RE: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-21 Thread Reinhard Pötz
-Original Message- From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reinhard Poetz wrote: There remains one open question for me: How to I get 'feedback' whether the called pipeline did its job well or not? And if not, how to I get information about what happend

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: snip Let me add: - make a new method that allows the flow to call a pipeline and pass a different output stream. This will allow to use pipelines as tools to serialize things, say, to disk or to other means. What do you think? /snip I think

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Sorry to jump in lately, but the vote made me consider that thread as important and I finally looked at it. So here we go... Which was the reason to call for a vote even if the discussion is not yet finalized :-) I do know how lazy you people are :-) (oh, just because

RE: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Thank you very much! I thought that it would work the other way! Regards, Reinhard -Original Message- From: Christopher Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re

RE: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Reinhard Poetz
-Original Message- From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration] Reinhard Poetz wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Ugo Cei
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Therefore I'll come up with a solution of using the flow as controller for XMLForms - a 'pre-alpha' version is already running at my laptop. I know that my solution is far from being perfect (continuations can be very tricky ...) but I want to learn and the feedback will

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Ugo Cei
[I'm resending this, since the first time I managed to inadvertently cut the last part of the message.] Reinhard Poetz wrote: Therefore I'll come up with a solution of using the flow as controller for XMLForms - a 'pre-alpha' version is already running at my laptop. I know that my solution

RE: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Reinhard Poetz
For my flows I use a self-defined function which makes this for me: function callPipeline(src) { xc = cocoon.componentManager.lookup( myXMLConsumer.ROLE ); resolver = cocoon.environment.getObjectModel().get(source-resolver); srce = resolver.resolveURI(src);

RE: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Ugo Cei wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Therefore I'll come up with a solution of using the flow as controller for XMLForms - a 'pre-alpha' version is already running at my laptop. I know that my solution is far from being perfect (continuations can be very tricky ...) but I want to

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Sorry to jump in lately, but the vote made me consider that thread as important and I finally looked at it. So here we go... Which was the reason to call for a vote even if the discussion is not yet finalized :-) I do know how lazy you people

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Michael Melhem wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:20:17PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote: snip/ OK. So we have some strong and justified -1's against map:flowmap... Yes your argument is convincing, so perhaps we should put the flowmap issue on the back-burner .. ;) One small point

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-17 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Reinhard Poetz wrote: There remains one open question for me: How to I get 'feedback' whether the called pipeline did its job well or not? And if not, how to I get information about what happend (error message/status information)? What do you think? I think you are getting right to the bone

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-16 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Sorry to jump in lately, but the vote made me consider that thread as important and I finally looked at it. So here we go... Semantic confusion induced by map:pipeline First of all, I wonder if all this started because the sitemap top-level

RE: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-16 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: snip Let me add: - make a new method that allows the flow to call a pipeline and pass a different output stream. This will allow to use pipelines as tools to serialize things, say, to disk or to other means. What do you think? /snip I think you mean a function

Re: [vote] finilizing the pending votes on flow [was Re: [RT] Flow/SitemapIntegration]

2003-01-16 Thread Christopher Oliver
Hi Reinhard, Just a warning, you should always use the var keyword with local variables in JavaScript. Your function should probably read: function callPipeline(src) { var xc = cocoon.componentManager.lookup( myXMLConsumer.ROLE ); var resolver =