Hi Folks,
Being able to activate the dynamic globing on a per-directory or per-target
or per-glob call basis would be nice. Coupled with "automoc" feature of Qt,
that would simplify things greatly.
I would be happy to test patches on our large scale project "3DSlicer".
See https://github.com/Slic
On 2013-05-30 08:47, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
Working with make taught me once and for all, that functions like
[execute_process] should be avoided whenever possible. A build tool
creates files from files via the means of targets. So if you want to
use a tool like this effectively, you should use t
Hi Folks,
Putting on my list moderation hat, I'd like to terminate the debate
in this thread. Arguments on both sides have been hashed out a few
times. Whether we all agree or not, some people find source globs
useful and it will not be disruptive to CMake to add an option to
add dependencies on
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:27:28AM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> Also, very astonishing to me is the fact that after apparently finding
> file(GLOB) in the documentation, you clearly didn't read the whole
> paragraph. It's right there:
>
> >> We do not recommend using GLOB to collect a list of
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:59:22PM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2013-05-28 21:23, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:21:57AM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >
> >> GLOB is just one of many things that will surprise you when working with
> >> CMake if you don't understand
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:55:33PM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2013-05-28 19:50, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
>
> > Files don't just happen to be lying around in directories. You have to
> > create them in a specific path, with a specific name. Even if the act of
> > creation was performed by ano
On Wednesday 29 May 2013, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2013-05-28 19:50, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> > Files don't just happen to be lying around in directories. You have to
> > create them in a specific path, with a specific name. Even if the act of
> > creation was performed by another developer, on
On 29.05.2013 22:59, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2013-05-28 21:23, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:21:57AM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
[...]
>
>> I do understand the distinction between calling cmake and make and I
>> understood from the start when variables are evaluated an
On 2013-05-28 21:23, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:21:57AM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
GLOB is just one of many things that will surprise you when working with
CMake if you don't understand the difference between the configure and
build passes.
I've written quite a bit of
On 2013-05-28 19:50, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
Files don't just happen to be lying around in directories. You have to
create them in a specific path, with a specific name. Even if the act of
creation was performed by another developer, on another machine, that
information is written to disk in the c
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:21:57AM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2013-05-19 19:47, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
>
> > I you ever put "junk files" with, say, a .cpp extension in a source tree
> > of a C++ project, you're the only one to blame.
>
> This is not unusual at all. I'm often in the situat
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 01:13:12PM -0400, David Cole wrote:
> > > Explicit lists violate DRY
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_repeat_yourself
>
> No, this doesn't apply :-)
> By having some files lying around in a directory I did not state
> anything, so I do not repeat myself in the CMa
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:57:34PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > Explicit lists violate DRY
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_repeat_yourself
>
> No, this doesn't apply :-)
> By having some files lying around in a directory I did not state anything, so
> I do not repeat myself in
On 2013-05-19 19:47, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
I you ever put "junk files" with, say, a .cpp extension in a source tree
of a C++ project, you're the only one to blame.
This is not unusual at all. I'm often in the situation where I have
source files for classes that are works in progress, tangent
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Neundorf
To: cmake-developers
Sent: Thu, May 23, 2013 12:55 pm
Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Safe source list GLOBs
On Thursday 23 May 2013, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> On Wed, May
On Thursday 23 May 2013, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:50:34AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > > On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrot
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:50:34AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>
> > On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > >
> > >> Globs simply do not work well fo
On Monday 20 May 2013, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:26:58PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > > On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > > >> Glo
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:26:58PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > >> Globs simply do not work well for source files.
> > >
> >
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:50:34AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> >
> >> Globs simply do not work well for source files.
> >
> > GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake c
On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> >> Globs simply do not work well for source files.
> >
> > GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake currently ;]
>
> No it
On 5/15/2013 4:48 AM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Globs simply do not work well for source files.
GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake currently ;]
No it does not. It is sloppy IMO. It will pick up junk files.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:55:37PM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Globs simply do not work well for source files.
GLOBs work great for source files. Just not with CMake currently ;]
> I don't think this will be come a module in CMake.
>
> To have this work in a generic way, you would have to run
Sorry for the top post... :)
Globs simply do not work well for source files. I don't think this
will be come a module in CMake.
To have this work in a generic way, you would have to run something that
did the glob with each time the build system was run, and be able to
change the sources
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:49:03AM -0400, Brad King wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 11:09 PM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
>
> > I recently ran into the issue of GLOBs being unsafe for source lists and
> > wrote a very simple piece of code to fix the problem. A generalized
> > version of that code is available h
On 05/11/2013 11:09 PM, Wojciech Knapik wrote:
> I recently ran into the issue of GLOBs being unsafe for source lists and
> wrote a very simple piece of code to fix the problem. A generalized
> version of that code is available here:
>
> https://github.com/wknapik/scm/blob/master/code/cmake/Module
26 matches
Mail list logo
