Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread Archie Cobbs
Brian Jones wrote: I'm not following Harmony too closely (so let me talk out my ... a moment) but let me see if I understand it so far. Harmony is: 1) Writing their own class libraries (based on email about japi comparisons) 2) Writing their own JVM (which I think is based in some part on on

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread David Gilbert
Brian Jones wrote: Harmony is: ... 3) Writing their own test suite (because Mauve doesn't use junit and has a different license, but I think that's going to be fixed) I think you are right that Apache are working on their own test suite. In Mauve, work is being done on JUnit integratio

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread Brian Jones
Okay, there is a solution that is rather expedient to fixing the classpath/classlib licensing problems. The FSF has within it's power the ability to relicense the software under new terms and conditions or could in fact dual license the software under both the current license and a suitable Ap

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread Archie Cobbs
Brian Jones wrote: So, given these things and my love for this project, I would really like the FSF to allow the developers to provide Classpath under an Apache compatible license in addition to the current licensing scheme, at least I would support that idea. However, I don't think we requir

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread Per Bothner
Brian Jones wrote: I don't really see the FSF backing down from the point of view that the users of free software should have the right to modify and release the software and Apache is unlikely to change either, as they have benefited enormously (in terms of brand at least) from letting anyone

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread David Daney
Archie Cobbs wrote: Brian Jones wrote: So, given these things and my love for this project, I would really like the FSF to allow the developers to provide Classpath under an Apache compatible license in addition to the current licensing scheme, at least I would support that idea. However,

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread Archie Cobbs
David Daney wrote: So, given these things and my love for this project, I would really like the FSF to allow the developers to provide Classpath under an Apache compatible license in addition to the current licensing scheme, at least I would support that idea. However, I don't think we requi

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-09 Thread Casey Marshall
On Mar 9, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote: David Daney wrote: So, given these things and my love for this project, I would really like the FSF to allow the developers to provide Classpath under an Apache compatible license in addition to the current licensing scheme, at least I woul

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-10 Thread Dalibor Topic
Casey Marshall gnu.org> writes: > So sure, the FSF could release Classpath under > the disjunction of the GPL and the ASL, if they saw it as fit to. > That would not be what the Apaches would want. Dual licensing is not acceptable for the ASF, as far as I have been told. The only way GNU Cla

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-10 Thread Per Bothner
Dalibor Topic wrote: The only way GNU Classpath would be acceptable for Apache Harmony, afaict from our dicussions in the past year, would be if the FSF contributed it to the ASF, and had the ASF manage the project, under the Apache license. Anything else is non-option for ASF, for a variety of r

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-10 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:20:02AM -0800, Per Bothner wrote: > Dalibor Topic wrote: > >The only way GNU Classpath would be acceptable for Apache Harmony, afaict > >from > >our dicussions in the past year, would be if the FSF contributed it to the > >ASF, > >and had the ASF manage the project, und

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-10 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 00:20 -0800, Per Bothner wrote: > Dalibor Topic wrote: > > The only way GNU Classpath would be acceptable for Apache Harmony, afaict > > from > > our dicussions in the past year, would be if the FSF contributed it to the > > ASF, > > and had the ASF manage the project, under

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-10 Thread Per Bothner
Dalibor Topic wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:20:02AM -0800, Per Bothner wrote: Harmony appears to be basically an attempt at a hostile takeover of the Free Java movement. They're all in favor of cooperation - as long as it is 100% on their terms. Complete surrender is all they will accept.

Re: Where's the love?

2006-03-10 Thread Brian Jones
Dalibor Topic wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:20:02AM -0800, Per Bothner wrote: Dalibor Topic wrote: The only way GNU Classpath would be acceptable for Apache Harmony, afaict from our dicussions in the past year, would be if the FSF contributed it to the ASF, and had the ASF manage