the real parent scope is? Maybe it's not what I think it is.
-
Robert Dailey
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.dewrote:
On 10/20/2011 08:44 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.de
wrote:
On 10
There isn't any way to do a trace from cmake gui is there?
Maybe that's a separate feature request on its own :P
I'll check out the trace and follow up with results.
-
Robert Dailey
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
On 10/20/2011 5:11 PM
AFTER this one (in the same
directory CMakeLists.txt script) that DO NOT use MFC, I didn't want them
to be affected by the flag. I'd still like to do this but it's no big deal.
Removing the bottom 'set' fixed it.
-
Robert Dailey
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai
class, dialog
classes, etc) were removed, the remaining CPP files linked gave me this:
LNK1104: cannot open file 'libc.lib'
Now this is just confusing. What is this lib and why can't it find it?
-
Robert Dailey
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Those
- means, but looks like maybe it is pulling
that lib out from this lib? I don't know how that works but it's very
sneaky... any idea what these command-line arguments are doing in a debug
LIB file???
-
Robert Dailey
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
More
compatible project transparent to the lower level
CMakeLists scripts. Hiding away the flag and how it needs to be set is a big
part of this, but I can't do it.
Anyone know how I can make this work?
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
?
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http
? How can I get the $(IntDir) path instead?
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Hendrik Sattler
p...@hendrik-sattler.dewrote:
Yes. Compilation of a project should always be possible without polluting
the system.
For other programs or libraries in the same source tree, install() is not
the right thing.
You have several options:
a)
know how to get to that
target's header files.
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
.
Any idea if install() can do this? I'm not really sure of the purpose for
install(), so maybe I'm approaching this wrong.
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
This works:
set( project_count 0 CACHE INTERNAL )
function( define_project )
math( EXPR count ${project_count}+1 )
set( project_count ${count} CACHE INTERNAL )
endfunction()
define_project()
message(${project_count})
define_project()
message(${project_count})
define_project()
it accordingly
-
Robert Dailey
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
In my particular CMake project, I have three CPP files:
a.cpp
b.cpp
c.cpp
I want 'a.cpp' to be compiled in all configurations (release debug).br
I only want 'b.cpp
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:16 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
In visual studio, there is a way to exclude a source file from the build
on
a per-configuration basis (debug vs release). The actual VCPROJ
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.dewrote:
You might use an installation component for the concerned headers:
CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.8 FATAL_ERROR)
PROJECT(INSTCOMP C)
SET(CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE ON)
SET(F_PREFIX /dev/shm CACHE PATH )
FILE(WRITE
of my function, I do this:
function( define_project ... )
math( EXPR count ${project_count}+1 )
set( project_count ${count} )
endfunction()
However, 'project_count' is always 0 each time that the function is
executed.
How can I make this work?
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered
${new_count} CACHE INTERNAL FORCE )
Thanks!
-
Robert Dailey
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Glenn Coombs glenn.coo...@gmail.comwrote:
Calling a function pushs a new variable scope. All variables visible in
the callers scope are copied into the new scope but changes by default only
affect
to all' so I am explicitly included in your reply, as I
have mail delivery turned off for the mailing list. Thank you!
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
()
Any reason why this isn't working as documented?
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Well there you go, deleting the cache reconfiguring fixed it. That was
weird.
Thanks for the help!
-
Robert Dailey
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok interesting, it is working for me too. I guess my reproducible use case
was invalid.
(BTW
-in functionality for this kind of behavior or
if there is a different implementation I could use. Can anyone help me out?
Thanks in advance.
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please
this? I need something similar to the `debug` and `optimized`
keywords that are accepted by the `target_link_libraries()` CMake operation.
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Hello,
I'm using the latest RC build of CMake 2.8 and I noticed a new annoyance.
Please follow these steps:
1. Create a CMakeList.txt that sets up a project with any number of
source
wrong. It should be:
source/SpawnShadowEntityAction.cpp
-
Robert Dailey
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if I can get you guys a reproducible project. However, I hope you
guys have access to the version of xcode I'm using. I'll also get
, I'll try to
find time to provide a reproducible test project.
-
Robert Dailey
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have a sample project ready yet, but I will provide the generated
xcode project files in case you guys want to take a look at them
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
My paths are correct. I'm passing in the correct absolute paths into
add_executable. I think that cmake is using the current
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
I've attached a test project that reproduces this issue. At the root
test directory, create a new directory called 'build'. So you will
have test/build.
cd into test/build and run:
cmake -G
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
The goal here is to try to build Xcode projects for building iPhone apps.
My CMake logic for producing projects is rather complex, which is why I am
hesitant to post it here. But basically I'm
to be OK.
-
Robert Dailey
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:15 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Sounds like maybe you are using ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR} in a function
or macro. (defined at the top level, but called from a lower level)...
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:12 PM
I'll see if I can get you guys a reproducible project. However, I hope you
guys have access to the version of xcode I'm using. I'll also get you the
version number next monday when I get back into work.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, that's what
How is this work coming along? I'm using a build of CVS HEAD, which I
believe is v2.7.2. Does this currently build the appropriate version of
xcode projects?
Also, where are the CMAKE_OSX_ variables documented on the Wiki? I can't
seem to find them.
-
Robert Dailey
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009
it into add_executable like so:
add_executable( foobar MACOSX_BUNDLE
/Users/imac/work/redsword/projects/foobar/mysource.mm )
-
Robert Dailey
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
Hello,
Just wondering if CMake can support generating wxDev-C++ projects. From
looking around at it myself, I don't see any support for this. I'm sure the
developers have thought of this, but I'm still curious as to what they have
to say.
Thanks!
-
Robert Dailey
to maintain lists of paths and files for just
so I can set up my project with that information.
-
Robert Dailey
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
Keep up the great work Bill. Looks like they were able to reproduce the
issue. Not much you can do until they fix it right?
-
Robert Dailey
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Bill Hoffman wrote:
CVS CMake has initial VS 2010 support
this is because I like Visual Studio to work out of, but as a compiler I
like GCC a bit better. However, I still plan to write Windows applications
using GCC.
Sincerely,
Robert Dailey
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
Thanks for the response Bill.
I guess I could always use CodeBlocks MinGW.
Sincerely,
Robert Dailey
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to generate Visual Studio projects with
CMake
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:16 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Robert Daileyrcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response Bill.
I guess I could always use CodeBlocks MinGW.
Sincerely,
Robert Dailey
How about a single source folder
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:54 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If I have the following CMakeLists.txt:
cmake_minimum_required( VERSION 2.6.4 )
project( project1 )
add_executable( project1 source1.cpp
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:54 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If I have the following CMakeLists.txt:
cmake_minimum_required
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:44 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression that project() created some kind of scope that
allows you to reset certain variables. Subdirectories allow you to create a
new scope, but you inherit all the values from the parent. I
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
migu...@ieee.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:54 PM, James Bigler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Robert Dailey
Hi,
If I have the following CMakeLists.txt:
cmake_minimum_required( VERSION 2.6.4 )
project( project1 )
add_executable( project1 source1.cpp )
project( project2 )
add_executable( project2 source2.cpp )
project( project3 )
add_executable( project3 source3.cpp )
If I create visual studio 2008
Just curious about how you guys came up with the name 'CMakeLists.txt'.
While I've grown to accept it, I still can't say I really understand the
meaning of the name. Something that would make sense to me is
CMakeScript.txt or CMakeFile. I am especially curious as to why you guys
use an extension.
There is a specific compiler flag that I'm telling CMake to use for the MSVC
compiler, however this flag is only supported by MSVC90 and higher. Right
now I'm doing this:
if( MSVC90 )
...
endif()
But how do I check something like this:
if( MSVC_VERSION GREATER 9 OR MSVC_VERSION EQUAL 9 )
...
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Tyler Roscoe ty...@cryptio.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 01:41:58PM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
There is a specific compiler flag that I'm telling CMake to use for the
MSVC
compiler, however this flag is only supported by MSVC90 and higher. Right
now
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Tyler Roscoe ty...@cryptio.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:30:36PM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
The problem is that there is no central location for this data. I was
referencing the useful
variableshttp://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variablespage
entry in the cmake-gui or pass it with -D on the
cmake command line:
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Debug -G NMake Makefiles ../source_dir
nmake
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
When I generate using NMake Makefiles generator, I build like this (I
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Thanks for this information. Was this documented somewhere publicly?
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake2.6docs.html#variable:CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
Thanks. I actually was not specific enough
When I generate using NMake Makefiles generator, I build like this (I run
this command from inside the build directory):
nmake /f Makefile
Everything builds just fine, but is this a debug or release build? When you
build with NMake, do you have a choice of which configuration you want to
use? I'm
To the CMake developers:
The Visual Studio team has created a new blog to discuss the project system
in Visual Studio 2010:
http://blogs.msdn.com/vsproject/
This blog may contain information now and in the future that will help ease
the implementation of VS2010 support.
Is there a clean and compact way I can find out if Visual Studio targets are
being built? Note that I want to be able to check this regardless of the
version. I know I can check CMAKE_GENERATOR, but I would end up having to
check around 8 strings for all possible versions of visual studio. Is
On second thought, I suppose what I really want to check for is MSVC in
general, since you can still compile using MSVC without Visual Studio.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a clean and compact way I can find out if Visual Studio targets
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.orgwrote:
Apart from every compiler making this different (i. e. different
parameters for each compilers), what are the difficulties you see for
making this a first-class feature? My Windows coworkers demand this
feature
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Denis Scherbakov denis_scherba...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Apart from every compiler making this different (i. e.
different
parameters for each compilers), what are the difficulties
you see for
making this a first-class feature? My Windows coworkers
demand
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
After installing the macro I presented in my first reply a month ago
this has saved me several hours of compile time total on my main
project. However the recent addition of a velociraptor has reduced
this need
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:17 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.comwrote:
I've been reading this newsgroup for a while and I notice that most
of the people complain that they miss some feature on Windows, but
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:22 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is what I do for Vs2005 builds and CMake 2.6.4
I put this in the main CMakeLists.txt before any
add_subdirectory(Libraries)
snip
You need to then create
laGUIPCH.h
laGUIPCH.cxx
the .cxx file contains any
Hey guys,
First of all I just want to let you guys know that I DID find this in my
search:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-May/021483.html
However, I do not feel as if a direct answer was given. Besides, that was
over a year ago and I'm hoping some new developments have taken place. Is
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Oops! I spoke too fast :)
I found this:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-May/029660.html
But, don't forget about this post:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-May/029782
Hey guys,
I'm sure you've already started VS2010 support. How is that going? I'd like
to test it out for you if you've already released support for it in 2.7. Let
me know! Thanks.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
Oops! I spoke too fast :)
I found this:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-May/029660.html
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm sure you've already started VS2010 support. How is that going? I'd like
to test it out for you if you've
] Relative include() calls
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:36:33 +0200
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Tyler Roscoe ty...@cryptio.net wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
From a CMakeLists.txt in my root source dir, I am calling:
include( ../cmake
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Tyler Roscoe ty...@cryptio.net wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:42:03AM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
The most annoying thing about this solution, though, is that every single
CMakeLists.txt that includes this module needs to make sure it has
From a CMakeLists.txt in my root source dir, I am calling:
include( ../cmake/common.cmake )
From common.cmake, I am calling:
include( BoostUtils.cmake )
BoostUtils.cmake and common.cmake are side-by-side in the same directory on
Windows. The second call to include() fails, because the working
Does the cmake-gui application on Windows have any option to enable the
serialization of window size/position, as well as any divider position? I
like to make the window slightly larger and move the divider upwards so that
the output window (bottom) is larger than the variables list (top).
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.comwrote:
It doesn't have that option.
Feel free to put it in the bug tracker, or it gets forgotten.
I wanted to confirm before I create a bug report.
Also feel free to submit a patch.
I would love to, if I didn't have
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Philip Lowman phi...@yhbt.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still looking to figure out how a single project can be configured to
generate multiple executables. Can anyone clarify?
A Visual Studio project
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Philip Lowman phi...@yhbt.com wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have built Boost 1.39 on Windows with static libraries, and they are
named like so:
libboost_filesystem-mt.lib
When I try to do
I'm creating a find_package module for the TBB library, and it has 2 libs:
tbb.lib and tbbmalloc.lib. Both of these are part of TBB, and in my
TBB_LIBRARIES variable I want to return both of them. However, I can only
search for one of them at a time using find_library(). Is there a way to
make it
Hi,
I have built Boost 1.39 on Windows with static libraries, and they are named
like so:
libboost_filesystem-mt.lib
When I try to do this:
find_package( Boost REQUIRED COMPONENTS filesystem )
I get an error saying it could not find boost_filesystem. If I rename the
above library and remove
When installing CMake 2.6.4 on Windows XP, I notice that the shortcut that
the installer creates links to the deprecated GUI, or at least, that's what
the shortcut's text says. If this GUI is deprecated, why is the installer
encouraging its use by creating a link to it from the desktop? Unless
not generating true XCode projects?
Perhaps we are misunderstanding?
Some explanation would be helpful. Thanks.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Thanks David.
Where can I find a platform-ambiguous version of the documentation
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
I actually have another question about the Xcode generator. I didn't want
to create another thread for this.
A co worker and myself noticed that the generated Xcode projects for MAC
seem
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
What do you mean specified order? Why does the order of static libraries
matter? And also what do you mean by repeats?
Linkers on unix (including apple) require that the order of static
The latter does not work for me. I don't know what to tell you.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Nelson tor...@connect2.com wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 11:58:55 am Robert Dailey wrote:
Sorry, the missing $ was a typo. The problem was that I was doing:
include( foo.cmake )
I
It seems that CMake, in general, does not support cross-compilation. It
generates projects as if they will build targets on the current platform
instead of for another. Correct me if I'm wrong.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Paul Oppenheim (Poppy Linden)
po...@lindenlab.com wrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Obviously this creates a lot of clutter in the solution explorer window in
Visual Studio. Is there a more recommended practice for structuring unit
tests in CMake? Personal advice
I want to set a couple of custom directories of mine to be searched for
cmake modules when I use include( foo.cmake ). However, I can't seem to get
this to work. My code is basically:
set( CMAKE_MODULE_PATH {CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/cmake )
include( foo.cmake )
This, however, does not work. It says it
:
You are missing a $ :
set( CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/cmake )
To prepend, use this construct:
set( CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/cmake ${CMAKE_MODULE_PATH})
HTH,
David
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to set a couple
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Paul Oppenheim (Poppy Linden)
po...@lindenlab.com wrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Do you have unit tests that require failure to compile in order to be
successful? If you do, placing these particular unit tests in a project with
other tests that must compile
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Paul Oppenheim (Poppy Linden)
po...@lindenlab.com wrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
Do you have unit tests that require failure to compile in order to be
successful? If you do, placing
For the Boost library, we have compiled it for both the iPhone device and
iPhone simulator. However, I'm not sure how to tell the difference between
the two from CMake when we have xcode as our generator. Perhaps there is a
way I can generate multiple xcode configurations for both the device and
2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net
This is cross compiling, right ?
Yes. You compile the ARM code for the device on a different platform. For
example, on Windows I'd compile the ARM application and then transfer that
binary to the device to be executed.
Does Xcode support
2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net
Yes, there is I think, in cmake cvs, but I think this is not yet in a
released
version, but I'm not sure.
Check the documentation for set_property( ... CACHE ...) and for
Properties
on Cache Entries.
I'm using CMake 2.6.4 RC4. Is it
2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net
On Thursday 09 April 2009, Robert Dailey wrote:
2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net
...
Does Xcode support this out of the box ?
Support *what* outside of the box? If you're talking about cross
compiling,
then yes
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
I'm using CMake 2.6.4 RC4. Is it included in this build?
No.
Thanks, Bill. When can I expect to see this feature? More specifically, what
version of CMake will it be included in?
2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net
On Thursday 09 April 2009, Robert Dailey wrote:
I think it would be useful to have a combo box type for cache
variables.
This would allow the user to select from a list of pre-defined values in
the cmake-gui application. I'm not sure how
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Bill Hoffman
bill.hoff...@kitware.commailto:
bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
I'm using CMake 2.6.4 RC4. Is it included in this build?
No.
Thanks
What support cmake has for building an xcode project that allows building
targets for multiple SDKs.
For example, a single project that allows building for 10.3, 10.4, and 10.5
of the Mac OSX SDK. Or 2.2.0 and 2.0.0 of the iPhoneSDK for both hardware
and simulator.
I'm reading the guidelines for find package modules here:
http://www.cmake.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Modules/readme.txt?root=CMakeview=markup
No where in here do I see any mention of uppercase variable names. For
example, if my find package is:
FindFoo.cmake
My return variables are:
Can CMake generate an Xcode project for iPhone SDK development (For both the
simulator and device SDKs)? From the looks of it we cannot do that,
especially when we use MACOSX_BUNDLE in add_executable().
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
I noticed that in the cmake-gui application (Windows), the drop-down box is
on the binary directory edit field and not the source directory field. This
seems backwards to me. Was this decision arbitrary or by design? If the
latter, why? Would it be possible to move the history listing to the
, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/5 Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com:
I noticed that in the cmake-gui application (Windows),
The behavior is the same on Linux.
the drop-down box is
on the binary directory edit field and not the source directory field.
This
seems
3, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/2 Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com:
Is there a portable way of disabling Runtime Type Information (RTTI)
through
CMake? I hope I don't have to strangle CMake too much to get this basic
functionality...
Disabling rtti
I can't tell you how hard it is to hunt down strange behavior in CMake.
Often times I would save myself 30 minutes of time on each of the hard bug
fixes if I could just step through each line of logic as it was being
executed and view the values of variables in a watch window of some sort.
Does
and view variable values dynamically,
no such tool can be made for it. CMake has to support the required hooks.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
I can't tell you how hard it is to hunt down strange behavior in CMake.
Often times
with the
prompt and make usable frontends for people who prefer a GUI solution to
debugging like Visual Studio.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:57 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the thing that has the Returning
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jed Brown j...@59a2.org wrote:
On Thu 2009-04-02 13:17, Robert Dailey wrote:
It would be great to see CMake provide some more debug-related commands
later.
Perhaps CMake could even implement its own prompt.
It would be extremely useful to be able to set
haha, good one. I replied on an impulse. I didn't even think about googling
it :)
Thanks for the link ;)
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Sean McBride s...@rogue-research.comwrote:
On 4/2/09 2:49 PM, Robert Dailey said:
What is GDB?
Sorry, can't resist:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=GDB
601 - 700 of 878 matches
Mail list logo
