With clojure-in-clojure on the horizon (if not around the corner) I wonder if
an imports clause would be appropriate, and solve some of the complexities
of discerning between clojure and java/clr/javascript/objectivec/(go?)
(ns foo
(uses clojure.contrib.repl-utils)
(imports java.util [List
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:24 PM, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
One question: how would Java class imports be dealt with? I think it should
be unified:
(ns foo
(uses java.io :only [File FileInputStream] :as io))
I think this is a bad idea. Java (or other host) classes are not
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:24 PM, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
One question: how would Java class imports be dealt with? I think it
should
be unified:
(ns foo
(uses java.io :only [File FileInputStream] :as
YES please. If I could upvote this message I would.
A half-a-dozen of examples on ns/in-ns and require/use/refer and the
differences in using them at the prompt or inside a ns would be
fantastic.
The ns macro is one of the obscure corners of clojure. It relates to
the java class path problem,
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Albert Cardona sapri...@gmail.com wrote:
YES please. If I could upvote this message I would.
A half-a-dozen of examples on ns/in-ns and require/use/refer and the
differences in using them at the prompt or inside a ns would be
fantastic.
Some more ns
On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:08 PM, John Harrop wrote:
(ns foo.bar.baz
(:use [clojure.contrib.core :only (seqable?)]))
(and thus violates the usual clojure rule of using vectors rather
than lists for groupings that are not invocations -- that is,
function calls, macro calls, or special form
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.comwrote:
Before:
(:refer-clojure :exclude [read])
(:require (clojure.contrib [graph :as graph] [fcase :as fcase])
[clojure.contrib.stream-utils :as su])
(:use [clojure.contrib def except server-socket]
(:uses [clojure.core :exclude [read])
[clojure.contrib.graph]
[clojure.contrib.fcase]
[clojure.contrib.stream-utils :as su]
[clojure.contrib.def :refer-all true]
[clojure.contrib.except :refer-all true]
[clojure.contrib.server-socket
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
Here are some of the ideas I've liked best for how to do it.
Thanks for pulling this together. I like the whole direction
you're going here.
- require that each libspec (reference to a lib) be a vector, disallowing
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
Here are some of the ideas I've liked best for how to do it.
I like where this is heading.
- don't refer any names from the target namespace into the current
namespace by default
YES!
- support :only [],
2009/11/11 Andrew Boekhoff boekho...@gmail.com:
(:uses [clojure.core :exclude [read])
[clojure.contrib.graph]
[clojure.contrib.fcase]
[clojure.contrib.stream-utils :as su]
[clojure.contrib.def :refer-all true]
[clojure.contrib.except :refer-all
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/11/11 Andrew Boekhoff boekho...@gmail.com:
(:uses [clojure.core :exclude [read])
[clojure.contrib.graph]
[clojure.contrib.fcase]
[clojure.contrib.stream-utils :as su]
I like almost all of this a lot. My only disagreement is on prefix
lists ... I wouldn't want to lose them, and in fact would prefer to
see them extended to recursive prefix lists (trees).
-Jason
On Nov 11, 10:12 am, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.com wrote:
On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:08 PM, John
So I have
(ns foo.bar.baz)
and I want to grab clojure.contrib.core/seqable?
What do I do?
(ns foo.bar.baz
(use clojure.contrib.core :only seqable?))
#CompilerException java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Don't know how to
create ISeq from: Boolean (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)
(ns foo.bar.baz
(use
(ns foo.bar.baz
(:use [clojure.contrib.core :only (seqable?)]))
(and thus violates the usual clojure rule of using vectors rather
than lists for groupings that are not invocations -- that is,
function calls, macro calls, or special form calls).
It works fine with a vector.
user= (ns
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Richard Newman holyg...@gmail.com wrote:
(ns foo.bar.baz
(:use [clojure.contrib.core :only (seqable?)]))
(and thus violates the usual clojure rule of using vectors rather
than lists for groupings that are not invocations -- that is,
function calls,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:08:31PM -0500, John Harrop wrote:
In case anyone was wondering, apparently it wants
(ns foo.bar.baz
(:use [clojure.contrib.core :only (seqable?)]))
(and thus violates the usual clojure rule of using vectors rather than lists
for groupings that are not invocations --
17 matches
Mail list logo
