Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Tim Franklin
On Thu, September 4, 2008 12:42 pm, Mike Louis wrote: > I usually set the max reserve command to 95 percent to leave room for > routing and other overhead. That way I don't have to specify a specific > class to take care of it if I reserve akll remaining bw in the pm Be careful, this *doesn't* gua

Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Mike Louis
t: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:43 AM To: Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question On Thu, September 4, 2008 09:07, Ryan wrote: > Hey all, > > Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy > appli

Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Johannes Resch
On Thu, September 4, 2008 09:07, Ryan wrote: > Hey all, > > Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy > applied to a Serial (T1) interface, and for the life of me don’t > understand why. I’m pretty sure it’s my fault and not a “feature”. > > Error I am get

Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Ryan
as well. My first mistake. :) -Ryan -Original Message- From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 3:32 AM To: Ryan Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question Ryan, have a look at the max-reserved-bandwidth comman

Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Aaron Riemer
: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] silly qos question Hey all, Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy applied to a Serial (T1) interface, and for the life of me don’t understand why. I’m pretty sure it’s my fault and not a “feature”. Error I am

Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Jeremy Stretch
With the 656 Kbps limit for the Data-DSCP class, your reserved bandwidths total 1152 Kbps, or 75% of a 1.536 Mbps interface. Remember that by default IOS will only reserve up to 75% of an interface's bandwidth. You should be able to change this with the 'max-reserved-bandwidth ' command applied

Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Aaron Riemer
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Sent: Thursday, 4 September 2008 3:07 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] silly qos question Hey all, Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy applied to a Serial (T1) interface, and for the life of me don’t understand why

Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Ryan, have a look at the max-reserved-bandwidth command. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/qos/command/reference/qos_m1g.html#wp1113113 -- Tassos Ryan wrote on 4/9/2008 10:07 πμ: Hey all, Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy applied to a Serial (T

[c-nsp] silly qos question

2008-09-04 Thread Ryan
Hey all, Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy applied to a Serial (T1) interface, and for the life of me don’t understand why. I’m pretty sure it’s my fault and not a “feature”. Error I am getting when I try to apply the service policy direction output: %I