Re: [c-nsp] Replacing 3750X stack

True, but check for feature parity beforehand. If you're just doing basic l2 then more than likely it's already there. But always check first Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie From: i...@st-andrews.ac.uk To: darre...@outlook.com Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Replacing 3750X stack Date: Sun,

[c-nsp] Cisco ASR901 and Tunnels

I have some Cisco ASR901s and would like to have a layer 2 or layer 3 tunnel between them over a layer 3 network. I have configured GRE and tunnel is up and it is possible to ping the remote ends. All looks good from the control plane side but I am not having success with traffic being

[c-nsp] IOS XR SLA and Track

Hi all I have the below configuration RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#sh run ipsla Mon May 12 14:23:06.005 UTC ipsla operation 1 type icmp echo destination address 192.168.102.1 frequency 5 ! ! schedule operation 1 start-time now life forever RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#sh ipsla statistics 1 Mon May 12

[c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

Hey, Does anyone have DOM information in SNMP on IOS XR (ASR9001)? All we got is -32768 on all modules. So far we only tested on 4.3.2, just wonder if they actually fixed on more recent releases. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

Hello Nikolay, I opened case for this issue for 4.3.1 in august 2013. Cisco promised fix in 5.1.1. Created DDTS CSCuh86588. I can confirm that issue doesn't fixed in 5.1.1. On Mon, 12 May 2014 15:49:54 +0400 Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote: Hey, Does anyone have DOM information in

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR SFP DOM in SNMP

It has not been fixed and has been junked by cisco as an “enhancement” vs “bug” - Jared On May 12, 2014, at 8:27 AM, gu...@golas.ru wrote: Hello Nikolay, I opened case for this issue for 4.3.1 in august 2013. Cisco promised fix in 5.1.1. Created DDTS CSCuh86588. I can confirm that issue

[c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

Hi All, Has anyone encountered this issue on the ME3600/ME3800s; Cisco 2960 - Layer 2 device terminating Layer 2 connections | | Layer 2 Trunk on 100Mbps port | Cisco ME3800 - Various layer 2 connections trunked up in VLANs for termination on ME3800 We are trying to apply some policers on the

[c-nsp] standby preempt delay [after reload]

I have a situation where 'standby x preempt delay minimum 120' doesn't seem to have an effect after a reload [12.2(33)SXI11] -- e.g. the hsrp groups are immediately preempted and met with an empty routing table for a couple of minutes. QUESTION: Are 'standby x preempt delay minimum nn' and

Re: [c-nsp] standby preempt delay [after reload]

On 12/05/14 14:28, Randy wrote: I have a situation where 'standby x preempt delay minimum 120' doesn't seem to have an effect after a reload [12.2(33)SXI11] -- e.g. the hsrp groups are immediately preempted and met with an empty routing table for a couple of minutes. I don't know the answer to

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

On Monday, May 12, 2014 03:10:15 PM James Bensley wrote: Has anyone encountered this and has anyone overcome it? Are you running the latest code for this platform? It's been several months since I first tested it, but egress policing for all queues is a recent feature (Thank God!). To be

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Reporting......

Thus spake Phil Mayers (p.may...@imperial.ac.uk) on Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:20:39PM +0100: On 09/05/2014 16:26, Scott Voll wrote: OK so we are moving from a Unicast to Multicast video stream and we have been reporting on how many people are watching the stream. as we move this to a multicast

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR901 and Tunnels

GRE is not supported on the ASR901. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Ivan cisco-...@itpro.co.nz wrote: I have some Cisco ASR901s and would like to have a layer 2 or layer 3 tunnel between them over a layer 3 network. I have configured GRE and tunnel is up and it is possible to ping the

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR901 and Tunnels

Thanks Pete. Do you know if any of the other tunnelling modes are supported? ipipIP over IP encapsulation ipsec IPSec tunnel encapsulation ipv6Generic packet tunneling in IPv6 ipv6ip IPv6 over IP encapsulation Thanks Ivan GRE is not supported on the ASR901. On Mon, May

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR901 and Tunnels

I can't find info that says they are supported, but I'd assume not. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Ivan cisco-...@itpro.co.nz wrote: Thanks Pete. Do you know if any of the other tunnelling modes are supported? ipipIP over IP encapsulation ipsec IPSec tunnel encapsulation

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR901 and Tunnels

EoMPLS is supported, it will give you a layer 2 tunnel if MPLS is enabled in the core. On 5/12/2014 6:00 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote: I can't find info that says they are supported, but I'd assume not. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Ivancisco-...@itpro.co.nz wrote: Thanks Pete. Do you know if

[c-nsp] Cannot activate the following os-mbi package because the system is membooted: mem:asr9k-os-mbi-4.2.3

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ios(admin)#install activate *4.2.3* synchronous Error:Cannot activate the following os-mbi package because the system is Error:membooted: Error:mem:asr9k-os-mbi-4.2.3 How should I do? Thank you very much. ___