Re: [CMake] Copying Required Runtime Libraris (MSVC 2003)

Edit.. Find in This Page in your browser. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] vs 2k5 express problems

the Microsoft Platform SDK? CMake won't function properly with VS 2005 Express without it. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Different INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES for each library

in subdirectories added using SUBDIRS() or ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(). In these subdirectories you can add more include directories if you want to. So for this to work I am forced to split my CMakeLists.txt file into separate parts spread across different directories. Correct? Yup. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.4.6, MinGW and console application

. But I think your build is not clean and you've got something left over somewhere. Try isolating with a very simple hello world and see what behavior you get. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.4.6, MinGW and console application

On 7/5/07, Sebarnolds [Seb / Frip] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just want to build a regular console application with a main function and not a WinMain, does anybody knows how I could do this ? Do an ADD_EXECUTABLE *without* [WIN32] as an option. See the docs. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.4.6, MinGW and console application

believe it. I build Chicken on MinGW all the time, it's all plain console stuff, and I don't do this. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.4.6, MinGW and console application

On 7/5/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/07, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.cdt/msg12121.html I think you need to add: TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(map2syBR mingw32) which should link your program to the libmingw32

Re: [CMake] Enviromentvariable

over. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

[CMake] Re: [Chicken-users] preferred gui library

On 7/4/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/4/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Felix was intoning lightweight back when we had that GUI discussion. As I said then, the problem with that approach is, everyone wants different versions of lightweight. So by the time

Re: [CMake] jokers (*) in cmake -E echo

/boot /cdrom /dev /etc /home /initrd /initrd.img /initrd.img.old /lib /local_home /lost+found /media /mnt /opt /proc /root /sbin /srv /sys /tmp /usr /var /vmlinuz /vmlinuz.old What can I do to just echo /* Try //* Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake

[CMake] good open source IDE

Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Linking several executables to the same object files

time than with simple commonfile.o targets in the previous Makefile. Why don't you want to make a library out of them? Probably because he's faking a convenience library. Chicken does this. http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org Look at how libpcre is reused. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] Progress above 100% when making chicken-2.6

underlying library 6 times. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Progress above 100% when making chicken-2.6

other people's builds also show too much progress? Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 6/27/07, Clark J. Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downloaded chicken-2.6 from http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/index.html and compiled it with CMake-2.4.6. When making, the progress percentage showed more

Re: [CMake] integrating cmake project with third party project

commands directly inside an ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND, you have to use things that actually work on the command line. You could run a new CMake instance to fire off a script, i.e. COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -D var=value -P myscript Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 6/25/07, abhijeet mhatre [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio generator missing

is GPLed. The -mno_cygwin option is possible to avoid this, but few people attempt it in practice, so builds often just fall apart. I don't know how dependent CMake is on cygwin1.dll's Unix compatibility layer. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] Documentation strategy

On 6/20/07, Robert J. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brandon Van Every wrote: Counting on people to buy books to do evaluations is bad strategy. I'm not talking strategy. I'm simply saying that your broad claim that I am; note the subject line. Strategy is about broad patterns of behavior

Re: [CMake] Documentation strategy

documentation. CMake can either provide that like everyone else does, or fall by the wayside over time. There's too much competition out there for people to accept this situation indefinitely. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org

Re: [CMake] Documentation strategy

improving the quality of the docs by community effort, with a better process, is a bad idea? Or just not a compelling idea? The sky won't fall if we completely ignore it and proceed with business as usual? The rest I will address privately. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

[CMake] Documentation strategy

version control systems, like Darcs and Mercurial. I haven't looked around to see if anyone has come up with a better open source doc paradigm. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Documentation strategy

On 6/20/07, Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-06-20 10:56-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote: On 6/20/07, Philippe Fremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All in all, CMake is a good and powerful tool, but I find that the documentation is lacking behind. More structure, more usage example

Re: [CMake] Documentation strategy

documentation isn't worth it, compared to the scope of the things I need to get done. I know what my own code does. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Documentation strategy

On 6/20/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/20/07, Robert J. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brandon Van Every wrote: They aren't going to buy a book to do an evaluation. They often will. I can shell out $40, wait a few days for it to arrive and get other paying work done

Re: [CMake] Adding Generated Header to VS Project

build directory is in fact NOT part of the include paths. What gives? This works fine on OS X/Linux? Is there something special I need to do for Windows? Why do you have quotes around ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR} ? You don't need them. Maybe that's it. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] FILE command in make_custom_target

the match that starts the fire. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] FILE command in make_custom_target

On 6/19/07, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Fremy wrote: It is ironic that a running cmake instance, that supports platform agnostic directory creation, is not able to do that inside a rule and has to fallback an calling a second cmake instance for that. Actually, when a

Re: [CMake] FILE command in make_custom_target

something guaranteed to be portable. Come to think of it, cmake -E mkdir mydirectoryname is supposed to have been added, according to bug #3776. But it isn't in CMake 2.4.6 on Windows. So, I'm reopening the bug. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] MSYS static libraries under MSVC

. Sounds like bugs. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Cmake and cross compiling

somebody help me ? http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling You will need the CMake in CVS. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] compiling foo.c as a c++ file for visual studio projects

On 6/15/07, Jon W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using cmake to generate solutions for Visual Studio 2003. With several of the projects I need to compile the *.c files as c++ code. I'm trying to get the /TP flag to override the /TC flag that is automatically generated by cmake, but not having

Re: [CMake] Re: compiling foo.c as a c++ file for visual studio projects

and set_target_properties is critical, otherwise you will get an error. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] how to use a cross linker

On 6/14/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look at this page, it documents current CMake cvs HEAD: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling I'm happy about questions, comments, ideas etc. That's pretty cool. The 1st thing that springs to mind is not a CMake issue

Re: [CMake] creating static library with references to other .lib files

On 6/14/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it really impossible to pass an option to the linker when creating a static library? It's not terribly difficult. But I thought I'd save you the learning curve if it wasn't necessary. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] Flag ordering: cmake -P -D vs cmake -D -P

. Please ping bug #4372, document cmake -Dvar=value -P script order dependency. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Flag ordering: cmake -P -D vs cmake -D -P

On 6/13/07, Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry did not see the bug. I changed the assignee to Bill, since Andy C. left Kitware. Hm I didn't realize that. I changed 2 other bugs I've filed in the same manner. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] creating static library with references to other .lib files

On 6/12/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/6/12, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I don't know what the MSVC linker can accomplish. Would suggest reading the MSVC docs to make sure it can be done. I *know* that it can be done, since our current hand-written .vcproj files

Re: [CMake] creating static library with references to other .lib files

On 6/13/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/6/13, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]: But why don't you just ship your users a dynamic lib? As far as I know, there are no restrictions on dynamic libs including static libs. That is an alternative, but it requires a non-trivial

Re: [CMake] How to get suffix of shared library file?

it. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] creating static library with references to other .lib files

On 6/12/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/6/7, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/6/7, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 6/7/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I would like to be able to create a static library on Windows which

Re: [CMake] Generating dynamic libraries

, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] building c code as c++ code

) but this is. I do think there is a bug that breaks this in 2.4.6, but it will be fixed in 2.4.7. Is LANGUAGE documented in 2.4.7? Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] building c code as c++ code

PROJECT(projectname CXX) doesn't work? If it doesn't, that's a showstopper bug. I'd be surprised. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] building c code as c++ code

On 6/10/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/10/07, John Pretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I need to do is convince cmake that this .c source code is supposed to be compiled with a c++ compiler. If I rename the files (foo.c - foo.cxx), it builds correctly, but again, assume

Re: [CMake] C# support again

? Currently there are no plans to develop support ourselves to my knowledge. If someone volunteers to add it we will accept the contribution. If you want to do this we can get you started. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake

Re: [CMake] Is CMake powerful enough?

to use CMake. They gave me a 1st cut of my Chicken Scheme build system once upon a time. Of course I've altered it beyond recognition, but the point is, they provided an important piece of support when I was just getting started. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND and *multiple* DEPENDS Was: [CMake] Reexecute cmake to update build.make

by ; but if you print it with MESSAGE( mylist ) (with quotes), it will. This is correct and expected CMake behavior. However it's not in the documentation for MESSAGE. I've added bug #5149 about the lack of documentation. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: Re: [CMake] moving project folder

Autoconf may be an awful tool to work with, but in one respect it is far superior to CMake. The documentation is really first class. There's abundant, Chapter-driven explanation of how to use it, and extensive examples of how to work around Autoconf's limitations. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: Re: [CMake] moving project folder

into CMakeLists.txt. You could certainly detect if a specific compiler is available and take specific actions on that basis. See the CMake Useful Variables. http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake

Re: [CMake] Is CMake powerful enough?

On 6/8/07, Oliver Kullmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan W. Irwin wrote: I always run cmake with a separate build tree so one set of terminal windows is open in various sub-directories of the source tree and one set in various sub-directories of the build tree, and I now think of this as

Re: [CMake] visual studio compiler option not being set

. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Can two executables share one object file?

working for real in my tutorialized Chicken Scheme build. http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

[CMake] C# support again

and doesn't mind adding a wiki page. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] creating static library with references to other .lib files

in your own code, and the publically available version. Segfaults etc. Here's the issue in our bug tracker that we haven't resolved yet, it gives a lot of detail as to what kinds of things can go wrong. http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/215 Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] moving project folder

directories around in the filesystem. They use hardcoded absolute paths for safety, so if you want them somewhere else you must regenerate them. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Is CMake powerful enough?

based on untyped shells using incredibly error prone system tools. I think the SML/NJ guys got sick of it and did something about it, they made some kind of build tool, but I've never checked it out. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake

Re: [CMake] Is it possible to link against libraries, built in another cmakelists.txt ?

I don't see why not. But you'd have to find them the say way you find any other external 3rd party library. Either know where the library is, FIND_ them somehow, etc. Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 6/6/07, Alexander Ivash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the subj is possible? I have two cmake

Re: [CMake] Cmake with Eclipse

a possibility to choose between release and debug? In vc++ this was very easy to handle :) I don't know how to do these things in Eclipse. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Cmake with Eclipse

/progress.make'. Stop. Hopefully you can give me some further hints. Best regards, Joachim 2007/6/5, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] : On 6/5/07, Joachim Zettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, thank you for your help up to now. I followed the tutorials you provided to me and made

Re: [CMake] Cmake with Eclipse

configurations, but I'm sure it's in the archives. Sorry I was a little slow on the make VERBOSE=1 comment, but keep it in mind for future bug reports. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman

Re: [CMake] visual studio converter?

for such large scale conversion? You porting a big project to another platform? Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] visual studio converter?

On 6/5/07, Jon W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/5/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/5/07, Jon W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any tools available to convert Visual Studio files to cmakelists.txt? I have hundreds of vcproj files and this would help make

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio GNU make projects

so great about GNU Make? Sounds like a legacy issue you should dump. Unless it's an underlying 3rd party library, in which case you don't touch that build, you just wrap it with an ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND and let it do its own thing completely independently. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

[CMake] Setting properties on all targets in one line

to specify directories, though. I thought it was for library names. I'd worry about mysterious things breaking, unless Bill blesses it. Can't recall an expected subdirectory mechanism. Guess I'd have to RTFM. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] Generating files during building

real, main cmake sees it, so that it's static and decided by that time. I have CMake scripting examples in the Chicken Scheme build, http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org , but I'm using ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND at build time, not configuration time. Not what you want. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] Converting a makefile into a CMakeLists.txt file

of commented, non-trivial examples of stuff. http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Re: custom build

to the correct build time directory. I do think it is regrettable, however, that CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE has this behavior. An unknowing user would expect it to have a useful value. Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 5/24/07, Won-Ki Jeong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried that, but it does not seem to work

Re: [CMake] Finding libraries under Windows

I don't understand why this should be a problem. Chicken searches for many header files and libraries on various platforms. Try looking at the Chicken sources for inspiration. http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 5/16/07, Leon Moctezuma [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [CMake] CPack and 7-Zip?

Does *any* program ever find 7-Zip as a suitable program for .zip files? I just installed 7-Zip on a new machine the other day, and I had to manually associate the 7-Zip File Manager with .zip files. Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 5/14/07, Peter Visser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT and CMake

to figure out how to use CMake with it. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Help converting an autotools project

stuff side by side, and strategies for supporting both at once while maintaining stability. My CMake build is heavily commented, it's supposed to serve as a tutorial for new CMakers to some degree. http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 5/10/07, Andreas

[CMake] RE: CMake 2.4.1/VC71 Why the wierd project.dir subdirs?

, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] MSYS paths (in build output)

that up. So, they need prodding on MinGW issues, and it would be great if you'd prod them. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] RE: CMake 2.4.1/VC71 Why the wierd project.dir subdirs?

that are probably there for a reason? Either a logical reason or a historical reason; doesn't matter. Rob, I'd still like to know the original problem that prompted you to delve into this. I read this thread because I've faked convenience libraries. What was your driving problem? Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] RE: CMake 2.4.1/VC71 Why the wierd project.dir subdirs?

preference for nomenclature is not a sufficient reason for a feature request. It should be a standard that everybody benefits from and actually works for everybody. Even the corner cases that you don't personally put much weight on. Cheers, Brandon Van Every

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.4.1, VC71, VCMIDLTool missing AdditionalIncludeDirectories tag

Why CMake 2.4.1? Are you stuck with that version for some reason? Current is CMake 2.4.6, and of course there's CMake CVS. Does the problem exist for either of those? Cheers, Brandon Van Every On 5/9/07, Rob Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Title says it all. No way to pass a list of extra

<    1   2   3   4   5   6