Jeff Weiss jeffrey.m.we...@gmail.com writes:
From browsing git, it looks like the project.clj version hasn't been
incremented in 7 months, and the fix for closures came in after that.
If you're using serializable.fn from a maven repo, it is out of
date, AFAICT.
Sorry about that; just pushed
On 31 Mar 2012, at 00:00, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
That opens a giant can of worms. How, for example, do we discover that
(partial * 2) and #(* % 2) and (fn [x] (* 2
I believe the latest code does capture closures properly. I haven't tested
all kinds of crazy corner cases, but it does work for all my closures.
From browsing git, it looks like the project.clj version hasn't been
incremented in 7 months, and the fix for closures came in after that. If
Another idea is to put :indentation metadata on vars, so user-defined
macros could be indented properly. Currently I have (define-clojure-indent
...) with a number of forms in my emacs config file, and it seems to be
pretty common solution. It'd be nice to replace this hack with an
Vinzent ru.vinz...@gmail.com writes:
Phil, what do you think? Could it be experimentally implemented in
clojure-mode?
No, clojure-mode determines indentation exclusively from static
heuristics. There is dynamic indentation support in slime, but I've
never looked into it; I'm not sure how I
Hi,
I wanted to serialise functions and send them over the network. The problem
with serializable-fn is that it doesn't capture closures.
I wrote some code which re-programmed the fn macro to capture the closures as
well as the actual function form, and attach them as meta-data also on the
Nathan Matthews nathan.r.matth...@gmail.com writes:
I wanted to serialise functions and send them over the network. The
problem with serializable-fn is that it doesn't capture closures.
It's designed to capture closures; if it doesn't that would be an
(unsurprising) bug.
-Phil
--
You
I'm not sure how I feel about indentation rules
changing depending on whether slime is active or not.
What I was thinking, is that there'd be some function which would collect
and save indentation metadata, so it can be used later. Thus, active slime
connection required only the first time
Nathan Matthews nathan.r.matth...@gmail.com writes:
I wrote some code which re-programmed the fn macro to capture the
closures as well as the actual function form, and attach them as
meta-data also on the actual function object.
Could you submit it as a patch to serializable-fn? It would be
Vinzent ru.vinz...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure how I feel about indentation rules
changing depending on whether slime is active or not.
What I was thinking, is that there'd be some function which would
collect and save indentation metadata, so it can be used later. Thus,
active
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Vinzent ru.vinz...@gmail.com wrote:
Another idea is to put :indentation metadata on vars, so user-defined macros
could be indented properly. Currently I have (define-clojure-indent ...)
with a number of forms in my emacs config file, and it seems to be pretty
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Matthews
nathan.r.matth...@gmail.com wrote:
Also it bothers me that
(= (partial * 2) (partial * 2))
is false. Logically it shouldn't be right? If we captured the function
forms, that would enable better equality for functions.
That opens a giant can
Probably you slightly misunderstood what I mean. Consider this scenario:
I've set up a project which uses a new library with non-standart indent.
I've connected to swank and compiled it. Then I'm calling some
clojure-mode-update-indent function, which walks through all loaded
namespaces and
Counter-example: one could write if-authenticated macro, which will take
fixed number of args, but should be indented as normal if.
суббота, 31 марта 2012 г. 3:07:23 UTC+6 пользователь Cedric Greevey написал:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Vinzent ru.vinz...@gmail.com wrote:
Another idea
Vinzent ru.vinz...@gmail.com writes:
Probably you slightly misunderstood what I mean. Consider this
scenario:
I've set up a project which uses a new library with non-standart
indent. I've connected to swank and compiled it. Then I'm calling
some clojure-mode-update-indent function, which
On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
That opens a giant can of worms. How, for example, do we discover that
(partial * 2) and #(* % 2) and (fn [x] (* 2 x)) and #(+ %1 %1) are all
equal? Nevermind once we get into situations like #(reduce + (map
(constantly 1) %) equals #(loop
2012/3/30 Vinzent ru.vinz...@gmail.com:
Counter-example: one could write if-authenticated macro, which will take
fixed number of args, but should be indented as normal if.
OK, check the macro structure to see if any args are incorporated as
invokable forms -- so, in arguments in special forms
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Lee Spector lspec...@hampshire.edu wrote:
On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
That opens a giant can of worms. How, for example, do we discover that
(partial * 2) and #(* % 2) and (fn [x] (* 2 x)) and #(+ %1 %1) are all
equal? Nevermind once we
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Petr Gladkikh petrg...@gmail.com wrote:
I am pondering on the idea of having more (or even a lot) of metadata
that could be useful for debugging and problem resolution.
Since we can store anything in metadata, can we store not only source
file path and line
19 matches
Mail list logo
