On 1/6/2011 7:16 AM, luxInteg wrote:
On Thursday 06 January 2011 02:11:46 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2011-01-06 03:02- luxInteg wrote:
just curious,
but I wondering if anyone on list has ever built gcc with cmake.
(or at least had a go)
gccxml has CMake files that build most of gcc.
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=64e940f7fa3625db7efce4c1935e5a2c42cadba6
commit 64e940f7fa3625db7efce4c1935e5a2c42cadba6
Merge: 6bdb5e4 7bbab25
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Thu Jan 6 16:52:37 2011 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
bill.hoff...@kitware.com
http://www.kitware.com
518 881-4905 (Direct)
518 371-3971 x105
Fax (518) 371-4573
On 1/5/2011 1:01 PM, David Cole wrote:
Exactly. It needs further work.
I'm not about to be the brave volunteer who adds a test that adds the
window server must be running requirement. And whoever does should
probably add a setting CMAKE_ENABLE_GUI_TESTS that is OFF by
default. Then, only on
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e207994883b65b3ddcfdbfec9c0068f59252d796
commit e207994883b65b3ddcfdbfec9c0068f59252d796
Merge: 2a672c1 90b0f2c
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 3 14:07:14 2011 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage
On 12/28/2010 9:25 AM, Micha Renner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 28.12.2010, 08:51 -0500 schrieb David Cole:
CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_PREFIX only has one F
Shame on me.
Nevertheless, thank you.
Useful hint...
cmake --trace
That will show all the commands including set commands for stuff like
On 12/27/2010 10:25 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 12/27/2010 10:03 AM, Anders Backman wrote:
Seems to be bug in CMake!
I reduce the solution down to 1 project. Still fails. So I copied the
generated .sln file into agx.cmake.sln
More helpful would be a minimal CMakeLists.txt and instructions
960ace1
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Tue Dec 28 11:00:00 2010 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage kwro...@kitware.com
CommitDate: Tue Dec 28 11:00:00 2010 -0500
Merge topic 'add_support_for_windres' into next
960ace1 Add testing for windows resources
On 12/27/2010 10:03 AM, Anders Backman wrote:
Seems to be bug in CMake!
I reduce the solution down to 1 project. Still fails. So I copied the
generated .sln file into agx.cmake.sln
More helpful would be a minimal CMakeLists.txt and instructions on how
to get CMake to create the bad .sln
On 12/23/2010 8:44 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
On 23 December 2010 13:24, David Coledavid.c...@kitware.com wrote:
How do we make it very hard? What about KDE and Homebrew make this very
easy? Specifics, please.
I think for you guys general guidelines on what patches would/wouldn't
be accepted
On 12/23/2010 9:59 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
A few questions:
What platforms does it need to be tested on?
At least one. The important thing is that it actually has a test, that
will be run with make test on CMake after the code is merged into CMake.
The dashboards will take care of testing
On 12/22/2010 1:13 AM, Bill Spotz wrote:
Hello,
I have a CMake build system that includes a subdirectory that builds
a
python interface using SWIG. I would like to run make with a target
specified such that the swig command is called but the resulting wrapper
file is not compiled. The
On 12/22/2010 4:15 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
The problem is that CMake does not call the linker. It invokes the linker by
calling the compiler and passing flags through it.
In the module, Darwin.cmake, you find:
SET(CMAKE_C_LINK_FLAGS -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names)
On 12/22/2010 4:37 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 12/22/2010 04:21 PM, Cochran, Bill wrote:
So, I guess the problem is cmake is incorrectly guessing my compiler? I'm
not using intel, I'm using gnu.
Both Darwin-GNU and Darwin-icc need the fix.
IIRC, Apple's port of GCC documented the
On 12/22/2010 6:08 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
I track next very closely.
I looks as if Brad added the -Wl, to both Darwin-GNU and to Darwin-icc.
If Bill Hoffman is correct and The intel compiler does not want and can not have
the -Wl, syntax., then there is a problem with one of Brad's
, below.
- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=503544980c38bacdde19255b0597db8151d0c7c4
commit 503544980c38bacdde19255b0597db8151d0c7c4
Merge: 23f34ce 753e208
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=251c8514e29c80ac737060487b61f43394dee77c
commit 251c8514e29c80ac737060487b61f43394dee77c
Merge: 5035449 8c7b19d
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Wed Dec 22 16:15:14 2010 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic
On 12/21/2010 12:30 AM, ajay bansal wrote:
Hi All,
I want to create a Visual studio project (VS2008, c/c++) using this
cMakeList.txt for i386, x64 Itanium platforms on windows. I found
options for i386 x64 platforms in cmake GUI but there is nothing for
Itanium platform.
- Does cmake support
On 12/21/2010 11:38 AM, ajay bansal wrote:
Hi Bill,
Thanks for providing the info. Since i need to create vcProj solution
files as part of my build, Can i use NMake to achieve it ?
Could you please suggest me any other alternative if possible.
You will have to modify the C++ code to get
On 12/21/2010 2:17 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
AFAIK, this is because CMake does not know how to handle a .def file
for incorporation in the target, i.e. ${library}.def has no LANGUAGE
Actually, it should...
Something like this should work:
(assumes you have a perl script to create a .def
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f38d6f0a00b5edba11dcd79445b4675f9d29077
commit 6f38d6f0a00b5edba11dcd79445b4675f9d29077
Merge: d8848f9 f578381
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 20 15:34:35 2010 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=7b74942a96ada709ace7b4b4a0cf7c6e50bd08b8
commit 7b74942a96ada709ace7b4b4a0cf7c6e50bd08b8
Merge: 6f38d6f afbfb7a
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 20 15:48:27 2010 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=d555dd3854f7b59f1c335a05f1920908ee3f1fcd
commit d555dd3854f7b59f1c335a05f1920908ee3f1fcd
Merge: 35cd138 86979e4
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Tue Dec 14 15:06:36 2010 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic
On 12/12/2010 1:22 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
Thank you.
No more clue with that list now, beside the fact that there is no ZIP.
May be my cpack execution call is buggy.
With the extra trace now in place I should see if this is the case.
Eric, should we roll back the change? Lots of tests are
On 12/13/2010 9:52 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 12/12/2010 1:22 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
Thank you.
No more clue with that list now, beside the fact that there is no ZIP.
May be my cpack execution call is buggy.
With the extra trace now in place I should see if this is the case.
Eric, should
I am working of fixing this, but have run into an issue...
I did get the test to run, now it fails like this:
78: CPack: Create package
78: CPack: - package: C:/Users/hoffman/Work/My
Builds/CMake-vside/Tests/CPackComponentsForAll/buildZIP-NoComponent/MyLib-1.0.2-win32-Development.zip
On 12/9/2010 5:42 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
any hope to solve
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10122
with the discussed change of policy for cygwin ?
Yes, I have put that on the roadmap. I hope to have time to create the
policy before the release. Thanks for the reminder.
-Bill
There are a few things we have already started to do that should help
with the bug tracker issue.
1. We hare having 4 releases of CMake each year. After each release we
post to the list and ask people to vote for bugs they would like fixed
in the next release.
2. We are now sending all
On 12/10/2010 11:01 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
I have a third idea that we have not yet tried:
What do people think of automatically closing bugs if they are not modified
for some period of time (say 6 months).
On 12/10/2010 12:48 PM, Thompson, David C wrote:
Mantis lets you customize bug resolution. Maybe a new category of
resolution could be created. Instead of Won't Fix it could be
Lack of Activity?
It would have to be something that made it clear, that unless someone
cares enough to re-open it,
On 12/9/2010 5:26 AM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
Thanks Bill for the trick.
Unfortunately this works only for exe targets.
It doesn't work for dll's. Moreover, before the link command there is
this output: Visual Studio Non-Incremental Link
If it says that then the /INCREMENTAL flag is not being
On 12/9/2010 12:32 PM, John Drescher wrote:
Haven't been following this thread closely, but changing the handling of
/INCREMENTAL is a pain, at least in VS 2005 and 2008. Here is some code
we use to *disable* /INCREMENTAL. With a little creativity, you could
probably use this to forcibly
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=23d26f27542b696654c336adfed2b0981ae991af
commit 23d26f27542b696654c336adfed2b0981ae991af
Merge: e0201a7 cddcad5
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Thu Dec 9 13:40:43 2010 -0500
Commit: CMake Topic Stage
On 12/8/2010 10:36 AM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have some experience with the NMake generator and with
incremental linking. There seems to be a bug in CMake. Currently NMake
generator seems to generate build files that are not compatible with
incremental linking of libraries.
I
On 12/8/2010 12:53 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
Hi Bill,
First just by running cmake -E vs_link_exe CMake crashes on my
machine (CMake 2.8.2, Win7): cmake.exe stopped working Close the
program/Debug the program. Is this the right behaviour?
It is not meant to be a command that is called by
On 12/8/2010 1:49 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 12/8/2010 12:53 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
Hi Bill,
First just by running cmake -E vs_link_exe CMake crashes on my
machine (CMake 2.8.2, Win7): cmake.exe stopped
On 12/8/2010 2:28 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
What does Visual Studio Non-Incremental Link mean in the below output?
In the link command below you can see the /INCREMENTAL /DUMMY options.
I explicitly added them now but still the same behaviour:
It means what it says. It means it is doing a
On 12/8/2010 4:21 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
Yes I did. That is why I am wrote this post. Regardless of previous
build. I always get:
LINK : examples.exe not found or not built by the last incremental
link; performing full link
Try a make VERBOSE=1 with the /incremental:yes on, and post the
On 12/8/2010 10:18 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 12/8/2010 4:21 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote:
Yes I did. That is why I am wrote this post. Regardless of previous
build. I always get:
LINK : examples.exe not found or not built by the last incremental
link; performing full link
Try a make VERBOSE=1
On 12/2/2010 7:10 AM, salwa wrote:
thanks. it look's like i'm the only one :(
there is this blog:
http://sites.google.com/site/michaelsafyan/coding/articles/iphone/cross-compiling-for-the-iphone-using-cmake
-Bill
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
On 11/24/2010 5:02 PM, Ted Berg wrote:
I'm seeing a reproducible failure generating Visual Studio 10 output
on a system with the following installed:
CMake 2.8.2
CMake 2.8.3
Visual Studio 2005
Visual Studio 2010
Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows
v6.1
v7.0A
v7.1
To keep everything
On 11/28/2010 3:19 AM, Sebastian Schaetz wrote:
Michael Hertlingmhertl...@... writes:
1) In the top-level CMakeLists.txt, you might say
SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(
main.cpp PROPERTIES OBJECT_DEPENDS
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/kernels/libkernel_executable.a
)
When
On 11/22/2010 11:18 AM, Verweij, Arjen wrote:
Hi,
-rdynamic is used for linking with pgf90 even though it is not
supported. The flag is imported from Linux-GNU.cmake and I guess it
is included because cmake (2.8.3) checks for C and C++ compilers by
default.
On 11/16/2010 7:19 PM, David Doria wrote:
Hm, it works correctly in Linux, but I still get a bunch of
error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
What symbols?
Try running dumpbin /symbols OSC.lib. Also use VS IDE to make sure the
library is listed.
Everything look ok? Any thoughts?
The new CDash allows for multiple names to be registered with your
account. If you go to My CDash, My Profile, you can add your credentials.
Due to CVS/git usage in CMake, you will need at least two of them... :)
Here are the ones with trouble right now for CMake:
(SendEmail): User: Alex
Ok thank you for checking this.
My global credential is my e-mail and I added
Eric NOULARD
and
eric.noulard (my previous cvs login)
Thanks, that should do it. You were not alone, and CDash only recently
had the ability to have more than one of these per user. However, we
still need to
On 11/14/2010 5:00 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
There has been some discussion on the list about improvement
of the dependency scanner, this kind of idea may be examined there.
May be it's worth filing a feature request on this subject.
I have not followed this too closely. However, I thought
On 11/15/2010 1:36 PM, Dieter Oberkofler wrote:
I'm having a hard time to understand why after upgrading from CMake 2.8.2 to
2.8.3 I get the input line is too long when running nmake.
The problem must be related to the upgrade because moving back to 6.8.2 with
the absolute same build environment
://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
bill.hoff
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
Hi Rolf,
Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...)
Still needs some tweak, as the output is:
On 11/8/2010 3:30 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
Hi Rolf,
Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
morning on a QNX machine
On 11/8/2010 1:15 PM, Allen D Byrne wrote:
This did work before the update - and reinstalling cmake 2.8.2 worked. BTW, I
uninstalled and deleted the CMake Program Files folder to make sure there was
no interference between versions. I now believe this to be a CMake 2.8.3
problem. I'll be glad
On 11/5/2010 10:48 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
We are aiming for quarterly releases from now on, scheduling them every 3
or 4 months. That would make the next release of CMake version 2.8.4 and
scheduled to have an rc1 release candidate in approximately mid-January,
2011, target date: Wed.
On 11/2/2010 10:05 AM, Phil Smith wrote:
Is anyone else successfully using a toolchain file for an in-source build with 2.8.2 or
later? We can't be the only ones?! I've reduced this to a relatively minimal case, but it
doesn't fail on the first TryCompile, so I can't just stuff in a dummy
On 11/3/2010 3:09 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
I may have a problem with Visual Studio 2010 generator.
The concerned project CERTI (https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/certi)
builds fine on on several using CMake.
But when we try to build
On 11/3/2010 6:00 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/11/3 David Coledavid.c...@kitware.com:
It should be fine. CMake should handle .h files that have this property
set. We should fix it. (And we will -- probably in the 2.8.4 release.)
OK no problem.
Sorry for being late to test that combination
On 11/2/2010 4:16 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
David Cole
Looks like w3c has had enough of the excessive traffic (although the
post is back from 2008):
http://www.w3.org/blog/systeam/2008/02/08/w3c_s_excessive_dtd_traffic
Odd thing is, it fails all the time. If you run xmllint from the
On 11/2/2010 10:11 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
Seems like W3C is now requiring the User-Agent header, otherwise you get
a 403 response. Using wireshark I found that xmllint doesn't send a
User-Agent identification, and gets rejected. If I use wget and tell it
to suppress the User-Agent header I
On 11/1/2010 9:46 AM, Thomas Lehmann wrote:
Perfect!
Why does it not work with “msbuild” directly?
Kind Regards
Thomas
f:\Checkouts\prototyping\cmake_sandbox\objcmake --build . --target install
Microsoft (R) Visual Studio Version 9.0.21022.8.
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. Alle Rechte
On 10/29/2010 6:33 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
As there is no example in the documentaion,
could someone clarify me if the change of any policy
that should require an additional
cmake_policy(SET CMP NEW)
could also be requested at cmake invocation with
On 10/24/2010 11:52 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 13:12 +, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
So this is only different from what other build tools or whatever do. But
it is well known behaviour, it is documented, and it can't be changed for
backward compatibility anyway.
The only
So, I think the only way to fix this is to create a new policy. The
policy will warn all cygwin builds that CMake is no longer defining
WIN32 on cygwin. As with all policies, if a project has the minimum
required CMake set to the version of CMake that implements the policy
the new behavior
On 10/26/2010 9:58 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 17:53 -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Backwards compatibility may not be important to you, but to CMake it is
very important. When a developer chooses to use CMake, I want to
respect that choice, and work as hard as I can to make
On 10/20/2010 9:08 AM, Tim St. Clair wrote:
correction, I can see this issue with 2.8.2 i386 binaries vs. hand build.
Tim, it is still unclear to me what your problem is and where you are
getting the binaries from.
So, a few questions:
1. Where did the binaries come from (i.e. cmake.org,
On 10/20/2010 9:29 AM, Tim St. Clair wrote:
when using ExternalProject_Add with hand built version of cmake 2.8.2
seems to have a series of issues with auto tools relating to the env,
the afore mentioned example is a direct repo. Where it will fail in
RHEL 5.5 re-running aclocal (when I don't
on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
bill.hoff...@kitware.com
http://www.kitware.com
518 881-4905
BUILD_IN_SOURCE 1
#--install Step --
INSTALL_DIR ${EXTERNAL_STAGE}
INSTALL_COMMAND make install )
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park
On 10/14/2010 2:18 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org
mailto:neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote:
So, I think we have to use
On 10/14/2010 7:11 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
william.croc...@analog.comwilliam.croc...@analog.com wrote:
Something like this is probably better (crudely adapted from something
like this for test executables from here[1]):
macro (purify exename)
add_custom_target(purify-${exename})
So, I think we have to use the new name approach. Do we want to call it
2? Or should we call it something else?
Alex, do you have time to do this?
I want to get the CMake release out very soon.
Thanks.
-Bill
___
cmake-developers mailing list
Remaining are as far as I see:
-set new policy CMP0017 to NEW by default
Projects with an exotic setup may break, but that's probably better than
breaking all KDE 4.5.0/1 builds. One could also argue that these projects
relied on internal implementation details of cmake. As a pro, I think this
On 10/12/2010 9:09 AM, Thomas Sondergaard wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that Visual Studio doesn't run custom commands added with
add_custom_command in parallel. This means running moc and uic is slow
on Windows. Is there something that can be done about this?
No, I don't think so, VS does not
On 10/12/2010 10:17 AM, william.croc...@analog.com wrote:
Hello:
I'm a newbie cmake user and would like to rename the makefile
produced by running cmake.
I have searched the doc, mailinglist-archive and web,
but to no avail.
This is useful because:
1 - It provides a convenient way to slowly
On 10/12/2010 11:14 AM, william.croc...@analog.com wrote:
[ elided ]
So, is there a command I can place in my CMakeLists.txt files
which will cause them to produce a file named xyz.make (let's say)
instead of Makefile.
Thanks in advance.
Use out of source builds, and there should be
On 10/12/2010 11:52 AM, william.croc...@analog.com wrote:
[ elided ]
So, is there a command I can place in my CMakeLists.txt files
which will cause them to produce a file named xyz.make (let's say)
instead of Makefile.
[ elided ]
I still think Qt/qmake was right in providing the ability
On 10/9/2010 8:25 AM, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
Greetings,
Using CMake 2.8.2. The Visual C++ 2008 generator applies preprocessor
definitions to the resource files in the project (the preprocessor
definitions property in the Resources section of the project
contains , e.g. the macros added with
On 10/8/2010 3:32 AM, NoRulez wrote:
Hello,
does CPack have msi support also, or if no, is it planned?
Nothing planned, but if someone wanted to contribute something that
would be welcomed.
-Bill
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
On 10/8/2010 11:57 AM, kent williams wrote:
I think what I'm doing isn't clear to you.
I have a CMakeLists.txt that is essentially 'sourceless' -- it defines
a bunch of CMake variables, and then builds a bunch of prerequisites
and applications added with ExternalProject_add. It doesn't have any
On 10/7/2010 8:21 AM, Thomas Sondergaard wrote:
I've got a reasonably big project with 30+ shared libraries and 70+
executables all in one cmake-based project. Today I changed one line in
a CMakeLists.txt in a sub-directory to link boost program_options in one
particular executable, and it
On 10/7/2010 11:25 AM, kent williams wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Clifford Yappcliffy...@gmail.com wrote:
I use $(MAKE) in my BUILD_COMMAND and that seems to do OK, although I
don't know if it works universally.
That's an environment variable, as near as I can tell and isn't
On 10/7/2010 11:52 AM, kent williams wrote:
1. Is that $(MAKE) or is it ${MAKE} ? One thing missing from the
CMake documentation -- unless I'm mistaken there's not much
explanation of CMake syntax in the documentation.
No, this is make syntax not CMake syntax.
2. I think it's probably not
On 10/7/2010 12:13 PM, kent williams wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
What you want is for make to treat the external projects just like any other
library or executable in a build.
so, if you run this at the top of the build:
make -j4
It
be a pure custom command approach.
We could model it after the scons java support which is quite simple. I
am thinking of adding a module for java building into the Modules
directory as java does not really fit our language type that well.
Anyone want to help?
-Bill
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc
On 10/7/2010 2:37 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Thursday 07 October 2010 18:57:50 Bill Hoffman wrote:
The java support was broken a while ago when we re-organized the build
trees. I don't have much time to work on this, but I would like to get
it fixed. The best approach might be a pure
On 9/30/2010 10:03 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
Is this a limitation of JOM or an oversight of CMake?
This is a job limitation.
What this means?
It means my spell checker turned jom into job... :)
This is a limitation of jom, I know the maintainer of jom said he wanted
to work on this as a
On 9/29/2010 9:38 AM, elizabeta petreska wrote:
If I use such a script for comparing time stamps of input and output
files, I would need to rewrite every cmakelists.txt that uses
add_custom_command, and execute the needed commands only if input file
is older than output,or maybe I did not
On 9/29/2010 9:55 AM, elizabeta petreska wrote:
Just checked. same issue
Can you try the 2.8.3 rc1 :
http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.3-rc1-win32-x86.exe
Also try this one:
http://www.cmake.org/files/dev/cmake-2.8.2.20100928-g1b0e5-win32-x86.exe
-Bill
. Unfortunately the problem remains.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Bill Hoffman
bill.hoff...@kitware.com mailto:bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 9/29/2010 9:55 AM, elizabeta petreska wrote:
Just checked. same issue
Can you try the 2.8.3 rc1 :
http
On 9/24/2010 1:03 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
JOM does a nice work compiling multiple files of the same top-level
product (.exe, .dll etc) but for some reason it doesn't build multiple
top-level targets in parallel. Here I have a project that generates
several independent dlls, each based on one or
On 9/29/2010 11:02 AM, elizabeta petreska wrote:
This is the link to bug report http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=11274
OK, I have fixed the issue in CMake next.
To get around the problem you can use MAIN_DEPENDENCY like this:
ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(
OUTPUT
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=d9dc4dbe4359c4da0cda11c479faa5a1a0386401
commit d9dc4dbe4359c4da0cda11c479faa5a1a0386401
Merge: 49041df 5253206
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Wed Sep 29 14:49:23 2010 -0400
Commit: CMake Topic
On 9/28/2010 4:53 PM, James Bigler wrote:
I feel a bug shouldn't be closed until the fix can be found in a CMake
release. The bug should also make it clear which release the fix should
be found in. Pushing the fix to next doesn't qualify as being closed,
because I can't expect my customers
On 9/28/2010 5:43 AM, David Cole wrote:
Why do you think this is incorrect?
Either $(Configuration) or $(IntDir) should be acceptable locations for
obj files...
This was a bug, Brad checked in the fix into next.
-Bill
___
Powered by
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=6dc009c46581435241af70ed54ab17c658ceddf4
commit 6dc009c46581435241af70ed54ab17c658ceddf4
Merge: ca68ba9 1c2e17f
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 28 14:38:12 2010 -0400
Commit: CMake Topic
-
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=97ec9c3b2fad7be5686b40c6484528441b4cd190
commit 97ec9c3b2fad7be5686b40c6484528441b4cd190
Merge: 7075b00 19a9a1d
Author: Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 28 18:06:34 2010 -0400
Commit: CMake Topic
On 9/23/2010 2:20 AM, J Decker wrote:
using 2.8.3-rc1 I decided to throw the project against visual studio
and see what I got.
clicking on the install target
-- Build started: Project: INSTALL
(CMakePredefinedTargets\INSTALL), Configuration: Debug Win32 --
3 CMake Warning (dev) at
On 9/23/2010 2:27 AM, norulez wrote:
Hello,
is there a way to add additional informations to cdash like Qt version,
database version and such things to the build time. The thing is that i want to
know under which version a build fails.
You can add Notes.
-Bill
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
--
Bill Hoffman
way, both cases need testing, may be the last one needs a
separate bug/feature request report.
The last one may not be supported. You can not give CMake windows paths
for variable and expect it to work... :)
-Bill
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065
Eric,
This commit is breaking windows installs:
commit 6a521f8604ee4e6a757109e731a36fdc5575f6c8
Author: Eric NOULARD eric.noul...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Aug 23 17:38:33 2010 +0200
CPack Enable better handling of absolute installed files
The idea of the patch is to let the install
901 - 1000 of 2920 matches
Mail list logo
