[c-nsp] hey

http://www.therockhhc.com/egisnisahggxjvy.php Breakthrough Diet Exposed: Celebrity Doctor Uncovers The Holy Grail of Weight Loss ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Router 2 factor authentication

Hi Dominik Your solution sounds like what I'm looking for. Are you using RADIUS or TACACS as your AAA? With regard to the cli that you will see from the router, do you just enter username and passwd+PIN In answer to Ben's question, this is also for compliance reasons as well Regards Mark

[c-nsp] Router 2 factor authentication

Hi I am looking for a 2FA solution in order to connect to Cisco devices. I would like to use either Radius or TACACS as the AAA part, however I'd like to know whether/how I could interconnect this to a 2nd auth such as a token based RSA securID platform I'd appreciate any input if this is

[c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

Hi I would like to cap a physical GE interface to 100mbps whist running vlans through it on a GSR i.e. interface GigabitEthernet0/0/6  no ip address  no ip directed-broadcast  rate-limit input 100032000 12504000 12504000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop  rate-limit output 100032000

Re: [c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

, will that affect this? Cheers Mark   - Original Message From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com To: Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 2:59:05 PM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR Mark Tech wrote on Thursday

Re: [c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

  1-4095 (config)#int gigabitEthernet 0/0/6 (config-if)#service-policy output parent-gig-out % 'match vlan/pseudowire' not supported in gig-out The GSR cards  are 12000-SIP-601 and SPA-10X1GE-V2 - Original Message From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com To: Mark Tech techcon

[c-nsp] 7600 SNMP stats and processes issue

Hi I have migrated an Ethernet customer connected from our 7206 (PE) to our new 7609 (PE) and I am now seeing some very strange SNMP interface results from the 7600. The graph itself looks very spikey and when for example a BGP change takes place the is a trough of about 20Mbps, then a peak of

[c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

Hi I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable. My technical requirements are: 10Gbps line rate IPv4 Able to handle full

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

Hi thanks fot that. I was looking at the ES card until the licence pricing was introduced. Then it suddenly went away very quicky!! Cheers Mark - Original Message From: Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 interfaces not showing as down

Got it, seems to work well, thanks all - Original Message From: Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk To: Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:46:59 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 interfaces not showing as down On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 08

[c-nsp] 7600 interfaces not showing as down

Hi I have some WS-X6748-SFP  and WS-X6748-GE-TX installed on a 7600 chassis.If I remove a cable on an interface, there is nothing in the log to say that the interface is down, is there a way around this? Regards Mark ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 interfaces not showing as down

Hi Jared, thanks for the quick reply, could you be a bit more specific as I'm not sure what you mean Regards Mark - Original Message From: Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net To: Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:34:29 PM

[c-nsp] 7600 IP Precedence map not working

Hi I am testing an NNI connection between a 7600 and a 7200 - test environment at the moment I have a scenario where a provider network allocates IPP 7 for voice, whereas we allocate IPP5 I devised a simple service policy to swap IPP in and out, i.e. policy-map NNI-VOICE-IN   class

[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 vlan issue

Hi With my GSR, I can split traffic on seperate physical interfaces, reusing the same vlan #, i.e. interface GigabitEthernet0/0/6.2  encapsulation dot1Q 2  ip address 7.7.7.1 255.255.255.252  no ip directed-broadcast  no cdp enable ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/7.2  encapsulation dot1Q 2  ip

[c-nsp] Static default route VRF not appearing

Hi In an IP-VPN test, I need to add a static default route pointing to CE1 from PE1. This would I assume be redistributed to other PE's, then CE routers as 'redistribute static' is enabled on the PE config for this customer however this seems not to be the case. In fact PE2 never even sees

Re: [c-nsp] Static default route VRF not appearing

Got it Cheers Mark - Original Message From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:17:10 PM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Static default route VRF not appearing Mark Tech wrote

Re: [c-nsp] GSR no ldp all of a sudden

Got it. OSPF was removed from loopback interface Got it working now - Original Message From: Brian Turnbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2008 5:23:52 PM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] GSR no ldp all of a sudden I would

Re: [c-nsp] GSR no ldp all of a sudden

Hi Actually we do run RANCID in the production network, however these boxes are still on test :) Cheers Mark - Original Message From: Mark Tinka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brian Turnbow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 7

[c-nsp] GSR no ldp all of a sudden

Hi I have a couple of GSR's and 7600'2 running ldp in an an MPLS test environment. All of a sudden 1 GSR has lost all its LDP neighours. I have cleared the mpls ldp neighours, and finally ended up rebooting the router with no success Here is an brief output of some ldp commands: -here

[c-nsp] GSR not allowing policy map

Hi I have a simple rate limit policy map that I would like to attach to a sub-interface on a port channel however I get the following error: VLAN loadsharing is not enabled, policymap cannot be attached My policy map is as follows: class-map match-any Default_rate_policing_class_map   match

Re: [c-nsp] IP-VPN CE-PE local pref problem

Sorted, seems there was a rogue rt that was not being imported. All fixed now Thanks for all your help - Original Message From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Luan Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Freedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] IP-VPN CE-PE local pref problem

the primary route and the exact opposite happens, i.e. the 5.14.93.0/24 route is installed in PE2 and does not exist in PE1; is this normal behaviour? Regards Mark - Original Message From: Luan Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Freedman [EMAIL PROTECTED

[c-nsp] IP-VPN CE-PE local pref problem

Hi I have set up a dual homed IP-VPN network between 2 PE's and 2 CE's using  SoO - thas all working fine. I have added an inbound route-map to the 'backup' PE and CE to reduce the local preference in order to make the other PE and CE the preferred gateways. CE1PE1 primary |   

Re: [c-nsp] IP-VPN CE-PE local pref problem

Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:51:55 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IP-VPN CE-PE local pref problem can you post show ip bgp vpnv4 rd rd x.x.x.x/y from both PEs ? for the prefix in question? Dave Mark Tech wrote: Hi I have set up a dual homed IP-VPN network between 2 PE's and 2 CE's using  SoO

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel

Etherchannel Yes, I've been waiting for link-agg on these SPA modules for AGES I don't even have any dates for when it will be available, its a major pain Use ECMP if you can... Dave,. Mark Tech wrote: Hi I am trying to configure Ethernchannel/link bundling on a 12406. The port channel seems

[c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel

Hi I am trying to configure Ethernchannel/link bundling on a 12406. The port channel seems to be accepted, however when I try and add a channel-group to my GE interfaces, it says its not supported? I am using SPA-10X1GE-V2 line cards with c12kprp-p-mz.120-32.SY6.bin IOS interface

Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco 12406 Etherchannel

) –10G multiservice engine SPA Interface Processor (12000-SIP-601) The GE cards are installed in a 12000-SIP-601, or is that I don't have an'Engine 5' within the 601installed? Regards Mark - Original Message From: Leonardo Gama Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED

[c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP 7600 MPLS

Hi Can the WS-X6748-SFP support MPLS on a 7600 chassis? Regards Marl ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP 7600 MPLS

? Mark - Original Message From: Rubens Kuhl Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 9:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP 7600 MPLS You didn't mention if is a DFC-equipped WS-X6748-SFP or not, but I don't think

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP 7600 MPLS

- Original Message From: JH Cockburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 10:25:01 AM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP 7600 MPLS Hi Mark, We have those (DFC-equipped) in our 7600's acting as P devices in our Datacenter

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP 7600 MPLS

);} st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }Hi M, Also make sure your IOS will support MPLS…ip-base image will not for instance… Cheers - From: Mark Tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 11:59 AM

Re: [c-nsp] Internet vrf, pros and cons

Thanks for all the replies. Looks like I'll stick to running the ISP routes natively - Original Message From: Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ryan Otis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 10:19:19 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Internet vrf,

[c-nsp] Internet vrf, pros and cons

Hi We area going to deploy a new MPLS network which will be used for Internet customers and IP/VPN customers. I understand that there are two options with running these networks: 1. Run the internet natively across all boxes and secure them down against DoS attacks etc 2. Create an Internet VRF

Re: [c-nsp] IOS version

of the product The alternative is to get some Foundry MLX's which I already run as my main peering boxes, however they only do Ethernet with no option for PDH/SDH etc apart from STM4/16 Any suggestions - Original Message From: Peter Rathlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED

[c-nsp] IOS version

Hi We currently run Cisco 7206VXR's using c7200-p-mz.122-25.S train in an ISP environment. I am looking to get some 6500's but I'm a little confused as to which IOS to get as 12.2 'service provider' seems to just have deferred software. Other than that the only other options are 12.2.33-SXH1

[c-nsp] Cisco BGP received community

Hi How can I see what BGP communities are being sent to me via BGP on a Cisco box. With Foundry I can use the command 'sh ip bgp neighbors xx.xx.xx.xx routes detail' and the output will give me detailed information including what communities are being sent i.e. sh ip bgp neighbors