On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Mark Newton wrote:
On Sep 21, 2013, at 1:41 AM, Mohacsi Janos moha...@niif.hu wrote:
1xRSP-4G - 93-95 Gbps/slot FDX
2xRSP-4G - 186-190 Gbps/slot FDX
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I seem to remember reading something at some point saying
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone knows off the top of their head what the limitations
are in terms of 40/100G LC support with RSP4.
1xRSP-4G - 93-95 Gbps/slot FDX
2xRSP-4G - 186-190 Gbps/slot FDX
I seem to remember reading something at some point
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Phil Bedard wrote:
The 9010 with the non-RSP440 is about 184G/slot using both fabrics.. I
am not entirely sure the 100G cards work without the 440...
It does, however in single RSP-4G you are limited 93-95Gbps. No problem
with redundant RSP-4G.
Regards,
Hi Aaron,
Can you try configuring the DWDM channel with frequency, instead
of channel. We run into a similar problem a while ago. Solution was to
configure with frequency.
Best Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
Hi,
Have a look at 6deploy training material about deployment considerations
e.g.:
http://www.6deploy.org/workshops2/20110629_skopje_macedonia/17.IPv6_deployment%20consideration_v0_9_skopje.pdf
Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Phil Mayers wrote:
This is just curiosity; it's not even strictly our problem.
We host a POP (physical space, power cooling, a bit of telco liason) for our
upstream, who have an ASR9k on site that we and a lot of other people connect
into.
In providing assistance for
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Mack McBride wrote:
The 9K uses a crossbar fabric evolved from the 6500/7600 (not the same as the GSR
- CRS evolved fabric)
The port interface chips are the same.
The NPU chip is the same as used in the ES cards.
Primary difference is in the way the FIB is run on the 9K
On Tue, 3 May 2011, vince anton wrote:
Hi everyone
We currently run SFX14 on 7600 SUP720-3BXL with line cards having DFCs
Box has been stable doing L2 aggreagation and some L3 SVI stuff OSPF, BGP
(not full feed). All this for v4 only
I would now like to turn on v6 on this box, having
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Tom Mayer wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking about my deployment strategy for a relatively small v6 network.
Current Situation:
Several racks of dedicated servers. 240 servers per vlan (/24 v4 per
vlan) sharing their gateway, isolated from each other via pvlan
(+proxyarp)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mack McBride wrote:
The cost per gigabit is not at parity yet for low gigabit rates.
If you are maxing out a 7600 then a ASR 9K is definitely the next step.
The ASR 9K seems to be very mature for its age.
We deployed ASR9K network recently. We had to open 14 TAC case in
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, MKS wrote:
100G can be expected in 2011 (or early 2012) for ASR9K and Nexus 7000.
AFAIK you cannot expect 40G for 7600.
Are there any (public) reasons given for not offering 40G for 7600?
My assumption is the following:
- sup720/rsp720 series backplane connectivity
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Robert Hass wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Mohacsi Janos moha...@niif.hu wrote:
- sup720/rsp720 series backplane connectivity capacity is 40Gbps
Same like Sup-2T new RSP-2T could do it. Wondering if new Sup-2T will
be MIPS or PPC. Probably PPC and IOS XE same
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, MKS wrote:
Hi list
It's been some time since we have received a 7600 update, but I was
checking the cisco site any found out the the only platform supporting
anything bigger than 10gig interfaces is the CRS (40G pos and 100G
ethernet) (on a side note, is the 100G
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, MKS wrote:
Does anyone know if/when 40/100 is coming to the ASR9000 or if 40G is
coming to the 7600?
Hi,
40G can be expected in 2011 (or early 2012) for ASR9K, Nexus 7000/5000, Cat
6500.
I assume you are talking about 40G Ethernet?
Yes 40GE.
100G can be expected
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Righa Shake wrote:
Hi,
Am looking for a tool that i can use to backup Cisco configurations with
ease.
The tool could be opensource or commercial.
Use rancid:
http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/
Regards,
Righa Shake
___
Hi Tim,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, tim wrote:
Hi list,
Short question about the ASR 9006/9010:
Do I need to replace the switch fabric (or something else - like with
the GSR/12000 series when upgrading to 12400/12800) when 100GE is
available? Or do I just buy a new 100GE Linecard and put it into
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jeferson Guardia wrote:
Hi Group,
A doubt/curiosity, what happens in a router that you are setting up IGP's ,
and you dont hardcode the router-id, thus
it will look for an IPv4 address to use as a router-id, but what if I dont
have any IPv4 address configured? Where
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Charles Mills wrote:
Doing some research for an IPv6 migration plan. It is almost
inevitable that it will run on older switch gear at some point for the
sites I'm being tasked with evaluating.
Older Layer 3 gear being what it is I'm already aware does everything
in
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Gert Doering wrote:
- some of the cat4000-family devices do IPv4 in hardware and IPv6 in
software (we have no 4k, so others will help clarify that)
The latest sup6-e does it in hardware:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Anton Kapela wrote:
On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Stephen Cobb wrote:
Check out the top of rack switch recommendations thread that started a couple
days back. IPv6 has parity with v4 in 12.2(50)-ish IOS, even on the 3550's, so people are
claiming. This might help.
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Michael Robson wrote:
It's been a while since I worked with IPV6 and I am now once again
plunging myself into this feckless world and was wondering if a couple
of holes had now been plugged. What is the accepted way in IPV6 land to
dish out IPV6 DNS server addresses
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Yes, unfortunately it is only link-local. I am just trying to figure it
out how to marry link-local with our global ipv6 assignments.
That's now the way it works AFAICT.
Basically, the routers
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/08/2009 11:41, Gert Doering wrote:
SLAAC works *very* well for the things it was made for: zero-conf
environments, with no dedicated DHCP server - as in home networks or
office networks.
No it doesn't. After 13 years of ipv6 development, I
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Leonardo Gama Souza wrote:
Why can we forget about HSRP with IPv6?
With IPv6 you can get rid of DHCP, forget VPN's, forget DDNS, forget
HSRP, and most importantly you no longer need NATs that understand
every
protocol that runs through it and so remove a possible
According to Cisco:
265x(XM) is capable for the following performance for IP packets:
in CEF switching: 4 PPS and around 21 Mbps
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
Hi,
We're considering getting some ASR (1004 and 1006) as peering routers.
I would like to know what sort of experience you had with them.
What are the advantages of running the 'modular' IOS XE? We tried the
'modular' software on 6500 and we ran
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Julio Arruda wrote:
- The device has more horse-power and potential capabilities than 7200 with
any NPE. It survived several DoS attacks, while 7200 died.
Interesting, the Control-plane in the IOS-XE, from what I understand, is not
the legacy piece IOS, correct ? Is
Hi!
Have a look at this:
http://www.cisconetblog.com/2008/10/cisco-asr-14000-series-router.html
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Wed, 22
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi there...
In a SP environment, what's common practice so far with subnetting?
Typically, in IPv4 today we use a /30 or /29 for point to point and each
device has a /32 loopback...
I've been reading a lot of different opinions and everyone seems to
Don't know . We asked a year ago the same feature.
Regards
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Wed, 21 May 2008, David Freedman wrote:
Many thanks
Dear All,
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 22:15 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
snip
PS: I'm sorry. This was my last 6500/7600 BU politics suck big time rant.
Aww... It was beginning to get under my skin. ;-D
While it won't change any time soon, this is just
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Carlos Friacas wrote:
See:
4966 Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol
Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status. C. Aoun, E. Davies. July
2007.
Yes, but there is a new movement called NAT64 that might fly...
Regards,
Janos
Best
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2008-02-01 08:56 +0100), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what's the point, anyway? As far as I know the 3550 *hardware*
can't do IPv6 routing. As long as you're talking about *software*
IPv6 routing, a suitable 2800 router would probably give you
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, MKS wrote:
Hi
I'm a bit confused about hardware support for VPLS and cisco 7600.
If I have only LAN cards e.g. 6724 customer facing and 6704 core facing does
that mean that I have no VPLS support or just not H-VPLS ?
Can I run some topology of VPLS with only LAN
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Morten Skriver wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:01:43PM +, MKS wrote:
I'm a bit confused about hardware support for VPLS and cisco 7600.
If I have only LAN cards e.g. 6724 customer facing and 6704 core
facing does that mean that I have no VPLS support or just
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Not ever?
Some experts from Cisco might answer. I think it is mostly HW problem...
Regards,
Janos
Thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29, 2008 11:32 AM, Mohacsi Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Anyone knows when can the 7200VXR support VPLS?
AFAK VPLS is not supported on 7200VXR.
Regards,
Janos
thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29, 2008 9:22 AM, Dennis Dubbelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For supporting VPLS on a 7600, OSM or ES20
2008, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Luan Nguyen wrote:
Not ever?
Some experts from Cisco might answer. I think it is mostly HW problem...
Regards,
Janos
Thanks.
-lmn
On Jan 29, 2008 11:32 AM, Mohacsi Janos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:14:09AM -0800, Mark Boolootian wrote:
I'm probably a bad person for asking, and not first searching, but can
someone remind me what happens when the FIB fills
Sup32 with 12.2SXFsomething seem to crash...
Hi,
Tipical behaviour if TCAM is overflowed. How many TCAM entries you
have?
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, [EMAIL
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Phil Mayers wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 10:11 -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
Until recently the 65xx and 76xx were the same car, just a different
paint job. Now the BUs are differentiating the boxes.
65xx will be running the 12.2SX train. This is aimed more at the
Hi,
I doubt there is a BGP MIB for that. You can do it with custom script
without SNMP
Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Nicolas
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Dimitrios Kalogeras wrote:
Hash: SHA1
Hi to all of you,
Do you know if it sposible to configure Multicast AFI for IPv6 in the
BGP configuration in the 12.2(18)SXF9 advanced enterprize IP feature set ?
No. It is available only in 12.2(33)SRB and later - if I
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, matthew zeier wrote:
Any best practice ideas on using ipv6 autoconfig on firewall interfaces
vs. static assignments?
Whatever address you have to put into the DNS as a service points or lots
of configuration files you should use static assignments. For example I
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Zahid Hassan wrote:
Dear All,
I am carrying full feed Internet (219K) plus VPNv4 routes (1K)
on an OSR-7609 with SUP-2/PFC2.
I seems to be getting intermittent packets drops and loss of
connectivity from CPEs terminating on this OSR.
I wondering if has anything
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:41:01AM -0700, matthew zeier wrote:
What's the difference between an ipv6ip tunnel and a gre tunnel?
Well, one is using IPv6-IP encapsulation, and the other is using GRE
encapsulation.
Sort of like what is the
46 matches
Mail list logo
