Here's one approach: Make a github of the code and content that runs the
site. People fork and make pull requests.
You talked me into it.
https://github.com/fogus/www-readevalprintlove-org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
lol, That is really awesome!
I'm going to have to really read through the sources now.
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 3:28:41 PM UTC-4, Fogus wrote:
Here's one approach: Make a github of the code and content that runs the
site. People fork and make pull requests.
You talked me into it.
I loved Mathematica's documentation that had lovingly maintained
by... in the sidebar or something to that effect. It was really
apparent that the maintainer did lovingly maintain it. Can't seem to
find it at the moment though.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Brent Millare brent.mill...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Michael Fogus mefo...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's one approach: Make a github of the code and content that runs the
site. People fork and make pull requests.
You talked me into it.
https://github.com/fogus/www-readevalprintlove-org
Awesome! So beautiful! I
Thanks guys! (And also to the other announcement.)
On Oct 4, 2:07 pm, Mayank Jain firesof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Michael Fogus mefo...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's one approach: Make a github of the code and content that runs the
site. People fork and make pull
The general feeling seems to be that there is good content out there, but
it would be nice if it were on Clojure.org, especially from the perspective
of new users and promoting the language.
The copyright on the site is to Rich Hickey, and the logo and site design
are credited to Tom Hickey.
You guys are over-thinking it. Set up a new site, get users, tweak it,
perfect it, it will become the defacto site, and you will make it
really easy for Rich et al to make the switch :). It may take loads of
hard and unappreciated labor though :(. That is why it has to be a
labor of love.
On Wed,
On Oct 3, 8:42 pm, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
Set up a new site, get users, tweak it,
perfect it, it will become the defacto site, and you will make it
really easy for Rich et al to make the switch :). It may take loads of
hard and unappreciated labor though :(. That is why it has
What's the best way to allow collaborative contribution on content that
must be agreed upon?
Here's one approach: Make a github of the code and content that runs the
site. People fork and make pull requests.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
I put together the Getting Started confluence page. I'm sure it could
still be improved, but adding further to it won't really fix the
problems you've noticed, and that many other people have noted. It's
still on a secondary site, and Confluence doesn't really give you a
lot of design
To cite some concrete examples:
Datomic
0 hits on Clojure.org
Clojurescript
1 hit
On Oct 1, 11:09 pm, nchurch nchubr...@gmail.com wrote:
I put together the Getting Started confluence page. I'm sure it could
still be improved, but adding further to it won't really fix the
problems you've
I should clarify that the issue with Clojure.org isn't really \design,
per seit's the choice of what to present on what level. Scala
gives you pointers for what you need to know, right away at the top:
About Scala, Documentation, Code Examples, Software, Scala
Developers. Whereas Clojure has
You can make your site with many examples and good documentation and maybe
it will be at first place at google if it will have great value.
A lot of people here will agree with that. Site could be better place to
get started ! but old site still there.
As far as i know there is a company
Clojuredocs is already out there and quite good (though not modified
much as of late). However, it doesn't show up very high on Google
(not even on the first page for Clojure). There's also Learn
Clojure, which has a clean design but hasn't been updated in a while
(and also doesn't seem to have
I decided to quickly compare the website experience of starting Clojure and
starting Scala.
I do a Google search for Clojure
I decide to try the first link, Clojure.org
There's some basic information. I follow the somewhat obscure link halfway
down the side, Getting Started
Ok, that looks
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:13 PM, aboy021 arthur.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
The getting started issue is an ongoing problem for Clojure. It's an issue
that keeps coming up in the surveys and on the mailing list. Other languages
are doing it really well, Scala is just a convenient example. What does
Probably they wouldn't, but that's not the point.
The clojure community is doing something wrong for providing a coherent
beginner experience.
Maybe we aren't good at encouraging people to contribute documentation.
Or the composability of Clojure leads to small library islands without
much
Sounds like the main beef is with the official website's styling and
layout. I agree its not necessarily the prettiest but all the information
is there. On the other hand, there are plenty of great resources that
provide a great getting started experience in my opinion. Just typing
clojure in
18 matches
Mail list logo
