On 2021-07-28 23:53:35, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote:
>
> I would like your feedback.
>
Starting with v0.103 will be really helpful. I've already voiced my
concerns about CMake... As the Gentoo maintainer, the switch is a bit
annoying, since we've been fixing autotools issues f
How's this? https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/pull/231
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Fortescue
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 2:07 PM
> To: Micah Snyder (micasnyd) ; ClamAV users ML
>
> Subject: Re: [SUSPICIOUS] [clamav-users] PATCH: Re: ClamAV® blog: ClamAV
> 0.104.0 Release C
Hi All,
For the past couple of months I've been promoting the idea of having Long Term
Support (LTS) feature releases for ClamAV within internal Talos communications.
For the purposes of this discussion:
* A "feature release" is a version starting with MAJOR.MINOR.0 to include
all PATCH v
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:59:14 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> a bit OT, but I upgrade debian servers for years in a short steps, combining
>
> "apt-get upgrade" so only safe packages are upgraded
> and manual upgrades a few at once via aptitude
> (so packages with complicated dependencies a
_
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf
Of Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 11:22 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Cc: Joel Esler (jesler)
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAVR blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate
is here!
Please do.
On 28/07/2021 22:02, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote:
Will do. Thanks for the fix. Ok if I add you to the acknowledgements section
of the news?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Fortescue
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 1:59 PM
To: Micah Snyder (micasnyd) ; ClamAV users ML
Sub
Will do. Thanks for the fix. Ok if I add you to the acknowledgements section
of the news?
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Fortescue
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 1:59 PM
> To: Micah Snyder (micasnyd) ; ClamAV users ML
>
> Subject: Re: [SUSPICIOUS] [clamav-users] PATCH: Re: ClamAV
Hi Micah,
Please can you submit it for me - I don't have an account.
Regards
Mark.
On 28/07/2021 21:55, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote:
Mark,
This is amazing! Thanks!
If you have an account on GitHub, can you submit this as a PR? If not, I can
submit one for you.
Regards,
Micah
-
Mark,
This is amazing! Thanks!
If you have an account on GitHub, can you submit this as a PR? If not, I can
submit one for you.
Regards,
Micah
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users On Behalf Of
> Mark Fortescue via clamav-users
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 12:02 PM
> To: c
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 14:24:46 G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
> Hi Gene,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreads
> >
> > But pthread is installed. "sudo ldconfg -v|grep pthread" comes back
> > empty
> >
> > Now what?
>
> I'm g
Hi Elia,
I would need to see the log messages from your subsequent updates to be sure
what's going wrong. The logs you shared in your initial email show a bug but
subsequent freshclam runs _should_ work.
If you want, the verbose log may reveal something.
Like Joel suggested, it may be the Recei
Hi again,
After a bit of digging around, I have updated CMakeLists.txt to fix this
issue and another minor issue.
See attached patch.
This may not be the correct solution but at least it generated the
correct entries on clamav-types.h.
Regards
Mark.
On 28/07/21 19:10, Mark Fortesc
Hi Gene,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreads
But pthread is installed. "sudo ldconfg -v|grep pthread" comes back empty
Now what?
I'm guessing you have the stable version of ClamAV already installed
on the box, and so clamscan is inst
Hi All,
I have found a bug that will cause issues for 32bit builds and maybe
some 64bit builds.
On all three of my OS (2 x x86_64 and one x86) tested, CMake is not
setting DEFINE_SF64_PREFIX used in clamav-types.h.in.
This breaks the build on one x86_64 OS and may cause issues on the x86
OS
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 12:30 PM, Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> This sounds about right.
> A lot of signatures in daily 26231 were removed from daily 26232 or 26233
> and added to main 60. There was a glitch and main 61 was created to flush
> caches on some of the mirrors.
>
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 12:24:32 G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 July 2021 07:06:08 G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
> >> $ cd ~
> >> $ rm -rf clamav-0.104.0-rc
> >> $ tar xzvf clamav-0.104.0-r
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Asenova, Elia via clamav-users wrote:
Hello guys,
This is related to a freshclam update problem that I have. Basically when
running freshclam I get the following errors:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Jul 28 14:30:20 2021
daily database available for update (local ve
Hi there,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 07:06:08 G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
$ cd ~
$ rm -rf clamav-0.104.0-rc
$ tar xzvf clamav-0.104.0-rc.tar.gz
$ cd clamav-0.104.0-rc
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ cmake ..
blows up, fussing about
Hi there,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Lee, Raymond wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:16 AM Asenova, Elia wrote:
... when running freshclam I get the following errors ...
Downloaded 22 patches for daily, which is fewer than the 37 expected patches.
We'll settle for this partial-update, at least for no
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 4:04 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 27.07.21 18:51, fxkl47BF via clamav-users wrote:
>> for many years it's worked fine with timeout set at 30 seconds
>
> for many years it worked with people fetching via wget/curl, but it does not
> apply now.
>
So true.
>
Hi Elia,
I ran into this same problem and just deleted /var/lib/clamav/daily.c[lv]d
and ran freshclam again.
Kind Regards,
Ray
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:16 AM Asenova, Elia via clamav-users <
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>
>
> This is related to a freshclam update pr
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 07:06:08 G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
> Hi Gene,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
> > The next instruction line from INSTALL.md is:
> >
> > cmake .. -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release"
> >
> > Which generates this response:
> >
> > CMake Err
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 7:17 AM, Rick Cooper wrote:
>
> total disregard for the user base, not so much as a poll or query on the
> lists, enjoy your new cutting edge toys
>
> Corporate BS rears it's ugly head again, First snort, then centos and now
> clamav.
I think this is unfair. This is
Hello guys,
This is related to a freshclam update problem that I have. Basically when
running freshclam I get the following errors:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Jul 28 14:30:20 2021
daily database available for update (local version: 26209, remote version:
26246)
Downloaded 22 patches fo
We are planning on making LTS versions for distros again.
—
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 07:45, Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Rick Cooper wrote:
>
>> total disregard for the user base, not so much as a poll or query on the
>> lists,
>
On 28/07/2021 21:53, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote:
In my case, I can't simply upgrade to the latest Debian (or any
other distro), as one of the systems is our home firewall and
gateway -- with iptables, multi-LAN routin
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 03:52:27 Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
> > cmake --version RETURN says:
> > cmake version 3.7.2
>
> Ah. INSTALL.md says:
> ### Build requirements
> - CMake 3.16 for Windows, and 3.14+ for other operating
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote:
In my case, I can't simply upgrade to the latest Debian (or any
other distro), as one of the systems is our home firewall and
gateway -- with iptables, multi-LAN routing (with local DNS), a bit
of bridging, encrypted tunnels to
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Rick Cooper wrote:
total disregard for the user base, not so much as a poll or query on the lists,
When ClamAV 0.103 was released in September 2020 CMake was an *experimental*
option.
There will be a 0.103 release in September 2021, but is likely to be the last
one.
0.10
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, July 28th, 2021 at 3:04 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 27th, 2021 at 11:51 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
> >
> > > you weren't unblocked by changing receivetimeout.
> > >
> > > wait until you are u
Ok that was the answer. It was done because the development team wanted new
toys and the fact that you have to include instructions as to how to go
about building cmake (and using a version that requires a fairly new
distro). And cmake is constantly releasing new updates which, in my mind,
puts it
Hi Gene,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
The next instruction line from INSTALL.md is:
cmake .. -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release"
Which generates this response:
CMake Error: The source directory
"/home/gene/src/clamav-0.104.0-rc/build/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release" does not
On 27.07.21 16:37, fxkl47BF via clamav-users wrote:
> it made no difference
>
> Tue Jul 27 11:34:03 2021 -> Received signal: wake up
> Tue Jul 27 11:34:03 2021 -> ClamAV update process started at Tue Jul 27
11:34:03 2021
> Tue Jul 27 11:34:03 2021 -> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:41:03 +0100
Mark Fortescue via clamav-users wrote:
One quick answer to why people do not upgrade the OS is that the
hardware does not support the upgrade (mostly due to memory and x86_64).
I work with embedded systems where the code is very specific to the
hardware so new
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
cmake --version RETURN says:
cmake version 3.7.2
Ah. INSTALL.md says:
### Build requirements
- CMake 3.16 for Windows, and 3.14+ for other operating systems.
CMake suite maintained and supported by Kitware (kitware.c
35 matches
Mail list logo
