Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001-X Password Recovery Failure

sed the the asr1001s to choose "controller mode" looking for an SDWAN controller. Thanks! Tim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001-X Password Recovery Failure

. But basically 16-something to the latest GA 17, though if 17 is problematic we may just stay at the latest 16. Thanks for the reply! Tim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

[c-nsp] ASR1001-X Password Recovery Failure

Hi Folks, I recently upgraded and erased the startup config on a couple of asr1001-x routers that are being repurposed.  Standard procedure, though this is the first time I have used the 1001-x specifically. Upon reboot I was expecting a "Router>" prompt, but instead I'm presented with a

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

e linecards are now well past end of sale, and in fact are past End of Vulnerability/Security Support as well, so maybe it's a moot point anyway. For 10GBASE-T in the 2nd gen I'd suggest the X9788TC-FX linecard and FM-E2 fabric module, these should behave properly with the config I posted earlier.

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

suspect you are using some other platform eg n5k or n7k? I may be able to try it out here depending on what you're using. Thanks, Tim -Original Message- From: Drew Weaver Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 12:37 PM To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) ; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: RE: Nexus

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

ce cir 36000 kbps bc 128 bytes conform transmit violate drop class drop-bgp police cir 0 bps bc 32000 bytes conform transmit violate drop Hope that helps, Tim -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 6:41 AM To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

Nexus_9000_Series_NX-OS_System_Management_Configuration_Guide_7x/b_Cisco_Nexus_9000_Series_NX-OS_System_Management_Configuration_Guide_7x_chapter_011000.html Hope that helps, Tim -Original Message- From: Satish Patel Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:13 AM To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) Cc: Lasse Birnbau

Re: [c-nsp] NXOS 7 apply VTY access-list to both IPv4 and IPv6

access-class foo in ipv6 access-class bar in tstevens-9236c-1(config-line)# Hope that helps, Tim -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Francisco José Bernal Fernández Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 9:37 AM To: Drew Weaver Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] EOBC0/0 ifInErrors

full-duplex interface may record as a runt. It would be interesting to know what happens to the runt and collision stats if you can force both ends to full duplex, or both ends to half duplex. Tim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net htt

Re: [c-nsp] cisco ACL filter outbound only

few you can install into a VM to play with by downloading an ISO.  The edgerouter you'd have to fake with vyos/vyatta. Tim On 9/14/20 7:17 PM, Mike wrote: Hello,     I have some gear that needs a public ip, but does not have the best security profile, and I want to put up an ACL that only

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes

odern routers are built out of lots of "ASICs". I imagine the forwarding element design is the differentiator: 1. Fixed pipeline: EARL family 2. Progammable pipeline: UADP family 3. Run-to-completion: "Silicon One" family Not an exhaustive list, lots of other examples etc...

Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:34 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 19/Jun/20 16:09, Tim Durack wrote: > > > > > It could be worse: Nexus ;-( > > > > There is another version of the future: > > > > 1. SP "Silicon One" IOS-XR > > 2.

Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:05 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 19/Jun/20 14:50, Tim Durack wrote: > > > If y'all can deal with the BU, the Cat9k family is looking > > half-decent: MPLS PE/P, BGP L3VPN, BGP EVPN (VXLAN dataplane not MPLS) > > etc. > > UADP programm

Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?

> cisco-nsp mailing list > cisco-nsp@puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list > cisco-nsp@puck.nethe

Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check

Ah yes, I would say LDPv6 and/or SR/MPLS IPv6. SRv6 reads like a science project. Either way, I would like to achieve a full IPv6 control plane. On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:46 PM Saku Ytti wrote: > I'm pretty sure that one or more of Mark, Gert or Tim are thinking > SR/MPLS IPv6 when th

Re: [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check

bones. Or if your > focus is totally on SRv6. Or if you don't care either way :-). Thanks. > > Mark. > -- Tim:> ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] BGP maximum-prefix on ASR9000s

104322145 841463 0 0 00:23:06 249910 Happy to report that it didn't explode. Thanks Tim. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] new ASR9901 ios update problem

eXR makes this so much easier. Other than the pain of 6.3.2 -> 6.3.3 (where RPM moved to code signing) pretty much none of that is necessary. But yeah, 3* lines should get you from any version > 6.3.3 to any other version. ([conf t, fpd auto-upgrade enable, commit, end,] copy url:///file

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

process and export and reduce the statistical validity of the sample. Using mgmt0 should be fine for sflow export. Hope that helps, Tim -Original Message- From: Lasse Birnbaum Jensen Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 10:58 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus Data Broker

--- Begin Message --- Release notes have this information. EX & FX are both supported. 3600-R is not. See Table 2/Table 3 here: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/xnc/nexus_data_broker/release_notes/Nexus_Data_Broker_Release_Notes_371.html Hope that helps, Tim -Original Mes

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

, region resizing requires a switch reboot. Tim -Original Message- From: Satish Patel Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 12:12 PM To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) Cc: Cisco Network Service Providers ; Nick Cutting Subject: Re: TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396 Thanks for clarification, i have

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

, no performance penalty for that. Tim -Original Message- From: Satish Patel Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 10:46 AM To: Cisco Network Service Providers ; Nick Cutting ; Tim Stevenson (tstevens) Subject: TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396 Folks and ( Tim/Nick ) I have Cisco Nexus 9396 L3

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

--- Begin Message --- -Original Message- From: Satish Patel Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 10:23 AM To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) Cc: Nick Cutting ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance Thanks Tim, Here is the output of show hardware rate-limiter

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

oming from all sflow enabled switches without dropping, for the same reason mentioned above. Hope that helps, Tim -Original Message- From: Satish Patel Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:40 AM To: Nick Cutting Cc: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-n

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

--- Begin Message --- Make sure you distinguish between N9300 (1st generation) and N9300-EX/FX/FX2 (2nd generation). The SFLOW + SPAN limitation applies only to the latter. It's also on the latter that Netflow is supported, which can run concurrently with SPAN sessions. Tim -Original

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)

> Extreme (ex-Brocade) CER-RT I'd heard Extreme were looking to EOL/EOS that box. It's too slow for 2019 anyway and has some pretty critical bugs that I don't think can be fixed. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

anything newer. > I applaud Cisco for moving away from QNX, but I haven't heard anything > positive about the 64-bit XR variant as yet. YMMV. "Is don, is good". I use it a lot in my day job and it's been fine. -Tim ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] Qos Statistics on the 7K

398869316] I guess you're hoping to figure out which specific ACEs are matching in each class (vs just seeing the total number of packets classified in each class, as seen in 'sh policy-map interface')? I can check w/our engineering team and see if there's some reason this has not been implemented.

Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB programming

network. We match incoming routes tagged with RTBH from the RR and rewrite to the appropriate next-hop "/dev/null" by address family, which it sounds a lot like what you guys do. I would consider this to be "policy". Why would you not? > > Mark. -Tim. _

Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB programming

> -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Robert Raszuk > So for educational purposes could you describe some real valid use cases to > apply bgp policies on routes *received* over IBGP ? > > Thx, > Robert. Setting local preference?

Re: [c-nsp] Fixed switch based on N9K-X9636C-RX

--- Begin Message --- There isn't one. Closest is Nexus 3636C-R, this is J+ based like the 9636C-RX but with on-chip tables only (no external TCAM). Tim -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 5:39 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] N9K ASIC port grouping

--- Begin Message --- Yes, 9236C is 6 slices, 6 x 100G each. I guess I should have been nice and dumped a few other common platforms from the lab - see below. Tim ** 93180YC-FX (1 slice, 18 x 100G): tstevens-93180yc-fx-3# sh int hard Legends: SMod - Source Mod. 0 is N

Re: [c-nsp] N9K ASIC port grouping

08 -10 20405 0 Eth1/541a006a00 1024255 212 -10 24486 0 No port-channels configured (0x0) leaf1# Hope that helps, Tim -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 10:3

Re: [c-nsp] XR on GNS3

> XRv is simple control-plane of XR in a VM. This is why L2 forwarding isnt > supported (though is configured). > XRv9000 is full control- and data-plane and much tighter coupling of the two. > L2 forwarding should work, but L2VPNs and such will fail miserably. > > q. XRv9000 6.4.1 works fine -

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 3048 airflow configuration

> On 15 Mar 2018, at 19:17, Ian Mock wrote: > > Yes, port side exhaust is normal for datacenter class switches. The switches > face the same side as the server ports they're plugging into for ease of > cable management, and to maintain symmetry of airflow. > > Ian Mock

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

> On 5 Mar 2018, at 19:20, Nick Cutting wrote: > > I don’t think it cares what end is plugged in. > But I left it plugged in to my laptop when I moved it from , to 920-4 > (working) to the 920-12 not working so that shouldn’t matter. > > It only shows up once it is

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 3548 and VDCs

ow the 7000's config for VDCs? This is expected, all nexus in 7.x will have a 'default VDC' config section. Only n7k allows you to configure additional VDCs. There shouldn't be much if any config modification required in the VDC config. Hope that helps, Tim - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computi

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Opinions

rts routed with full OSPF/MPLS/BGP/L3VPN... Tim:> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:03 PM James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I would second what everyone else has already said; we're using > version 3.16.something (can't remember off the top of my head) on > pr

Re: [c-nsp] General ME3600 software stability

> On 20 Oct 2017, at 14:06, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > > Hello! > > For those running (a lot of?) ME3600s (24FS) in your network - I’m probing to > see what your views are on the current state of software stability on those > boxes. > > I’ve got a couple hundred of these in

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

and the behaviour of the transfer... You see the re-transmissions caused by any packet loss in real time, and its immediate impact on the TCP throughput. I find this very helpful. The packet loss is no longer hidden like it was with iperf_v2. iperf3 doesn't interoperate with the old iperf (v

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

? I'm thinking of standard stuff like a few BGP feeds, IGP, ACLs, QoS and MPLS L2/L3 VPNs. We've been pretty happy with the asr1004 as a platform, but we're not doing anything super cutting edge with it, either. Thanks, Tim Densmore ___ cisco-nsp mailin

Re: [c-nsp] Difference betwen Cisco 7301 and ASR 1002 in vpdn ?

I'd start here: Apr 2 07:57:46.146: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: interface [175] 15 -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Olivier CALVANO Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2017 5:59 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Image

> ... but don't expect 3.18 to work flawlessly ... we just had to go back > down to a newer 3.16 as the 3.18 had some issues we couldn't live with ... > > -garry > Also note 3.18S and 3.18SP are different. 3.18SP is what was previously going to be 3.19 so don't get confused between which is

[c-nsp] G.8032 Interop between IOS-XR Calix E7

don't see the APS Message Level described in the standard but its a required config on the Cisco gear. I can change this value from 0-7. Their documents don't go into detail on that matter. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tim Calvin

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 93108TC-EX Breakout Support

: yes 93108tc-ex-1# You can find that (buried) in the NXOS release notes here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus9000/sw/7-x/release/notes/70342_nxos_rn.html Search for "breakout cable". Hope that helps, Tim

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 S vs SP train?

For the record, 3.18SP fixes this vulnerability: https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160804-wedge On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:17 PM Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. The mystery of software trains... > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 S vs SP train?

Thanks. The mystery of software trains... On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:40 AM Tim Cooper <li...@coop3r.com> wrote: > > > > On 4 Jan 2017, at 13:34, Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Anyone know the difference between the S and SP train for ASR92

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 S vs SP train?

> On 4 Jan 2017, at 13:34, Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Anyone know the difference between the S and SP train for ASR920? When I asked Cisco I was told that 3.18SP is essentially what was originally to be 3.19S but no more detail than that. Not clear if S and SP a

[c-nsp] ASR920 S vs SP train?

Anyone know the difference between the S and SP train for ASR920? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

I have an NCS-5501 in the lab (SE unit, non-SE not available for demo.) Working OSPF, MPLS, MP-BGP, L3VPN etc. No production experience yet. I am looking at the NCS-5501 for a high performance dense 10G P/PE (no CE involved.) Looking at NCS-5502 for dense 100G P. I think the NCS-5500 platform is

Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

NCS-5500: 4GB off-chip GDDR5 memory for additional buffering On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:57 AM Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > That is the last spec I saw. Off-chip buffer on both base and SE. Off chip > TCAM only on SE. > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM Saku Ytti &l

Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

That is the last spec I saw. Off-chip buffer on both base and SE. Off chip TCAM only on SE. On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > > Only the -SE SKU, NCS-5501 lacks external TCAM. > > Hmm, or did both of them have deep buffers and TCAM being only > addition on the

Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

NCS-5501 has additional off-chip buffer (~50ms at 100G) NCS-5001 has on-chip buffer only On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:23 AM Stephen Fulton wrote: > I have not used the 5501 but I've been told to be mindful of the buffers > on it, specifically when shifting from higher to

[c-nsp] SFP DOM SNMP Polling?

? Tim:> ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] VASI NAT with MPLS

enable no ipv6 redirects mpls ip ospfv3 network point-to-point ospfv3 10 ipv6 area 0 end Not entirely intuitive but this worked in the lab... Tim:> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM Jason Lixfeld <ja...@lixfeld.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > I’m trying to find some documentation to help me

Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

> On 24 Oct 2016, at 17:08, Nick Cutting wrote: > > ASR920 with licensing (apparently Netflow now supported) - 1/4 price of 1001-X > Nexus 2nd gen 9k - 93180YC-EX Switch (s-flow support) - 1/3 price of 1001-X But no NAT. ___

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast within VLAN on Nexus7K over vPC

want to also L3 multicast route this traffic. Hope that helps, Tim At 03:27 AM 10/20/2016 Thursday, Yham asserted: Hi All, I have two cisco nexus 7K as core switches and two cisco 4500 as distribution/access switches. Nexus switches have vPC with each downstream 4500 switch

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

At 02:02 PM 9/9/2016 Friday, Nick Hilliard asserted: Tim Stevenson wrote: > which is 8 x 1G > connections to 8 x 8:1 oversubscribed port ASICs. the easiest way to think of a 6148 is that it's like 8 individual 1G ethernet hubs connected into a 1G switch. Now, now - a hub would

Re: [c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

rts in one port group, you'd only get 1G of thruput Hope that helps, Tim Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Nick Cutting ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp arch

Re: [c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of >> the transmitter? >> &g

Re: [c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Tim Durack wrote: > > OSA measurement confirms this unexpected behavior. I have a case open > with > > Cisco to investigate optics turning on/off when router port is in a > > shutdown sta

Re: [c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of > the transmitter? > > (10G DWDM SFP+ optic, EDFA amplified link etc...) > > -- > Tim:> > To follow up on my

Re: [c-nsp] Optical amplification 1310nm

s may need a dispersion compensation solution which the coherent ones will not. I'm expecting a lot more product options in this space within the next 12 months. I'll be interested to hear what solution you choose! Regards Tim. Tim Rayner Optical Engineer, AARNet Pty Ltd street address: Buildin

Re: [c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

transmit anything. > > On Aug 4, 2016 2:27 PM, "Tim Durack" <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of >> the >> transmitter? >>

[c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of the transmitter? (10G DWDM SFP+ optic, EDFA amplified link etc...) -- Tim:> ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/l

Re: [c-nsp] BGP blackhole community config

On 6/20/2016 11:38 AM, Satish Patel wrote: > I have tried that too and got this error. > > R1(config-router)#neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx route-map RTBH out > % "RTBH" used as BGP outbound route-map, tag match not supported > % not supported match will behave as route-map with no match >

[c-nsp] IOS-XRv 9000 v6.0.0 and high cpu

Hi All, Has anyone had an opportunity to play with the IOS-XRv 9K version 6.0.0 image? Are you seeing high CPU usage (even with all ports shut down?) Just trying to ascertain why its burning through 2 cores for what seems to be no real good reason. Thanks Tim

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

ttps://www.flexoptix.net/en/produkte/transceiver/10-gigabit-cwdm-sfp-transceiver-70km-sm-ddm-dom.html Depending upon your migration strategy, you could leave your passive muxes unchanged and just make the switch to 10G CWDM optics. I hope this helps Regards Tim. Tim Rayner Optical Engineer, AARNet Pty

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

ether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net <javascript:;> > https://puck.net

[c-nsp] NCS5K?

Anyone eyeing up the NCS5K range? I could do a lot of damage with a pair of NCS 5011 and 5001 "linecards". Chassis-free core? Probably not the intended use case. -- Tim:> ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://pu

[c-nsp] Cisco C6K/SUP720 15.1(2)SY6 IPv6 BGP ttl-security hops

but next-hop is inaccessible. I would imagine this is a known bug, but can't find a suitable bug ID. Anyone else hit this? -- Tim:> ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at h

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus as MetroE switch?

th C6K and C6.8K due to the time-tested code base. N7K in contrast has been "challenging". Be very cautious when evaluating platforms for (I)SP functions. Make sure the BU understands and will support what you intend to do. -- Tim:> ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] SFP/Transceiver Issue

ch receive power, then stop working - which is the symptom that you describe. Good Luck with it! Regards Tim. Tim Rayner Optical Engineer, AARNet Pty Ltd street address: Building 9, Banks Street, YARRALUMLA ACT 2600 postal address: GPO Box 1559, CANBERRA ACT 2601 t. +61 2 6222 3575 f.

Re: [c-nsp] FW: N7K F2e Module

When F2E is mixed with M, then F2E ports operate as L2 only, but in this case he is unable to configure the *M* ports with anything other than "switchport host". That's just wrong. Probably the first step is to get on decent code, and see if the issue remains. Ie, 6.2.12 or 6.2

[c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits

-PeeringPolicyEnforcement.pdf ) 4. Don't worry about peers stealing transit. 5. What is peering? Your comments are appreciated. -- Tim: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:24 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote: Question: What is the preferred practice for separating peering and transit

Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:29:31AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote: 4. Don't worry about peers stealing transit. 5. What is peering? I'm afraid that the majority of answers will be 4./5., mixed with 6. what? how can

Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Rolf Hanßen n...@rhanssen.de wrote: Hi, you forgot do some interface-ACL-magic that drops peer-traffic that does not have a destination IP in my cool-networks-whitelist. Yup, valid option. I am trying to avoid anything that involves maintaining lists.

Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:32:53AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote: (It would be cool if Cisco would understand that hardware forwarding platforms need useful netflow with MAC-addresses in there... ASR9k

Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits

handles nicely. Can I ask why you terminate peering and transit on different routers? (Not suggesting that is bad, just trying to understand the reason.) Tim: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS XRv (Virtual ASR9k)

Not sure about access. That link was posted on the Cisco Learning Network ages ago when I was still studying for the SPCORE and SPEDGE tests, and that's what I've always used for images. IIRC I just used my basic (no entitlements) login to access the files. Tim Densmore On 8/17/2015 12:08

Re: [c-nsp] me3800x IOS

Hi Folks, Thanks for the recommendations - very helpful. I meant to reply earlier, but I'm sure you all know how that goes sometimes. Tim Densmore On 7/27/2015 10:25 AM, Tim Densmore wrote: Hi Folks, I'm looking for recommendations for the best (least buggy) IOS for the 3800x. If anyone

Re: [c-nsp] Anycast GW for L2 subnet

on solutions to both those limitations but I am speaking only of what we have today. Hope that helps, Tim Tim Stevenson, tstev...@cisco.com Routing Switching CCIE #5561 Distinguished Engineer, Technical Marketing Data Center Switching Cisco - http://www.cisco.com +1(408)526-6759

Re: [c-nsp] Anycast GW for L2 subnet

.html Hope that helps, Tim Tim Stevenson, tstev...@cisco.com Routing Switching CCIE #5561 Distinguished Engineer, Technical Marketing Data Center Switching Cisco - http://www.cisco.com +1(408)526-6759 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] me3800x IOS

Hi Folks, I'm looking for recommendations for the best (least buggy) IOS for the 3800x. If anyone wants to share their opinion, or well-known gotchas, I'd appreciate it. For now, all we really need is basic L2/L3 MPLS, OSPF, and usual L2 features. Nothing fancy. Thanks! Tim Densmore

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco BGP AIGP

-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco BGP AIGP BGP AIGP has been added to some versions of IOS/IOS-XE/IOS-XR. Looks like this feature is restricted to IPv4 and IPv6 AF though. Anyone know if AIGP for VPNv4 and VPNv6 is supported or on the roadmap? -- Tim

[c-nsp] Cisco BGP AIGP

BGP AIGP has been added to some versions of IOS/IOS-XE/IOS-XR. Looks like this feature is restricted to IPv4 and IPv6 AF though. Anyone know if AIGP for VPNv4 and VPNv6 is supported or on the roadmap? -- Tim: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] 10GigE Remote Fault Notification?

Does 10GigE support Remote Fault Notification like GigE with auto-neg does? -- Tim: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] C6880X locator led?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote: Possibly stupid question: how does one toggle the locator led on a C6880X chassis? For the record: R1(config)#hw-module slot 5 led beacon -- Tim: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] C6880X locator led?

Possibly stupid question: how does one toggle the locator led on a C6880X chassis? -- Tim: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

reasons for buffers on a unit like this is the speed disparity between 10ge and 1ge ports, unless you're planning to do a lot of shaping (rather than policing) - is this correct? Thanks, Tim Densmore ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

these serious consideration. Thanks for all of the info folks! Tim Densmore ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

?...Mark/Anyone else...can you please confirm if this is correct? I just fired off a clarification request. I probably asked for the wrong part number or something like that - ASR-920-24SZ-M. Tim Densmore ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

with the idea of a router being the next step up from a switch, especially given that we're looking at a quote that's around 4x less than what we have for 3800s. I'm a product line dunce, though, so any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks, Tim Densmore

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

Yes, which I was stunned by as well - sub $10k for the asr, and $30k+ for the 3800, though that quote was several months old. I take it that I should probably verify what I was quoted wasn't just a PSU or something... Tim Densmore On 3/23/2015 3:10 PM, CiscoNSP List wrote: Hi Tim - Are you

Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Throw in some PoE and you've got a very interesting box. It isn't just the SP market that needs to eliminate STP :-) -- Tim

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gb+ Core w/ Netflow

FTFY - w/QOS(Shaping) - 60Gb(Without any additional licenses) -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Sent: Saturday, 14 March 2015 3:55 PM To: Jeremy Bresley; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10Gb+ Core

Re: [c-nsp] N7k PIM Anycast RP - Do we still need MSDP to sync RPs?

This is RFC 4610. Tim At 06:41 AM 3/5/2015 Thursday, Phil Mayers murmered: On 05/03/15 10:00, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:19:09PM -0800, Tim Stevenson wrote: You do not need MSDP under this configuration, Anycast w/PIM Anycast w/MSDP are two different ways to do

Re: [c-nsp] N7k PIM Anycast RP - Do we still need MSDP to sync RPs?

this configuration, Anycast w/PIM Anycast w/MSDP are two different ways to do basically do the same thing. Tim Cheers, Manu Chao ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco console port to USB

This is the best USB to serial adapter ever. I'm still using mine from ~2004 or so. -- Tim On Mar 2, 2015 10:23 AM, Aaron dudep...@gmail.com wrote: Keyspan USA-19HS (aka x-triplite) or anything with an FTDI FTDI is a popular chip so support is pretty strong. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:21 AM

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >