Dear all:
I am facing some about Cisco Processor Engine: NPE-G1 which was plug into
Cisco 7206VXR . Due some issue i unplug the NPE-G1 card and insert this engine
to another Cisco 7204VXR router at same time i am getting problem while booing
the 7204VXR router and results 7204VXR not come up
Well, the C6880-X features a slightly modified version of the Sup2T as a new
base-board, which actually
has a larger FIB TCAM with 2M IPv4 entries (if the data from BRKARC-3468 is
correct).
So that might qualify as a new Sup, even if it's just for the semi-fixed
chassis as of now :)
I assume a
Hi allI have the below topology
R1 E1/0 - R5 F1/0
Its connected via a layer 2 switch , I have advertised Loopback interface on R1
(1.1.1.1)now , the route is installed in R5 routing tableMy concern is that
E1/0 has a BW value of 1 and delay of 1000 , F1/0 of R5 has BW value of
10 and
Because router calculates metrics from himself to destination , not from
neighbor to destination.
this is Advertised distance , when R5 recieves routes from R1 with AD ,
R5 will add its metrics to R1 which will be FD
On 09/02/2013 12:45 PM, M K wrote:
Hi allI have the below topology
R1 E1/0 -
On 09/01/2013 05:55 PM, Rolf Hanßen wrote:
Hello,
ok, beside the technical stuff: How do you guys manage the licenses if
there is no number/certificate/key ?
We keep a record of all the purchase orders we make, and although it
would take an hour or so of someones time, it would not be overly
Thanks for the great explanation
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:51:09 +0400
From: iinf...@gmail.com
To: gunner_...@live.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP Metric
Because router calculates metrics from himself to destination , not from
neighbor to destination.
this
On 30/08/2013 21:59, Tom Cooper wrote:
Software by Cisco. That's the first mistake.
well no, it's not. Cisco is a very large company with a huge number of
programmers working on a wide variety of platforms. Writing them all off
like this is unfair.
In the case of e.g. XR, the compiled
During the bootup of Cisco WS-C2960-24-S switch I see following messages:
Initializing Flash...
mifs[2]: 0 files, 1 directories
mifs[2]: Total bytes :3870720
mifs[2]: Bytes used : 1024
mifs[2]: Bytes available :3869696
mifs[2]: mifs fsck took 0 seconds.
mifs[3]: 519 files,
Mike,
I am still not sure what your complete solution looks like... Any chance you
could give us a bit more info? A diagram would be really nice.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2013 10:58
The traceback errors you are getting decode to issues allocating memory while
the router is booting.
My guess would be this is a very old device (NPE-G1 was announced End of Sale
in 2011)... They are still supported by Cisco (Last day of support is Feb 2017)
You most likely have a hardware
You need to match on the exact protocol to make ZBF work properly. In your
first example you match and inspect on access-list 102 which is IP and IP
header have not enough information to link echo with corresponding
echo-reply. TFTP is asymmetrical - ZBF should work with it though (again
with
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 10:08 +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Randy wrote:
It would only be used for detecting inbound UDP floods and other
high PPS anomalies so there is no need for full flows or even much
details, just ip src/dst.
It's useless for this or any
On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Though Sup720 Netflow has many limitations, the OP's use case is one that it
can actually help with.
No, it isn't - he won't be able to detect anomalies reliably nor will he be
able to characterize floods, because the statistics are
Hi all,
I used this configure on PE1:
interface GigabitEthernet9/16.12
description test redundant psedowire
encapsulation dot1Q 12
xconnect 10.5.0.38 1138074000 encapsulation mpls
backup peer 10.5.0.87 1174087000
end
When I shutdown interface of
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 08:35 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
In essence - yes, IOS will establish peer relationships with random
hosts unless you ACL it off. Yes that is crazy.
And on top of ntp access-group maybe also include ntp disable on
every customer facing interface, just to use both
Hi,
What sort of platform is this on? Generally this sort of issues (one
way traffic) would indicate that something doesn't get flushed
properly after the switchover to backup. This setup should generally
work no problems.
kind regards
Pshem
On 3 September 2013 14:03, PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX
Hi Aaron,
As someone else suggested one reason for needing/using QoS is if you are using
sub-line-rate links between your core devices.
If you are purchasing a 400Mbps link from a carrier and have it plugged into a
1Gbps interface, then you will need to shape your traffic to 400M to ensure you
17 matches
Mail list logo
