[Clamav-users] Problems with version 0.90 amd webmin

2007-02-20 Thread smc-oper
Hello, I need help about clamav and webmin.We made the update to version 090.rc2.Now we have the problem when we want to use webmin. We get the message Bitte geben Sie im Konfigurationsmodul den Ort der zweiten Unterschriftsdatenbank an (das sollte daily.cvd sein) Because we only have now an

[Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV 0.90 - Failed to compile

2007-02-20 Thread Ian Abbott
On 20/02/2007 04:53, Vinyl Bne wrote: I tried to upgrade to ClamAV 0.90 and failed while compiling. The same "configure" option was fine with ClamAV 0.8x.xx Below is the snippet of compilation message/error. The configure line is *./configure --enable-milter --with-dbdir=/var/clamdb --with-user

Re: [Clamav-users] Creation of binary .rpm package.

2007-02-20 Thread Lorenzo Ortega
hello try to download some rpm from: http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/clamav/ bests Graeme Nichols escribió: > Bill Randle wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 12:58 +1100, Graeme Nichols wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I tried to create a binary .rpm package from the clamav-0.90.tar.gz >>

RE: [Clamav-users] 0.9 update libssl and libcrypto

2007-02-20 Thread Daniele Marco Bevar
ok, thanks a lot, it works. too bad for the automatical updates...(yum) Daniele Marco Bevar Mondo Rondo Web Factory http://www.mondorondo.com/ -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Henrik Krohns Envoyé : lundi, 19. février 2007 12:19 À :

[Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread ShopOnWeb
Hi, I have a problem with upgrade from 0.88.7 to 0.90 on Fedora Core 5. My steps for upgrade are: #cd /usr/local/src #tar xzvf clamav-0.90.tar.gz #service postfix stop #service clamd stop #rm -f /usr/local/lib/*clam* #cd clamav-0.90 #./configure && make && make install #service clamd start [EMAIL

Re: [Clamav-users] Using clamassassin with 0.90 - failed error 40!

2007-02-20 Thread Daniel Staal
--As of February 20, 2007 10:02:12 AM +0800, Richard is alleged to have said: I finally found that error 40 is because of calling an unknown option. It seems the clamassassin is calling clamscan with something wrong now. It worked fine, and again works ok since I downgraded to 0.88.7. Am I the

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Jan-Pieter Cornet
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:15:56PM +0100, ShopOnWeb wrote: > Hi, I have a problem with upgrade from 0.88.7 to 0.90 on Fedora Core 5. > My steps for upgrade are: > > #cd /usr/local/src > #tar xzvf clamav-0.90.tar.gz > #service postfix stop > #service clamd stop > #rm -f /usr/local/lib/*clam* > #cd

Re: [Clamav-users] Perl module Mail::ClamAV not compatible with ver.0.90

2007-02-20 Thread Reinhard Hainz
hi, we had the same problems with Mail::ClamAV (version 0.17) and clamav 0.90. Attached you will find a simple patch for Mail::Clamav (no modification in clamav). Please note, that I have not realy verified this patch (some deprecated functions and definitions). Reinhard René Berber wrote:

[Clamav-users] Update fail in clamav-0.90

2007-02-20 Thread Miguel Rois
Hi all When I write the command freshclam as root, the file main.cvd don't updated, your date is 31 Dic with 83.951 viruses. The file daily.inc is OK in your version. When I run clamscan say OK, and your database have 93.275 viruses known ¿¿¿ Someone idea Miguel __

Re: [Clamav-users] Is clamav 0.88.7-1 Vulnerable

2007-02-20 Thread Antonio Storni
I am using this FreeBSD package. File: clamav-0.88.7_1.tgz 744 KB 12/30/2006 12:49:00 PM My question now is: Is this clamav Vulnerable? Thanks for your information. --- Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:25:30PM -0800, Antonio Storni said

Re: [Clamav-users] Is clamav 0.88.7-1 Vulnerable

2007-02-20 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:51:40 -0800 (PST) Antonio Storni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using this FreeBSD package. > > File: clamav-0.88.7_1.tgz 744 KB 12/30/2006 > 12:49:00 PM > > My question now is: > Is this clamav Vulnerable? > > Thanks for your information. I am not

Re: [Clamav-users] Update fail in clamav-0.90

2007-02-20 Thread Antonio Storni
>From http://www.clamav.net/ Latest ClamAV™ stable release is: 0.90 Total number of signatures: 93275 ClamAV Virus Databases: main.cvd ver. 42 released on 31 Dec 2006 13:09 +0100 daily.cvd ver. 2612 released on 20 Feb 2007 12:28 + --- Miguel Rois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > Whe

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with version 0.90 amd webmin

2007-02-20 Thread guenther
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 11:09 +0100, smc-oper wrote: > I need help about clamav and webmin.We made the update to version > 090.rc2.Now we have the problem when we want to use webmin. Why are you using an old release candidate? You should update to the officially released version 0.90 instead. > W

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:15:56 +0100 "ShopOnWeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# service clamd start > Avvio di clamd: ERROR: Parse error at line 76: Option FixStaleSocket > requires boolean argument. > ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf > [FALLITO]

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Salvatore
"Brian Morrison" wrote: So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket Thanks. -- Salvatore. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:53:04 +0100 "Salvatore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Brian Morrison" wrote: > > So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? > > In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: > > FixStaleSocket > The error message tells you that it: "requires boolean argument." -- Brian Morrison

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Jonathan Armitage
Salvatore wrote: > In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket 0.9x introduces a new configuration syntax: you can now turn single options on and off, the old crude hack of "DisableDefaultScanOptions" is no longer required. Please have a look at the examples: clamav-0.9*/etc/clamd.con

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Richard Feldmann
Salvatore spake thusly on Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:53:04PM +0100: > "Brian Morrison" wrote: > >So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? > > In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: > > FixStaleSocket > > Thanks. > > -- > Salvatore. --- end quoted text --- Read the error a little more closely a

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Steve Basford
Salvatore wrote: > FixStaleSocket > How about: **FixStaleSocket yes FixStaleSocket no In other words, the format for .conf files changed in 0.90... you need yes/no after the option. Example: http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=clamav-devel&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fetc%2Fclamd.conf&rev

[Clamav-users] Clamd is dying silently after about an hour

2007-02-20 Thread Jonathan Armitage
This morning I installed clamav-0.90 on our main mail server at work, a V210 running Solaris 10. I enabled the experimental code, and there was no problem building (except for the previously discussed LDFLAGS problem, which resurfaced). After about an hour, or maybe at busy times, clamd disap

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Rob Munsch
Salvatore wrote: "Brian Morrison" wrote: So what do you see at line 76 of clamd.conf? In clamd.conf at line 76 I have: FixStaleSocket "Avvio di clamd: ERROR: Parse error at line 76: Option FixStaleSocket > requires boolean argument." ^^^ Thanks. -- Salvatore.

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd is dying silently after about an hour

2007-02-20 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > After about an hour, or maybe at busy times, clamd disappears without a > trace. No core dump, nothing in the logs. > This happens on every Solaris instance I've built. It does not matter if it is Sol8, Sol9, or Sol10. I've not had time to go back in and rebuild it without the experimental

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd is dying silently after about an hour

2007-02-20 Thread Jonathan Armitage
Dennis Peterson wrote: This happens on every Solaris instance I've built. Ah. Well perhaps you will be pleased to hear that the Solaris x86 version you helped me with the other day is still going strong, although admittedly on a very lightly loaded machine (40-60 messages a day). Jon __

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-20 Thread Kevin Way
Dennis Peterson wrote: >> So, its been a few days. How is everyone feeling about the new version? >> I've hesitated to upgrade just yet. I've seen alot of feedback indicating >> problems and very little about smooth and great upgrades. >> >> What's the general concensous - You can't upgrade fast en

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-20 Thread Kevin Way
Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:13:38 -0800 > Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 3:00 PM -0800: >> >>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:51:54 -0800 >>> Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > I just had to

Re: [Clamav-users] Creation of binary .rpm package.

2007-02-20 Thread Eric Hoeve
Graeme Nichols wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to create a binary .rpm package from the clamav-0.90.tar.gz > tarball using the command 'rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz' which failed > with the following errors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] download]# rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz > error: Name field must

Re: [Clamav-users] Creation of binary .rpm package.

2007-02-20 Thread Graeme Nichols
Lorenzo Ortega wrote: hello try to download some rpm from: http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/clamav/ bests Hello Lorenzo, thank you very much for that information. I'll go look. Regards, Graeme. Graeme Nichols escribió: Bill Randle wrote: On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 12:58 +1

Re: [Clamav-users] Creation of binary .rpm package.

2007-02-20 Thread Graeme Nichols
Eric Hoeve wrote: Graeme Nichols wrote: Hello, I tried to create a binary .rpm package from the clamav-0.90.tar.gz tarball using the command 'rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz' which failed with the following errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED] download]# rpmbuild -tb clamav-0.90.tar.gz error: Name field

Re: [Clamav-users] Perl module Mail::ClamAV not compatible with ver.0.90

2007-02-20 Thread Juan David Hoyos
At CPAN there's a new version of Mail::ClamAV (0.20), but it doesn't show any test and isn't packaged yet. Looks like is still in dev process. See: http://search.cpan.org/~sabeck/Mail-ClamAV/ And: http://search.cpan.org/src/SABECK/Mail-ClamAV-0.20/ Worked fine for me. __

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav 0.90 -- Debian packages?

2007-02-20 Thread Lutz Petersen
Can anybody explain what to write into /etc/apt/sources.list for Debian-Etch ? I tried to use the entry published in the Wiki, but this doesn't work.. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav 0.90 -- Debian packages?

2007-02-20 Thread Stephen Gran
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:56:20AM +0100, Lutz Petersen said: > > Can anybody explain what to write into /etc/apt/sources.list for Debian-Etch > ? > > I tried to use the entry published in the Wiki, but this doesn't work.. The packages for 0.90 have not yet made it to etch. They are going to

[Clamav-users] Error compiling 0.90_2 on FreeBSD

2007-02-20 Thread Nicki de Wet
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade to the latest version, however it gets an error in building libclamav. It seems that libpthread is required now, but it does not exist on the system I'm compiling on. It has never had a problem with this in the past. Here is the compiler output: bsd-ns2# make all ===