Sorry, guess I wasn't clear.. I mean IPv6 neighbors as in layer 2 clients..
Not IPv6 routing neighbors.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:14 PM, brad dreisbach wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:57:37PM -0500, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know the maximum amount of IPv6 n
Does anyone know the maximum amount of IPv6 neighbors an ASR9K platform
(don't care which modules) can support?
Have a requirement to support in upwards 200K ipv6 neighbors for a
centralized WLAN deployment at a large university. 200K is the requirement
due to link local, and multiple global IPv6
I would avoid TRILL going forward IMHO.. Most vendors have abandoned future
investment with it. Plus there are limitations with the Broadcom Trident
asics where you can't decap & route natively (without doing some special
packet looping to workaround this limitation)..
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:0
This is the worst day of the year on the internet :)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Łukasz Bromirski
wrote:
>
> > On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:30, Joe Loiacono wrote:
> >
> > "cisco-nsp" wrote on 04/01/2015
> 09:04:04 AM:
> >
> > > From: Łukasz Bromirski
> >
> > > > One of the local data centres i
If this is a test environment you could put policies in place to influence
traffic to come in your EDGE2, but meanwhile for outbound still have
traffic going out EDGE1. Then fail EDGE1 and see how long it takes..
That'll give you an answer if its inbound or outbound that is taking the 15
seconds.
I come across cheaper NICs out there that actually support 5ghz, but don't
support the DFS channels! Heck even Google with its Nexus devices don't
enable DFS in the OS even though the NICs can do it..
DFS is costlier to implement so they go the cheap route.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Chris
Yes you can put it all in one domain if you'd like. Rather large domain
IMHO, but is possible depending on how your topology is laid out. There is
a finite limit of how many devices can be cascaded.
When they speak of region they're talking about MST region. With MST you
need to have the configura
Marketing folks love to use half-duplex when speaking about backplane
fabric speed.. Typically they don't do that on the ports themselves,
typically..
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> On 11/18/14, 2:16 AM, M K wrote:
> > Hi all , we were arguing about the full duplex FE in
for some reason i seem to remember that if you have the i/o modules with
console in them that it disables the onboard console on the g1/g2 engines..
Been a while since i've touched one of these though.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Scott Granados
wrote:
> If you have the old 25 pin mod tap
Revenue just gets dumped into different BU buckets and each has its own
comp plan for the sales reps. It matters to them because it affects their
pocket books :)
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> Cisco tries to tell us the same thing. We think it has a lot to do with the
>
Really it comes down to the fact that you can pause all traffic except for
your iSCSI (if identified properly) and FCoE traffic.. With PAUSE frames
everything gets paused on that link, including your storage traffic.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Mathias Sundman wrote:
> There is a lot of
Have you guys ever looked at the HP 5900 series??
HP's 5900, Arista and Cisco 3K's all use the same broadcom trident+
chipsets. HP 5900 comes in a few models, one which is a 48 port SFP+ with
4xQSFP+ that is 21K list. They also have a 48 port Copper 10gig version
with 4QSFP+ that lists at 21K too.
New Nexus 7710 and 7718 chassis and F3 line modules announced too..
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 09/06/13 20:58, Rinse Kloek wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
>> The new Catalyst 6807-XL chassis will be able to scale
t;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Evans
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:57 AM
> To: cisco-nsp
> Subject: [c-nsp] Fabricpath and L3 on the same line card
>
> Can anyone t
Can anyone tell me if Cisco F2/F2e line modules can run Fabricpath and L3
(SVI's) on the same line module. Is it line rate as well or does it proxy
through an ASIC burning ports, etc. Is an M1 module required?
Someone has told me it cannot, but I believe it can. Are there any
limitations with it?
ther.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Evans
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 8:11 PM
> To: Tim Jackson
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] End to end keepalive over QinQ provider
>
> Agreed.. L3 is the answer.. This is actual
Halliday <
> ross.halli...@wtccommunications.ca> wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Evans
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1
to end notifications that will
cause an interface to go down or be taken out of forwarding. With LACP you
can do this because the ports will debundle. I was hoping that CFM would
take the path out of service, but I don't think that is the case.
Thoughts?
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Chris
Oh really... I was reading on CFM, but though it used the EOAM DMACs...
let me check into that more! thanks!
Anyone have details on using CFM?
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Have you tried CFM? It uses standard Ethernet frames, though CCMs are mcast
> frames
>
>
> adam
I'm running into a situation where I have a QinQ provider who doesn't do
BPDU tunneling for protocols like OAM, LACP, etc.. Besides using an EEM
script along with SLA, are there any other built in protocols that could be
utilized to determine L2 connectivity end to end? I'm just using standard
Cat
In the past my company has ran into these issues. We helped it some by
doing a hold-queue of 4096 on the interfaces and enabling jumbo frames
where possible.
It sounds like you're just running into a CPU issue though, which is one
reason we moved away from the 6500/7600 platforms for this use case
Can anyone tell me the maximum number of VRFs supported on the 7K and ASR
platforms??
I am working on a technical review of vendors and am looking for that
information.
I believe the 7K is 1000 (minus the internal vrfs)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
I haven't worked with the ASA/PIX line in a while, but if you're doing
static NAT entries it requires proxy arp to work. Essentially needed
anytime you have NAT entries for IP's other than what is assigned to
the psychical interfaces.
The documentation was clear on the feature years ago, i'd check
Ahh good. I can't exactly remember what I ran into. Thx for clearing that
up!
On Aug 22, 2012 3:56 PM, wrote:
> > Also this depends on vendor too. IIRC junos uses udp for its trace
> routing
> > and ios uses icmp.Meaning that if you did traceroute from a cisco box
> > going over a juniper
t smart enough to render it on the cli output…. I would think that
> wireshark on windows would tell me if it is or isn’t seeing those
> extensions with the label info
>
> ** **
>
> Aaron
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com]
&g
Also this depends on vendor too. IIRC junos uses udp for its trace routing
and ios uses icmp.Meaning that if you did traceroute from a cisco box
going over a juniper network the labels wouldn't show and vice versa. You
brought up something I was 100% suee about a few years ago but those brai
Google is one of the few who enabled entries for their main website
pages on the v6 go live day a few months back...
That is why it's doing it. There are some other sites that will be
affected too for you.
Hth.
On Aug 17, 2012 8:19 AM, "Chris Lane" wrote:
> to follow up, once i added v6
IIRC
On the cat6k if you have mls qos disabled globally it will trust. If you
enable qos i believe it will rewrite based on your mapping tables.
On Jul 13, 2012 8:38 AM, "Blake Dunlap" wrote:
> If you look at the documentation for the Sup2T it does actually specify
> default trust when I looke
You could have your isp assign a transit ip subnet for the link and then
out your ips internal your border router. Another thing you could do static
nats if the first option isn't available.
On Jul 9, 2012 7:50 PM, "Spencer Barnes" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to move to a new ISP. Our old one
This is where I ask the question whether you need QoS and its queues or
not? At my old employer we never enabled QoS on our 6500s in the data
centers because of this buffer carving issue. When you disable QoS on the
6500 platform it lets the dscp/802.1p bits pass, which we were fine with.
We never
Tac is right. This is a downfall of ethernet switching qos. The buffers are
carved up for the queues. My advice is to disable qos altogether or remap
all traffic and buffers back to one queue.
On Jun 26, 2012 4:22 PM, "John Neiberger" wrote:
> I'm getting conflicting information about how WRR sc
Question for you service provider folks. How do cable modems, dsl, ftth,
etc limit bandwidth? I believe that everything is limited at the customer
edge demarq device, performing bandwidth limits on a central network device
would be too costly to do.
Do the CE devices use a form of traffic shaping
Unfortunately the answer is most likely yes. Is this device a router?
Does it have many routes coming into it from a routing process? Any
spanning tree loops going on.
Before you reboot it, I would try to isolate it from the network so it's
not learning routes. You would hopefully get access ba
Development has stopped for dynamips the last I heard. This was because all
newer platforms are going to a licensed model and more asic based.
Emulating newer hardware is much more complex.
On Jun 18, 2012 11:43 AM, "Aaron" wrote:
> Do y'all know if GNS3 (0.8.2) only supports the routers and swit
Switch the 3750 to use flex links. That way you can have redundancy without
causing a loop.
On Mar 13, 2012 9:50 AM, "Ryan West" wrote:
> N2k's do not run spanning-tree and will block ports if a bpdu is detected.
> You can disable spanning tree on those ports, but your 3750 will be flat at
> that
Have a stored key on your ssh client already for that hostnamr or ip?
On Feb 23, 2012 8:59 AM, "Chris Lane" wrote:
> running a 7600 with s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH7
> actually just installed device, added crypto key rsa ~ all normal here,
> noting unusual to report.
> but, oddly thi
Make sure you notify your field team who is responsible for shipping the
device that EFA is sent to a different address.. We've accidentally sent
EFA request to normal RMA depots and that was not fun trying to track the
gear down..
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Gmail wrote:
> Ok. Before the R
I've always gotten it from our account team.
On Feb 23, 2012 6:02 AM, "许虎" wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Is anyone know the EFA progress of Cisco RMA?
>
> The customer need us to do the analysis, they need the EFA report.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Hu Xu
> ___
Inside of Cisco brand maybe not. Outside of Cisco definitely possible.
On Jan 21, 2012 5:02 PM, "chris stand" wrote:
> >
> > (... and this is reason #1 why we are not using VSS)
> >
> > gert
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
> We have two data centers, one with VSS one w
There are 'other' vendors out there besides Cisco who's switches provide
SFlow which will give you information you're looking for as compared to
netflow, assuming your collector supports it. These same vendor/switches
also can do the routing as you're asking about for the low cost you're
looking fo
Ask and you shall receive.
Hint
On Sep 29, 2011 3:41 PM, "Tim Durack" wrote:
> We are currently using the C6K in this role. The N7K is looking like
> the logical replacement.
>
> If Cisco produced a 10/100/1000/PoE FEX, and upgraded the N7K to
> support 100s of FEX on a chassis pair, we could
I've done this before by tftping a replacement configuration file. You can
use snmp to trigger the router to download a file.
On Sep 8, 2011 5:44 PM, "Mike" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sure this can be done and am calling on my fellows to help light
> the way!
>
> I have a cisco 2970 switch newly ins
Checked the 5585 limits? It's supposed to blow a 5580 out of the water...
On paper.
On Sep 6, 2011 8:06 PM, "P C" wrote:
> Off topic: anyone have a VPN load generator? I've always had a
> useful application for such.
>
> Anyways, if you use cisco products and you need RA VPN, your best bet
> is p
What issues are you seeing? One thing to check is that on cisco devices you
should specify the long version of costing. Cisco hasn't updated their
default to match the newer rfc out there. This alone could be causing your
problems.
On Aug 30, 2011 10:47 AM, "Alessandro Braga" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
Research h-qos.
You have to make. Master service policy and apply shaping to it. Within
that policy you call your other qos service policy as a sub procedure
essentially.
On Aug 25, 2011 7:08 AM, "Hendrik Kahmann" wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am just working on a QoS configuration on Cisco 19xx and 29x
Did you back rev the saved configuration too? Maybe an option has been
turned on by default in 15.x?
On Aug 22, 2011 4:16 PM, "Chris Gotstein" wrote:
> Backed down to SRE, but still seeing high utilization on the IP Input
> process. Have no idea why this is happening now, thought it was due to
> t
You need the sup2t to be able to get dual fabric connections in the upper
slots I believe.
On Aug 17, 2011 2:58 PM, "Drew Weaver" wrote:
> With a 6513-E would you be able run it with:
>
> 2xSUP720-3BXLs
> 10xWS-6748(/w DFCs)
> 1x WS-6708?
>
> I don't need the 10/100/1000 ports to be "line rate" ei
Leave it on. There are reasons for it that I don't have at home with me. But
its needed for span and other things to stop unicast flooding.
On Aug 16, 2011 12:03 AM, "Randy" wrote:
> I have inherited a setup:
> - cat6509E's running IOS: various flavors for SXF. In the process of
upgrading to a sta
Depends on what you mean by brocade. I bet you are looking at the foundry
gear. The Foundry hardware is actually really nice. The real brocade
switches based on fos I would throw in the trash can (at least based on the
brocade 8k) from years ago.. I'd say that the foundry gear is on par with
cisco
Inactive usually means the vlan isn't built locally.
On Jul 21, 2011 8:33 PM, "Renelson Panosky" wrote:
> I am working in this interface 2248TP some of the interface are showing
down/inactive. My svi on the core are up/up. I think it maybe a
spanning-tree issue but I am not sure. can anyone help ?
You will need to reboot due to enable the new pfc mode anyways.
On Jul 17, 2011 5:36 PM, "Matlock, Kenneth L" wrote:
> If the 2nd one will even come up, it will almost definitely come up in RPR
mode instead of SSO. So you're going to take a hit on all your linecards
when trying the switchover. (My
Check the ttl on the multicast stream. A ttl of 1 will cause it to hit the
CPU of your first hop router.
On Jul 13, 2011 8:02 AM, "Antonio Soares" wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I have a customer with a few 3560/3750's and one 4500/SUP5 acting as the
> core switch.
>
> For some reason, when a user star
Its a multichannel interface. You need tto go into controller 5/x and define
it.
On Jul 5, 2011 4:08 PM, "Josh Baird" wrote:
> Forgive the silly question..
>
> I just installed a PA-MC-2T1 in a 7206. Logs confirm:
>
> *Jul 5 19:17:20.519: %OIR-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 5, interfaces
> admin
Its all forwarded by the supervisor. I wouldn't be worried about that too
much. I'd be more worried about the full internet table being on the 6500.
It will probably be okay but 6500s aren't great high scale routers. They
don't have much CPU power.
On Jun 29, 2011 11:17 AM,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our
Upgrade code. That will fix it. Known bug from olden days.
On Jun 28, 2011 3:54 PM, "Christopher J. Wargaski" wrote:
> Greetings--
>
> I recently installed a stack of HP (H3C) switches in a closet and
> connected them with an LACP link to a 6513 running 12.2(17d)SXB11a. (Yes,
> that is circa 2006,
And a cat 6k/7600 will take forever to reconverge with large tables.
On Jun 27, 2011 10:10 PM, "Jeff Kell" wrote:
> On 6/27/2011 2:59 PM, Jason Greenberg wrote:
>> Can someone advise me as to why a 3750 L3 Switch (Metro Model) wouldn't
outperform a 7300 series router as a multi-homed BGP gateway?
You can do it. Just have to worry about loops. Spanning tree isn't supported
on the fex ports.
On Jun 24, 2011 1:38 AM, "Thomason, Simon"
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> Just doing a little research at the moment for some design work and I
found out that you can not plug a switch into a nexus2k as all ports
Make sure that your source ping IP is the same as the tftp source IP?
On Jun 12, 2011 4:33 PM, "Renelson Panosky" wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade the IOS in a new Nexus 7000 that i am working on. I
> keep getting this crazy error: TFTP get operation failed:connection timed
> out.
>
> I can ping my
Configuration looks right. You have vpc configured but are you using it
with the fex or are they single homed? You also have a port channel
configured but are only using one physical link?
If the fex are attached cross 5k you need vpc commands on the port channels.
Physical layout would help u
Post your configuration. We've rolled quite a few of them.
On Jun 2, 2011 2:53 PM, "Renelson Panosky" wrote:
> Have anybody here is running Cisco Nexus 5548P with 2248TP. I configured
> everything but i still can't see the Cisco Nexus 2248TP. Can anyone help
me
> with this ?
>
Do you have nat 0 statements on the configuration?
On May 30, 2011 6:11 AM, "Muhammad Asif Rao" wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> I'm getting problem for intervlan connectivity over fwsm, 3 vlans being
> linked to fwsm 10(dmz1/50),20(dmz2/20) & 30(outside). Intervlan routing
> required b/w 10 & 20 vlan whi
We stay away from it. Physical security is the best security.
All depends if you are willing to accept the risk it now.
On May 28, 2011 8:30 AM, "chris stand" wrote:
> Is anyone using shared VMware or HyperV environments for your Internal and
> also External facing services on the same boxes ?
>
Vrf uses Bgp extended communities. Not standard. So no..
Hope this is your question.
On May 18, 2011 2:07 PM, "Jeff Kell" wrote:
> If you have VRF-enabled a router (well, a 6500), does this affect BGP
community
> processing at all? (Suspecting community overlap with VRF route
distinguishers?)
>
I'd go with the dual 4948 solution vs a single box...
On May 4, 2011 8:54 AM, "Dan Letkeman" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking at replacing our core switches (2x3560G). I'm looking
> at a few options, but the ones that interest me the most is the
> 4948E-E, and the 4503-E w/two 48 Port line cards
No. You need to research lan qos. That card is a LAN card.
On Mar 26, 2011 6:56 PM, "Peter Olsson" wrote:
> We usually use this QoS config to give voice traffic priority:
> class-map match-all VOICE
> match ip dscp ef
> policy-map BRANCH-WAN-EDGE_child
> class VOICE
> priority percent 10
> class
Also check the ttl if your packets. If its 1 it will always hit the CPU
regardless of group address.
On Mar 25, 2011 6:01 AM, "Peter Rathlev" wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 20:55 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
>> Thanks. We'll try just adding "ip igmp snooping querier" to the specific
>> SVI to see
Peter. Yes just enable igmp snooping and querier. Easier way is to enable
pim which does the rest. Traffic that has a low ttl of one will still get
punted to the CPU..
On Mar 23, 2011 5:18 AM, "Peter Rathlev" wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 09:04 +, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> If you just want to d
ot want to have an
event happen.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Evans
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2011 11:17 AM
> To: tvarri...@comcast.net
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
&
The command still works. You also need to configure speed 1000 under the
port.
On Mar 21, 2011 9:03 PM, "Tony Varriale" wrote:
> On 3/21/2011 6:22 PM, Thomason, Simon wrote:
>> Hey All,
>>
>> Was just wondering if anyone has had much luck using generic copper sfp
in a nexus 5020? I have run into a
The qfx3500 looks great on paper. However there are a lot of features that
aren't supported at FCS.. One big one such as Layer 3 functionality, its not
supported until Q3.
The QFX3500 also uses the same merchant silicon that the Nexus 3K uses..
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:06 PM, magno wrote:
> Ju
If I remember right under the tacacs server configuration you need to tell
it to use the vrf. This might be under the server group also.
On Mar 16, 2011 5:34 PM, "Judith Sanders" wrote:
> I am trying to configure my ASR 1006 to use TACACS+ via my vrf interface,
which is my gigabitethernet 0 inter
This new network switch is the 3ks which are based on merchant silicon. Its
a stop gap solution until they spin their own. I believe its based on the
broadcom Trident chipset that other vendors such as bnt juniper and arista
are using..
They are due out by end if April for fcs I believe.
On Mar 1
Talk to your se.. it's due out by end of April.
On Mar 16, 2011 8:41 AM, "Soon Lee" wrote:
> Can I get any document what you say?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Soon Lee
>
> CCIE# 17724
>
>
>
> From: Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpsp...@gmail.c
Ciscos lowest latency box is the nexus 3000..
On Mar 16, 2011 8:17 AM, "Soon Lee" wrote:
> Hi
>
> Lowest latency switch hahaha.
>
> according to this document(
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/switches/ps5718/ps6021/stac_report_cisco_catalyst_4900m_10gige_switch.pdf
)
>
> Latency of C4900M is 19 mi
Pim is needed on sender segments. Igmp is needed on receiver segments.
Basically one command is easier to do both jobs as they go hand and hand
with each other in the environments typically..
On Mar 1, 2011 10:16 AM, "Benjamin Lovell" wrote:
> Turning on PIM also turns on the IGMP querier functio
Can anyone provide their reasoning for using VDC? Everytime we review it
there is no compelling reason for us to use it over a vrf.
Interested in seeing others opinions.
Thanks
On Mar 12, 2011 1:14 PM, "Federico Cossu" wrote:
> 1) yes we do
> 2) no management vdc, but yes we do that as well.
>
>
We don't use 3750 or smaller switches anymore due to this. 4948 is deemed
data center class so we started using it ffor that. Haven't had any issues
so far.
On Mar 7, 2011 11:11 PM, "Dan Letkeman" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a fair amount of output drops from traffic bursts on our
> 3560G's
3c or 3cxl is all that is supported on that module.
On Mar 4, 2011 5:45 AM, "Jiri Prochazka"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if I can swap original DFC3CXL distribution card used on
> WS-X6708-10G-3CXL with legacy DFC3B module without any problem?
>
> So after this swap it would be WS-X6708-10G-3B, w
You also need to configure IP reverse path verify on your incoming
interface. That is what you are missing...
On Mar 2, 2011 3:58 PM, "Jay Nakamura" wrote:
> I am testing BGP black hole setup in my GNS3. One AS announcing to
> the other AS to black hole a prefix. I am hitting a wall where the
> r
Its recommended to use bfd if you can as it is distributed processed
On Feb 26, 2011 7:11 PM, "David water" wrote:
> Any good documentation on NSR or GRES that some one can point me to? I am
> looking for the functionality and design recommendation? What IGP timer
> should I use with it? OSPF Fast
Try pinging with a larger mtu? Rule that out first I would say.
On Feb 20, 2011 7:40 AM, "Rutger Bevaart" wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm puzzled by the following, maybe you've seen something like this as
well.
>
> We've setup an MPLS inter-AS VPN with us being a Cisco 7200 running
12.2(33)SRE2 and
What is your Igp? Ldp needs an igp to function properly or else you need bgp
to do the label exchange for you which I think only works on ebgp.
Look at the mpls label bindings and see I'd they are being setup properly.
On Feb 13, 2011 7:34 AM, "marc williams" wrote:
> setup:
>
> asr1-asr2
>
>
1 gig support isn't until the e-rocks release coming up March 1st.
On Feb 9, 2011 12:32 PM, "Nick Hilliard" wrote:
> On 09/02/2011 17:14, Michael Balasko wrote:
>> Maybe look at Arista Networks? Most of their folks are ex-Cisco so it
tastes just like chicken:) Gear is awesome, as is the support an
I personally don't want the Nexus platforms to be bloated down with
un-needed features.. Hence why the 6500 has had some many problems over the
years.. The Nexus platforms were meant to be data center platforms. Most
data centers you don't need large routing tables, you don't need MPLS, you
don't n
I concurr... already we have seen less issues with our 7ks than we have with
our 6500s both software and hardware wise. Nx-os isn't bloated with
crap.yet
On Feb 4, 2011 1:41 PM, "Tony Varriale" wrote:
> On 2/4/2011 10:22 AM, Mack McBride wrote:
>> The most comparable for the 7600 is the ASR
We are personally not installing anymore 6500 unless we have to in the data
centers... nexus all the way.
On Feb 4, 2011 8:20 AM, "Drew Weaver" wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I think most folks can agree that the amount of traffic on the Internet is
being carried by 6500/7600 series gear is probably a prett
d to read up on this and change the values around if I've got it wrong
> and it should be 8m cir with burst (or some other combination).
>
> There could be numerous mistakes in the above, I've typed it out and not
> tried it on an actual box. Happy to hear comments on whether
36000 2048000 conform-action transmit
> exceed-action drop
>
> rate-limit output 8192000 1536000 2048000 conform-action transmit
> exceed-action drop
>
>
>
> But Fa0/1.100 & Fa0/1.101 should never go over 8 Mbps together so they
won't
> saturate my 10 Mbps WAN and
This is commonly know has h-qos. Not all platforms support it However..
On Feb 2, 2011 4:59 PM, "Pshem Kowalczyk" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3 February 2011 05:45, Rens wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have 2 subinterfaces (Fa0/1.100 & Fa0/1.200)
>> Here are the things I would like:
>> 1) rate limit both to 8
You could get a mux unit for your install. Have them deliver a channelized
ds3 yo your site and break it out to t1s on your prem again.
On Jan 31, 2011 10:23 AM, "Gert Doering" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:11:43AM -0500, Rich Davies wrote:
>> stumbled on 7500/7200 port adapter which
t may be that an upgrade between two releases requires you to do
> something.
> e.g. see <
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/5_x/nx-os/release/notes/51_nx-os_release_note.html#wp293013
> >
>
> you can certainly run vPC with one vPC peer switch being a different
Cisco has advised us to not use issu when possible.. we have had a few weird
bugs from it after the fact.. we are running 4.2(4)..
On Jan 27, 2011 7:32 AM, wrote:
> Yes, vPC is compatible with ISSU and both os will work together while
upgrading both boxes.
>
> But upgrading from 4.2 to 5.x is dis
It should be catching it with the network control system policy. Can't
remember the name exactly.. we only have been using bgp with ours so far..
On Jan 16, 2011 3:09 PM, "Matthew Melbourne" wrote:
> We are currently seeing IS-IS adjacencies flap on one of our pair of
> N7k boxes (eachN7k is dua
You could have some microbursts going on that can kill the buffers even at
low traffic rates...
On Jan 16, 2011 10:04 AM, "Klementina Miloslava"
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Dan Letkeman wrote:
>
>> No.
>>
>> Drops are happening even when its not under load. Has nothing to do
>> with bandwidt
Nope
On Jan 15, 2011 11:15 AM, "Drew Weaver" wrote:
> Are there any cheap/old switches out there that you can install the same
version of the OS that the Nexus 7000 runs? The main benefit of this would
be learning the new commands, etc but not having to buy a Nexus 7000.
>
> thanks,
> -Drew
>
> __
gt;
>> Stuff like the 8-Port 10G cards are not supported in 3.7.3, amongst other
limitations you will encounter.
>>
>> - Jared
>>
>> On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:52 PM, John Neiberger wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:45 PM, John Neiberger
wrote:
>>>
Dumb question. But you powered it with 220 I hope...
On Jan 6, 2011 5:29 PM, "John Neiberger" wrote:
> We have a couple of new ASR 9k routers in our test lab. None of us
> have had training on them yet and none of us know IOS-XR yet. One of
> our engineers is installing the new blades and two of
Do these devices still have an unlimited warranty?
On Dec 26, 2010 12:04 PM, "Keegan Holley" wrote:
> Depends on your throughput needs. Have you looked at the 2960-S series?
> It's pretty much a 2960 with 10G stack cables. It would be a cheap way to
> allow your environment to scale without needin
I think you mean ios xe. Xe is pretty stable. I have only experience with
the asr1k tho..
On Dec 13, 2010 2:46 PM, "vince anton" wrote:
> Hi list,
>
>
> Im looking at the new SUP7 on the 4500 for a project im working on.
>
> it fits fine in terms of capacity and performance required for the job
>
Do a show queuing command on the interface and it will tell you the queue
capabilites.
On Dec 7, 2010 6:09 AM, "Roger Wiklund" wrote:
> I have a simple question regarding QoS on 6500.
>
> My question is: how do I know what type of cards/interfaces I'm using
> (Flex WAN, OCM-WAN, LAN), and what typ
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
