well with the 230gbps / slot (figure 500
I really love how they stand behind their products.
The Limited Lifetime Warranty is for the original customer that purchased
from a Cisco Authorized Reseller. Warranties are not transferable. If you
could provide the Proof of Purchase from a Cisco Authorized Reseller then we
could honor your
Hi,
Now one of the routers gets separated from the network, while it's
physical interface remains in up state, which is easily possible
especially with ethernet. Now the routers can not see each other, so
both of them became DR, and start to announce the network. The problem
is with
Mack,
Ok that math doesn't make sense.
on Nexus 7000 the fabric bandwidth is different from the forwarding
performance of a given I/O (linecard) module.
you'll have to trust that Tim S does have his math correct ...
cheers,
lincoln.
___
cisco-nsp
Hi,
I have here a 1841 with IOS:
My schema here is:
VPN3000 DSL Router (doing NAT) Windows Server PC as PPTP client
(NAT) LAN
Yeah, I know 2 boxes doing NAT, some ports and gre protocol forwarded to
the windows server... no commments :-P
Well, the plan is to replace the DSL router and the
Pete Templin wrote:
Call me crazy, but I got no sense that this new thingy can
route, from
the little video or any of the data sheets. They'd be spouting the
pps
of IPv6 hardware routing, if it could.
with initial I/O modules chassis, up to 240M PPS IPv6 h/w
switched
Hi
I'm a bit confused about hardware support for VPLS and cisco 7600.
If I have only LAN cards e.g. 6724 customer facing and 6704 core facing does
that mean that I have no VPLS support or just not H-VPLS ?
Can I run some topology of VPLS with only LAN cards (full mesh, hub-spoke,
partial mesh).
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, MKS wrote:
Hi
I'm a bit confused about hardware support for VPLS and cisco 7600.
If I have only LAN cards e.g. 6724 customer facing and 6704 core facing does
that mean that I have no VPLS support or just not H-VPLS ?
Can I run some topology of VPLS with only LAN
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:59 PM, James Humphris wrote:
What type of hardware platform would I need to use as a collector if I
enabled netflow (or even sampled netflow) on a number of these devices
in my data centre!?!
In addition to Aamer's comments in re Cisco NFC, commercial folks such
as
Anyone knows when can the 7200VXR support VPLS?
thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29, 2008 9:22 AM, Dennis Dubbelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For supporting VPLS on a 7600, OSM or ES20 linecards are needed on the
Core facing interfacces. Those cards will handle the label push and pop
for SVI based
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:03:42AM +0100, Gabor Ivanszky wrote:
I did some research in different OSPF literature, and couldn't find any
solution for the following simple-looking issue:
Let's assume you have a broadcast multi-access network(e.g. ethernet)
with a subnet living on it, and
I would like to test the 12.2.33-SXH1 code in our 6500 720 and see
there are two versions MODULAR and NON-MODULAR for the advanced IP
with SSH. I would like to use the modular because of the new
security feature for multiple login levels for WEB access.
Does anybody have any
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:01:43PM +, MKS wrote:
I'm a bit confused about hardware support for VPLS and cisco 7600.
If I have only LAN cards e.g. 6724 customer facing and 6704 core
facing does that mean that I have no VPLS support or just not H-VPLS ?
Can I run some topology of VPLS
For supporting VPLS on a 7600, OSM or ES20 linecards are needed on the
Core facing interfacces. Those cards will handle the label push and pop
for SVI based interfaces.
You can use your defined hardware as a MPLS Access node and terminate
your PW on a VPLS based 7600 router. This router must
At 03:04 AM 1/29/2008 -0600, mack observed:
Ok that math doesn't make sense.
60/48=1 1/3 not 2.
So at small packets, this system can do 4 ports non blocking 6704 can do ~3.
Even at that 32 ports with 80gbps forwarding is still an
oversubscription of 4:1
Yes, this card is 4:1 oversubscribed at
There are some techniques that one can use to scale something like this. One
could use a UDP loadbalancer to a complex for collectors to distribute the
load.
The cisco NFC does support this model with hiearchrial collectors, as other
collector implementations do as well. The one thing you
Either I am mis-reading what you are trying to ask, or you are not making
yourself very clear, because what I can gather from your descriptions thus
far, this is explicitly covered in most OSPF explanations.
This may help you understand things more clearly.
Routers don't become DR/BDR/DROthers,
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 09:57 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, Pete Templin observed:
Call me crazy, but I got no sense that this new thingy can route,
Yes, it can route.
Alright, so I couldn't find that (definitively) in the first two pages I
read. It's called a 'switch'. I know the line is blurry
Does it do netflow output?
yes, NetFlow export v5 and v9 (flexible netflow) export are supported.
h/w table of 512K netflow entries shared between ingress egress on
each forwarding engine (per I/O module).
Or sampled netflow?
yes, (true) sampled netflow is supported in h/w too.
I suppose
Enno Rey wrote:
Now one of the routers gets separated from the network, while it's
physical interface remains in up state, which is easily possible
especially with ethernet. Now the routers can not see each other, so
both of them became DR, and start to announce the network. The problem
is
Hi,
It can't be HW problem because 7206 is software router.
May be there is a performance or marketing problem..
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Not ever?
Some experts from Cisco might answer. I think it is mostly HW problem...
At 08:48 AM 1/29/2008 -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable). No immediate plans for it either.
This would be
Ian Cox wrote:
At 08:48 AM 1/29/2008 -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable). No immediate plans for it
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Morten Skriver wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:01:43PM +, MKS wrote:
I'm a bit confused about hardware support for VPLS and cisco 7600.
If I have only LAN cards e.g. 6724 customer facing and 6704 core
facing does that mean that I have no VPLS support or just
Used to happen to me all the time!
We call it the Switch in the middle problem! (although the actual fault in
our case usually involves an inground fibre and an mechanical digger)
Design it out by not having sprawing L2 nets
If all your long, damage prone links are in their own subnets you
Lincon,
Just on the netflow point, whilst it's all very well being able to
generate a ton of netflow data export records, but has the Cisco Netflow
Collector been sufficiently scaled to deal with the sort of volumes of
traffic generated by these next generation platforms?
What type of hardware
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi folks...
I'm looking for a good IP Subnet tracking system - open source would be
wonderful but commercial is fine too...
Requirements:
IPV4 and IPV6 Address Tracking
ARIN SWIP Updates Automatically
Multiple User Access (Read Only, Read/Write)
Hi Whisper,
thanks for your response.
probably I didn't explain the issue very clear, I apologize.
I try to give an other example for the same issue, which is a bit more
practical (and more complicated).
On the attached figure you see a topology which is intended to provide a
redundant
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable). No immediate plans for it either.
This would be a show-stopper for us in our Data Center. We have
Anyone ever seen this before?
I have a series of distribution switches (3550s/3560s/3750s mostly) linked to a
6509 using EIGRP with route authentication.
Everything has worked up to this point, until trying to add a recent 3550-12G.
It won't establish the EIGRP session.
The keys are the
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Not ever?
Some experts from Cisco might answer. I think it is mostly HW problem...
Regards,
Janos
Thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29, 2008 11:32 AM, Mohacsi Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Not ever?
Thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29, 2008 11:32 AM, Mohacsi Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Anyone knows when can the 7200VXR support VPLS?
AFAK VPLS is not supported on 7200VXR.
Regards,
Janos
thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Anyone knows when can the 7200VXR support VPLS?
AFAK VPLS is not supported on 7200VXR.
Regards,
Janos
thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29, 2008 9:22 AM, Dennis Dubbelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For supporting VPLS on a 7600, OSM or ES20
I laugh whenever I see RANCID mentioned. I implemented RANCID at a
previous job to just save configs and it had a funny effect of making
all the support staff more aware of changes they were making, because
everyone would get notified of the change. I was recently looking at
installing
Hi folks...
I'm looking for a good IP Subnet tracking system - open source would be
wonderful but commercial is fine too...
Requirements:
IPV4 and IPV6 Address Tracking
ARIN SWIP Updates Automatically
Multiple User Access (Read Only, Read/Write)
Other than that, not much else. Using NorthStar
BT Diamond IP
http://btdiamondip.com/
rocks.
On Jan 29, 2008 2:05 PM, Ray Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.oneunified.net/blog/OpenSource/Debian/AddressManagement/index.blo
g (See the 2007 June 29 entry) (Constructive criticism on the 2007 Sept 14
article are welcome as
http://www.oneunified.net/blog/OpenSource/Debian/AddressManagement/index.blo
g (See the 2007 June 29 entry) (Constructive criticism on the 2007 Sept 14
article are welcome as well).
I've diagrammed a table relationship for something that covers many of the
concepts asked for below. A few things
Peter Lothberg wrote:
You don't need MPLS to do this, any encpsulation works. For example
there are large world_wide deployments providing this using L2TPv3 as
transport.
L2TPv3 could be interesting. I don't know if it would be the optimal
way to accomplish what one could do with MPLS VPNs
Peter Lothberg wrote:
Ian Cox wrote:
At 08:48 AM 1/29/2008 -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable). No immediate
Quoting Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable). No immediate plans for it either.
This would be a
Loved the article.
But Brocade's switch can't connect data centers over vast distances
like the Nexus, making it less attractive in an increasingly virtualized
IT world. Cisco has created the switch for the new virtualized data
center
How far are you going to get with that 1 SR spf+ optic(vast
We have just finalized a design consisting of 6509s in the Data Center (core),
with VSS enabled, Sup720-3Cs, etc - the whole nine yards. Does anybody know
of a tool or link allowing us a feature-to-feature comparison between 6500s
(modules and IOS features) and 7000s, so that we could determine
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 20:51 +, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Say it with me everyone, MPLS MPLS MPLS. It's silly to build any device
without MPLS support.
MPLS is old school, it limits you to be in your own MPLS-fishball
network.
A little OT, but I'd say CsC and inter-AS MPLS (+VPN) is
Crippled indeed - I had 5sec-CPU samples spiking to 80% and above,
causing packet loss in our core with all SXF modular releases. Because
of this, modular code has been relegated to the most experimental
reaches of our network lab...I'm in wait-and-see mode for SXH.
-Original Message-
Hi everybody,
Regarding this old thread, we are trying to build graphs via SNMP for
CRS-1 modules.
Using the method described by Cisco at the links below it works for
all modules (SIP,
DRP etc), but not for the active RP! I was wondering if anybody ever
tried finding a way
and if they succeeded.
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:55 -0500, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
We are upgrading our sup-720-3Bs to the 720-CXL with 10G ports, which
requires the SXH code.
Makes me a little nervous ~
Just go for the monolothic code instead, it shouldn't have the same
problems. :-)
Regards,
Peter
Ian Cox wrote:
At 08:48 AM 1/29/2008 -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable). No immediate plans for
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable). No immediate plans for it either.
This would be a show-stopper for us in our Data Center.
This is disappointing :(
The sales hype indicated this was revolutionary.
Instead it is a slight improvement over the existing switch gear with crippled
MPLS and routing capability.
The 4:1 over subscription at the port level even limits it for intense SAN
usage.
--
LR Mack McBride
Network
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
It can't be HW problem because 7206 is software router. May be there is a
performance or marketing problem..
That is what I am saying: probably hardware of 7206 is not capable of
handling it, since it is a SW router
HW of 7206 theoreticaly
Thanks to everyone for the input I have several options to look at now
from commercial to open source
Best!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Koch
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:11 PM
To: Ray Burkholder
Cc:
Take a look to http://iptrack.sourceforge.net/ it is opensource.
El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 13:02 -0500, Paul Stewart escribió:
Hi folks...
I'm looking for a good IP Subnet tracking system - open source would be
wonderful but commercial is fine too...
Requirements:
IPV4 and IPV6 Address
Just last week, I put together this wish list of an IP management tool
that we'd like to have. I'm probably reaching a bit with some of the
features but it is still a wish list after all.
We manage quite a few clients and we do builds frequently for new
clients so any tool which can replace Excel
We have repeatedly mulled over writing a truly usable, extensible and
easy-to-understand IP manager at Evariste. The problem is there just
wasn't enough concrete demand from our existing clients to warrant
the development investment up-front, or it would have been done a long
time ago, as it's
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Dmitry Valdov wrote:
Hi,
It can't be HW problem because 7206 is software router. May be there is a
performance or marketing problem..
That is what I am saying: probably hardware of 7206 is not capable of
handling it, since it is a SW router
On Tue, 29 Jan
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:35 -0500, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
I would like to test the 12.2.33-SXH1 code in our 6500 720 and see
there are two versions MODULAR and NON-MODULAR for the advanced IP
with SSH. I would like to use the modular because of the new
security feature
Hi Gabor,
I can't see how you could avoid this problem. If you have the following:
Host1Host2
vv
RTR-A - SW-A - SW-B - RTR-B
and you break the link between SW-A and SW-B, what would you suggest
would determine if RTR-A or RTR-B is the correct one to announce
FYI, I am using IPPlan.
We found some issues to deploy it but most of them were related to our
environment here, so at this momment it is being used with some
customization -related with some information we wanted to add to an IP-
and we don't find critical issues yet.
I suposse it would be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Tim Stevenson wrote:
At 10:18 PM 1/28/2008 -0600, mack observed:
No mention of MPLS though which gives the CRS-1 a leg up on the
backbone routing market.
NO MPLS (though the h/w is capable).
http://www.forbes.com/technology/cionetwork/2008/01/27/cisco-nexus-switch-tech-inter-cx_ag_0128techcisco.html
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
http://tinyurl.com/2osxg5 says that the VS-S720-10G-3C has no
ACE counters, but the VS-S720-10G-3CXL does. That was unexpected.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:22:53AM +0100, Marian ??urkovi?? wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:07:13PM -0500, David Prall wrote:
It uses SFP+'s, they supposedly will be available in both 1GE and 10GE.
While the move to SFP+ for the Nexus7000 is clearly the only solution
(datacenter needs
They don't have to provide it to you, until you purchase it from them.
But if you knew the GPL 1 or 2, you'd know that. Otherwise you can
get it at kernel.org.
On Jan 29, 2008 3:36 PM, Rubens Kuhl Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about NX-OS ?
Is it built upon qnx ?
No. It is a linux
Rubens,
No. It is a linux kernel. The core system management HA
infrastructure is taken from SAN-OS (ie MDS) with Ethernet L2 L3
functionality laid on top.
As the Linux kernel and some code commonly used on embedded Linux
devices are GPL'ed, what is the URL for the part of the code
What about NX-OS ?
Is it built upon qnx ?
No. It is a linux kernel. The core system management HA
infrastructure is taken from SAN-OS (ie MDS) with Ethernet L2 L3
functionality laid on top.
As the Linux kernel and some code commonly used on embedded Linux
devices are GPL'ed, what is the
Just stumbled across a router in our network currently sitting at 1535
days of uptime, not to often you see that sort of uptime on a router
these days, given this router does nothing important anymore though...
in fact I think it's probably been forgot about, which is a good
enough reason
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:19:20PM +0200, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Has anyone real world experience of using these 2 features (Reflexive
ACLs or CBAC) on 6500 with MSFC2 (SUP2) or MSFC3 (SUP720)?
depends on your environment.
if you can limit the traffic that that would trigger the
lets see.. i got a couple cat55k's up over 3000 days
i knnow i have another device up somewhere around 11/12 years, i just cant
remember which one right now..
i knnow i ahve some more
SJC1 sh sys
PS1-Status PS2-Status Fan-Status Temp-Alarm Sys-Status Uptime d,h:m:s Logout
-- --
Hi,
I'm trying to determine what kind of throughput we can expect from a 2611XM
currently in production (IOS 12.3(24), 128MB RAM). The router is doing eBGP to
two peers but only advertises one network and receives default routes only.
Other than that it's plain vanilla.
Cisco's router
Ben Steele wrote:
Anyone got anything currently running longer?
router uptime is 4 years, 10 weeks, 5 days, 9 hours, 13 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System restarted at 14:27:52 ACDT Fri Nov 14 2003
System image file is flash:c2600-js-mz.122-17a.bin
cisco 2620 (MPC860)
Adam,
I had an identically configured 2611XM in service a couple years ago.
The CPU maintained 70-90% during peak times. At the time that was with
about 8Mbps passing through it. One night when the router reached just
under 10Mbps the CPU pegged at 100% (usually I only see Cisco IOS
devices
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Howard Jones wrote:
I know it's heretical but I have a Nortel ASN in a dark corner of the
network with at least 5 years of uptime. Sadly it also has a BayRS bug
which means the uptime counter breaks after about 280 days or so.
Currently it claims to have been up for -17
Once upon a time, Andrew Gristina [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
They don't have to provide it to you, until you purchase it from them.
But if you knew the GPL 1 or 2, you'd know that. Otherwise you can
get it at kernel.org.
If they don't include the source with the router, they have to include
an
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:52:44AM +0800, Lincoln Dale (ltd) wrote:
Rubens,
No. It is a linux kernel. The core system management HA
infrastructure is taken from SAN-OS (ie MDS) with Ethernet L2 L3
functionality laid on top.
As the Linux kernel and some code commonly used on
On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Lincoln Dale (ltd) wrote:
Rubens,
No. It is a linux kernel. The core system management HA
infrastructure is taken from SAN-OS (ie MDS) with Ethernet L2 L3
functionality laid on top.
As the Linux kernel and some code commonly used on embedded Linux
devices
Hi Peter, all,
thanks for all the responses!
After thinking over the situation first(days ago), I also came to the
same conclusion, so we solved the issue through design. I was just
curious whether there is any nice solution possible in the framework
of routing protocols. It seemed so
Ben Steele wrote on 30.01.2008 01:05:
Just stumbled across a router in our network currently sitting at 1535
days of uptime, not to often you see that sort of uptime on a router
these days, given this router does nothing important anymore though...
in fact I think it's probably been
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:35:23AM +1030, Ben Steele wrote:
Anyone got anything currently running longer?
router uptime is 4 years, 10 weeks, 5 days, 9 hours, 13 minutes
Pff, that's nothing :-)
win-gw uptime is 8 years, 17 weeks, 2 days, 19 hours, 4 minutes
System restarted by power-on
At 03:22 PM 29-01-08 -0500, Casey Mills wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/technology/cionetwork/2008/01/27/cisco-nexus-switch-tech-inter-cx_ag_0128techcisco.html
Anyone else find it interesting that Juniper yesterday launced their EX
switch series (specifically the EX8200):
91 matches
Mail list logo
