config caused the the asr1001s
to choose "controller mode" looking for an SDWAN controller.
Thanks!
Tim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ces.
But basically 16-something to the latest GA 17, though if 17 is
problematic we may just stay at the latest 16.
Thanks for the reply!
Tim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Hi Folks,
I recently upgraded and erased the startup config on a couple of
asr1001-x routers that are being repurposed. Standard procedure, though
this is the first time I have used the 1001-x specifically.
Upon reboot I was expecting a "Router>" prompt, but instead I'm
presented with a "User
work. One wrinkle here is that these
linecards are now well past end of sale, and in fact are past End of
Vulnerability/Security Support as well, so maybe it's a moot point anyway. For
10GBASE-T in the 2nd gen I'd suggest the X9788TC-FX linecard and FM-E2 fabric
module, these should beha
OS; I suspect you are using some other platform eg n5k
or n7k? I may be able to try it out here depending on what you're using.
Thanks,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Drew Weaver
Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 12:37 PM
To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) ; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
police cir 36000 kbps bc 128 bytes conform transmit violate drop
class drop-bgp
police cir 0 bps bc 32000 bytes conform transmit violate drop
Hope that helps,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 6:41 AM
To: 'cisco
isco_Nexus_9000_Series_NX-OS_System_Management_Configuration_Guide_7x/b_Cisco_Nexus_9000_Series_NX-OS_System_Management_Configuration_Guide_7x_chapter_011000.html
Hope that helps,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Satish Patel
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:13 AM
To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens)
Cc: Lasse Bi
access-class foo in
ipv6 access-class bar in
tstevens-9236c-1(config-line)#
Hope that helps,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Francisco José
Bernal Fernández
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 9:37 AM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp
ed - which the full-duplex interface may record
as a runt.
It would be interesting to know what happens to the runt and collision stats if
you can force both ends to full duplex, or both ends to half duplex.
Tim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
few you can install into a VM to play with by downloading an ISO.
The edgerouter you'd have to fake with vyos/vyatta.
Tim
On 9/14/20 7:17 PM, Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have some gear that needs a public ip, but does not have the best
security profile, and I want to put up an ACL that
or pedantic: modern routers are built out of lots of
"ASICs". I imagine the forwarding element design is the differentiator:
1. Fixed pipeline: EARL family
2. Progammable pipeline: UADP family
3. Run-to-completion: "Silicon One" family
Not an exhaustive list, lots of other e
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:34 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 19/Jun/20 16:09, Tim Durack wrote:
>
> >
> > It could be worse: Nexus ;-(
> >
> > There is another version of the future:
> >
> > 1. SP "Silicon One" IOS-XR
> > 2.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:05 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 19/Jun/20 14:50, Tim Durack wrote:
>
> > If y'all can deal with the BU, the Cat9k family is looking
> > half-decent: MPLS PE/P, BGP L3VPN, BGP EVPN (VXLAN dataplane not MPLS)
> > etc.
> > UADP pro
Routing, Why?
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list
> cisco-nsp@puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> ___
> cis
Ah yes, I would say LDPv6 and/or SR/MPLS IPv6. SRv6 reads like a science
project.
Either way, I would like to achieve a full IPv6 control plane.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:46 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that one or more of Mark, Gert or Tim are thinking
> SR/MPLS IPv6 wh
y if you run native dual-stack backbones. Or if your
> focus is totally on SRv6. Or if you don't care either way :-). Thanks.
>
> Mark.
>
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
38195 104322145
841463 0 0 00:23:06 249910
Happy to report that it didn't explode.
Thanks
Tim.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
eXR makes this so much easier.
Other than the pain of 6.3.2 -> 6.3.3 (where RPM moved to code signing) pretty
much none of that is necessary.
But yeah, 3* lines should get you from any version > 6.3.3 to any other
version. ([conf t, fpd auto-upgrade enable, commit, end,] copy url:///file
hardd
ually process and export and reduce the statistical validity
of the sample.
Using mgmt0 should be fine for sflow export.
Hope that helps,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Birnbaum Jensen
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 10:58 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300
--- Begin Message ---
Release notes have this information. EX & FX are both supported. 3600-R is not.
See Table 2/Table 3 here:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/xnc/nexus_data_broker/release_notes/Nexus_Data_Broker_Release_Notes_371.html
Hope that helps,
Tim
-Original Mes
, region resizing requires a switch reboot.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Satish Patel
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 12:12 PM
To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens)
Cc: Cisco Network Service Providers ; Nick Cutting
Subject: Re: TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396
Thanks for clarification, i have
e, no performance penalty for that.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Satish Patel
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 10:46 AM
To: Cisco Network Service Providers ; Nick Cutting
; Tim Stevenson (tstevens)
Subject: TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396
Folks and ( Tim/Nick )
I have Cisco Nexus 93
--- Begin Message ---
-Original Message-
From: Satish Patel
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 10:23 AM
To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens)
Cc: Nick Cutting ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance
Thanks Tim,
Here is the output of show hardware rate-limiter
llector is able to consume
everything coming from all sflow enabled switches without dropping, for the
same reason mentioned above.
Hope that helps,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Satish Patel
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:40 AM
To: Nick Cutting
Cc: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) ; cis
--- Begin Message ---
Make sure you distinguish between N9300 (1st generation) and N9300-EX/FX/FX2
(2nd generation). The SFLOW + SPAN limitation applies only to the latter. It's
also on the latter that Netflow is supported, which can run concurrently with
SPAN sessions.
Tim
-Ori
> Extreme (ex-Brocade) CER-RT
I'd heard Extreme were looking to EOL/EOS that box.
It's too slow for 2019 anyway and has some pretty critical bugs that I don't
think can be fixed.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether
to expect anything
newer.
> I applaud Cisco for moving away from QNX, but I haven't heard anything
> positive about the 64-bit XR variant as yet. YMMV.
"Is don, is good".
I use it a lot in my day job and it's been fine.
-Tim
_
[0015:000b:000b] qos ip 0.0.0.0/0 10.1.1.0/24 [398869316]
I guess you're hoping to figure out which specific ACEs are matching in each
class (vs just seeing the total number of packets classified in each class, as
seen in 'sh policy-map interface')? I can check w/our engineering tea
re in the network.
We match incoming routes tagged with RTBH from the RR and rewrite to the
appropriate next-hop "/dev/null" by address family, which it sounds a lot like
what you guys do.
I would consider this to be "policy". Why would you not?
>
> Mark.
-Tim.
___
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Robert Raszuk
> So for educational purposes could you describe some real valid use cases to
> apply bgp policies on routes *received* over IBGP ?
>
> Thx,
> Robert.
Setting local preference?
--- Begin Message ---
There isn't one. Closest is Nexus 3636C-R, this is J+ based like the 9636C-RX
but with on-chip tables only (no external TCAM).
Tim
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 5:39 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nethe
--- Begin Message ---
Yes, 9236C is 6 slices, 6 x 100G each. I guess I should have been nice and
dumped a few other common platforms from the lab - see below.
Tim
**
93180YC-FX (1 slice, 18 x 100G):
tstevens-93180yc-fx-3# sh int hard
Legends:
SMod - Source Mod. 0 is N/A
08 -10 20405 0
Eth1/541a006a00 1024255 212 -10 24486 0
No port-channels configured (0x0)
leaf1#
Hope that helps,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Youssef
Bengelloun-Zahr
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 10:3
> XRv is simple control-plane of XR in a VM. This is why L2 forwarding isnt
> supported (though is configured).
> XRv9000 is full control- and data-plane and much tighter coupling of the two.
> L2 forwarding should work, but L2VPNs and such will fail miserably.
>
> q.
XRv9000 6.4.1 works fine - t
> On 15 Mar 2018, at 19:17, Ian Mock wrote:
>
> Yes, port side exhaust is normal for datacenter class switches. The switches
> face the same side as the server ports they're plugging into for ease of
> cable management, and to maintain symmetry of airflow.
>
> Ian Mock
Yeah I get that, but
> On 5 Mar 2018, at 19:20, Nick Cutting wrote:
>
> I don’t think it cares what end is plugged in.
> But I left it plugged in to my laptop when I moved it from , to 920-4
> (working) to the 920-12 not working so that shouldn’t matter.
>
> It only shows up once it is connected to the router, as
ere? Should I just follow
the 7000's config for VDCs?
This is expected, all nexus in 7.x will have a 'default VDC' config
section. Only n7k allows you to configure additional VDCs. There
shouldn't be much if any config modification required in the VDC config.
Hope that hel
rts routed with full OSPF/MPLS/BGP/L3VPN...
Tim:>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:03 PM James Bensley wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I would second what everyone else has already said; we're using
> version 3.16.something (can't remember off the top of my head) on
> probably a
> On 20 Oct 2017, at 14:06, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> For those running (a lot of?) ME3600s (24FS) in your network - I’m probing to
> see what your views are on the current state of software stability on those
> boxes.
>
> I’ve got a couple hundred of these in the field, and it to
viour of the transfer... You see the
re-transmissions caused by any packet loss in real time, and its immediate
impact on the TCP throughput. I find this very helpful.
The packet loss is no longer hidden like it was with iperf_v2.
iperf3 doesn't interoperate with the old iperf (v2) - y
ersa)? I'm thinking of standard
stuff like a few BGP feeds, IGP, ACLs, QoS and MPLS L2/L3 VPNs. We've
been pretty happy with the asr1004 as a platform, but we're not doing
anything super cutting edge with it, either.
Thanks,
Tim Densmore
I'd start here:
Apr 2 07:57:46.146: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: interface [175] 15
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Olivier
CALVANO
Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2017 5:59 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Diff
> ... but don't expect 3.18 to work flawlessly ... we just had to go back
> down to a newer 3.16 as the 3.18 had some issues we couldn't live with ...
>
> -garry
>
Also note 3.18S and 3.18SP are different. 3.18SP is what was previously going
to be 3.19 so don't get confused between which is ac
co? I don't see
the APS Message Level described in the standard but its a required config on
the Cisco gear. I can change this value from 0-7. Their documents don't go into
detail on that matter.
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Thank
reakout capable: yes
93108tc-ex-1#
You can find that (buried) in the NXOS release notes here:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus9000/sw/7-x/release/notes/70342_nxos_rn.html
Search for "breakout cable".
Hope
For the record, 3.18SP fixes this vulnerability:
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160804-wedge
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:17 PM Tim Durack wrote:
> Thanks. The mystery of software trains...
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:40 AM Tim Coop
Thanks. The mystery of software trains...
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:40 AM Tim Cooper wrote:
>
>
> > On 4 Jan 2017, at 13:34, Tim Durack wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know the difference between the S and SP train for ASR920?
>
> When I asked Cisco I was told that
> On 4 Jan 2017, at 13:34, Tim Durack wrote:
>
> Anyone know the difference between the S and SP train for ASR920?
When I asked Cisco I was told that 3.18SP is essentially what was originally to
be 3.19S but no more detail than that. Not clear if S and SP are going to run
side by s
Anyone know the difference between the S and SP train for ASR920?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
I have an NCS-5501 in the lab (SE unit, non-SE not available for
demo.) Working OSPF, MPLS, MP-BGP, L3VPN etc. No production experience yet.
I am looking at the NCS-5501 for a high performance dense 10G P/PE (no CE
involved.) Looking at NCS-5502 for dense 100G P.
I think the NCS-5500 platform is
NCS-5500: 4GB off-chip GDDR5 memory for additional buffering
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:57 AM Tim Durack wrote:
> That is the last spec I saw. Off-chip buffer on both base and SE. Off chip
> TCAM only on SE.
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> > Only
That is the last spec I saw. Off-chip buffer on both base and SE. Off chip
TCAM only on SE.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:55 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
> > Only the -SE SKU, NCS-5501 lacks external TCAM.
>
> Hmm, or did both of them have deep buffers and TCAM being only
> addition on the -SE SKU?
>
>
> --
NCS-5501 has additional off-chip buffer (~50ms at 100G)
NCS-5001 has on-chip buffer only
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:23 AM Stephen Fulton wrote:
> I have not used the 5501 but I've been told to be mindful of the buffers
> on it, specifically when shifting from higher to lower bps ports.
> That's S
?
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
enable
no ipv6 redirects
mpls ip
ospfv3 network point-to-point
ospfv3 10 ipv6 area 0
end
Not entirely intuitive but this worked in the lab...
Tim:>
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m trying to find some documentation to help me understand if it’s
&
> On 24 Oct 2016, at 17:08, Nick Cutting wrote:
>
> ASR920 with licensing (apparently Netflow now supported) - 1/4 price of 1001-X
> Nexus 2nd gen 9k - 93180YC-EX Switch (s-flow support) - 1/3 price of 1001-X
But no NAT.
___
cisco-nsp mailing lis
required if you want to also L3 multicast route this traffic.
Hope that helps,
Tim
At 03:27 AM 10/20/2016 Thursday, Yham asserted:
Hi All,
I have two cisco nexus 7K as core switches and two cisco 4500 as
distribution/access switches. Nexus switches have vPC with each downstream
4500 switch
At 02:02 PM 9/9/2016 Friday, Nick Hilliard asserted:
Tim Stevenson wrote:
> which is 8 x 1G
> connections to 8 x 8:1 oversubscribed port ASICs.
the easiest way to think of a 6148 is that it's like 8 individual 1G
ethernet hubs connected into a 1G switch.
Now, now - a hub
sing traffic
2. if you put all 8 ports in one port group, you'd only get 1G of thruput
Hope that helps,
Tim
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Nick Cutting
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Tim Durack wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
>
>> Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of
>> the transmitter?
>>
>> (10G DWDM SFP+ optic, EDFA amplified link etc..
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Tim Durack wrote:
> > OSA measurement confirms this unexpected behavior. I have a case open
> with
> > Cisco to investigate optics turning on/off when router port is in a
> > shutdown state. (C6880, SUP2T, 15.2(1)
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
> Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of
> the transmitter?
>
> (10G DWDM SFP+ optic, EDFA amplified link etc...)
>
> --
> Tim:>
>
To follow up on my own question: the optics
data-center-interconnects.php
This may need a dispersion compensation solution which the coherent ones will
not.
I'm expecting a lot more product options in this space within the next 12
months. I'll be interested to hear what solution you choose!
Regards
Tim.
Tim Rayner
Optical Eng
On Aug 4, 2016 2:27 PM, "Tim Durack" wrote:
>
>> Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of
>> the
>> transmitter?
>>
>> (10G DWDM SFP+ optic, EDFA amplified link etc...)
>>
>> --
>> Tim:>
>
Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of the
transmitter?
(10G DWDM SFP+ optic, EDFA amplified link etc...)
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/l
On 6/20/2016 11:38 AM, Satish Patel wrote:
> I have tried that too and got this error.
>
> R1(config-router)#neighbor xx.xx.xx.xx route-map RTBH out
> % "RTBH" used as BGP outbound route-map, tag match not supported
> % not supported match will behave as route-map with no match
> R1(config-router)
Hi All,
Has anyone had an opportunity to play with the IOS-XRv 9K version 6.0.0 image?
Are you seeing high CPU usage (even with all ports shut down?)
Just trying to ascertain why its burning through 2 cores for what seems to be
no real good reason.
Thanks
Tim
ample:
https://www.flexoptix.net/en/produkte/transceiver/10-gigabit-cwdm-sfp-transceiver-70km-sm-ddm-dom.html
Depending upon your migration strategy, you could leave your passive muxes
unchanged and just make the switch to 10G CWDM optics.
I hope this helps
Regards
Tim.
Tim Rayner
Optical Engineer,
___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Anyone eyeing up the NCS5K range? I could do a lot of damage with a pair of
NCS 5011 and 5001 "linecards". Chassis-free core? Probably not the intended
use case.
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://pu
but next-hop is inaccessible.
I would imagine this is a known bug, but can't find a suitable bug ID.
Anyone else hit this?
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
K due to the time-tested code base. N7K in contrast
has been "challenging".
Be very cautious when evaluating platforms for (I)SP functions. Make sure
the BU understands and will support what you intend to do.
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ith too much receive power, then stop
working - which is the symptom that you describe.
Good Luck with it!
Regards
Tim.
Tim Rayner
Optical Engineer, AARNet Pty Ltd
street address: Building 9, Banks Street, YARRALUMLA ACT 2600
postal address: GPO Box 1559, CANBERRA ACT 2601
t. +61 2 6222 35
When F2E is mixed with M, then F2E ports operate as L2 only, but in
this case he is unable to configure the *M* ports with anything other
than "switchport host". That's just wrong.
Probably the first step is to get on decent code, and see if the
issue remains. Ie, 6.2.12 or 6.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore
wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:24 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Tim Durack wrote:
>
> >> Question: What is the preferred practice for separating peering and
> transit
> >>
efix handles
> nicely.
>
>
Can I ask why you terminate peering and transit on different routers? (Not
suggesting that is bad, just trying to understand the reason.)
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.neth
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:45 AM, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you forgot "do some interface-ACL-magic that drops peer-traffic that does
> not have a destination IP in my cool-networks-whitelist".
>
Yup, valid option. I am trying to avoid anything that involves maintaining
lists.
__
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:32:53AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
> > > (It would be cool if Cisco would understand that hardware forwarding
> > > platforms need useful netflow with MAC-addresses in there...
> certainly be appreciated. Software IOS can do it, Sup720 cannot do it
> due to hardware constraints, Sup2T exports MAC addresses taken from random
> caches in the system but not the inbound packets, XR doesn't do it at all,
> hrmph)
>
At the risk of introducing religio
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:29:31AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
> > 4. Don't worry about peers stealing transit.
> > 5. What is peering?
>
> I'm afraid that the majority of answers will be 4./5.,
-PeeringPolicyEnforcement.pdf
)
4. Don't worry about peers stealing transit.
5. What is peering?
Your comments are appreciated.
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Not sure about access. That link was posted on the Cisco Learning
Network ages ago when I was still studying for the SPCORE and SPEDGE
tests, and that's what I've always used for images. IIRC I just used my
basic (no entitlements) login to access the files.
Tim Densmore
On 8/17/
https://upload.cisco.com/cgi-bin/swc/fileexg/main.cgi?CONTYPES=Cisco-IOS-XRv
On 8/17/2015 11:54 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Hi all,
I need to do some lab testing with XR for a ASR9001... Does anyone know
where the XRv image is... I've looked everywhere... I think my search-foo
is broken today :
Hi Folks,
Thanks for the recommendations - very helpful. I meant to reply
earlier, but I'm sure you all know how that goes sometimes.
Tim Densmore
On 7/27/2015 10:25 AM, Tim Densmore wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for recommendations for the best (least buggy) IOS for the
3800x.
ogy of each tree
We are actually working on solutions to both those limitations but I
am speaking only of what we have today.
Hope that helps,
Tim
Tim Stevenson, tstev...@cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Distinguished Engineer, Technical Marketing
Data Center Switching
Cisco
7554.html
Hope that helps,
Tim
Tim Stevenson, tstev...@cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Distinguished Engineer, Technical Marketing
Data Center Switching
Cisco - http://www.cisco.com
+1(408)526-6759
___
cisco-nsp mailing list c
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for recommendations for the best (least buggy) IOS for the
3800x. If anyone wants to share their opinion, or well-known gotchas,
I'd appreciate it. For now, all we really need is basic L2/L3 MPLS,
OSPF, and usual L2 features. Nothing fancy.
Thanks!
Ti
:00 -0400
> > From: tdur...@gmail.com
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco BGP AIGP
>
> >
> > BGP AIGP has been added to some versions of IOS/IOS-XE/IOS-XR. Looks like
> > this feature is restricted to IPv4 and IPv6 AF though. Anyone
BGP AIGP has been added to some versions of IOS/IOS-XE/IOS-XR. Looks like
this feature is restricted to IPv4 and IPv6 AF though. Anyone know if AIGP
for VPNv4 and VPNv6 is supported or on the roadmap?
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
> Possibly stupid question: how does one toggle the locator led on a C6880X
> chassis?
>
For the record:
R1(config)#hw-module slot 5 led beacon
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing lis
Does 10GigE support Remote Fault Notification like GigE with auto-neg does?
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Possibly stupid question: how does one toggle the locator led on a C6880X
chassis?
--
Tim:>
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
main reasons for buffers on a unit like this is the speed
disparity between 10ge and 1ge ports, unless you're planning to do a lot
of shaping (rather than policing) - is this correct?
Thanks,
Tim Densmore
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
just looking at l2/l3vpn and non-BGP DIA I'm going to
give these serious consideration.
Thanks for all of the info folks!
Tim Densmore
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
m - Im stunned as well?...Mark/Anyone else...can you please confirm if
this is correct?
I just fired off a clarification request. I probably asked for the
wrong part number or something like that - ASR-920-24SZ-M.
Tim Densmore
___
cisco-nsp mailin
Yes, which I was stunned by as well - sub $10k for the asr, and $30k+
for the 3800, though that quote was several months old. I take it that
I should probably verify what I was quoted wasn't just a PSU or something...
Tim Densmore
On 3/23/2015 3:10 PM, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi Tim - Ar
ut I'm having a hard time with the idea of
a router being the next step up from a switch, especially given that
we're looking at a quote that's around 4x less than what we have for
3800s. I'm a product line dunce, though, so any pointers
___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
Throw in some PoE and you've got a very interesting box. It isn't just the
S
FTFY - w/QOS(Shaping) - 60Gb(Without any additional licenses)
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> CiscoNSP List
> Sent: Saturday, 14 March 2015 3:55 PM
> To: Jeremy Bresley; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10Gb+
This is RFC 4610.
Tim
At 06:41 AM 3/5/2015 Thursday, Phil Mayers murmered:
On 05/03/15 10:00, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:19:09PM -0800, Tim Stevenson wrote:
You do not need MSDP under this configuration, Anycast w/PIM &
Anycast w/MSDP are two different ways t
1 - 100 of 807 matches
Mail list logo
