Hi!
Maybe I looked over something, but is there any way to display
clamscan's return codes only after a one file scan? I mean the number of
the error (0, 1, 40, 50, 52, etc. according to man clamscan).
Thanks in advance.
Balazs Hegedus
___
http://lurk
- Original Message -
From: "Troy Ayers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ClamAV users ML"
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:38 PM
Subject: [Clamav-users] off topic: virus of the day
Anybody aware of a new mass mailing worm, possibly released in the last
24 hours?
This one seems to infect winXP
Hai
I just updated clamav 0.81 to 0.83 (fedora 1)
i updated with yum
after updating i run the freshclam but it is still saying
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
WARNING: Local version: 0.81 Recommended version: 0.83
how can I solve this prblm
pls help
t
On Tuesday 08 Mar 2005 08:04, Hegedus Balazs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Maybe I looked over something, but is there any way to display
> clamscan's return codes only after a one file scan? I mean the number of
> the error (0, 1, 40, 50, 52, etc. according to man clamscan).
Using the bourne shell and it's de
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:10:36 +0200
"Rushan Sobar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the new viruse file can be found on this link
> http://home.earthlink.net/~gallery10/omg.pif
This is not a VX list.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV
it is updated to 0.83
it saying in rpm -q clamav is 0.83
i don't want to uninstall the exsiting one it is intergrated with my
mail server so i want to update it to 0.83
i updated it i want to configure the updated version 0.81 to 0.83
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:39:30 +, Rob MacGregor
<[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 11:50 +0300, Jijos wrote:
> it is updated to 0.83
> it saying in rpm -q clamav is 0.83
> i don't want to uninstall the exsiting one it is intergrated with my
> mail server so i want to update it to 0.83
> i updated it i want to configure the updated version 0.81 to 0.83
You
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:50:01 +0300, Jijos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it is updated to 0.83
> it saying in rpm -q clamav is 0.83
> i don't want to uninstall the exsiting one it is intergrated with my
> mail server so i want to update it to 0.83
> i updated it i want to configure the updated version
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 08:48 +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> David Blank-Edelman schrieb:
> >
> > Today I managed to catch clamd in a hung state and so I poked and
> > prodded at it with gdb. Btw, by hung I mean that attempts to contact
> > clamd on the local socket failed with "connection refused"
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:48:41 +0100
Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This definitely looks like a mail scan with 17 attachments (or level
> of attachments?), and a threadmanager after a database update,
> waiting for the mail scan to finish.
> Tomasz? Trog?
Does the current CVS version f
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:25:48 +0300, Jijos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hai
> I just updated clamav 0.81 to 0.83 (fedora 1)
> i updated with yum
> after updating i run the freshclam but it is still saying
>
> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
> WARNING: Loca
how to find the old libaries?? of 0.81
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:53:23 +, Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 11:50 +0300, Jijos wrote:
> > it is updated to 0.83
> > it saying in rpm -q clamav is 0.83
> > i don't want to uninstall the exsiting one it is intergrated with my
>
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 12:15 +0300, Jijos wrote:
> how to find the old libaries?? of 0.81
Go and look in your lib directories.
run ldd on your freshclam binary.
-tog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
http://lurker
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Robert Blayzor
> Sent: maandag 7 maart 2005 15:39
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout
>
>
> I'll give it a whirl, and yes, I seem to have it tra
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Thomas Lamy wrote:
Damian Menscher schrieb:
I'm seeing logs like:
Intercepted virus from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seems strange to me that the invalid users would have made it past
sendmail's RCPT TO and into the AV engine. I'm guessing
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons
> Sent: dinsdag 8 maart 2005 0:23
> To: 'ClamAV users ML'
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout
>
>
> Mark wanted us to know:
>
> >Yesterday, I subjected Clam
Rushan Sobar wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Troy Ayers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ClamAV users ML"
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:38 PM
Subject: [Clamav-users] off topic: virus of the day
Anybody aware of a new mass mailing worm, possibly released in the
last 24 hours?
This one seems
17 matches
Mail list logo
