Hi,
Am 13.12.2010 um 23:52 schrieb Ken Wesson:
That's not what I meant. I figure all of us have tabs permanently open
to there (I have two actually). What we don't have is the whole thing
memorized, or the time to read it all rather than use it for reference […]
My solution to this problem
Hi,
Am 14.12.2010 um 04:25 schrieb Sunil S Nandihalli:
yeah cool I can do that.. thx. But I remember seeing a syntax for it in the
ns macro...
(ns name.space
(:refer-clojure :rename {+ core+}))
Please note that / is a special case symbol. Slashes are not allowed in
symbols, and I'm not
On 14 December 2010 09:22, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 um 23:52 schrieb Ken Wesson:
That's not what I meant. I figure all of us have tabs permanently open
to there (I have two actually). What we don't have is the whole thing
memorized, or the time to read it all
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:52 AM, James Reeves jree...@weavejester.com wrote:
On 14 December 2010 09:22, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 um 23:52 schrieb Ken Wesson:
That's not what I meant. I figure all of us have tabs permanently open
to there (I have two actually).
javajosh javaj...@gmail.com writes:
Ok, I decided to nuke ports, fink, and delete every package they ever
installed. I successfully installed emacs 23.2 via homebrew (there's a
good overview of homebrew here
http://ascarter.net/2010/02/22/homebrew-for-os-x.html).
I'm coming late to this
There has been much thought lately around build and release processes.
See http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Common+Contrib+Build
The goal is to to have more libraries under the umbrella of contrib
without requiring them to keep to the same release schedule. Each library
can have its own
Howdy,
I asked this on #clojure and posted a question on Stackoverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4424220/how-do-i-rebind-a-var-in-a-
lazytest-describe-test), but no dice. I'm assuming that it's because
this is so simple and I'm doing it so incorrectly that nobody can even
begin to
I am currently working on an MPI package for Clojure.
This crossed my mailbox and may be of interest to the
clojure community.
Tim Daly
~~
4th European Lisp Symposium
Special Focus on
Any reason why the doc string has been removed from clojure.xml/emit
(and emit-element)? Are these functions deprecated?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from
On Dec 14, 2010, at 18:00 , Ralph wrote:
Any reason why the doc string has been removed from clojure.xml/emit
(and emit-element)? Are these functions deprecated?
Well, they're buggy.
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/search?q=clojure.xml+emit
On issue 412 Stuart Halloway explains:
If
Not to sound like a one track record here, but you should look at
clojure.contrib.generic.arithemetic to see how to redefine /
have a great day,
--Robert McIntyre
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 14.12.2010 um 04:25 schrieb Sunil S Nandihalli:
Both `describe` and `it` create functions. That is, they expand out
to `(fn [] ...)`. Wrapping `binding` around the creation of a fn has
no effect.
For finer control over where the fn gets created and how failures get
reported, you can use `do-it` and `expect`.
(describe ...
(do-it ...
Hi,
Am 14.12.2010 um 19:04 schrieb Robert McIntyre:
Not to sound like a one track record here, but you should look at
clojure.contrib.generic.arithemetic to see how to redefine /
Which does not make / a legal symbol. Slashes are not allowed in Symbols and
the future of this code is not
On Dec 14, 2:31 am, Konrad Hinsen konrad.hin...@fastmail.net wrote:
That's actually what clojure.contrib.complex-numbers already uses! And
it's based on multimethods, not protocols, because of all those binary
operations.
It is possible, though not trivial, to do 2-argument dispatch with
I wouldn't worry too much about your reputation. Your posts are top
notch, and you obviously know the language better than 90% of most
clojure users. Have confidence and laugh if you think someone is
disparaging: actions speak far louder than words.
On Dec 14, 4:42 am, Ken Wesson
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:23 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't worry too much about your reputation. Your posts are top
notch, and you obviously know the language better than 90% of most
clojure users.
Thank you.
Have confidence and laugh if you think someone is
disparaging:
Hi all,
My apologies for resurrecting a dead thread of discussion if this has
already been put to bed, but I was wondering if anyone has been working
on implementing a bit syntax for Clojure in the rough conceptual style
of Erlang's bit syntax.
I say conceptual because I'm not necessarily
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Stuart Sierra
the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
There has been much thought lately around build and release processes.
See http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Common+Contrib+Build
Thanx.
The goal is to to have more libraries under the umbrella of contrib
For now, you can just look at the repository
at http://build.clojure.org/releases/org/clojure/
Once we get automated releases from Hudson/Maven (real soon now) the JARs
will be deployed to the Maven Central repository, where they will be
automatically indexed by search engines like
(defn fact [n] (reduce * (range 1 (inc n
(fact 100)
This produces the right result on 1.2 but ArithmeticException integer
overflow on 1.3-alpha4.
Is this intentional?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send
On Dec 14, 6:30 pm, Miki miki.teb...@gmail.com wrote:
(defn fact [n] (reduce * (range 1 (inc n
(fact 100)
This produces the right result on 1.2 but ArithmeticException integer
overflow on 1.3-alpha4.
Is this intentional?
Primitive math is the default in 1.3
--
You received this message
Hi guys,
I love to listen to mp3's that I've downloaded, on my way to work. I think
it would be great to compile a list of links to Clojure-based mp3's. I love
InfoQ, but not all of the videos are downloadable.
Here are my first two:
Stuart Halloway on Clojure and Functional Programming
As Brian said, primitive math is now the default in 1.3. If auto-
promotion on overflow is desired, you can use the +', -', *', inc',
dec' functions (note the single quote suffix).
http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Enhanced+Primitive+Support
On Dec 14, 5:36 pm, Brian Goslinga
Of course, TANSTAAFL: the auto-promoting version of the functions will
be slower than their primitive counterparts.
On Dec 14, 6:23 pm, Benny Tsai benny.t...@gmail.com wrote:
As Brian said, primitive math is now the default in 1.3. If auto-
promotion on overflow is desired, you can use the +',
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Benny Tsai benny.t...@gmail.com wrote:
As Brian said, primitive math is now the default in 1.3. If auto-
promotion on overflow is desired, you can use the +', -', *', inc',
dec' functions (note the single quote suffix).
Why was this done? I preferred having +,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Benny Tsai benny.t...@gmail.com wrote:
As Brian said, primitive math is now the default in 1.3. If auto-
promotion on overflow is desired, you can use the +', -', *', inc',
dec'
On Dec 14, 8:04 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Benny Tsai benny.t...@gmail.com wrote:
As Brian said, primitive math is now the default in 1.3. If auto-
promotion on overflow is desired, you can use the +', -', *', inc',
dec' functions (note the
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:56 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Benny Tsai benny.t...@gmail.com wrote:
As Brian said, primitive math is now the default in 1.3. If auto-
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Brian Goslinga
quickbasicg...@gmail.com wrote:
This topic has been discussed to death before on this group.
If so, it was before I joined.
Doing the right thing is actually harder than you might first think
But it's also already being done by Clojure 1.2 so I
On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:26 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Brian Goslinga
quickbasicg...@gmail.com wrote:
This topic has been discussed to death before on this group.
If so, it was before I joined.
That's what archives are for:
Just ran across:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html
Whoah! I had no idea there was so much, uh, 'intricacy' going on
behind Lisp. :)
Anyway, it was interesting to read it having a bit of Clojure under my
belt. With the exception of types, it seems like
On Dec 14, 9:24 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
Breaking source compatibility with just about every single preexisting
line of Clojure code out there is supposed to make our lives *easier*?
Actually, it appears that the majority of the lines of code out there
use integers that fit
javajosh javaj...@gmail.com writes:
Just ran across:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html
Whoah! I had no idea there was so much, uh, 'intricacy' going on
behind Lisp. :)
Anyway, it was interesting to read it having a bit of Clojure under my
belt.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Benny Tsai benny.t...@gmail.com wrote:
As Brian said, primitive math is now the default in 1.3. If auto-
promotion on overflow is desired, you can use the +', -', *', inc',
dec'
Steve is trolling with that Lisp post.
There is so much noise in what he says,
there is no point beginning to reply.
And all of it would be off-topic.
Ignore it.
Tim Daly
On 12/14/2010 11:23 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
javajoshjavaj...@gmail.com writes:
Just ran across:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Brian Goslinga quickbasicg...@gmail.comwrote:
(Since java.lang.BigInteger is
slow on small numbers, clojure.lang.BigInt is also being introduced
(which is the type of 1N) that should be as fast as math was in 1.2
when the numbers fit into a long)
AFAIK,
The functions get-in, assoc-in, update-in are really useful. Just
wanted to share a thoughts.
user= (def m {:a {:b {:c 10 :c1 20} :b1 90} :a1 100})
#'user/m
1. Lets see the behavior of these functions in the corner case of
empty keyseq:
user= (get-in m [])
{:a {:b {:c 10, :c1 20}, :b1 90}, :a1
I'm using IntelliJ Idea 10 with the La Closure plugin version 0.3.15
and Java 6 I've added Clojure 1.2 to a project.
The breakpoints I put on Java code get hit, but the ones I put on
Clojure do not. in fact, if the debugger is stopped on a Java
breakpoint, the breakpoints on Clojure code have
One thing I've argued for in the past, but got no traction:
We have:
get-in, get
assoc-in, assoc
update-in, ?
Let's add update to go with update-in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I've argued for in the past, but got no traction:
We have:
get-in, get
assoc-in, assoc
update-in, ?
Let's add update to go with update-in.
Let's give them absolutely no excuse like we don't have time
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Michael Gardner gardne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:26 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Brian Goslinga
quickbasicg...@gmail.com wrote:
This topic has been discussed to death before on this group.
If so, it was before I
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Brian Goslinga
quickbasicg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 9:24 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
Breaking source compatibility with just about every single preexisting
line of Clojure code out there is supposed to make our lives *easier*?
Actually, it
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you honestly suggesting I search the archives for every word of
every thought that it ever occurs to me to post here?
With all due respect, the topic has already been bike shedded into the
ground by many members in
My main question is, what tasks/apps is clojure ideally suited for?
I've been playing with implementing Binary Search Trees in clojure and
Java as a way to learn clojure and compare the two languages. My
original thought was to implement some basic data types and algorithms
in a handful of
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:38 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you honestly suggesting I search the archives for every word of
every thought that it ever occurs to me to post here?
With all due respect,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Todd t.greenwoodg...@gmail.com wrote:
My main question is, what tasks/apps is clojure ideally suited for?
I've been playing with implementing Binary Search Trees in clojure and Java
as a way to learn clojure and compare the two languages. My original thought
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:38 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you honestly suggesting I search the archives for every word of
On Dec 14, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Michael Gardner gardne...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what archives are for
Are you honestly suggesting I search the archives for every word of
every thought that it ever occurs to me to post here?
I don't have
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
Coding an imperative, mutable BST in Clojure isn't going to be its strong
suit.
Maybe you didn't do this though. I didn't read your code carefully. I just
saw the delete in your protocol and assumed it was
you may want to also post this on the jetbrains la clojure forum
http://devnet.jetbrains.net/community/idea/clojure?view=discussions
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:00 AM, HiHeelHottie hiheelhot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using IntelliJ Idea 10 with the La Closure plugin version 0.3.15
and Java 6
On Dec 14, 8:52 pm, ka sancha...@gmail.com wrote:
user= (get-in m [])
{:a {:b {:c 10, :c1 20}, :b1 90}, :a1 100}
This seems strange to me. I would expect Clojure to return nil, as
there is no key in there that is nil. Assuming that an empty vector is
the same as asking for a nil key, that is.
On Dec 15, 6:12 am, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I've argued for in the past, but got no traction:
We have:
get-in, get
assoc-in, assoc
update-in, ?
Let's add update to go with update-in.
update should really be in there. I always try to write update then i
Lisp is Not an Acceptable Lisp
Friday, April 14, 2006
Clojure wasn't out then.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
53 matches
Mail list logo
