i'm talking strictly between your LNS and your CPE here, if you find
your MMPPP is giving poor performance due to physical differences
between the 2 sessions (ie speed and latency), then try doing
something a little more creative like multihopping both ppp sessions
onto the one router and u
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> can anyone recommed a tool to 'blast' this particular interface
TTCP with UDP traffic, best directed at a null-routed IP address on the
other side of that interface.
Pay careful attention to the order of command-line parameters or weird
things will happen.
If you want
Thanks Ben,
I understand now. Coz previously, regarding the user I though this is a single
user with PC/notebook/windows dialing using two different wireless service...
is it possible?
regards
- Original Message
From: Ben Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Edi Guntoro <[EMAIL PROTEC
Yes it's possible to have say windows do multilink ppp through 2
seperate network devices, never tried it though so not sure how
reliable their implementation of it is.
Ben
On 16/07/2008, at 5:12 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:
Thanks Ben,
I understand now. Coz previously, regarding the user I tho
Hi,
Is it recommended to run three STM-1 (PA-POS-1OC3) on a single
Cisco700vxr with NPE-G1 ?
Regards,
Samit
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pi
There is a nice index including this and other similar product
comparisions (switch performance, vpn performance etc.) at:-
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tools/quickreference/index.html
Paul.
Paul Stewart wrote:
Thanks... that's actually the document I was looking for ;)
Our theory to da
Hi again,
It may be a bit unclear, but on the 3560/3750-platform, you'll have to
do egress policing by manipulating the DSCP-values on input-interfaces
and tweaking the srr-queues on the output-interfaces.
The old 3550-platform supported egress policing via aggregate-policers,
a bit more logicall
Samit wrote:
Hi,
Is it recommended to run three STM-1 (PA-POS-1OC3) on a single
Cisco700vxr with NPE-G1 ?
Technically, it is supported, as each of the two buses have 600
bandwidth points, with an STM-1 interface taking up 300. Question is
whether it might be recommendable to get a second r
If I remember correctly they are rate limited.
You should use netflow and match on ACL dst if of Null0 rather
than the log feature of the ACL's.
Rodney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:31:26PM +0700, a. rahman isnaini r.sutan wrote:
> Hi charles,
>
> Depends on the engine processor.
> Our G1 can hand
Yep. Done in CEF path.
Rodney
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:34:21PM +0100, Paul Cosgrove wrote:
> Hi Rodney,
>
> Is that safe to do even if the traffic rate and/or cpu is high?
>
> Looks like a nice feature.
>
> Paul.
>
> Rodney Dunn wrote:
> >Or you could load the new 12.4(20)T and set up a pac
What is the configuration of that interface and can you provide
a 'sh int' between two drop periods?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:22:31PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having problems with a particular device going down every 3-4 days.
> The switchport for which this device is co
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 18:10:00 Garry wrote:
> Technically, it is supported, as each of the two buses
> have 600 bandwidth points, with an STM-1 interface taking
> up 300. Question is whether it might be recommendable to
> get a second router for redundancy reasons, e.g. if you
> are terminatin
Have you tried 'hold-queue ...' command. This may resolves your problem.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Wilkinson, Alex
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having problems with a particular device going down every 3-4 days.
> The switchport for which this device is connected to is te
OK than, so Cisco Router has a limitation on plotting the maximum
hits/matches on ACL to a raw log.
Thanks Rodney.
a. rahman isnaini r.sutan
Rodney Dunn wrote:
If I remember correctly they are rate limited.
You should use netflow and match on ACL dst if of Null0 rather
than the log feature of
Gentlemen,
Saying about Cisco it's very new and interesting matrices for me (I mean
bus/interface bandwidth points).
Is this info available publicly?
Thank U
--
Respect, Andy Oleynik
...
andyo> > Is it recommended to run three STM-1 (PA-POS-1OC3) on a single
andyo> > Cisco700vxr with NPE-G1 ?
a
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps341/prod_presentation09186a008009184d.pdf
Regards,
Mathias
From:
Andrey Oleinik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Garry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
"cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Date:
16.07.2008 15:00
Subject:
Re: [c-nsp] bandwidth points table (former Thr
Hello,
We've had an ASA5500 online for about two years providing
VPN services for wireless users on our campus (v8.0(3)).
Starting over the weekend, we've encountered a problem
where users can connect and authenticate, but traffic isn't
passing through the box (i.e. client side show transmit
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Samit wrote:
Is it recommended to run three STM-1 (PA-POS-1OC3) on a single Cisco700vxr
with NPE-G1 ?
Could it be done? Yes, but I wouldn't expect to see good performance if
you try to move anything approaching line-rate traffic on those interfaces.
jms
__
Samit,
Take a look at the Jacket Card. It would help to extend the bandwidth
point limitation:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7200/install_and_upgrade/port_ad
apter_jacket_card_install/8427J.html
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
It is inadvisable to increase the output hold-queue as far as I am
aware, this could cause packets to be delayed on egress which could
cause TCP timeouts.
Dave.
Farhan Jaffer wrote:
> Have you tried 'hold-queue ...' command. This may resolves your problem.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Nope
You will have no buffer should flooding traffic occurs.
a. r.isnaini rangkayo sutan
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Samit wrote:
Is it recommended to run three STM-1 (PA-POS-1OC3) on a single
Cisco700vxr with NPE-G1 ?
___
Hi,
We're using a Cisco AS5350 as a SIP <-> ISDN PRI gateway. Normally we
route calls from the incoming ISDN line to a SIP server (and vice versa).
Currently we're wondering if we can route calls coming in from a specific
ISDN line to another ISDN line directly without having to go through a SI
Hi Guys,
This really depends on the speed of the Interface and what is connected on the
other side.
We had a Serial Satellite link of 5M, which was never running higher than
4.5M - due to regular bursty traffic.
After increasing the queue (fair-queue 320 256 0) the link now does about
4.9M, w
Andreas Sikkema wrote:
We're using a Cisco AS5350 as a SIP <-> ISDN PRI gateway. Normally we
route calls from the incoming ISDN line to a SIP server (and vice versa).
Currently we're wondering if we can route calls coming in from a specific
ISDN line to another ISDN line directly without havin
Hello,
anybody having a AS5350 with PRI(s) and asterisk running for
incoming/outgoing calls between SIP and ISDN/Analog is willing to post
as5350 config and asterisk config?
just to get straight to the core...
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.n
On Wed, July 16, 2008 5:53 pm, Raul Lopez Nevot wrote:
> Hello,
> anybody having a AS5350 with PRI(s) and asterisk running for
> incoming/outgoing calls between SIP and ISDN/Analog is willing to post
> as5350 config and asterisk config?
All the configs I have are rather lengthy (for AS5300s and
Greetings,
So, according to this at table 3:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet09186a00801aa71c.html
the NM-2FE are not supported on the 2651XM. Any idea as to how I could
get 3 FE ports on a 2651XM? I don't need anywhere near line speed but
need the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:56:37PM -0400, Jason Berenson wrote:
> So, according to this at table 3:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet09186a00801aa71c.html
>
> the NM-2FE are not supported on the 2651XM. Any idea as to how I could get
> 3 FE ports on
Doug,
The only issue is the XM is not EOL and the 3640 is, I think. I may be
able to dig up a 3640 in my office, if not I'll probably go with a 2691.
-Jason
Doug McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:56:37PM -0400, Jason Berenson wrote:
So, according to this at table 3:
http://www
0n Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:28:05AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>What is the configuration of that interface and can you provide
>a 'sh int' between two drop periods?
>From 'running-config'
interface FastEthernet4/10
no snmp trap link-status
>From 'show int FastEthernet4/10'
Hi Everyone,
Just wondering if anyone has come up with a way to hairpin traffic using
a Cisco router? The problem is as follows;
Say for example I have a router connecting to the Internet and an
internal LAN doing normal NA, e.g;
203.1.2.3 -> ROUTER <- 192.168.1.0/24 (203.1.2.3 being th
Hi Nick,
We had the same problem at work and used DNS to get around it. The only
solution we found was to have an second internal DNS that would resolv to
the internal IP so that both internal and external users could access the
server from a common DNS name.
Marc.
2008/7/17 Geyer, Nick <[EMAIL
This is where dns doctoring on the asa/pix really comes in handy!
Split dns is usually the way to go but I had another thought, can you
put the public 203 address as an alias on the server and then setup a
policy route-map on your lan interface to match packets with a
destination of your se
Hi Marc,
That's what I usually do as well.
In this scenario though an internal DNS server is not an option as all
traffic is by IP address not hostname. Its got me stumped and I know
Cisco used to say it was not possible, but am just wondering if there is
anything new that could be used/man
34 matches
Mail list logo
