Getting this error with Firefox 39
An error occurred during a connection to 10.52.122.26. SSL received a weak
ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key in Server Key Exchange handshake message.
(Error code: ssl_error_weak_server_ephemeral_dh_key)
The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the
I'd be interested with this as well, not for wireless, but newer 88xx
phones. Customers are not happy with the transition to Cisco for speed
dials, because they aren't user friendly to use and moderately happy with
how they have to program speed dials.
For instance, an 8821 with latest code, you
No issues with any of my customers. The expressways/VCS/E were the only
ones we were concerned with, and had them all at 8.5.2 or 8.5.3 and had no
issues.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> How did your leap second go?
>
>
>
> I didn’t n
As said by others, license is free for the MRA part, to get the free
license, here is a handy blog entry :
https://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/how-to-get-expressway-c-and-e-licenses/
He also has entries on helping set it up, but it's pretty simple once you
get in and start configuring.
For lab purposes, we've all probably modified an ISO to make it bootable
(if you don't know how, just google it), and it's pretty easy to do with
the right tools.
I don't ever remember seeing an official stance from Cisco on it, and I've
heard that TAC can tell if a system was installed with an I
015 at 7:45 AM, Charles Goldsmith
> wrote:
>
>> Not with MGCP
>>
>> Sent via C=64 Mobile
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2015, at 12:09 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>>
>> So, for Domain Name, did you not specify the SKIGWXXX or just the
>> last 10 of the MA
to start learning some of the APIs
> > (devnet.cisco.com <http://devnet.cisco.com>) for those of us with
> > few or rusty programming skills.
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Ed Leatherman
> > mailto:ealeather...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> &g
We have a customer with 80+ sites and about 10 phone types. Creating the
service templates is a daunting task, because there seems to be no way to
BAT these in and it's time consuming to create them through the gui. I did
find
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/prime/collaboration/10-5
Thanks for this, much clearer than the more generalized list of products.
Do you know if the other business units created similar docs to this one,
for instance the UCS, R/S etc?
Thanks again!
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Matt Taber (mtaber)
wrote:
> Document released today on cisco.com r
We are having issues with it on CUC 10.5.1, and TAC tells us it's a false
alert and we can ignore it. They have no plans to fix it. If anyone wants
more details, I can give it to you and/or a TAC case number.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Erick Bergquist wrote:
> Yep, around 2G here to. I
Check RTMT for what errors you are seeing, call TAC with that info. Also,
while in RTMT, set it up to email you for alerts, so you know when your
backups do not work.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Reto Gassmann wrote:
> hello group
>
> Last weekend we rebooted our CUCM 9.1 cluster.
> When I
tml
>
>
> Kind Regards,
> Lokesh
>
> ----------
> *From:* Matthew Loraditch
> *To:* Charles Goldsmith ; Lokesh Lal <
> lokesh_...@yahoo.co.in>
> *Cc:* voip puck ; Lokesh lal <
> lokesh...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 28 May 2015 7:57 PM
> *Su
(and expressway) say it
> needs to go in the callmanager-trust
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Charles Goldsmith
> wrote:
>
>> Just restart Tomcat
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ed Leatherman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good morning!
>>>
Just restart Tomcat
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> Cert related question - think I know the answer but I dont see it
> explicitly stated so figured I'd ask.
>
> I need to add the CA cert for my expressway-C to call manager as a
> callmanager-trust cert
8, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Lokesh Lal wrote:
> If u check cucm 9 and above , each port/analog requires essential ucl
> licence.
>
> Check utilisation report
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>
>
>
> ---- Original message
> From: Charles Goldsmith
> Da
les,
>
> What additional licenses are required? We need to deploy as SCCP/MGCP with
> CUCM 9.1 and 10.5.
>
> Only 1 essential UCL license per port or any license enablement on IOS
> gateway?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Lokesh
>
> ------
> *From:* Charles
They configure the same as say the vg224, other than they have the ability
to have additional modules installed. I have not used that latter
function, but just configuring them as analog gateways.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Lokesh lal wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> We have been assigned to deploy Anal
There are no timers in the SIP trunk, but the SIP Profile has several.
Please let us know which timer you find that resolves this? I have a
customer that will be going to 10.5 soon and are using RightFax.
Also, RightFax has some good documentation and support, they may have
this already covered.
all CUWL licenses in PLM are upgraded to 10.x will PLM draw from
> the 10.x pool for 9.x UCMs that require user licenses?
>
> Thanks,
> Gentoo
>
>
> On 2015-04-29 13:09, Charles Goldsmith wrote:
>>
>> Open a licensing case with the usual info (contract, SO#, etc) and
I know there have been other discussions about this, and an update to
the dx80 code was slated for q2y15.
Can we have an update from someone in the know?
Is there a beta/trial program available for the code? If so, we could
probably assist in testing if needed and also I work for a partner, if
t
Open a licensing case with the usual info (contract, SO#, etc) and
request that they be converted.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
> Any pointers to a process to convert/upgrade CUWL 9.x licenses to CUWL 10.x?
>
> Are CUWL 10.x licenses "handed down" to users on older UCM versions once
Yes, separate licensing, but PLM licenses it for us, and to answer Scott's
original question, I don't think there is a server license for it anymore,
same as CUCM and CUC.
UCCX still has it's own license setup, and requires an HA license if you go
down that path.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:39 AM,
you can clear df-bit at
>> the interface, that may help move some of the larger packets through IF they
>> have the DF-bit set.
>>
>>
>>
>> +Chris
>>
>> TME - Unity Connection and MediaSense
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:c
It could be, I had not found that one. Thanks Nate!
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:26 PM, NateCCIE wrote:
> CSCur34011? (not for the VPN but for the network connectivity for the PC)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
What's your MTU over the backup VPN? I've seen odd issues on some
networks with different providers and MTU and fragmenting packets
always caused issues until the MSS was set.
I'm not sure why this would affect the 8851's, but we've noticed some
other oddities with the 8851's. For instance, comp
Cisco 8831 has wireless mics, but the speaker/base is wired.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've had a few requests for "Wireless" conference phones lately for some
> medium sized rooms. In these cases the executive wants to get any cables etc
> off the table, so
Try clearing security on them?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:49 AM, James Dust
wrote:
> We have recently received a batch of reconditioned 9951 phones which I am
> attempting to get working on our cucm cluster (version 8.6.2)
>
>
>
> When the phone powers up it gets an IP address from our pool, and I
, Apr 2, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
> We aren't doing advanced networking on either the c or e.
>
> I'm guessing because we do nat on the e we need to configure the nat
> reflection, is that a correct assumption?
>
> On Apr 2, 2015 7:28 PM, "Charles Go
Erick, are you doing advanced networking on the C or NAT reflection
for the traversal? Is your traversal connected? I would check for
firewall drops when trying to connect if the traversal is connected.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
> Not a security or a firewall guy so
Per this:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube_mgmt/configuration/xe-3s/cube-mgmt-xe-3s-book/voi-stateful-switchover.html
it says it is on 3.2 or later, but it does have a list of caveats,
perhaps that is what I was thinking about.
Sorry for the false alarm.
On Wed, Apr
That's ok, the rest of us scrolled down now to see... the benefits of
working from home :)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> omg. my apologies.
>
> i just noticed that the page scrolls into other stories.
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infras
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought cube-ha was missing from
the code on these? same as the ASR's since they are all running
ios-xe.
I have not tested it myself, just doing a lot of reading in
preparation of deploying these.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> I have a
This is exactly what I have for my home lab, and iscsi mounts for the
datastores. It works really well.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) wrote:
> Dennis, you must have had the same VCP trainer I did, that was a frequent
> refrain.
>
> If you want to go really cheap loa
Given that it is complaining about accessing the upgrade file, are you
using dvd image/dvd on the host or sftp? I'd try a different method to see.
Not a whole lot of information, but I have seen SFTP cause similar issues,
I think it was a permissions problem on a linux setup using openssh.
On Mo
in. Getting DNS for the phones should be
> pursued.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Charles Goldsmith
> wrote:
>
> Nate, we recently had TAC have us put cuplogin back in for a 10.5 setup.
> The customer didn't have DNS on all of their phone v
Nate, we recently had TAC have us put cuplogin back in for a 10.5 setup.
The customer didn't have DNS on all of their phone vlan's, and we had to go
back to IP on the CUCM server names. Because of this, we had issues
getting Jabber to login and not spit out cert problems.
Removing the uds-cisco s
You definitely do not want _cisco-uds and _cuplogin on the outside from my
understanding.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/expressway-series/117811-configure-vcs-00.html#anc10
Just collab-edge on the outside, plus any b2b/federation records you need.
On Tue, Mar 3
ens on project squared" -- http://www.projectsquared.com
>
>
>
> *Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room
> <https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/ccna-ccnp-collaboration
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Dana, take a look at the logs on both VCS, but start with the edge. In the
menu, Maintenance > Diagnostics > Diagnostic Logging as well as Status >
Logs
You should be able to see your connection attempt and see why it's failing.
___
cisco-voip mailing
Dana, the deployment guide talks about a single nic and nat reflection,
look at the firewall section of
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/config_guide/X8-5/Mobile-Remote-Access-via-VCS-Deployment-Guide-X8-5.pdf
Depending on your network layout, this could be
nav_home> |
> G+ <https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Charles Goldsmith
> *Sent:* Monday, January 19, 2015 1:15 PM
> *To:* Mike
> *Cc:* voip puck
>
> *Subject:* Re:
Mike, this has been discussed previously, where is this documented? Per
the 10.6 documentation, it is not supported for concurrent use.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Mike wrote:
> Just a FYI…10.6 will be your CAD to Finesse migration platform. It is the
> only supported co-resident version
I don't know about standalone, but from this matrix:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html
it looks like you need 9.0 for the mx200 and if it's a g2, then 10.5
That doesn't sound right, but unless that doc is way off or I'
We see this a lot with carriers, it prevents scammers from changing
caller-id info. Some carriers will make an exception for things like main
numbers, just have to prove you own that number, which isn't hard.
I've never went through the excercise of modifying the SIP header to
resolve this.
On F
Almost every customer asks me about it, it's not built into our SOW to do
that, but we give them the documentation on how to do it if they want.
Most seem to just build documentation to send out to their end users on how
to add people to their contact list.
It would be ideal if we had a simple too
is contact info in the comments of the code of the college friend,
Solomon, so if you want customizations, etc, he's available to contract
with.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Charles Goldsmith
wrote:
> yes, anything to get me started
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 201
Cliff, not sure if you prodded today or what, but I received my customer's
licenses this afternoon.
Many thanks!
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Clif Perry (cperry)
wrote:
> Dana – Please send me an email at cpe...@cisco.com with the GLO case
> number and I’ll get this sorted out for you.
>
>
Cliff, that's a great late holiday present! I'll email you from my work
account.
Many thanks!
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Clif Perry (cperry)
wrote:
> Dana – Please send me an email at cpe...@cisco.com with the GLO case
> number and I’ll get this sorted out for you.
>
> Charles – Looks
wrote:
> Actually I beg to differ. It’s a system that needs to be improved upon.
>
>
>
> *From:* Josh Warcop [mailto:j...@warcop.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 08, 2015 7:01 PM
> *To:* Mike ; 'Dana Tong'; 'Erick Wellnitz'; 'Charles Goldsmith&
Not sure what you mean by fudging hosts file.
Per the IM&P/CUPS docs, you need either an SRV record for _cuplogin._
tls.domain.com or _cisco-uds._tls.domain.com (for 9.1 and higher) for
communication, or you can manually set the server names/IP in the jabber
client. Using SRV records makes it ver
Get the customer's Cisco AM involved is my advice.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Dana Tong
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> A customer of mine did an upgrade last August and still has not been
> able to obtain the licenses that they are entitled to.
>
> The customer first bought CUWL licenses some 8 yea
Negative, but I'd be curious if you get it to work, maybe even with a
different headset. I've been holding off buying one because of the mac and
lack of soft phones other than jabber.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Ryan Burtch wrote:
> I'm looking for a SIP SoftPhone that I can use with CUCM
f CAD and into Finesse if you can
> easily show them in their own environment.
>
>
>
> You’d think they would put this in the release notes as it’s a pretty big
> deal in the CCX world.
>
>
>
> *From:* NateCCIE [mailto:natec...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December
Kevin, not supported to run them both at the same time, unless 10.6 has
indeed changed that, I haven't perused the docs yet.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Kevin Przybylowski
wrote:
>
> Do you mean the last version? They’ve been together the last few
> revisions.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voi
Does anyone know if this will be on PUT for upgrades/installs? IIRC, one
of the VotE briefings mentioned this was going to be a GA build for 10.5.x
Right now, PUT is giving out 10.5.1
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Tim Frazee wrote:
>
> probably only significant to large centralized d
I had a customer that had bought CUEAC back on version 8.x a few years ago
and complained about this very thing. When I spoke to Arc about it, they
told me that they researched and the layout was the best you could have and
there was no reason to customize it.
The customer switched to a 3rd party
; Is the pri-group already configured on that controller? If so, you'll
> need to shut down the voice-port, the serial interface, and then do "no
> pri-group" on the controller before re-defining the pri-group configuration.
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Charles Goldsm
We are seeing an odd error on a migration from a Nortel setup over to an
h323 setup.
the error message after entering PRI 2 is
*crsvr1(config-controller)#pri-group timeslots 1-24 nfas_ backup nfas_int 1
nfas_group 1*
*%The Primary-group is already defined*
*%The first definition of the primary-g
yes, anything to get me started
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> I got a super simple front end written in PHP running on the same LAMP
> stack the the PostGreSQL database is running on (benefit of being a former
> programmer). It isn't 100% complete bu
Before I go down the road of re-creating the wheel, has anyone written a
nice front end to the postgresql database for simple reports for a customer?
While pgadmin will do the trick, a non-technical person will struggle with
getting reports out as needed.
I'm thinking about a simple search for pe
I may be wrong about this, but isn't it the underlying pub/sub stuff? I
ran into this a while back where dbreplication wasn't working but the ccx
db was. Turned out it was the passwords weren't synced between the
databases, they had to root the box and run a script to sync 60+ passwords
between t
Not sure if it will do everything you are looking for, but look at
Insight's Variphy tool, variphy.com
Good team there to work with.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Sean Knight via cisco-voip <
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi, we are running CUCM 9.1.2 and I would like a tool that wo
This discussion comes up about every 6 months on this list, LRO is no
longer affected and was only a 4.1 issue on esxi.
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/2012-October/029907.html
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements#Supported_Versions.2C_Patches_and_Up
That page specifically says you don't have to disable LRO if you are above
4.1 esxi and 8.6 CUCM.
Martin, which version of 5.5 are you on? GA, update 1 or 2? I recently
ran into an issue with a customer on 5.5 u1 and too new of raid drivers on
the card and had to downgrade the drivers. Wasn't c
https://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.vsphere.install.doc_50%2FGUID-09AA1655-4162-49D3-A1BC-945122716145.html
I haven't dug up the docs on 5.5, but I'm assuming its the same, 5.1 docs
mention it as well.
Note the pre-requisite of the eval not expiring already.
On Wed,
I have a customer who just purchased a couple of the dx80's and they are
still on 9.1.2. Per the release notes on the dx80 firmware, I need the
latest device pack for 9.1.2.
http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074288/116734/cmterm-dx80.10-2-2-23-readme.html
However, the release notes on said de
The phone won't disconnect a call and I've never heard of that happening,
other than network issues. I'd check layer1 and 2. Could be a bad cable
or a cable that has been pinched or damaged
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Matthew Ballard wrote:
> I’ve received a report from a user that her p
Stonefax onprem, working great with a SIP ITSP.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:24 AM, wrote:
> We use RightFax. The Network & Telephony team used to manage it, but
> we handed that off to our Infrastructure Applications team. So, management
> is easy for us, now! J We are using it on-prem, not c
I had a customer ask me to do this a couple of years ago. However, they
had an overhead paging system already setup, so we just setup a WAV file to
be piped through that, instead of using the phones.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Andy wrote:
> Just to put "another nail in the coffin" would be
The last time I tried this, It was a weekend long deal due to the
application replication not coming online in an HA environment. Took TAC
over 12 hours to figure out that the passwords weren't synced in all tables
and had to root and run sql updates to resolve it. Customer had changed
passwords
TG, you state that you aren't trying to promote a sub, but your subject
line indicates that you are. When talking about combining certs and TVS
restarts, thats for a migration, moving phones from one cluster to
another. This is not a way to promote a sub to a pub, which you cannot do.
If you are
Layer 1 issue... sometimes it's the simple things that cause problems.
Love the story from Daniel about the optical switch too.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> This is too funny. Yeah the button on the phone is broke. I can’t
> bel
d their is a delay about 10-12 seconds then the IP Phone
> rings and then I start seeing the debugs.
>
> Of course Cisco and Valcom state their are no issues.
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Charles Goldsmith
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a delay when you plug it into an a
Is there a delay when you plug it into an analog and take the router out of
the pic? What I'm really asking, is the delay in the valcom or your
router/CUCM?
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Steven Sarte
wrote:
> Anyone have experience with a Valcom 2901A door opener. Have it working
> with my
I don't think they can, but a lot of them are running soft switches now and
just handing off PRI's, so features change.
Why not control that on the CUCM side?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> Can the Bells etc limit on the class 5 swi
If you are referring to Java 1.8, I couldn't get it to run either. I wound
up downgrading to the latest 1.7 to get it to work.
I realize why java is used, cross platform and all, but damn is it a pain
to deal with.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Jeremy Rogers (AM) <
jeremy.rog...@dimensiondat
It depends on the size of your environment and which apps you are referring
to. Is it just CUCM/CUC or does it included CUPS/CIMP and UCCX and
possibly CUEAC?
How many servers are you talking?
This can all be done in a day/night, but depends on the size and speed of
things. I had a customer tha
It happens to the best of us. I did something similar once in front of a
customer, made a fool of myself.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> So I’m embarrassed to say I was SSH to wrong box J nothing was wrong
> with the process…
>
>
Personally, I wouldn't leave a system in that format, it's a waste of
space. Cisco's docs seem to change because at one point, the docwiki
specified that it could be built in either a raid 5 or raid 10 (for the app
storage), but that has been updated.
I'd personally setup a mirror with the first
Sorry Lelio, I badly assumed you were virtualized when you stated version 9.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Charles Goldsmith
wrote:
> I think most people use VMWare to alert to hardware issues, since the
> applications don't have visibility into the host server info.
>
>
I think most people use VMWare to alert to hardware issues, since the
applications don't have visibility into the host server info.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> We've had a couple of hard drives go and we've only noticed because we saw
> an amber light when we've
I'm pretty sure you have to get the bootable via PUT
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
> Is the bootable pcd_vApp_UCOS_10.x.iso not on cisco.com? I can’t
> find it. Just a PCD upgrade 10.5 from 10.0.1 under CallManager.
>
>
>
> Tyr
201 - 283 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
