Hello,
Was wondering if anyone on this list is using a Cisco 2811 as an ITP (for
SS7 STP functions) and if so is this module required to do T1 TDM:
VWIC-2T1/E1-RAN
The following documentation states that is required however the more I read
up on the VWIC-2T1/E1-RAN has additional features that
.
IOS issue seems plausible.
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 4:41 PM
To: Reuben Farrelly
Cc: Chuck Church; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
After running for most of the days
-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
After running for most of the days, things are back to getting mainly
process switched. ?? Strange.
rtr2811#sh int fa0/1 stats
FastEthernet0/1
Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out
explain the NTP issue. Maybe even the performance issue.
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 5:10 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Yea, I'll give
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
Yea, I'll give the upgrade ago. I gotta schedule it out. In the meantime,
I'm parshing through debug ip packet data to see what is being process
switched. I set the debug
That cef command was pretty useful. Before you scroll down to the
output/stats, here are the only two
bugs that look like they might be related to my issue. With test #1,
(everything disabled), it was ALL
process switched. Test #2 looks slightly better with only IP
virtual-reassembly enabled.
After running for most of the days, things are back to getting mainly
process switched. ?? Strange.
rtr2811#sh int fa0/1 stats
FastEthernet0/1
Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out
Processor3366529 213364344 66121 21868973
:43 PM
*To:* Chuck Church
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
Chuck,
Interesting. Not sure why it was so low. I switched back to this new ISP
conn on fa0/1 tonight and ran some more tests. Below
,
** **
Chuck
** **
*From:* Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:43 PM
*To:* Chuck Church
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
Chuck,
Interesting. Not sure
of weirdness
on an 870 ISR running 12.4(24)T.
Thanks,
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:09 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; vi...@abellohome.ne
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
...@abellohome.ne
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
The fa0/1 interface literally plugs into the cable modem for the ISP. Do
you think I should increase the buffer size a bit for that interface? I'm
sure there is a command for that. I added another sh
, December 22, 2011 12:09 PM
*To:* Chuck Church
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; vi...@abellohome.ne
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
The fa0/1 interface literally plugs into the cable modem for the ISP. Do
you think I should increase the buffer
switching, and I think it'll get better.
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 3:32 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Just some stats in regards to the process
The command:
router#show ip cef switching statistics feature
Will show you which feature is causing traffic to be punted to CPU.
Reuben
On 23/12/2011 7:42 AM, Chuck Church wrote:
You're on the right path. The more important number is the packets in/out,
as opposed to the characters. Look
again. Just curious, what does 'sh buffer' output look like?
Thanks,
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:43 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
buffer' output look like?
Thanks,
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:43 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Chuck
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jmail Clist
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 11:42 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
I have attached another log called latest_2811_logs. it contains the sh ip
traffic, sh int switching and a show proc cpu
Clist
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 11:42 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
I have attached another log called latest_2811_logs. it contains the sh
ip traffic, sh int switching and a show proc cpu sorted 1min output
: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Here is a show proc, show ip traffic and show int switching. Any feedback
is very much appreciated.
rtr2811#show proc cpu sorted 1min
CPU utilization for five seconds: 26%/17%; one minute: 13%; five minutes:
13%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked
: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Here is a show proc, show ip traffic and show int switching. Any feedback
is very much appreciated.
rtr2811#show proc cpu sorted 1min
CPU utilization for five seconds: 26%/17%; one minute: 13%; five
Hello,
I have an issue that is really causing me grief. I recentely inherited a
small network. There is an existing 1.5mbps Internet connection (fa0/0)
(includes MPLS as well/same provider). We added a new ISP that allows for
50mb down/5mb up. I added the new ISP to fa0/1 and modified the NAT
-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Hello,
I have an issue that is really causing me grief. I recentely inherited a
small network. There is an existing 1.5mbps Internet connection (fa0/0)
(includes MPLS as well/same provider). We added a new ISP
I saw a 2811 flattened recently by MTU / MSS issues, so
would be curious to see show ip traffic
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
The provider is using compression to get you the 50/5 number. The 2811
represents the true bandwidth allocation.
Did they ask you to go to a provider site to optimize your laptop?
Verizon did that to me, they told me I have 25 symteric although
I only get 8 symetric when I use my *NIX box to
Thanks for the replies. I actually had the interface set to AUTO first and
it did negotiate at 100mbps full duplex as well but the performance results
were the same. At the moment I am back on the legacy 1.5mbps connection. I
will cut it over tonight and perform some testing again. i will then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike,
I don't believe Verizon FiOS uses compression. Neither would the Windows
machine plugged directly into the hand off, so it would not compress or
decompress data in communicating with Verizon's hardware. Compression of an
entire link is CPU
10:57:11 -0600
From: Jmail Clist jmlis...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Message-ID:
CAO8NJwLyKmQj8jUJTYg2_82fyxyyQLRuCOraaeH3BG9ONPr8=q...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hello,
I
Vinny,
I agree, now that I think about it, it would not be compression but my *NIX
box does support
auto scaling, that has be available for some time. I also am familiar with
stack tuning and have done
so on my box. However, most modern stacks do not require as much as the old
days, again, I
handle up to 16.44 Mbps of fast / CEF switching. I was not
able to see your attachments in the digest nor in the archive. Do you have
CEF enabled?
cjw
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:57:11 -0600
From: Jmail Clist jmlis...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811
.
From: Christopher J. Wargaski war...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
According to
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools
On 5/2/11 19:24 , Chris Knipe wrote:
Given the low throughput on these WICs (Active/Passive failover), would I be
able to install two of them into the 2811, or do I need to look at an
alternative router?
Look for an alternative router like next generation of ISR's routers. 4
HWICs slots
Hi all,
I'm in the process of planning an new edge router, and I'm currently looking
at the Cisco 2811.. We need to have 2 x HWIC-1GE-SPF, 2 x WIC-1ADSL, and 2
x WIC-2T in the router.
Looking at the datasheet of the 2811, it states that 4 slots are on board,
capable of HWIC, WIC, VIC, or
Hello,
I have been asked to make some tunnel / securisation of an internal
using 2 cisco 2811 with IPBaseK9 IOS software.
The commercial documentation says that Cisco 2811 can do IPSec... Now
does IPBaseK9 can do that ?
Is there any pointer about documentation doing that on Fast Ethernet
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
I have been asked to make some tunnel / securisation of
an internal using 2 cisco 2811 with IPBaseK9 IOS
software.
The commercial documentation says that Cisco 2811 can
do IPSec... Now does IPBaseK9 can do that ?
Is there any pointer about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug McIntyre
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:38 PM
To: Justin Shore
Cc: 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.
I believe the main reason for this (besides the fact
Support for the WIC-1DSU-T1 was added with 11.2(12)P for some platforms,
11.3(3)T for most others and 12 for all platforms consistently. Support
for the V2 version was added with 12.3(1) and 12.2(17) Mainline trains.
Support for the 2800 ISRs emerged with 12.3(8)T.
That said you should have
The WIC-1DSU-T1 is not supported in a 2811 you need to use a WIC-1DSU-T1-V2
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, virendra rode //
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone is running 2811 with WIC-1DSU-T1, if so what
version of ios
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you need a WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 in a 2800.
Regards,
Matt
On 4/3/08 5:06 PM, virendra rode // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone is running 2811 with WIC-1DSU-T1, if so what
version of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Shore wrote:
I should have thought of that. :-(
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5854/prod_qas0900aecd80169bd6.html
Justin
- ---
Bummer because I thought I read somewhere that someone was
Yeah, and I was thinking I had a v1 working in an ISR too but I can't
find one. V2s are better anyway.
Justin
virendra rode // wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Shore wrote:
I should have thought of that. :-(
I'm not sure i'd say better all the time, i had a recent issue where i
had a circuit work in v1 card but not on a V2 card the v2 have less of
a tolerance for poor wiring and some smartjack configs.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, and I was thinking I
Don't forget that with the V2 card you must explicitly specify channel
speed to be 64K in order for bring up a T1. It's no longer the
default...
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
650-207-0372 cell
650-213-1302 office
650-969-2124 fax
On Apr 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Ben
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
Support for the WIC-1DSU-T1 was added with 11.2(12)P for some platforms,
11.3(3)T for most others and 12 for all platforms consistently. Support
for the V2 version was added with 12.3(1) and 12.2(17) Mainline trains.
Support
Dear all,
When I configure many(about 8) subinterfaces on one of the fastethernet
ports and connect the port to a switch as a trunk port, port speed per
subinterface drops almost to 10% of what it was before when it was a single
interface only.
Would appreciate if any one can throw some ideas
Ravi,
Can you please share the config? Also please share the output of show
int stat
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ravi Patwari
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 21:01 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811
Well, how much of an increase in traffic did you add to this one FE
interface by adding multiple vlans to it? Keep in mind the hairpinning of
traffic in an back out the same interface. Could you offload this process to
a L3 switch?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Ravi Patwari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can Anyone please tell me the switching fabric capabilities for Cisco 2811.
As due to high IP input rate my CPU utilization is getting high.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Ronnie
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hitesh Vinzoda wrote:
Can Anyone please tell me the switching fabric capabilities for Cisco 2811.
As due to high IP input rate my CPU utilization is getting high.
If IP Input represents major of your CPU usage, then you're not
switching packets in most optimal way - using CEF. Try to check if
Hitesh Vinzoda wrote:
Can Anyone please tell me the switching fabric capabilities for Cisco 2811.
As due to high IP input rate my CPU utilization is getting high.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Ronnie
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tools/quickreference/index.html
and
lo guys ...
so i have the cisco 2811 with and hwic-adsl , the thing is i'm only able
of getting about 1.6MB/S in download...
here's a copy of the adsl2+ sync...
cisco2811#sh dsl int atm0/0/0
ATM0/0/0
Alcatel 20190 chipset information
ATU-R (DS) ATU-C (US)
lo guys ... itsme again :|
so i'm trying to rate limit some wifi clients. they are eating all
the internet pipeline :(
i googled and found something like this lines as it follows.
in the f0/0 will be adding this 2 rate lines
rate-limit input access-group 101 512000 512000 512000
I think that you should reduce normal and extended burst, for example
I usually configure these way and it works fine, if I want to limit
64Kbps (for upload download) to 192.168.1.20
Normal Burst = configured rate * (1 byte)/(8 bits) * 1.5 seconds
Extended Burst = 2 * normal burst
Normal
hi there...
i got a cisco 2811 ... with and hwic-adsl ...
it syncs ok the dsl line .. and it does the ppp connection..
but then it doesn't route anything.. don't have acess to outside
the ip route its in place but no go :(
any1 can give me a hand?
compare to this.. i assume you are missing routing or ppp isnt really up etc
http://www.thedogsbollocks.co.uk/tech/cisco837-adsl.txt
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:15:54PM +0200, R.L. Nevot wrote:
Perhaps you have only one public IP address? are you performing NAT?
post your configuration might
fernando fernandes wrote:
hi there...
i got a cisco 2811 ... with and hwic-adsl ...
it syncs ok the dsl line .. and it does the ppp connection..
but then it doesn't route anything.. don't have acess to outside
the ip route its in place but no go :(
any1 can give me a hand?
Hi,
Can
55 matches
Mail list logo
