Some time ago, jacusy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this night my clamd-process terminated with an error. The reason was
> that freshclam took too long to do its update, so that clamd could not
> lock the database. So clamd exited. But this behaviour is very fatal
> because the mail system (postfix with amav
Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> Hello, Rob.
>
>
>>> Try this patch:
>>> http://citrin.ru/stuff/clamav/patch-0.90.1-matcher-ac.c
>>>
>>> Also see:
>>> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=434
>>>
>
>
>> Is this an issue if using clamdscan vs. clamscan? Is this patch
>> recommended
Hi, Bill,
Bill Landry wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote the following on 2/15/2007 4:07 PM -0800:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0800
Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Compile options: ./configure --enable-experimental
Please recompile without the experimental code and let us know if
G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
Did you get any response on this issue on the development list? The
problem still occurs now and then (occassionally, once every two or
three weeks, without a pattern). Today I came in the office and found
freshclam
Hi, Ian,
[...]
We have seen the same problem when using db.NL.clamav.net. Looking at
the availability figures for Germany
(http://www.clamav.net/mirrors.html#de) it seems there has only been
one server with a temp. failure tonight (which matches roughly the
time the problem occurred).
What
Dear Ian,
some time ago you wrote, in answer to one of my questions:
On 02/01/07 21:51, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
Ian Abbott wrote:
On 02/01/07 12:12, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
According to the monitoring system, the freshclam process
disappeared between 14:29 and 14:34. Running ClamAV on
Mathias wrote:
What mail server do you run? And how does the mailserver determine
the clamdscan header?
I'm running qmail with qmailscan 1.25. I guess something has got to be
compiled in there although I thougt that qmailscan was just a
perlscript (qmail-scanner-queue.pl). I'll dig into it un
Mathias wrote:
Hi. I'm confused. I just upgraded to 0.88.7/2410 but in my email
headers I
still get : "clamdscan: 0.88.4/2407".
Here's what I get when I manually run the version-parameter on the
binaries:
# /usr/local/bin/clamdscan -V
ClamAV 0.88.7/2410/Wed Jan 3 13:58:16 2007
# /usr/loca
Ian Abbott wrote:
[snip]
It might be the problem, especially if you are sending a signal
(SIGHUP) to the freshclam process from a log rotation script. If this
occurs almost immediately after an internally generated SIGALRM, it
could cause the main loop to terminate early, though that is extr
Ian Abbott wrote:
On 02/01/07 12:12, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
According to the monitoring system, the freshclam process disappeared
between 14:29 and 14:34. Running ClamAV on Solaris 9. Any idea why
after a 'connection refused' or 'connection timed out' the freshclam
proc
Hi, Stephen,
first of all, thanks for your reply.
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:12:03PM +0100, Rolf E. Sonneveld said:
Hi, all,
running:
ClamAV 0.88.6/2405/Tue Jan 2 09:39:39 2007
on Solaris 9
During the weekend we had problems on two (out of four) mailservers
which
Hi, all,
running:
ClamAV 0.88.6/2405/Tue Jan 2 09:39:39 2007
on Solaris 9
During the weekend we had problems on two (out of four) mailservers
which run clamav, where freshclam 'died'. i.e. the freshclam process was
gone. We use db.nl.clamav.net (on one mailserver) and db.de.clamav.net
(on th
Hi, Luca, Dennis, and others,
Hello Rolf,
bash-2.05# telnet 62.133.206.90 80
Trying 62.133.206.90...
Connected to 62.133.206.90.
Escape character is '^]'.
quit
302 Found
Found
The document has moved http://www.unnet.nl/";>here.
Apache/1.3.34 Server at localhost Port 80
Connection to 62.1
Hi,
running ClamAV 0.88.5 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10. Today I noticed that
on three different systems the freshclam daemon process was gone. After
trying to run freshclam interactively, I found the following (we're in
the db.NL.clamav.net zone):
bash-2.05# /opt/ClamAV/bin/freshclam
ClamAV
[...]
> Correct. But my question was about the SUNWbzip(x) packages. It seems I
> have a 32bit version on the system. And the 64bit SUNWbzipx seems to be
> not part of the standard Solaris 10 install CD. Do you know where I can
> get the SUNWbzipx package?
The SUNWbzipx package doesn't exist
Hello, René
thanks for your answer. My question, however, is not yet fully answered,
see below.
On 3/27/06, Rolf E. Sonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
during installation of ClamAV 0.88 (the package from Citrus,
http://www.citrus-it.co.uk/clamav//) on a Solaris 10 system
Hi,
during installation of ClamAV 0.88 (the package from Citrus,
http://www.citrus-it.co.uk/clamav//) on a Solaris 10 system I get the
following warnings:
WARNING:
The package "The Zip compression library
(64-bit)" is a prerequisite package and should be
installed.
WARNING:
The package
Hi,
excuse me if this has been asked before. How do I set archive limits to
prevent a DOS by a zip bomb like 42.zip?
Kind regards,
/rolf
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
18 matches
Mail list logo
