Re: [c-nsp] SD-WAN design for large scale

Look at Aryaka SDWAN which solves all these problems. Cheers Hitesh On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:38 AM omar parihuana wrote: > Guys I've just read the follow document: > > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise-networks/sd-wan/white-paper-c11-743108.html > > > So i am

[c-nsp] DSL-Qos

Hi, I am trying to mark packets at VAI interfaces and then use this markings to classify traffic in different classes when they exit the router downstream to carrier. I dont see packet being classified at physical interface yet the ip precedence accounting shows correct marking this is on 7200

[c-nsp] asr1001 4 full bgp feed

hi all, could anyone confirm if asr1001 can take 4 full bgp feed of 450k routes each. i know that it has limitation of 512k for fib but not sure if thats for only forwarding table which i reckon would be all best routes around 450k but assuming that we can hold 1.4 million routes that is 450k

Re: [c-nsp] asr1001 4 full bgp feed

to make sure you have at least 8GB of RAM and should be good to go. On the other hand, having better ESP would make sense in terms of future growth, so take a look at ASR 1002X. -- ./ Dnia 1 sie 2013 o godz. 08:09 Hitesh Vinzoda vinzoda.hit...@gmail.com napisał(a): hi all, could

Re: [c-nsp] asr1001 4 full bgp feed

I think its better to go for 1002-x instead of 1001 as we have to take IPv6 route table growth in calculation as well. any comments on licensing. Thanks Hitesh On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skwrote: Given the relentless growth of the global v4 table, I

Re: [c-nsp] asr1001 4 full bgp feed

Thanks all, Looks like we are sorted at the moment. Cheers Hitesh On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Chris Balmain ch...@team.dcsi.net.auwrote: You will need advipservices for MPLS On 01/08/2013, at 6:18 PM, Hitesh Vinzoda vinzoda.hit...@gmail.com mailto:vinzoda.hit...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [c-nsp] VTP and shared medium

hi there, Can you please share the output of show interface xxx trunk Thanks On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: And second question. If one port is in trunk mode and the other in access mode, shouldn't the untagged native Vlan1 traffic still flow as

Re: [c-nsp] VTP and shared medium

Hi Victor, Can you post the configuration on the other end. Seems like it hasn't negotiated the trunk. Further you can also DTP using below command Switchport nonegotiate Thanks Hitesh Vinzoda On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: I have configured

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x - g0/25 ?!

Looks like a cosmetic bug.. Thanks Hitesh Vinzoda On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: Doesn't seem to get rid of it. Here's what I just now did... - Rebooted.still there. - Tried to conf tno int g0/25got message that I can't remove hardware int

Re: [c-nsp] client VPN

Whats is the purpose of Cisco router here? Just set internet modem in bridged mode and let Cisco ASA have the public IP Address ( ASA can do pppoe if required) HTH Hitesh Vinzoda On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:25 AM, osama hammoudeh osama.hammou...@ad-tech.com.jo wrote: Dears I have cisco

Re: [c-nsp] private vlan ports

This could be helpful. its excerpt from Cisco's website.. Follow these guidelines when configuring PVLANs: •To configure a PVLAN correctly, enable VTP in transparent mode. •Do not include VLAN 1 or VLANs 1002 through 1005 in PVLANs. •Use only PVLAN commands to assign ports to primary,

Re: [c-nsp] pptp connection to 2600 with Windows VPN failing.

just remove the MPPE configuration under virtual-template and try...! Thanks Hitesh Vinzoda On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:59:10PM +0100, Christophe Lucas wrote: interface Virtual-Template1 ip unnumbered

[c-nsp] Multicast through Cisco ME-3600

Hi, I have recently noticed that routers running OSPF connected to two different ports and communicating via EFP's configured on Cisco ME3600 can not form OSPF neighborship. I cant see hello sent from other end while the unicast and broadcast does work as i can see the arp on both the ends and

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast through Cisco ME-3600

HI Reuben, This is what i thought that we are on very early release of IOS. Show commands of OSPF doesn't reveal much, while the OSPF debugs reveals that they are sending hello's but neighbors hello's are not seen on both devices. This pretty much suggests that ME3600 is unable to handle

Re: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF

Hi Gerald, I have tested this and worked like charm.. thanks for sharing the working configuration. Best Regards Hitesh On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Hitesh Vinzoda vinzoda.hit...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Gerald, Thanks for your inputs. Will try this configuration and let you know how it goes

Re: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF

, schrieb Hitesh Vinzoda: Hi Arie, This is already in place and the virtual-access interfaces belongs to this vrf and so do their PPP host router. This routes are not visible in upstream vrt U which is great but these routes do appear in Downstream vrf D so that is the reason they route

Re: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF

, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) avay...@cisco.comwrote: Hitesh, how does your virtual-access look like for the spokes? Can you please share the “show run interface virtual-access xx” for the spokes? ** ** Tnx Arie ** ** *From:* Hitesh Vinzoda

Re: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF

” command using the RADIUS attribute “lcp:interface-config=ip vrf forwarding U downstream D”… http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/feature/guide/ghdpvrf.html#wp1099907 ** ** Arie ** ** *From:* Hitesh Vinzoda [mailto:vinzoda.hit...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, October 10, 2012

[c-nsp] Half duplex VRF

I am trying to setup half duplex vrf to save vrf's on the LNS. Does anyone has working configuration for spokes and Hub connected on the same PE router i.e. LNS. So far i able to export-import the routes but the traces from one spoke to other goes directly via LNS instead of via Hub. Please

Re: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF

? Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hitesh Vinzoda Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 07:04 To: Cisco Mailing list Subject: [c-nsp] Half duplex VRF I am trying to setup half duplex vrf to save vrf's

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7200 LNS Multilink per-user RADIUS attributes

Hi, Try using Radreply as Cisco-Avpair += multilink:max-links=2 instead of = HTH Thanks Hitesh Vinzoda On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Steve Glendinning st...@netthatworks.comwrote: Hi all, I'm trying to configure multilink PPP on a Cisco 7200 (NPE-G2) LNS (12.4(4)XD11), but the LNS

[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 with MWAM as a LNS

Hi, I am researching Cisco MWAM with Cisco 7600 for LNS deployment and have few questions in mind, Hope some one had already worked on it or may be someone from Cisco can tell me about it, as there are less resources available for MWAM on Cisco website as well as Internet. What we are trying

[c-nsp] Cisco SAMI modules

Hi, Could anyone confirm whether Cisco SAMI module on 7600 supports traditional ppp over vpdn wholesale broadband? Thanks Hitesh ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] router does not see IGMP joins

Hi, Is PIM enabled on that interface ? Thanks Hitesh On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: Victor Sudakov wrote: What could be the reason that a Cisco 1841 router (IOS 12.4(13r)T) does not see IGMP joins to a particular group? tcpdump shows that the

Re: [c-nsp] IP address assignment to pppoe clients - Radius or DHCP

Thanks for all your support, Now the scenario is that how to achieve redundancy in LNS environment, I have heard that HSRP doesnt work in this case. TIA Hitesh On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote: Hitesh Vinzoda vinzoda.hit...@gmail.com writes: But the problem

[c-nsp] IP address assignment to pppoe clients - Radius or DHCP

to share how do they basically assign the IP addresses to ADSL PPPOE client, using Radius or DHCP? and how? Thanks in Advance Hitesh Vinzoda ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

[c-nsp] High Memory Usage due to NAT

I m facing a strange issue regarding the NAT. The problem statement is as below NAT configured on 3845 with 12.4.24 T ADV ENT SERVICES - Have got 64 /25 inside subnets to do the nat with 64 Live IP's. one each for /25 inside subnet. - I checked the processes and memory on freshly

[c-nsp] Not Allowing Vlan 1 on trunk ports

Dear All Is there a way to supress vlan 1 from passing from a trunk link coz i m not able to shutdown the L2 vlan 1. Regards Ronnie ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] VLAN 1 through routed ports

Can vlan 1 pass through routed ports between layer 3 switches. ..?? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN 1 through routed ports

gettin ip leased through DHCP. note: no helper commands are used on vlan 1 of 6509-2 and no ip address exists on SVI vlan 1. Regards On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 04:48:37PM +0530, Hitesh Vinzoda wrote: Can vlan 1 pass

Re: [c-nsp] ASA AIP-SSM-10

I m thru. Thanks Ronnie On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 03:28:38AM -0800, Hitesh Vinzoda wrote: Does that tftp server need to be of the same subnet for which i had one for IPS or nothing to be done. That tftp-server can

Re: [c-nsp] ASA AIP-SSM-10

Does that tftp server need to be of the same subnet for which i had one for IPS or nothing to be done. Regards On 11/26/08, Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:30:32AM -0800, Hitesh Vinzoda wrote: We were upgrading the patches on AIP-SSM-10 and IPS seems

[c-nsp] ASA AIP-SSM-10

Dear all, We were upgrading the patches on AIP-SSM-10 and IPS seems not to be coming up after reload. the module status is UNRESPONSIVE. more over we havent configure recovery on it. please suggest to bring up the IDS from scratch. Thanks Ronnie ___

[c-nsp] Multicast issue

Hi all, I had configured multicast in my lan using sparse-dense mode. RP and group is defined statically on each L3 switches. I'm receiving the multicast beyond all L3's except ones running HSRP. Any ideas guyz Regards Hitesh Vinzoda ___ cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:01:40 -0800 From: Hitesh Vinzoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco ASA 5510 VPN problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_Part_47910_25183294.1226311300543

[c-nsp] FWSM Access-control lists

places. Thanks in advance Hitesh Vinzoda ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN Interworking

Check for MTU size on interfaces. Regards Hitesh Vinzoda On 11/10/08, Mohammad Khalil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dears i have the following setup: CE1 -- PE1 -- MPLS Cloud -- PE2 -- CE2 PE1 is 7609 and has the IOS image c7600rsp72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRD.bin PE2 is a VXR G2

[c-nsp] HSRP With Multicast

Hi, I m having a HSRP running between two 4507 and PIM Sparse on SVI's of both the interface. I had configured Static RP for multicast for a specific group. Now the problem is when PIM Sparse is enabled on HSRP interfaces (SVI's on both 4507 ) multicast doesnt work. when i remove from any one of

[c-nsp] Cisco 2811

Can Anyone please tell me the switching fabric capabilities for Cisco 2811. As due to high IP input rate my CPU utilization is getting high. Thanks in advance Regards Ronnie ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] High CPU Utilization

Dear All, I have got a cisco 2800 router. its CPU is continously monitored to be 99%. it has got only two fast ethernet ports and traffic on these ports reaches to maximum. when you analyze the traffic goin thru these ports, Max is IP traffic.(98%). i tried fast switching on these ports using ip

[c-nsp] Routed Vlans

Dear All, I have got a Layer 3 switch attached to a layer 3 switch and ospf running between them. the link between them is a layer 2 trunk.just because i have to extend a vlan which is behind the trunk. when i perform TRACERT i can see the ip of the interfaces of both switches. does this mean

[c-nsp] Fwd: %SCHED-3-STUCKMTMR: Sleep with expired managed timer

-- Forwarded message -- From: Hitesh Vinzoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Aug 2, 2007 8:16 AM Subject: %SCHED-3-STUCKMTMR: Sleep with expired managed timer To: Cisco Mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Hi guyz, I m getting the error Aug 2 07:56:04.321: %SCHED-3-STUCKMTMR: Sleep

[c-nsp] %SCHED-3-STUCKMTMR: Sleep with expired managed timer

Hi guyz, I m getting the error Aug 2 07:56:04.321: %SCHED-3-STUCKMTMR: Sleep with expired managed timer 528346D0, time 0x32D50DB30 ( 16:02:04 ago). -Process= SNMP Timers, ipl= 5, pid= 158 -Traceback= 41052F18 410534B0 40E95EB0 I think its a SNMP error. it is also not allowing my NMS to poll

Re: [c-nsp] NTP Config

hey Guyz, Thanks for your suggestions... but we are going pretty deep inside. i dont want to sync my 6509 to sync with any public time sources. i want 1 out of 4 6509 to act as NTP master and want redundancy in the core for NTP and want my 350 LAN devices to be able to update the time from NTP

[c-nsp] NTP Config

I have got 4 6509 cisco in mesh for the core and i want to enable NTP on those to act as a master. i went thru the config, the only option there is configntp master stratum 8 ( 8 is the default value ) does only this command will enable the device to act as a NTP server and suggestions are