[cmake-developers] [CMake 0015217]: CPack make wrong dependencies between components

2014-10-24 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15217 == Reported By:sudakov_ivan Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Brad King
On 10/23/2014 10:34 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: implies the build isn't getting the include directories plumbed through properly. I reproduced it locally far enough to find that kcoreaddons is not installing headers like include/KF5/KCoreAddons/kpluginfactory.h when built with 3.1 but is with 3.0.

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Brad King
On 10/24/2014 09:50 AM, Brad King wrote: With 3.0 we see the list of headers accumulate. With 3.1 just the first one works and the rest do not. I bisected it down to: commit 5abfde6cb8a1ae0b2825797eab6c2e9842eb7c49 Author: Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.com Date: Wed Mar 12 14:01:45 2014

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Brad King
On 10/24/2014 10:02 AM, Brad King wrote: I bisected it down to: commit 5abfde6cb8a1ae0b2825797eab6c2e9842eb7c49 Author: Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.com Date: Wed Mar 12 14:01:45 2014 -0400 cmDefinitions: Don't store parent lookups When looking up scopes, it is faster to

[cmake-developers] [bcooks...@kde.org: Re: Fwd: Re: Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch]

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
[ Forward from Ben Cooksley. ] - Forwarded message from Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org - Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:55:23 +1300 From: Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org To: ben.boec...@kitware.com Cc: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com, cmake-developers@cmake.org

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Alex Merry
On Friday 24 October 2014 10:02:31 Brad King wrote: On 10/24/2014 09:50 AM, Brad King wrote: With 3.0 we see the list of headers accumulate. With 3.1 just the first one works and the rest do not. I bisected it down to: commit 5abfde6cb8a1ae0b2825797eab6c2e9842eb7c49 Author: Ben

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Alex Merry
On Friday 24 October 2014 10:20:42 Brad King wrote: On 10/24/2014 10:02 AM, Brad King wrote: I bisected it down to: commit 5abfde6cb8a1ae0b2825797eab6c2e9842eb7c49 Author: Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.com Date: Wed Mar 12 14:01:45 2014 -0400 cmDefinitions: Don't store

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 15:24:57 +0100, Alex Merry wrote: On Friday 24 October 2014 10:20:42 Brad King wrote: On 10/24/2014 10:02 AM, Brad King wrote: commit 5abfde6cb8a1ae0b2825797eab6c2e9842eb7c49 Author: Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.com Date: Wed Mar 12 14:01:45 2014 -0400

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:54:17 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 15:24:57 +0100, Alex Merry wrote: On Friday 24 October 2014 10:20:42 Brad King wrote: On 10/24/2014 10:02 AM, Brad King wrote: commit 5abfde6cb8a1ae0b2825797eab6c2e9842eb7c49 Author: Ben Boeckel

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:36:40 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: So after discussion with Brad, this commit breaks other subtle behaviors as well, so the plan is to just revert it instead and defer its optimizations until after 3.1 once proper tests are in place (more under development now). There

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] Preinstall requirements support for CPack RPM generator

2014-10-24 Thread Evgeny Kalishenko
Documentation added, authorship fixed, a couple of commits squashed. 2014-10-21 16:50 GMT+04:00 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com: On 10/20/2014 12:53 PM, Evgeny Kalishenko wrote: The final patch version with erroneous spelling fixes. Thanks. Please configure your git 'user.name' so that

Re: [cmake-developers] Severe behavioural change regressions in release branch

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:50:12 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Is build.kde.org now using the release branch of cmake.git instead of the next branch? When/why did that change? This was changed around about

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0015218]: Option to forward signals to running test subprocesses

2014-10-24 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15218 == Reported By:Zach Mullen Assigned To:

Re: [CMake] Fwd: Error in compiling OKULAR using CMAKE

2014-10-24 Thread lfdominguez
On Friday 24 October 2014 11:49:55 AM Sahil Sehgal wrote: Hello, I was trying to build Okular (KDE application) in IDE (QT-creator and Kdevelop both). I did the following steps: 1.) clonned the source code of Okular 2.) loaded the source code in IDE 3.) click on the build command.

Re: [CMake] The new cmake.org web site

2014-10-24 Thread Robert Maynard
Thanks for finding the broken link, I have correct the url and everything should be working now. On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:23 PM, David Cole via CMake cmake@cmake.org wrote: The new CMake web site looks fantastic! Even on my phone... Kudos to everybody involved in making it look pretty after

[CMake] OS X Fortran flags

2014-10-24 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi, I am building some Fortran sources and on Mac I want to make the resulting executable portable back to 10.7. So I have: if (APPLE) set (CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -stdlib=libc++) set (CMAKE_OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET 10.7) # Earliest version we can support with C++11 libc++

Re: [CMake] OS X Fortran flags

2014-10-24 Thread Bill Somerville
A small correction: On 24/10/2014 16:31, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi, I am building some Fortran sources and on Mac I want to make the resulting executable portable back to 10.7. So I have: if (APPLE) set (CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -stdlib=libc++) set

Re: [CMake] CMake, Xcode, and Intel Fortran? (digitalriptide)

2014-10-24 Thread Zaak Beekman
Please suggest the possible solution Regards Sahil Sehgal -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20141024/e8173598/attachment.html -- next part -- A non-text attachment

Re: [CMake] OS X Fortran flags (Bill Somerville)

2014-10-24 Thread Zaak Beekman
the possible solution Regards Sahil Sehgal -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20141024/b62f04c8/attachment-0001.html -- next part -- A non-text attachment

Re: [CMake] OS X Fortran flags (Bill Somerville)

2014-10-24 Thread Bill Somerville
On 24/10/2014 18:39, Zaak Beekman wrote: Hi Bill, Hi Zaak, thanks for the detailed suggestions, more comments in line below. I feel your pain. I suspect a CMake bug is hidden away somewhere causing this behavior, and have struggled with this quite a lot. I think you are correct. I *think*

Re: [CMake] OS X Fortran flags

2014-10-24 Thread Brad King
On 10/24/2014 11:31 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: So what am I missing? A brief scan of the CMake sources looks like it should be doing this right for GNU compilers as the compiler tests should check for those options being supported and supply them. It looks like a couple of lines are missing

Re: [CMake] OS X Fortran flags

2014-10-24 Thread Bill Somerville
On 24/10/2014 19:11, Brad King wrote: HI Brad, On 10/24/2014 11:31 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: So what am I missing? A brief scan of the CMake sources looks like it should be doing this right for GNU compilers as the compiler tests should check for those options being supported and supply them.

Re: [CMake] OS X Fortran flags

2014-10-24 Thread Brad King
On 10/24/2014 02:15 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Can I just put the patched module in my project Modules directory or do I have to build the whole CMake project? No need to recompile. You can just add the two lines directly in your Modules directory. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com

[CMake] CMake unit tests and the enable_testing() macro

2014-10-24 Thread
I'm test-driving CMake for a new project I've just started and I'm currently trying to set up a unit test framework. The project is a dynamic library written in C++, the unit tests are based on Boost test, and the project tree is organized essentially as follows: . ├── CMakeLists.txt ├──

Re: [CMake] CMake unit tests and the enable_testing() macro

2014-10-24 Thread Nils Gladitz
On 24.10.2014 20:28, Zé wrote: I'm test-driving CMake for a new project I've just started and I'm currently trying to set up a unit test framework. The project is a dynamic library written in C++, the unit tests are based on Boost test, and the project tree is organized essentially as

Re: [CMake] Is this the proper way to define a package config?

2014-10-24 Thread Robert Maynard
As far as I am aware the Boost find module doesn't support writing out import targets. As far as setting up interface libraries for imported tagets you want to use the IMPORTED_LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES and IMPORTED_LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES_CONFIG properties. Here is an example:

Re: [CMake] OS X Fortran flags

2014-10-24 Thread Bill Somerville
On 24/10/2014 19:16, Brad King wrote: Hi Brad, On 10/24/2014 02:15 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Can I just put the patched module in my project Modules directory or do I have to build the whole CMake project? No need to recompile. You can just add the two lines directly in your Modules

Re: [CMake] Fwd: Error in compiling OKULAR using CMAKE

2014-10-24 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday, October 24, 2014 11:49:55 Sahil Sehgal wrote: Hello, I was trying to build Okular (KDE application) in IDE (QT-creator and Kdevelop both). I did the following steps: 1.) clonned the source code of Okular 2.) loaded the source code in IDE 3.) click on the build command. I got

[CMake] Qt5 + cmake 3.0

2014-10-24 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
So I may be taking on too much.. but I am migrating to Qt5 and Cmake 3.0 on my project (from Qt4.8 and CMake 2.8) I have minimized the project to a simple testcase that will represent the problem, and it still exists. My project, has multiple executables and multiple libraries for each exec.

Re: [CMake] Is this the proper way to define a package config?

2014-10-24 Thread Robert Dailey
What is the Filters target here? How is it created? Would I just create a target called Boost and configure it as needed? On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Robert Maynard robert.mayn...@kitware.com wrote: As far as I am aware the Boost find module doesn't support writing out import targets. As

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.0.2-2183-ge5cde94

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via e5cde94df65918cf4d51ef7b8747732a02a3bdaf (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.0.2-2185-gab5e5a6

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via ab5e5a6292dbf461c3e53f57fe76bf0932dc50b1 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.0.2-2191-ge3db575

2014-10-24 Thread Ben Boeckel
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via e3db575e2e29789127fa40b2a7690aabd873a0b4 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.0.2-2194-gaac38f8

2014-10-24 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via aac38f88d4016191dbddc65a4ad5d1bb3fd8c9dd (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.0.2-2196-g33a603a

2014-10-24 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 33a603aa5558bd107a5d018daeb78659810a8183 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v3.0.2-2113-g97eb511

2014-10-24 Thread Kitware Robot
20141024) +set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20141025) #set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1) --- Summary of changes: Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) hooks/post-receive -- CMake