Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter and Postfix now working after update to clamav-0.95.3

2009-11-01 Thread Kalpin Erlangga Silaen
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote: System: FreeBSD-7.2 I just updated to clamav-0.95.3 on my system. I then realized that clamav-milter and Postfix were no longer connecting. /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf # Enable clamav-milter milter_default_action = accept

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter and Postfix now working after update to clamav-0.95.3

2009-10-30 Thread Jerry
System: FreeBSD-7.2 I just updated to clamav-0.95.3 on my system. I then realized that clamav-milter and Postfix were no longer connecting. /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf # Enable clamav-milter milter_default_action = accept smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter with postfix

2009-06-22 Thread Jerry
I am about to set up a new installation of Postfix and clamav-milter on a FreeBSD-7.2 system. On my present system I have clamsmtp installed. I was thinking that clamav-milter might be a better choice. Can anyone supply me with a basic template for getting clamav-milter working with Postfix? I

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter with postfix

2009-06-22 Thread Robert Schetterer
Jerry schrieb: I am about to set up a new installation of Postfix and clamav-milter on a FreeBSD-7.2 system. On my present system I have clamsmtp installed. I was thinking that clamav-milter might be a better choice. Can anyone supply me with a basic template for getting clamav-milter

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter with postfix

2009-06-22 Thread aCaB
Jerry wrote: I am about to set up a new installation of Postfix and clamav-milter on a FreeBSD-7.2 system. On my present system I have clamsmtp installed. I was thinking that clamav-milter might be a better choice. Can anyone supply me with a basic template for getting clamav-milter working

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Dennis Peterson
Gerard Seibert wrote: On Sunday October 22, 2006 at 09:49:38 (PM) Dennis Peterson wrote: Gerard Seibert wrote: I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not particularly interested in scanning outgoing mail. Perhaps someone has an idea how to correct this problem. Because

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Don Russell
Henrik Krohns wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:53:30AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. To scan 2000 identical messages is insane, not to mention a total waste of system

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Kevin W. Gagel
- Original Message - Dennis Peterson Gerard Seibert wrote: Because you don't scan outgoing mail I have to scan incoming mail from you. My usual response when I read this kind of thing is to just go ahead and blacklist you now rather than later. Please practice safe messaging.

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Monday October 23, 2006 at 11:49:47 (AM) Dennis Peterson wrote: Gerard Seibert wrote: On Sunday October 22, 2006 at 09:49:38 (PM) Dennis Peterson wrote: Gerard Seibert wrote: I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not particularly interested in scanning

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Dennis Peterson
Kevin W. Gagel wrote: - Original Message - Dennis Peterson Gerard Seibert wrote: Because you don't scan outgoing mail I have to scan incoming mail from you. My usual response when I read this kind of thing is to just go ahead and blacklist you now rather than later. Please practice

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Dennis Peterson
Gerard Seibert wrote: On Monday October 23, 2006 at 11:49:47 (AM) Dennis Peterson wrote: Gerard Seibert wrote: On Sunday October 22, 2006 at 09:49:38 (PM) Dennis Peterson wrote: Gerard Seibert wrote: I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not particularly interested

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Sunday October 22, 2006 at 09:49:38 (PM) Dennis Peterson wrote: Gerard Seibert wrote: I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not particularly interested in scanning outgoing mail. Perhaps someone has an idea how to correct this problem. Because you don't

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Henrik Krohns
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:53:30AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. To scan 2000 identical messages is insane, not to mention a total waste of system resources. Other than

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:53:30AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. To scan 2000 identical messages is insane, not to mention a total waste of system resources. Other than

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-23 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Monday October 23, 2006 at 07:01:47 (AM) Christopher X. Candreva wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:53:30AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. To scan 2000 identical

[Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-22 Thread Gerard Seibert
FreeBSD 6.1 Postfix-2.4-20061006 Clamav-milter 0.88.5 I am trying to get clamav-milter working with Postfix. I finally got it to work, so to speak, but only after using the '-f' aka '--force-scan)' flag. Without that flag, clamav-milter will only scan outgoing files, and then only if I use the

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter with Postfix

2006-10-22 Thread Dennis Peterson
Gerard Seibert wrote: I would rather not use the '--force-scan' option since I am not particularly interested in scanning outgoing mail. Perhaps someone has an idea how to correct this problem. Because you don't scan outgoing mail I have to scan incoming mail from you. My usual response