Re: [CMake] cmake HEAD: cpack rpm generator seems broken on openSuse 11.2

2009-12-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/8 winfried.ko...@gmail.com: Dear Eric, Sorry for the late response, I missed your last email. No problem. I tested CMake CVS HEAD as of today on OpenSuse 11.2 and building an rpm with CPack now works without patches. Ok now I guess the current state of CPackRPM in CVS HEAD is a

Re: [CMake] Compile same source file with different flags into the same library

2009-12-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/8 Matthias Moeller matthias.moel...@math.tu-dortmund.de: I try to write a cmake file for some external library (from the sparse suite). In the provided makefile a single source file is compiled twice with different compiler flags, e.g., $(C) -DDINT -c ../Source/amd_aat.c -o

Re: [CMake] Autotools conversion: case statement

2009-12-17 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/17 Nicola Brisotto nicolabriso...@gmail.com: Hello, I've an autotools script to convert to cmake. It has a lot of long case statement. Any tips to easily convert this statement? Here an example: case $THREADS in I would try a set of if(string MATCHES regex) endif(string MATCHES

Re: [CMake] using cmake to install dlls into windows/system32

2009-12-18 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/18 James Zipperer james.zippe...@modsystems.com: After  a lot of trial and error and some rtfm work, I figured out a way to do it.  The UpgradeDLL macro I mentioned below appears to be out of date and the preferred method is now InstallLib.  It appears to handle DLL versioning and

Re: [CMake] Cpack ignoring file installs

2009-12-18 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/18 Daniel Stonier d.ston...@gmail.com: This is my first shot at cpack, so I may be missing something entirely obvious here. I have two parts to the install on my project, one are the libs, the other are the headers. The libs are installed via the INSTALL(TARGET ...) command, whereas

Re: [CMake] using cmake to install dlls into windows/system32

2009-12-18 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/18 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com: See my note attached to this bug for a way to use your own override of the NSIS.template.in file. (So you can do it on a per-project basis rather than modifying the main one in the CMake installation...)

Re: [CMake] getting undefined error to my own libs.

2009-12-29 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/29 e...@cs.bgu.ac.il e...@cs.bgu.ac.il: hello. I'm writing a c++ program that uses three shared libs that I wrote, for some reason, when it gets to the main cpp file, it fails with undefined error. here is the error report: Concerning the link error [apparently] related to boost

Re: [CMake] getting undefined error to my own libs.

2009-12-29 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/29 e...@cs.bgu.ac.il e...@cs.bgu.ac.il: hello Eric, thanks for the response. I'd like to solve the Array issue first, then the boost because I have a feeling it is a different one because when I disable the relevant code it doesn't generates the error even when other parts of the

Re: [CMake] compiling single source with different flags

2009-12-29 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/29 Richard Wackerbarth rich...@nfsnet.org: Not as a real solution, but more as a workaround, you could create a derived source file which is just a copy of the source file and then you would have two separate files to be compiled with the appropriate flags. That's one solution, see

Re: [CMake] CPack RPM: why not name-version-release-arch.rpm filename?

2009-12-30 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/30 Winfried Dobbe winfried_...@xmsnet.nl: When I build a RPM with current CVS CMAKE/CPack for project projectname the file name of the generated rpm is: projectname-version-Linux.rpm The common filename for an rpm is projectname-version-release-architecture.rpm Putting Linux in

Re: [CMake] Question about dependencies and paths

2009-12-30 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/12/30 Talin viri...@gmail.com: I've got a problem that has been vexing me for several months: It seems that when I create a custom rule using add_custom_command, the DEPENDS clause sometimes works and sometimes doesn't, and I can't figure out why. Here's what my custom rule looks like:   

Re: [CMake] runtime error of ctest in windows VS2005

2010-01-05 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/6 Xi LIANG liangxi1986...@hotmail.com: Dear all, Im using Windows and the compiler is VS2005. I wrote a CMakeLists.txt file to run a image registration program, which generates a executable named as FFD_3D_mask.exe. This executable takes  some arguments as names of input and output

Re: [CMake] Does Cmake add 'standard' include paths ?

2010-01-07 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/7 Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group) jack.smith.ext...@unicreditgroup.de: CMake: cmake version 2.6-patch 2 This is a relatively old CMake version (Sept. 2008) could you by any chance try a more recent one? May be CMake 2.8.0 or even 2.6.4?

Re: [CMake] Can you add sources to a target library after add_library()?

2010-01-11 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/11 Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl: Too bad. I was hoping I could do this without having to use a list variable to collect all my sources. In my case, the use of conditionals is somewhat awkward. Personnally I sometime use several variable like: add_library(blah

Re: [CMake] Building targets for install only ...

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/13 Dr. Stefan Sablatnög stefan.sablatn...@svox.com: Hi everybody, Does anyone know whether there is a way to build a target only if “make install” is called? I tried “add_dependencies(install target), but it complains, that the target install does not exist. Is the install

Re: [CMake] Building targets for install only ...

2010-01-13 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/13 ctrlaltca ctrlal...@libero.it: The SCRIPT and CODE signature:  install([[SCRIPT file] [CODE code]] [...]) The SCRIPT form will invoke the given CMake script files during installation. If the script file name is a relative path it will be interpreted with respect to the current

Re: [CMake] Feature requests for CMake-GUI

2010-01-14 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/14 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com: Exactly, and having simple VCR-controls to build and install (and perhaps clean) would be enough for those users. They don't want to look at the IDE or the source code, they just want to build and install. Heck, it would be enough for me in the

Re: [CMake] Problem with current CVS HEAD for creating ZIP with shared lib on Linux

2010-01-19 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/19 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: Eric Noulard wrote: Hi CMake developers, [This message is for CMake developers, user-only may skip it entirely since it may be boring] Using current CVS HEAD (on Debian Linux host) I'm not able to build a zip file containing installed

Re: [CMake] Using gcc as an alternative compiler on windows

2010-01-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/20 John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com: Navigate to a CLEAN build directory and invoke either cmake or cmake-gui Out of source builds work great here. You keep your source in one tree and your builds in other trees. Hi Vikas, May be you could read the FAQ for knowing more about

Re: [CMake] Using gcc as an alternative compiler on windows

2010-01-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/20 Mike Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net: You need to have a valid/correct installation of MinGW or MSYS+MinGW or Cygwin. As a complement to Mike advice you may have a look at Code::Blocks (aka C::B) too, it's a cross-platform IDE working on Windows and there is downloadable

Re: [CMake] Checking function or symbol in namespace

2010-01-21 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/21 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net: The fact check_function_exists checks C function but not C++ free function is a bit confusing. That's true. AFAIU, CMake is dedicated to build C++ source code, However that's look false to me :-( so I suppose many users may expect it works

[CMake] Where to read information about XXXCoinfigYYY.cmake mechanism

2010-01-23 Thread Eric Noulard
Hi there, Where can I read more on how to write/generate appropriate XXXCoinfigYYY.cmake file for a project build with CMake? I did read: cmake --help-command find_package cmake --help-command install (most notably the EXPORT related things...) Is there an example project using/implementing

Re: [CMake] CPack and SWIG module on Windows

2010-01-24 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/25 Nicholas Yue yue.nicho...@gmail.com: Hi,   I am attempting to use CPack to package up a SWIG module I am distributing.   I have no problem with CPack on Linux but on Windows, I have some difficulty.   CMAKE CONFIG   = [...]       INCLUDE (CPack)       SET (

Re: [CMake] Installing Find*.cmake to the correct folder using NSIS configured by cmake on windows platform

2010-01-26 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/26 mika.raj...@patria.fi: Hi How can i tell the NSIS installer, using cmake, to install my Find*.cmake script to the ${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules directory? Writing that to the install command doesn't work. You do not give us enough information about WHAT exactly did not work, example of

Re: [CMake] Installing Find*.cmake to the correct folder using NSIS configured by cmake on windows platform

2010-01-26 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/26 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com: On 26. Jan, 2010, at 9:02 , mika.raj...@patria.fi wrote: Hi How can i tell the NSIS installer, using cmake, to install my Find*.cmake script to the ${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules directory? Writing that to the install command doesn't work. I did try

Re: [CMake] cmake_policy(VERSION 2.4) = no exe's generated

2010-01-30 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/1/29 Frank Bonniwell valef...@gmail.com: Hello All, I'm a student new to cmake and I ran into a stump with compiling some code. When I apply the cmake_policy as instructed in a previous compiling error, no executables are generated even when the output says otherwise. Did you try make

Re: [CMake] copy on install

2010-02-04 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/4 Tim St. Clair timoth...@gmail.com: Is there a clean way to copy the install target e.g. install (TARGETS foo DESTINATION bin) ~ install(TARGETS foo DESTINATION loc2 RENAME foo_bar) -doesn't exist. I basically need to install the same target to *multiple* locations with different

Re: [CMake] Static library issues.

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/5 Surya Kiran Gullapalli suryakiran.gullapa...@gmail.com: Hello all, I'm using CMake-2.8 on winxp with Visual Studio 2005 generator. lets say I've a dll created (A.dll) from some cxx files and a static library static.lib So I call Link_Directories to specify the directory where the

Re: [CMake] Manual version vs CMake version

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/5 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net: Hi, Perhaps it will be helpful information for someone. On popular Linux distributions CMake 2.6 may not be necessarily the same CMake 2.6 as documented [1] on the website. CMake from Ubuntu 9.10  reports cmake version 2.6-patch 4 CMake from

Re: [CMake] Relocatable RPM

2010-02-11 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/11 Will Dicharry wdicha...@stellarscience.com: Is there a way to make an RPM package generated with CPack relocatable? Should be possible, theoretically. Currently the spec file generated by CPackRPM is not. As far as I remember relocatable RPM should avoid absolute file install and use

[CMake] Fwd: Questions about CPack Debian generator

2010-02-12 Thread Eric Noulard
I dif forgot thet list... 2010/2/12 Thawan Kooburat ktha...@gmail.com: Hi, I am trying to create a Debian binary package using CMake/CPack and it is quite a nice tool. I understand that CMake/CPack try to rely on external tools as little as possible but there are 2 issues that I encountered

Re: [CMake] Fwd: Questions about CPack Debian generator

2010-02-12 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/12 Hendrik Sattler p...@hendrik-sattler.de: Did you dig the mailing list I think the file owner part has been discussed already. Concerning the dpkg-shlibs may be it's worth a feature request? And may be even a contribution? The code of Deb Generator is in:

Re: [CMake] Questions about CPack Debian generator

2010-02-12 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/12 Thawan Kooburat ktha...@gmail.com: Are you suggesting that there is a solution for the file owner permission? I try to search in the mailing list but I could not find it. Look at that thread of discussion: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-August/031250.html and in the end

Re: [CMake] CPACK RPM Gen not allowing symlinks.

2010-02-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/18 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: On Thursday 18 February 2010, Schwartz, Philip wrote: Hi all, I have a few libraries to install with my build that are prebuilt. They consist of a .so and a symlink to the .so of .so.22. Currently when installing, things work correctly.

Re: [CMake] CPACK RPM Gen not allowing symlinks.

2010-02-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/20 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com: 2010/2/18 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: On Thursday 18 February 2010, Schwartz, Philip wrote: Hi all, I have a few libraries to install with my build that are prebuilt. They consist of a .so and a symlink to the .so of .so.22

Re: [CMake] Using CPack to include shared libraries in rpms

2010-02-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/20 Hendrik Sattler p...@hendrik-sattler.de: Am Samstag 20 Februar 2010 01:27:20 schrieb Robert Knapke: My CMake project links a boost python shared library when builiding the libraries and executables.  I am using CPack to make an rpm of my project, but the boost python shared library

Re: [CMake] Using CPack to include shared libraries in rpms

2010-02-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/20 Robert Knapke knapke...@gmail.com: Eric, The reason I asked my original question was because a user of ours who was trying to install the project (using yum) was unable to install it (and it displayed the boost python library as a missing dependency). ok I see.  If I am building

Re: [CMake] Using CPack to include shared libraries in rpms

2010-02-22 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/22 Robert Knapke knapke...@gmail.com: Eric, I looked online at the two websites you gave me, but they dont seem to have rpms for the linux builds that I am sending to. I am using Suse 11.x. The people who are currently trying to install the program have Redhat. This may not work as

Re: [CMake] multicore interix'en testing

2010-02-25 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/25 Markus Duft markus.d...@salomon.at: Bill Hoffman wrote: Markus Duft wrote: Bill Hoffman wrote: I did not want to get into the technical thread on this issue, so I created a new message.  Markus, will you be able to run a dashboard for this platform?  It is sort of a requirement for

Re: [CMake] [CMake + CPack] How to install TTF fonts?

2010-02-27 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/27 Anatoly Shirokov shiroko...@mail.ru: Hi there! Does anybody know how to install own ttf fonts? I have installed FontName but the following:  SET(CPACK_NSIS_CREATE_ICONS_EXTRA    StrCpy \\\$FONT_DIR \\\$FONTS    !insertmacro InstallTTFFont \\\$INSTDIRbinV100026_.TTF\\\  

Re: [CMake] generate multiple packages the easiest way

2010-02-27 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/27 AKHRES Nader nader.akh...@laposte.net: Hello, I've looked at the archive but can't find exactly the answer suiting to my case. I need to create several packages (for instance nsis AND zip) of exactly the same source tree (no components). I've first try to use a list for

Re: [CMake] generate multiple packages the easiest way

2010-02-27 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/27 AKHRES Nader nader.akh...@laposte.net: I guess I've found my issue. I use a main script calling cmake command and passing CPACK_GENERATOR like this: -DCPACK_GENERATOR Maybe this don't work for list. Is there any way to pass a list to command line cmake? I would say that:

Re: [CMake] generate multiple packages the easiest way

2010-02-27 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/27 AKHRES Nader nader.akh...@laposte.net: ok, I manage to find another way: I do this SET(CPACK_GENERATOR_TXT ZIP\;NSIS)  #just escape ; so that it still a string SET(CPACK_GENERATOR ${CPACK_GENERATOR_TXT})  #here it becomes a list then I use -DCPACK_GENERATOR=${CPACK_GENERATOR_TXT}

Re: [CMake] Can CMake prompt the user for input while it's running?

2010-02-27 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/27 Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com: On 02/27/10 12:53, John Drescher wrote: On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Naram Qashatcyberb...@cyberbotx.com  wrote: I'm wondering if it's possible for CMake to prompt the user for input when it's running, as opposed to relying on passing in

Re: [CMake] [CMake + CPack] How to install TTF fonts?

2010-02-27 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/27 Anatoly Shirokov shiroko...@mail.ru: Actually we need to pass local exist file. In other words, the following    !insertmacro InstallTTFFont \\\$INSTDIRbinV100026_.TTF\\\ must be replace on    !insertmacro InstallTTFFont

Re: [CMake] Can CMake prompt the user for input while it's running?

2010-02-28 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/28 Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com: Now since there is a Grouped View based on var name in CMake gui you should be able to emulate what you want using conditionnal option + cmake gui + grouped view. Most of our users are compiling our program under *nix and will not be using a

Re: [CMake] Can CMake prompt the user for input while it's running?

2010-02-28 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/2/28 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: Off course the cmake UI would authorize to unfilter all vars just as today there is the advanced/normal view. You could just use the advanced/non-advanced to handle this. When you want to show a variable to the user make it non-advanced.  

Re: [CMake] CPack RPM: how to specify the compression type ?

2010-03-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/1 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: Hi, I'm not sure this is actually possible, but I'd like to build a rpm on a SUSE 11.1 machine, which can also be installed on a SUSE 10.1 machine. Beside the compression type problem it's not guaranted that dependencies found in 11.1 will

Re: [CMake] Supressing Make, but not Generators

2010-03-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/3 Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group) jack.smith.ext...@unicreditgroup.de: -Original Message- From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of J Decker Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:34 AM To: cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake]

Re: [CMake] xcodeproj internal reference lottery

2010-03-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/3 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com: The CMake generator for Xcode simply uses object pointers as the seed for those hex ids: that's why they change every time you run cmake. It's also what makes it easy to guarantee that those ids are unique without having a data structure to track it.

Re: [CMake] CPack RPM: how to specify the compression type ?

2010-03-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/3 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: RPM generator does not support custom rpmbuild parameter but it support custom spec file so depending on the solution (if it exists) it may already be possible or not  :-) Ok, found it, thanks to the friendly guys from SUSE :-) For

Re: [CMake] Strange search order of CMakeCache.txt

2010-03-05 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/5 kent williams nkwmailingli...@gmail.com: I recently had to help out a CMake newbie, who had run CMake in the source directory.  Then he re-read the instructions on build setup for our programs, and did it the right way -- i.e. he configured a build directory for an out of source

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try

2010-03-05 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/5 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D Please try your projects with it.   If you find any issues, let me know. I think this is about it.  So, if I don't hear anything by Monday, this is going to be 2.8.1.

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try

2010-03-05 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/5 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: Eric Noulard wrote: 2010/3/5 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D Please try your projects with it.   If you find any issues, let me know. I think this is about

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try

2010-03-06 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/6 Micha Renner micha.ren...@t-online.de: Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Eric Noulard: 2010/3/5 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D Please try your projects with it.   If you find any

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try

2010-03-06 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/6 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com: 2010/3/6 Micha Renner micha.ren...@t-online.de: Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Eric Noulard: 2010/3/5 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: CMake 2.8.1 RC 4 is ready to try: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D Please

Re: [CMake] Decompressing a file with cmake

2010-03-08 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/8 Droscy drosc...@yahoo.it: AKHRES Nader ha scritto: is it possible to uncompress a zip file with cmake? One solution could be writing the Find7Zip.cmake file in order to get the executable and use it to uncompress the downloaded file... I know that this solution is not very easy, but

Re: [CMake] set proxy with cmake file download

2010-03-12 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/12 AKHRES Nader nader.akh...@laposte.net I'm using windows... maybe it works on linux, I'll have a try but I would need a way to make it works on windows as well I don't know the default behavior of curl lib on Windows but the CTest source code do use HTTP_PROXY (upper case) env var

Re: [CMake] cmake -E remove /path/*.txt

2010-03-12 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/12 Alexandre Gramfort alexandre.gramf...@inria.fr: Hi, is there a way to have cmake do something like : cmake -E remove /path/*.txt I need to clear tests outputs before running new tests. I have a solution with a GLOB but the list of files is set during cmake configure so it does

Re: [CMake] Distributed Testing?

2010-03-19 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/18 Caron, Michael C. (US SSA) michael.ca...@baesystems.com: Can CMake/CTest handle testing distributed applications?  For example, I’ve got a Socket based server and client.  I want to test various combinations of server and client on the same machine, on distributed homogeneous

Re: [CMake] CPack packages are missing files

2010-03-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/20 Rob Hasselbaum r...@hasselbaum.net: Thanks for the quick responses! On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: Which one did you try? RPM, TGZ, ZIP ? DEB and TGZ. when you do make install are you root or normal user? Are you installing files

Re: [CMake] integrating with installshield

2010-03-22 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/22 Tyler Roscoe ty...@cryptio.net: I have a lot of complaints about Installshield, but I'll spare you the whinging and just say that I need to generate Installshield setups at the end of our CMake build. I am considering some options and was wondering if anyone else has experience with

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/28 Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr: This list seems not to be really active You are kidding right? Did you check the past 3 years archive ? and I did not receive any help since I posted this one week ago. BTW this issue has been open on Mantis more than 3 months ago and seems still to

Re: [CMake] Annoyances with cmake vs qmake

2010-03-28 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/28 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com: Hi Ruben, 2) A second point, and this has been brought up before on this list, several times even. With qmake: qmake make debug //produces debug binaries make release //produces release binaries make all //produces both make distclean

Re: [CMake] warning message

2010-03-29 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/29 nader.akh...@laposte.net nader.akh...@laposte.net Hello, I've the following message while generating projects with cmake: CMake Error: Error required internal CMake variable not set, cmake may be not be built correctly. Missing variable is: CMAKE_EDIT_COMMAND-- Generating done

Re: [CMake] warning message

2010-03-29 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/29 nader.akh...@laposte.net nader.akh...@laposte.net It is the one provided by ubuntu which is version 2.6-patch 4 I use Ubuntu kermit and cmake commande line. 2.6.4 is the official karmic package but it's becoming oldish and since 2.8.x is now the stable release for CMake I doubt that

Re: [CMake] Has anybody tried to use CMake to build software on the MinGW/MSYS/Wine platform?

2010-04-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/2 Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca: [..] I feel this platform has revolutionary potential. [...lengthy interesting post ...] May be you two can Wiki-fied your experimental story such that it would be easier to reproduce [and sometimes update] the procedure? -- Erk Membre de

Re: [CMake] use of ${cmake_command}

2010-04-05 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/5 AKHRES Nader nader.akh...@laposte.net: Hello, I've seen some examples where ${CMAKE_COMMAND} is used instead of cmake, typically in post build command Is it a better practice for portability? Yes. This way you can be sure to use the very same 'cmake' that you used to

Re: [CMake] Looking for a way to do 'make install' to a destination

2010-04-23 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/19 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com: On 19. Apr, 2010, at 16:22 , Magnus Therning wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:36, Remy Chibois rchib...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: It's some times useful to do an install rooted not at '/' but at some

Re: [CMake] A target for 'install'?

2010-04-23 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/23 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 14:31, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/4/23 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org: Is there a target for 'install' that I can add dependencies to by using add_dependencies()? This is currently unsupported

Re: [CMake] Why is this custom command run twice?

2010-04-23 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/23 aaron_wri...@selinc.com Is there no interest in this differing behavior between Linux and Windows? I'm pretty sure there should be :-) But may be not as urgent as you wish. I'm a little worried that CMake doesn't produce the same results in both situations. Aren't those kind of

Re: [CMake] different compiler flags for each executable

2010-04-28 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/28 Alex Flint alex.fl...@gmail.com: Hi there, Is there a way to add compiler flags (a la CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS) for just one particular executable? Did you try COMPILE_FLAGS property? set_target_properties(myexe_target PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wall) see:

Re: [CMake] No Native 64-Bit CMake Binaries?

2010-05-06 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/5/5 Eskandar Ensafi ens...@spacecomputer.com: Hello, I used to build my own CMake binaries under Linux and Windows, but I got tired of having to install compatible versions of third-party libraries such as Qt, so I’ve been downloading the prebuilt binaries instead.  On the Linux side,

Re: [CMake] CPackRPM.cmake patch

2010-05-07 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/5/7 Erwan Legrand elegr...@cloudmark.com: I missed a few things in my previous message. I'm currently trying to solve a two problems with the RPM generator:  * Lack of support for file names containing spaces  * Lack of support for %config and %config(noreplace)  * Lack of support for

Re: [CMake] CPackRPM.cmake patch

2010-05-11 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/5/7 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com: Thank you Erwan, Would you be kind enough to open a feature request on the bug tracker http://public.kitware.com/Bug/my_view_page.php I did open the bug myself before your message get too deep the mail stack: http://public.kitware.com/Bug

Re: [CMake] SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES different properties for same file, same library

2010-05-12 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/5/12 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com: On 12. May, 2010, at 13:03 , Bryn Lloyd wrote: Hi, I would like to cmakeify the UMFPACK/AMD libraries by Timothy Davis. I need to compile the same source file, multiple times, with different flags/defines in order to link the resulting object

Re: [CMake] cmake ld fails

2010-05-19 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/5/18 R. Bryn Fenwick robert.fenw...@irbbarcelona.org: Hi, I have received some code that works on one system, but is failing to work for me. Any suggestions how to debug this would be greatly appreciated. I think that I am setting everything up correctly however it appears to need some

Re: [CMake] cmake support Eclipse CDT

2007-07-31 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/7/31, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 7/30/07, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course CDT still uses the java-written eclipse platform sdk, but it doesn't have anything else to do with Java. So you're writing a plugin in Java to integrate CMake with Eclipse. Well,

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-07-31 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/7/31, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 7/31/07, Eric Noulard wrote: 2007/7/31, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva: Again I may help. I may provide you my hand-made CDT projects files for CMake enabled open-source projects https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp

Re: [CMake] cmake support Eclipse

2007-07-31 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/7/31, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 7/31/07, Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/7/31, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]: and CMake doesn't figure out how to do Java, then CMake will lose in the Eclipse world. Not so sure, even if I'm no eclipse expert

[CMake] merging autotool project and qt project

2007-08-01 Thread Eric Noulard
Did forget to cc the list... -- Forwarded message -- From: Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 1 août 2007 08:48 Subject: Re: [CMake] merging autotool project and qt project To: Marie-Christine Vallet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007/7/31, Marie-Christine Vallet [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Qt

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/7/31, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Attached is the file. I changed some variable names and other minor things, but I'm not certain it follows all the coding standards. I leave that to your inspection, although please point out whatever you find that you needed to fix

Re: [CMake] *Updated* Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/1, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Update patch and source. May be you can upload your patch on the Wiki when you update it? http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/Eclipse_CDT4_Generator_Development -- Erk ___ CMake mailing list

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/1, Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/7/31, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Attached is the file. I changed some variable names and other minor things, but I'm not certain it follows all the coding standards. I leave that to your inspection, although please point

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/1, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wednesday 01 August 2007 07:56, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: On 8/1/07, Eric Noulard wrote: ... I've tried to manually activate Team menu on this particular folder but I am still unable to do it without Sharing the whole

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/1, Andy Dingfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED]: one small point I would add... Instead of spending time getting cvs to integrate, I suspect more eclipse folks prefer Subversion, which works very well in eclipse. I'd rather use Subversion or even git too :)) The fact is my test case is on a

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/2, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thursday 02 August 2007 05:34, Eric Noulard wrote: Moreover I think in-source built should be supported by the CDT Generator in order to be consistent with other generator. [...] Yes, in-source builds should work and having Eclipse

Re: [CMake] RPM for CPack?

2007-08-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/2, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've coded my own solution for now to get Debians built, but was hoping to move to CPack 2.6 once it's released. But now I'm feeling some pressure to build RPM package as well. The full packager pressure :)) Does anyone know: does CPack 2.6 not

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/2, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Aug 2, 2007, at 5:34 AM, Eric Noulard wrote: Eclipse assume the top-level project folder MUST be under version control which is not the case with the current approach of the Eclipse CDT Generator which put .project and .cproject in the Build

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/2, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva [EMAIL PROTECTED]: start rambling I'm not sure where the problem is, but I'm certainly developing a love/hate relationship with eclipse ;) On the one hand it is a great tool, although a memory hog, that has quite a nice interface and great flexibility.

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-02 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/2, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Aug 2, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Eric Noulard wrote: When using out-of-source build with CMake (including Visual Studio) the project file is generated in the Build Tree not the Source Tree. LIke I said, Eclipse is NOT like other IDEs and therefor

Re: [CMake] *Updated* Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/1, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wednesday 01 August 2007 04:12, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: Update patch and source. I committed it to cvs with only minor cosmetical changes. Thanks you for that. Would it be possible to have some downloadable CMake CVS version

Fwd: [CMake] MSVC project names

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
Another Forget cc CMake-ML... Complement: When using other CMake macro you should use the primary name e.g: TARGET_LINK_LIBRARY(gammu-exe Gammu-Lib) -- Forwarded message -- From: Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 3 août 2007 10:23 Subject: Re: [CMake] MSVC project names

Re: [CMake] *Updated* Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/3, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think binary snapshot may be useful to widen testing? I may contribute intel linux built if you find it both feasible and useful. I will see what I can setup for this. The build process for the releases is automated, I was sure it was :))

Re: [CMake] RPM for CPack?

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/3, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 8/2/07, Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you have trouble with the macro do not hesitate to ask for explanation and/or send patched version either on the list or the wiki Thanks. Could you explain something to me? It looks to me

Re: [CMake] RPM for CPack?

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/3, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 8/3/07, Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But when I do this, I don't find any files named CPackSourceConfig.cmake in my build directory ('x'). Did you INCLUDE(CPack) in your root CMakeLists.txt ? Nope :) That fixed

Re: [CMake] RPM for CPack?

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/3, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 8/3/07, Eric Noulard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stange enough your guy doesn't want to improve its own software distribution... But anyway, the net effect is that I need to do as much outside of his source tree as possible, including any

Re: [CMake] *Updated* Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/3, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That would be a good idea. This way anybody wanting to test a binary snapshot build will be able to do it. So, I don't want to fill the disk with these things. Of course your are right. Should I just remove the previous night, or maybe only

Re: [CMake] How to request features?

2007-08-03 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/8/3, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 03 August 2007 09:49, Christian Convey wrote: On 8/3/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently we are in the process of migrating from phpbugtracker to mantis, so better wait a few days until everything is working

Re: [CMake] How to request features?

2007-08-04 Thread Eric Noulard
Re-send to the list because previous attached files were too big. 2007/8/3, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 03 August 2007 12:32, Eric Noulard wrote: Yes there is more. I throw hereafter the things I know, but there may be more. It checks whether if every package file

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >