Hi,
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 07:13:33PM -0400, Keegan Holley wrote:
You can always buy more switches and move ports. The 2960 and the hundreds
of other switches (and blades) just like it is a wiring closet switch for
the enterprise. It should be common knowledge (no offense if this is new
FYI The 48 port 3560E switches have 3x ASICs so you'll get the same
buffer limitations across each set of 24 ports.
Regards,
--Dan
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Vincent Aniello
vincent.anie...@pipelinefinancial.com wrote:
So it looks like a WS-C3560E-24TD has two ASICs:
switch#show
Hi group,
Below is a weird problem when I set an interface on ES20 linecard to its
default setting
Router(config)#default int g3/0/1
Command rejected: not allowed on this interface.
Command rejected: not allowed on this interface.
Command rejected: not allowed on this interface.
%
On 13/09/2010 07:05, Gert Doering wrote:
ports, while the average egress load never exceeded 50% (!)
The average that you're talking about here is measured over 5 minutes,
which is an eternity in terms of packet throughput. If you drop your
measurement interval from 5 minutes to something
On 13/09/2010 10:44, Gert Doering wrote:
Nick, grant me a bit of understanding about averaging and bursts :-)
Heh, this wasn't directed at you, really. But most people don't bother
looking at numbers any closer than the 5 minute average - which tells you
almost nothing about what's going
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:06:48AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/09/2010 10:44, Gert Doering wrote:
(spreading out the packets), while most other streaming software creates
somewhat massive wirespeed bursts, and then waits some milliseconds, and
then generates a new wirespeed burst.
Dear all,
Did someone know the real limitation of MPLS range label on 3750 Metro
series ?
On many Cisco documents I've read that the max value should no exceed
1048575
but I can't go further than 8191 (12.2(55)SE).
plr-pe-1#sh mpls label range
Downstream Generic label region: Min/Max label:
Oli/All,
Thanks for the clarification about no hardware assist whatsoever being involved
in route-map processing -- makes sense: I just wasn't thinking clearly. ;)
That said, just for posterity, we did notice about a 2% total drop in RP CPU by
simply removing the match statement from the final
Interesting enough, yesterday James Ventre posted a note where he
found at least some minimal info about the 2960/3560/3750 buffer
amount:
http://networking.ventrefamily.com/2010/09/3560ge-and-3750ge-buffers.html
Also, I have to say I have exactly the same experience as Gert - IPTV
streaming box
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
Interesting enough, yesterday James Ventre posted a note where he
found at least some minimal info about the 2960/3560/3750 buffer
amount:
http://networking.ventrefamily.com/2010/09/3560ge-and-3750ge-buffers.html
Ugh, ugly. I was hoping to find a
On (2010-09-13 11:08 -0400), Jeremy Reid wrote:
Separate from the original question asked: We did find the true culprit for
what was significantly elevating our RP CPU (BGP process) loads: An IPv6 peer
that was activated under *both* the ipv6 AND ipv4 address-families... Once
the errant
On a 48 port 3560E, 24 ports per ASIC
cat3560-2#sh platform pm if-numbers
interface gid gpn lpn port slot unit slun port-type lpn-idb gpn-idb
--
Gi0/1 1111/1 111local Yes Yes
Gi0/2 2
Seriously look at the juniper ex platforms if you are open to other
vendors. They sound to be exactly what your are asking for.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
Interesting enough, yesterday James Ventre posted a note where he
found at least some minimal info about the
Ugh, ugly. I was hoping to find a box that could do 10Gb/s uplink and
breakout as far down as 100Mb/s. Back to hunting again.
Have a look at the new ME 3600X / 3800X series.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
___
cisco-nsp mailing
The 4900 is 16MB shared for the whole box. The Arista 7048 (not stackable) is
about the only thing close to the S60, with 768MB.
Phil
On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/09/2010 17:28, Chris Evans wrote:
Seriously look at the juniper ex platforms if you are open to
I'm doing it on WS-X6704-10GE cards without issue. My largest segment is
26 nodes and it is fast and reliable.
AFAIK You should be able to run REP on any switching interface with
an IOS that supports REP.
Brian J.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de writes:
Now if I had more time :-) it might be worth investigating the (Linux)
streaming server software used, whether it can be changed to invest a bit
more CPU to better smooth out the packets... OTOH, the kernel might
just wreck this, and smear it all
Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org writes:
From what I remember, the EX4200 has rather small buffers - not terribly
different in size to the 3560/3750 range. This is from memory, so I could
be mistaken. Juniper are rather coy on the topic, which is always a sign
of relative paucity. If the box
Just a small tip when activating IPv6 in BGP - use the global bgp
command no bgp default ipv4-unicast.
This would stop the default creation of bgp peers under the ipv4 unicast
address family, avoiding the below situation.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:23:24PM +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
You can use pspacer to achieve something close to perfect smoothing of
bursty traffic.
Thanks for the link.
I'll give it a try - it's not perfectly what we want (because it needs
to know the target bitrate to shape to,
On 13/09/2010 21:33, Benny Amorsen wrote:
3MB per PFE, according to:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010073-en.pdf
http://kb.juniper.net/KB10963
so, the 24 port model has 2 PFEs (i.e. 6M buffer space) and the 48, 3 PFEs
(9 meg). That's not really very much,
On Monday, September 13, 2010 11:08:25 pm Jeremy Reid wrote:
Word to the wise, outside of us previously failing to
notice the V6 session output in a (v4) 'show ip bgp
summary', there were no log messages, etc. indicative of
the mis-built peer session, and the peer was up and
working
22 matches
Mail list logo
