On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 at 14:22:57 +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'am using ClamAV 0.80 with clamav-milter 0.80j to scan all my incoming mail.
>
> This morning i receive email that contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] virus (NAV
> version) in attachment my_details.pif.
>
> Why clamav-milter cannot detect
Nitin wrote:
I revoke spamassassin and clamav through /user/home/.procmailrc. It works
fine until I call clamav (just spamassassin). BTW, I use :
:0fw: clamAV.lock
| clamscan
to call clamav for user.
ClamAV is not designed to be used as a procmail filter. You probably
want to use clamassassin
I am having a problem running clamd with supervise.
Actually, it does this without supervise.
It seems to run, then kill itselfs and daemonise itself.
Then subsequent clamd's uses it as its parent instead on supervise
This started after I upgraded to the latest CVS version, so I have fiddled and
a
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:11, Shaun Bugler wrote:
> I am having a problem running clamd with supervise.
> Actually, it does this without supervise.
> It seems to run, then kill itselfs and daemonise itself.
> Then subsequent clamd's uses it as its parent instead on supervise
> This started after I u
On Friday 07 January 2005 12:15, Trog wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:11, Shaun Bugler wrote:
> > I am having a problem running clamd with supervise.
> > Actually, it does this without supervise.
> > It seems to run, then kill itselfs and daemonise itself.
> > Then subsequent clamd's uses it as i
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 10:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Maidment) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
>>> Don't
>>>understand, why online access should/must be only one way to receive updates.
>> We can send them to you every two weeks by a carrier pigeon.
Firstly buy me devocote for them. :)
BM> Be fair,
Hi!
6-Янв-2005 17:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel J McDonald) wrote to
ClamAV users ML :
>> >> "Fetch" from where (without online)? (BTW, updates for my
>> >> previous
>> My English is poor, but me looks, that above is irony/sarcasm. Don't
>> understand, why online access should/must
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
Firstly buy me devocote for them. :)
I was thinking, "buy me an oven" Mmm, Pigeon Pie.
BM> Be fair, Tomasz. The guy's Russian and you know what they do with
BM> carrier pigeons, don't you :-)
Earlier, cultivating pigeons was popular in our country, but n
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 14:22 +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'am using ClamAV 0.80 with clamav-milter 0.80j to scan all my incoming mail.
Are you certain? I'm not familiar with qmail-scanner, so it might be a
red herring, but:
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns1.tjipta.com by uid 501 wit
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 13:37 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 6-Янв-2005 17:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel J McDonald) wrote to
> ClamAV users ML :
>
> >> >> "Fetch" from where (without online)? (BTW, updates for my
> >> >> previous
> >> My English is poor, but me looks, that
Hi,
Running the following on a Debian Sarge machine:
clamav-milter 0.80-7
clamav-daemon 0.80-7
kernel-image 2.6.8-10
libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18
Averaging about 200 incoming SMTP connections per minute. Also
running SpamAssassin and spamass-milter. No local delivery (except to
the spam con
Hi,
As of early this morning, I'm getting error messages like this:
ERROR: Can't connect to port 80 of host database.clamav.net (80.95.80.7)
Broken Pipe
I've confirmed that my network appears to be being filtered from access
to database.clamav.net, since I can connect to port 80 there succe
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 07:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel J McDonald) wrote to
ClamAV users ML :
>> >> >> "Fetch" from where (without online)? (BTW, updates for my
>> >> My English is poor, but me looks, that above is irony/sarcasm. Don't
>> >> understand, why online access should/must be only one
On Friday 07 Jan 2005 13:45, Raj Mathur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running the following on a Debian Sarge machine:
>
> clamav-milter 0.80-7
Is the problem present in the version in CVS?
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] htt
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:48:44 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Does this mean, that ClamAV developers suggest, that _all_
> machines,
> where ClamAV will work, - at home, at corporations, at Nuclear Plants
> - should be internet-connected?)
You should visit h
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> Again. :( My machine have no web server runned and I doubt that it
> will.
>
> (Does this mean, that ClamAV developers suggest, that _all_
> machines,
> where ClamAV will work, - at home, at corporations, at Nuclear Plants -
> should be internet-connected?
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 08:50 -0500, Mark G. Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As of early this morning, I'm getting error messages like this:
>
> ERROR: Can't connect to port 80 of host database.clamav.net (80.95.80.7)
> Broken Pipe
>
> I've confirmed that my network appears to be being filtered from a
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:48:44 +0300 (MSK) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Arkady V.Belousov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Does this mean, that ClamAV developers suggest, that _all_
> machines,
> where ClamAV will work, - at home, at corporations, at Nuclear Plants
> - should be internet-connec
> DJM> That's fine - download them from the internet
>
> How? Is there ftp? Is there email lists (which sends updated bases
> directly, not only notification about "what new in last updated")? Is there
> local (to me) BBSes?
Nope. http. Use wget if you want a command line interface.
> DJM
> "Nigel" == Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nigel> On Friday 07 Jan 2005 13:45, Raj Mathur wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Running the following on a Debian Sarge machine:
>>
>> clamav-milter 0.80-7
Nigel> Is the problem present in the version in CVS?
Haven't tried
Arkady V.Belousov said:
> Hi!
>
> 7-ñÎ×-2005 07:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel J McDonald) wrote
> to
> ClamAV users ML :
>
>>> >> >> "Fetch" from where (without online)? (BTW, updates for my
>>> >> My English is poor, but me looks, that above is irony/sarcasm.
>>> Don't
>>> >> understand,
On Friday 07 Jan 2005 15:15, Raj Mathur wrote:
>> clamav-milter 0.80-7
>
> Nigel> Is the problem present in the version in CVS?
>
> Haven't tried that, since I'm paranoid about non-packaged software on
> production boxes. However if you feel that will help solve/trace the
> problem I can
On Friday 07 Jan 2005 15:15, Raj Mathur wrote:
>> clamav-milter 0.80-7
>
> Nigel> Is the problem present in the version in CVS?
>
> Haven't tried that, since I'm paranoid about non-packaged software on
> production boxes. However if you feel that will help solve/trace the
> problem I can
I am looking for some recommendations on the best (and hopefully easiest
way) to set up Virus and Spam protection for my server. I've played around
with some of the combinations, but havn't really got everything working
together like I want.
I'll list the tools I already have available, and then
Hi!
6-Янв-2005 20:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to "ClamAV users ML"
:
>> Ok, let me get this right. Clamav cannot clean? What good is it?
JM> What good is it? It detects viruses! I'd say thats pretty good.
1. When (I hope, not "if") disinfection will be implemented?
2. How handled vir
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 14:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Morrison) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
>> (Does this mean, that ClamAV developers suggest, that _all_
>> machines,
>> where ClamAV will work, - at home, at corporations, at Nuclear Plants
>> - should be internet-connected?)
BM> ClamAV is p
On Friday 07 Jan 2005 17:30, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> 1. When (I hope, not "if") disinfection will be implemented?
http://www.clamav.net/faq.htm, answer 26.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
_
* Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050107 10:46]:
> On Friday 07 Jan 2005 17:30, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>
> > 1. When (I hope, not "if") disinfection will be implemented?
>
> http://www.clamav.net/faq.htm, answer 26.
For records it is,
http://www.clamav.net/faq.html
i.e. faq.html and not faq.
Diane Rolland wrote:
> I am looking for some recommendations on the best (and hopefully
> easiest way) to set up Virus and Spam protection for my server. I've
> played around with some of the combinations, but havn't really got
> everything working together like I want.
>
> I'll list the tools I
Arkady V.Belousov wrote the following on 01/07/2005 06:30 PM :
Hi!
6-Янв-2005 20:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to "ClamAV users ML"
:
Ok, let me get this right. Clamav cannot clean? What good is it?
JM> What good is it? It detects viruses! I'd say thats pretty good.
1. When (I h
Hi!
6-Янв-2005 21:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Noel Jones) wrote to
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net:
NJ> "Cleaning" of viruses is a marketing ploy.
Not agreed. We use antiviruses from middle of 80th, and they save us
many programs, which else be losted...
NJ> after "cleaning" but a corrupted file.
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:38:18 -0600
Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you are running clamd, you can't manually signal it that it has
> fresh data
It's possible by sending SIGUSR2 to the main clamd process.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
6-Янв-2005 20:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to "ClamAV users ML"
:
Ok, let me get this right. Clamav cannot clean? What good is it?
JM> What good is it? It detects viruses! I'd say thats pretty good.
1. When (I hope, not "if") disinfection will be implemented
Ken Goods wrote:
> > Tools:
> > sendmail (currently my MTA)
> > postfix
> > procmail
> > clamav
> > spamassassin
> > amavis-new (but willing to use something else)
> >
> You may want to take a look at MailScanner. It works extremely well for
> me and is highly configurable. And my number one r
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 13:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
JM> make it into a users mailbox. ClamAV is not intended to be run after
JM> the fact on an already infected machine.
JM> I really dont see what the issue is here. You appear to be in a rare
JM> situation
Infecte
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:22:56 +0300 (MSK) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Arkady V.Belousov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is only one example, that there is exists ways outside
> internet.
Those alternatives have been out-evolved in the main
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org d
On 2005-01-07 22:22:56 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> 7-???-2005 13:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to ClamAV users ML
> :
>
> JM> make it into a users mailbox. ClamAV is not intended to be run after
> JM> the fact on an already infected machine.
> JM> I really dont see what the issue is
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 13:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
JM> make it into a users mailbox. ClamAV is not intended to be run after
JM> the fact on an already infected machine.
JM> I really dont see what the issue is here. You appear to be in a rare
JM>
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote:
> Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>
> And thats the problem. ClamAV wasnt really designed to be an av
> solution on a home machine. It doesnt disinfect, quaratine, or have a
> fancy gui like some other commercial av solutions. What it does do
Calvin Dodge wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote:
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
And thats the problem. ClamAV wasnt really designed to be an av
solution on a home machine. It doesnt disinfect, quaratine, or have a
fancy gui like some other commercial av solutions. What i
Hi!
6-Янв-2005 20:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to "ClamAV users ML"
:
JM> http://www.clamav.net/abstract.html#pagestart
JM> "The package provides a flexible and scalable multi-threaded daemon, a
JM> command line scanner, and a tool for automatic updating via Internet."
Let me rephr
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 15:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomasz Kojm) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
>> (Does this mean, that ClamAV developers suggest, that _all_
>> machines,
>> where ClamAV will work, - at home, at corporations, at Nuclear Plants
>> - should be internet-connected?)
TK> You should visit h
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:57:41 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mean, unacceptable, that there are not seen other
> ways for bases updating. (I hope, now I clearly express my question?)
It's now your homework to find the other ways. Not very subtle, but
well...
--
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:50:35 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 6-___-2005 20:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to "ClamAV users ML"
> :
>
> JM> http://www.clamav.net/abstract.html#pagestart
> JM> "The package provides a flexible and scalable multi-threaded
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 18:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lionel Bouton) wrote to ClamAV users
ML :
>>1. When (I hope, not "if") disinfection will be implemented?
LB> disinfection is implemented by your backup software, just restore the
LB> last backup to restore infected files clamav will delete. If you don't
LB>
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 21:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter J. Holzer) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
>> Infected machine _isn't_ _rare_ situation.
PJH> No, but
PJH> 1) I think real viruses which infect other programs are getting rare.
For me, as victim of virus like CIH, is unimportant that this virus
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 15:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Maul) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
>> JM> BBSes?? I ran one of those when i was 12...
>> This is only one example, that there is exists ways outside internet.
JM> Of course, but for open source software, how many methods can you really
JM> expect?
Hi!
8-Янв-2005 00:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomasz Kojm) wrote to ClamAV users ML
:
>> I mean, unacceptable, that there are not seen other
>> ways for bases updating. (I hope, now I clearly express my question?)
TK> It's now your homework to find the other ways. Not very subtle, but
TK> well...
Hi!
7-Янв-2005 08:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel J McDonald) wrote to
Clamav Users :
>> DJM> run freshclam,
>> What does freshclam such, that I can't reproduce manually (for example,
>> by simple placing updated bases into ClamAV directories)?
DJM> You can't validate the cvd's you receive manu
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:02:22 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 7-___-2005 08:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel J McDonald) wrote to
> Clamav Users :
>
> >> DJM> run freshclam,
> >> What does freshclam such, that I can't reproduce manually (for
> >> example,
>
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:02:22 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stop. Does this sentence mean, that I may just copy (received)
> .cvd files into ClamAV directories
Yes, you can do that.
> and at next (re)start they will be used
clamd will automatically reload
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:35:20 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> use commercial solution (like F-PROT or Dr.Web
I highly recommend buying a commercial a-v scanner with a 24h assistance
in your case.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\..
> Ken Goods wrote:
>
>
> > You may want to take a look at MailScanner. It works extremely well
> > for me and is highly configurable. And my number one
> reason for using
>
> Just as a caution, I noticed that you also list Postfix in
> your repertiore of software. If you are planning on
Arkady V.Belousov said:
> Hi!
>
> 8-ñÎ×-2005 00:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomasz Kojm) wrote to ClamAV users ML
> :
>
>>> I mean, unacceptable, that there are not seen other
>>> ways for bases updating. (I hope, now I clearly express my question?)
> TK> It's now your homework to find the other ways. No
Diane Rolland wrote:
Ken & Matt; Thanks for the tips; this was exactly what I was looking for!!!
MailScanner looks Extremely promising! (And it was a breeze to install).
I think I'll still be ablt to use ProcMail for the business mail rules.
Make sure to subscribe to the MailScanner list also, you
> Ken Goods wrote:
>
>
> > You may want to take a look at MailScanner. It works extremely well
> > for me and is highly configurable. And my number one
> reason for using
>
> Just as a caution, I noticed that you also list Postfix in
> your repertiore of software. If you are planning on
Diane Rolland wrote:
>Ken & Matt; Thanks for the tips; this was exactly what I was looking for!!!
>MailScanner looks Extremely promising! (And it was a breeze to install).
>I think I'll still be ablt to use ProcMail for the business mail rules.
Make sure to subscribe to the MailScanner list also,
57 matches
Mail list logo
