three full reboots plus at
least one switch-over.
The upgrade pie doesn't contain any rommon updates, they are in fpd pie.
You can't install fpd pie from 4.X onto 3.X.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
good in
describing what you can and what you can't. The rommon upgrades are in
the fpd package, it is also very well described in Cisco docs.
Please note some important SMU's for 4.2, some of them are reboot SMU's.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp
On 27-01-13 02:23, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
No new problems that I have observed, although having to repartition the
flash drives on the RSPs in order to install is certainly annoying.
Jason,
Special repartition for 4.2.3? Which flash did you have? Was it 2G or 4G?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
to
affect at all reflected routes.
I know I can overwrite it on the receiving side, but any way to change
the next-hop of reflected routes in IOS-XR?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
.
Cisco doc's are really not helpful:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4.1/routing/command/reference/b_routing_cr41crs_chapter_01.html#wp473953414
Do you know which other attributes it allows to change except the next-hop?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
the entire
thing, is it a simple paste and commit?
John,
In the configuration mode you just replace the whole policy. Remember
you can always use commit confirmed if you are unsure.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
to reset your OSPF sessions to enable
graceful so.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
working.
When did you install v6 copp? Have you had the issue since the very
beginning or just recently?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
On 29-06-11 21:31, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Is your CoPP similarly structured to mine?
More or less it is.
Richard Gallagher's suggestion about CSCsa78144 was really helpful in
our case and helped. Thanks!
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing
be no fragmented packets on IPv6. So
what is the whole issue about? What can be the source of v6 fragments?
Can they be safely dropped?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
There is a handy command on the IOS-XR: set default-afi all (it makes
the output of show ip bgp summary more juniper like), but it affects
only the current session though. Any ways to make it default? Can it be
somehow set in your username settings?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
this will work.
Solution 3 - HSRP version 2, up to 4096 groups:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t4/feature/guide/gthsrpv2.html
We use it with SXI, works well.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
is not possible for any given
prefix ;-) so I doubt this works.
I was able to test it in a lab after I sent the email, and it did not
work. I ended up using the route-map example you show below as a
work-around.
For me it worked on 6500 SXI afair. For sure it works on IOS XR.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
of our C6500 with SXI (even the latest one SXI5) seems to
accept the commands for warm reload.
Do you see it enabled on your SXH or SXI? Has anyone used it with C6500?
Thanks for any hints.
Kind regards,
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
addresses only,
or the better one on global addresses as well. One may get disappointed
with being forced to use link-local IP's as gateways.
At least on the normal IOS they were implemented separately.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
to be forwarded in software.
I guess it is also a case with 6500 sup720, isn't it? Does it depend on
software version?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
.
However unintentionally we had some blades running earlier rommon and
SXI with no problems at all.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
On 15-10-10 10:00, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 10/14/2010 07:33 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
On 14-10-10 09:40, Alexander Clouter wrote:
SXI4a is working fine on one of our 6500's and I updated from SXI3 to
SXI4a on the other two on Tuesday. No problems so far, although:
Just discovered
address, ie:
standby XXX ipv6 2001:db8:1:2::1/64
then, (not earlier) create an IP from this subnet on the interface:
int GiX/Y
ipv6 address 2001:db8:1:2::2/64
after that run:
show ipv6 route 2001:db8:1:2::3
interesting, huh?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco
smaller blocks) via eBGP?
It is just the same /24 route belonging to one internet exchange. Most
IX prefixes are forbidden to be announced, but this one is unfortunately
the exception :/
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
? And if they,
as you say, have recommended it for many years, why IOS XR still has the
same unchanged default values of administrative distance, while it has
many other IOS defaults updated?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
.
Thanks for any advices.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
pass vlans and keep
1500 MTU inside them.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
in case it is planned to announce them to the DFZ.
It has been changed recently, now your needs will be meet only for 9
months. It is the run out fairly policy. In a couple of months it will
be 6 months, eventually 3. And then the IP's will be over.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
Centos kernel could
probably help as well.
We solved it reinstalling all affected Centos servers to Debian.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
use them in pairs.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
:
Failed to commit one or more configuration items during an atomic operation
!!% Change would result in neighbor (X:Y:W::Z) being activated with an
invalid address family
So, Cisco IOS-XR on CRS-1 cannot receive v4 prefixes on v6 BGP session.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
session, you cannot on a
v6 eBGP session, at least with IOS-XR.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
it tries, as we always see only one type of addresses - v4 either v6,
never both. Any tricks to do it with Cisco? We use IOS XR (CRS-1's), but
we may also get this feed on a normal IOS (6500).
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
, then no, you cannot,
and then I have to escalate it ;)
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
, despite the messages on the
console. There is no any other crashinfo on any available filesystem on
both route-processor and switch-processor.
List: anyone successfully running SXF17a? Anyone with 6504-E chassis?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing
check MD5 of the file on the router before rebooting.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 8-3-2010 18:02, Manu Chao wrote:
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
And what with ospf and /31?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
that.
Has anyone seen broken ra suppression on SXI3?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
it.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-ethernet. You can do it on set of ports
within all the linecards you have.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco
Morten Skriver wrote
12.2(33)SXI2a was released on cisco.com yesterday.
Yes, I saw it yesterday, but does anyone know what they changed/fixed/broke?
http://www.ciscopaw.org/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/release/notes/ol_14271.html
does not mention SXI2a.
--
Grzegorz
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
I disagree. Not worst than DHCP. By the way how do you distribute
parameters for local links?
DHCP fake offers are better filterable I think. With v6 we now use
mostly static IP addressing. Still working for DHCP over v6.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
Phil Mayers wrote:
Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Yes, unfortunately it is only link-local. I am just trying to figure
it out how to marry link-local with our global ipv6 assignments.
That's now the way it works AFAICT.
Basically, the routers still send router-advertisments. However, the
link
.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Phil Mayers wrote:
Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
No real experience with HSRP though, can anyone shed some light on that?
I understand it only works for link-local addresses?
Yes, unfortunately it is only link-local. I am just trying to figure
it out how to marry link-local
change this I think.
Link-local IP's are fe80::/10, so I planned to use fe80::/16 in my
network just by replacing first 16 bits of our public IP's.
Can anyone say whether this is bad or wrong idea? :)
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:51 +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Link-local IP's are fe80::/10, so I planned to use fe80::/16 in my
network just by replacing first 16 bits of our public IP's.
Can anyone say whether this is bad or wrong idea? :)
VRRPv6 (on Junos at least
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:13 +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Why did they make v6 so complicated? What is wrong with public IP's on
vrrp/hsrp?
VRRPv6 -does- use global unicast addresses, so you can just tell your
clients to point to the global unicast address.
Could
have the same link-local IP's on different ifaces, can you?
But maybe for IPv6 of 64-bit-network-prefix::/64 you may create
fe80::64-bit-network-prefix as a gateway?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:45 +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
You cannot have the same link-local IP's on different ifaces, can you?
sure you can, that's what link-local is for.
dan...@jun1. show interfaces | match fe80::2$ | count
Count: 16 lines
So, can I have
, shut them down, then enable then and add them to the
bundle again.
Does anyone know any cisco bugs with LACP and IOS-XR?
Any help would be appreciated, regards,
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
use to have access to the real counters,
not the 'soft' ones?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
slightly increase
priority of this process? Please note that 'show int' also has 'frozen'
data.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
- IPV6
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
We have several 6500's, some of them heavily loaded. We use snmp to
graph traffic on all interfaces - just the simplest solution. Since some
time we have had an issue with the interface counters. When the CPU box
is really loaded (usually synchronization of BGP
like to know it.
Kind regards,
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
. But the amount of
the data will be so huge, that you will be unable to store/process it.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
47868 47868 47868
47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868
47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868 47868
47868 47868 47868 47868 I
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
for your help.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
prefixes.
The big aggregate prefixes will be announced statically in other places.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
modify it and
use, thanks. If you have another idea I will appreciate it.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
outgoing route-map)? Someone tried such setup?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
suspect that it will also jack with SIP and
MGCP sessions when an ICMP port unreachable is sent in response to
reject RTP datagrams. That wouldn't be good.
So, configure the port not to send any icmp, not tcp rst packets and you
will not loose any connection.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
in.
The simplest thing is to prepare a file containing no acl XXX and then
redefinition of the acl, put it of tftp server and load it using:
copy tftp://I.P.I.P/acl running-config
You do not need any extra tricks to do it, like temporary acl's and do on.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
62 matches
Mail list logo
