I just want to get a sanity check on some WRED settings. This is a 100G
linecard. If I have a class with "bandwidth remaining percent 1"
configured, as well as random detect 10ms 20ms configured, I believe that
means that WRED kicks in when the allotted buffer space is 10 ms full. If
I'm reading th
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 04:31:54PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Mikael Abrahamsson writes:
>
> > When 40GE and 100GE was standardized it was taken for granted that
> > 40GE would be used to connect servers and perhaps a little
> > inter-building backhaul, because of that only up to 10km was
> >
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Mark Tinka wrote:
Personally, I think this indicates a fundamental lack of
focus from vendors (and the IETF) in understanding the
actual problems operators have and need to solve.
So for this perticular problem statement, it's standardized in IEEE, not
IETF.
Also I woul
Hello,
I serve lots of residential subscribers and it's apparent that home
user oriented CPE gear is just getting stupider, less secure, more
vulnerable, more exploited as time goes on. I have implemented a basic
filter designed to protect CPE from remote exploitation and generally
the l
Hi all
I recently had a discussion on how to connect interfaces belonging to a same
port-channel & I would like your opinion.
On Nexus or Catalyst, I am wondering if the different interfaces of critical
Port-Channel (for example, a port-Channel going from Core to Distribution
switches)
should
Yep, requires routing SDM template.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 28/02/14 13:41, Michael Robson wrote:
>
>
>> However, now when I apply a created route-map to an interface, it take the
>> 'ip policy route-map' command but nothing appears on configuration for the
>> SV
Mikael Abrahamsson writes:
> When 40GE and 100GE was standardized it was taken for granted that
> 40GE would be used to connect servers and perhaps a little
> inter-building backhaul, because of that only up to 10km was
> standardized.
Just in case any vendors read this list:
There is a market
On Friday, February 28, 2014 03:05:52 PM Mikael Abrahamsson
wrote:
> I am all for "abusing" equipment in manners the vendor
> didn't think about, but it also helps to know what
> application the vendor thought the equipment would be
> used in, in order to understand why things are the way
> they
On 28/02/14 13:41, Michael Robson wrote:
However, now when I apply a created route-map to an interface, it take the
'ip policy route-map' command but nothing appears on configuration for the
SVI. If I apply a non-existent policy map to the same interface, the
configuration shows up on the SVI.
Aha! Very interesting.
Yes, we are running 15.2(4)M3 on the 2921 that reports 1GB RAM, and "show
platform" confirms that
Size of dimm = 512 Megabytes
The new 2921 that reports an accurate 512MB RAM in the "sh ver" is running
15.2(4)M5.
Thanks for sharing your experience; seems
Hi,
I need to configure a Cisco 3750 with route maps and so I upgraded from an
old LAN base image to IP Services (c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE8.bin)
and changed the SDM profile to 'access'
sh sdm prefer
The current template is "aggregator access IPv4" template.
The selected template optimizes
On February 28, 2014 1:33:52 PM CET, Gert Doering wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> While I can appreciate this, history has always proven that
>> users will find a use for something for which it wasn't
>> initially intended - y'know, like using a Cisc
Have the networks changed that much?
Some time ago we used to push L2 from mainframes on T/R or SDLC (I hated SDLC
always had to guess the settings) over WAN with DLSW+.
Now PWs and VPLS is the buzz.
Yeah the good old 4500 was actually the first router I have played with, that
was in Cisco ne
I've read a lot about the licensing on the ASR 9000 platform, but it's a
little unclear how it applies specifically to the ASR 9001 and ASR
9001-S. We're looking at setting up a pair of 9001-S routers, only one
of which really *needs* the AIP license for L3 VPN scale. If the router
with the A
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Mark Tinka wrote:
While I can appreciate this, history has always proven that users will
find a use for something for which it wasn't initially intended -
y'know, like using a Cisco 2901 as a core router :-).
I am all for "abusing" equipment in manners the vendor didn't t
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> While I can appreciate this, history has always proven that
> users will find a use for something for which it wasn't
> initially intended - y'know, like using a Cisco 2901 as a
> core router :-).
2503 made a good core router,
On Feb 28, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Vitkovský Adam wrote:
>> While I can appreciate this, history has always proven that users
>> will find a use for something for which it wasn't initially intended
>> - y'know, like using a Cisco 2901 as a core router :-).
>>
>> Mark.
>
> Hahahaaha you just made m
> While I can appreciate this, history has always proven that users
> will find a use for something for which it wasn't initially intended
> - y'know, like using a Cisco 2901 as a core router :-).
>
> Mark.
Hahahaaha you just made my day :D
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mail
On Friday, February 28, 2014 10:35:23 AM Mikael Abrahamsson
wrote:
> When 40GE and 100GE was standardized it was taken for
> granted that 40GE would be used to connect servers and
> perhaps a little inter-building backhaul, because of
> that only up to 10km was standardized.
While I can apprecia
hey,
So I guess
this Huawei GPON ONT in SFP form-factor will be something like RAD
MIRICi-155(http://www.radproductsonline.com/support/cs11c01/radcnt/mediaserver/18805_MIRICI-155.pdf)
which supports management over web-interface(or maybe even CLI is
available)
SFP form-factor is SFP :)
one c
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
At this stage we wouldn't be able to justify the spend to go 100G on
ASR9k. We're not talking about a single router or interface here, but
quite a few. Besides - that doesn't really answer the question what to
do with distances over the 10km.
When
Tarko,
thank you for this information! I totally overlooked OMCI. So I guess this
Huawei GPON ONT in SFP form-factor will be something like RAD MIRICi-155(
http://www.radproductsonline.com/support/cs11c01/radcnt/mediaserver/18805_MIRICI-155.pdf)
which supports management over web-interface(or mayb
22 matches
Mail list logo
