Here is my script for updating clojure
on Mac/Linux - update-clojure.sh or
on Windows (uses cygwin git) - update-clojure.bat
git clone git://github.com/richhickey/clojure.git
cd clojure
git pull
ant clean
ant
cd ..
git clone git://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib.git
cd clojure-contrib
Great question! I've been wondering the same, and I've found great
answers here.
But here is how I was able to get some of the assembly (in normal JVM,
not debug), but for small portions of code - for example this is how I
was able to see the point-in-poly algorithm.
Basically I put a tight
I have now the same problem, but under Mac OS X 10.5
Things used to work few days ago (if not yesterday)
On May 18, 7:32 am, klang karstenl...@gmail.com wrote:
First things first:
swank doesn't load and slime can't connect to the *inferior-lisp*
running clojure
I am missing something
-
Duser.dir=/Users/malkia/p/))
'(swank-clojure-java-path /System/Library/Frameworks/
JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/Home/bin/java))
It works :)
On May 19, 9:38 pm, Dimiter \malkia\ Stanev mal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have now the same problem, but under Mac OS X 10.5
Things used to work few
This is the best I was able to come up with in Clojure:
(defn byte-array-contains? [coll key]
scans a byte array for a given value
(let [c (int (count coll))
k (byte key)]
(loop [i (int 0)]
(if ( i c)
(if (= k (aget coll i))
true
(recur
Unless you provide some kind of isolated source code that reproduces
the problem, I don't think it is going to be easy to help you out.
But try adding (doall ..) to some your map calls and others.
Even better, look at this excellent explanation why this might be
happening by Cristophe Grand:
Or maybe just:
(defn mo [op args] (reduce op args))
I believe that won't make clojure make a faster code, but I might be
wrong.
I think the macroexpansion is the right thing if you want speed, as it
seems clojure could optimize well this:
(+ a b)
while it can't optimize this well
(+ a b c)
Thanks,
Dimiter malkia Stanev
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr
You can make your own macro to do that:
(defmacro mo [op args]
(reduce (fn [a# b#] (cons op [a# b#])) args))
(mo + 1 2 3 4)
(print expanded= (macroexpand '(mo + 1 2 3 4)) \n)
;expanded= (+ (+ (+ 1 2) 3) 4)
On Apr 23, 5:57 pm, Kevin Van Horn kvanh...@ksvanhorn.com wrote:
I'm writing an
Here's even more concise version:
(defmacro mo [op args]
(reduce (fn [ ab#] (cons op ab#)) args))
On Apr 23, 9:23 pm, Dimiter \malkia\ Stanev mal...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can make your own macro to do that:
(defmacro mo [op args]
(reduce (fn [a# b#] (cons op [a# b#])) args))
(mo + 1
I might be wrong,
but shouldn't you compile the .c file to .o with -fpic, and then
link with ld with -shared?
maybe just adding -fpic to:
gcc -fpic -shared ${JNI_CFLAGS} swig_test_wrap.c -o libswig_test.so
might do it.
On Apr 22, 6:41 am, Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo
antonio.fa...@gmail.com
I think this might come from Common Lisp (or Scheme, not sure).
In anycase CL also has unless which is exactly the opposite of
when - e.g. it would do the else part of if.
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_when_.htm
Basically some of the Common Lispers are saying that
msecs
((0.5 50.5))
user (time (main 1000))
; Evaluation aborted. ;; Actually not stack overflow, but HEAP
overflow (it took a while though)
user
Thanks,
Dimiter malkia Stanev.
On Apr 20, 10:01 pm, jleehurt jleeh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Those two are not recursive, but they call
inputs outputs)))
---
On Apr 21, 12:58 am, jleehurt jleeh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dimiter,
Thank you! I'm still a bit confused as to why this was happening. Does
lazy evaluation not work well with recursion?
On Apr 20, 11:06 pm, Dimiter \malkia\ Stanev mal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
I'm asking here question not directly related to Clojure, but related
to the JVM:
Is there any alternative (ClassLoader?) to store the .class files in a
different compressed format?.NET can store lots of classes in one
assembly? Is there something like that for JVM?
For example right now
Yes, that's a very good point. For example with in Common Lisp is
used also when dealing with external resources (with-open-file, etc.).
And also the point about other with- usages.
On Mar 7, 10:31 am, Dan redalas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:51 PM, rzeze...@gmail.com
Hi guys, anyone has an insight into the problem I'm running into?
On Mar 4, 2:27 am, Dimiter \malkia\ Stanev mal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
In the example below, if map is replaced with pmap, it goes twice
slower on my MBP (2 CPUs).
I believe it's probably the (reduce + ...) causing
Clojure is not good for:
- Real time application development, due to the JVM being soft-real
time. For example it can't be used for high-performance video pc/
console games, but it could be used for lots of turn-based games. Then
again anything done with XNA on the XBOX could be done with
to the client of your library.
Are you using the latest build? pmap now uses Java futures and they run in
a cached thread pool. If so, try running the algorithm a few times and see
if it speeds up as the thread pool winds up.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Dimiter malkia Stanev mal
I've just started using doto, after seeing the celsius example on the
Clojure page, but It brought back memories from Pascal days -
http://csci.csusb.edu/dick/samples/pascal.syntax.html#with_statement
It's probably nothing, but to me (with x (.Function1) (.Function2))
seems more readable than
npol xp yp -0.5 -2.5)))
(range 0 100)
Thanks,
Dimiter malkia Stanev
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure
And this is by using java -server, not java -client, right?
On Feb 23, 2:46 pm, Raffael Cavallaro raffaelcavall...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 23, 2:51 pm, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
The fibs implementation in clojure.contrib.lazy-seqs is not a function
that returns fib(n)
Hi guys,
I've just updated to the latest (1289) version of clojure, and swank-
clojure (slime) doesn't work anymore
Here is what I'm getting from emacs:
(add-classpath file:Users/malkia/p/swank-clojure/)
(require 'swank.swank)
(swank.swank/ignore-protocol-version 2009-02-14)
with it.
For example the same example in Python, Ruby or Perl runs at least for
200s (same with CLISP, haven't tried ECL or GCL).
Thanks,
Dimiter malkia Stanev.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post
On Feb 13, 5:35 am, Vincent Foley vfo...@gmail.com wrote:
Dimiter,
The latest revision of Clojure is r1278; are you using the Google code
trunk?
Vincent
Thanks, Vincent! I kept wondering why I don't see any more versions, I
was till on the sourceforge one.
25 matches
Mail list logo
