On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 12:11 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > Hmm, there could be an option for not rejecting signatures like
> > > *.Phishing.* or Safebrowsing.*
>
> On 31.03.09 11:46, aCaB wrote:
> > If you want to fine tune detection based on malware n
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Hmm, there could be an option for not rejecting signatures like
> > *.Phishing.* or Safebrowsing.*
On 31.03.09 11:46, aCaB wrote:
> If you want to fine tune detection based on malware names you can either
> do the tuning in clamd (as explained above) or use OnIn
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hmm, there could be an option for not rejecting signatures like
> *.Phishing.* or Safebrowsing.*
Hi,
If you want to fine tune detection based on malware names you can either
do the tuning in clamd (as explained above) or use OnInfected=Accept and
AddHeader=Yes and p
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > What I've meant is, can it (instruct sendmail to) reject mail only viruses,
> > not phishing nor unsafe pages, or do I need two instances of clamd for this?
On 30.03.09 14:40, aCaB wrote:
> Hi Matus,
> If you are using clamd for different purposes as well as for
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> What I've meant is, can it (instruct sendmail to) reject mail only viruses,
> not phishing nor unsafe pages, or do I need two instances of clamd for this?
Hi Matus,
If you are using clamd for different purposes as well as for serving the
milters and if you require d
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> You can then filter based on the virusname, if you want to treat
> >> phishing/safebrowsing-blacklisted entries as spam.
> >
> > Yes, that wil be important. Does clamav-milter support this for now?
On 24.03.09 15:46, aCaB wrote:
> clamav-milter has been nerfed
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> You can then filter based on the virusname, if you want to treat
>> phishing/safebrowsing-blacklisted entries as spam.
>
> Yes, that wil be important. Does clamav-milter support this for now?
Hi,
clamav-milter has been nerfed and it now relies on clamd.
All you h
> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +
> >> Ian Eiloart wrote:
> >>> That sounds good. What does it do, though?
> >>> My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files
> >>> containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then clamd will
> >>> block emails that contain those
On 2009-03-24 13:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +
>> Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>
>>> That sounds good. What does it do, though?
>>> My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files
>>> containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +
> Ian Eiloart wrote:
> > That sounds good. What does it do, though?
> > My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files
> > containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then clamd will
> > block emails that contain those URLs. Is that
Török Edwin wrote:
>
>
> On 2009-03-12 00:05, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Is such a list now available to explore for gotcha's that need to be
>> whitelisted?
>
> The list contains only hashes, so you can lookup URLs, but not browse them.
No thanks, then. That would be too full of surprised.
d
On 2009-03-12 10:41, Steve Basford wrote:
>> The safebrowsing.cvd will be distributed under Google's terms and
>> license. Therefore, before enabling SafeBrowsing in freshclam.conf
>> one should check that he's OK with that license. We'll provide all
>> necessary information and links to make it ea
> The safebrowsing.cvd will be distributed under Google's terms and
> license. Therefore, before enabling SafeBrowsing in freshclam.conf
> one should check that he's OK with that license. We'll provide all
> necessary information and links to make it easy to find out.
Hi,
Just a quick question:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:07:19PM +, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am pleased to let you know of a major new feature to be added to
> ClamAV. 0.95RC2 will be released next Monday, 16/3/09, which will
> include support for Google Safe Browsing.
Have you tried this with live servers? Can y
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:06:19 +0100
> Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>
>> * if I understood, freshclam will get the complete list of URLs from
>> Google. The computer running clamav/clamd/... will get this list from
>> clamav (as a signature) not from Google. Right ?
>
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:06:19 +0100
Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
> * if I understood, freshclam will get the complete list of URLs from
> Google. The computer running clamav/clamd/... will get this list from
> clamav (as a signature) not from Google. Right ?
That's right, freshclam will b
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
Hi Folk,
>
> I am pleased to let you know of a major new feature to be added to
> ClamAV. 0.95RC2 will be released next Monday, 16/3/09, which will
> include support for Google Safe Browsing.
Some questions :
* if I understood, freshclam will get the complete list
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:56:22 +
Ian Eiloart wrote:
> That sounds good. What does it do, though?
> My guess is that it enables freshclam to download copies of files
> containing URLs that Google considers "unsafe", and then clamd will
> block emails that contain those URLs. Is that right?
htt
--On 11 March 2009 17:07:19 + Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am pleased to let you know of a major new feature to be added to
> ClamAV. 0.95RC2 will be released next Monday, 16/3/09, which will
> include support for Google Safe Browsing.
That sounds good. What does it do, though?
My gu
Folks,
I am pleased to let you know of a major new feature to be added to
ClamAV. 0.95RC2 will be released next Monday, 16/3/09, which will
include support for Google Safe Browsing.
We wish to avoid a major new functionality such as this going into the
marketplace untested by adding it as a featu
20 matches
Mail list logo
