Yep.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Syncing rhino
At 02:10 PM 6/26/2003, Gianugo wrote:
...
>Great all around. If you lay out a general road map of what needs to
be
>>do
At 02:10 PM 6/26/2003, Gianugo wrote:
...
Great all around. If you lay out a general road map of what needs to be
done,
I'd like to try to help - but won't see daylight enough to do so for about a
week. If you're not done by then, count me in.
I think I will be able to use your help: unfortunatel
Geoff Howard wrote:
This will take no more than a few hours of (boring) coding, and I'm
willing undertake the effort if it sounds reasonable to us all, and
produce a first working extensible JavaScript interpreter that might be
committed in Rhino. Meanwhile, we can start approaching the Rhino guys
done about that.
Regards,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Syncing rhino
...
> > I would say then that it would be nice to go to the Rhino
> community with
> &
...
> > I would say then that it would be nice to go to the Rhino
> community with
> > suggestions *and* some code. I have been looking at it more thouroughly
> > and as of now I think that the real problem is not really Rhino missing
> > continuations, but Rhino being coded not to be extensible:
on 6/25/03 4:55 PM Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>
>>I think that the option of "active and direct" collaboration between
>>Cocoon and Rhino would be better for both. It might increase their
>>community, create a solid political link (that today is missing), give
>>us a m
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I think that the option of "active and direct" collaboration between
Cocoon and Rhino would be better for both. It might increase their
community, create a solid political link (that today is missing), give
us a meritocratic control on the platform (cocoon is probably goin
on 6/24/03 3:48 PM Christopher Oliver wrote:
> Although I think it would be nice to sync with the Rhino cvs, I can tell
> you from personal experience that the Rhino code at cocoondev.org is
> more stable than Cocoon itself at this point.
>
> So I think trying to place the blame on Rhino for not
on 6/24/03 2:29 PM Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> Geoff Howard wrote:
>
>
>>>This is good news. I understand that it's very difficult, but I hope
>>>that it might be easier than you think, and I hope I can somehow help
>>>you in that. Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
>>>intere
on 6/24/03 12:30 PM Geoff Howard wrote:
> At 01:00 PM 6/24/2003, Gianugo wrote:
>
>>Christopher Oliver wrote:
>>
OK... I spent some more time with the code and did some steps forward.
Now, unfortunately, I'm stuck due to my ignorance: any further step
would be just a wild bet from m
David Crossley wrote:
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
...Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
interest, I'm starting to think that I'm just being paranoid...
No, you are definitely not. All the issues that you and Christopher
are attending to are extremely important. I, for one, do
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
>
> ...Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
> interest, I'm starting to think that I'm just being paranoid...
No, you are definitely not. All the issues that you and Christopher
are attending to are extremely important. I, for one, do not think that
i c
At 09:29 PM 6/24/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
This is good news. I understand that it's very difficult, but I hope
that it might be easier than you think, and I hope I can somehow help
you in that. Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
interest, I'm starting to thin
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Although I think it would be nice to sync with the Rhino cvs, I can tell
you from personal experience that the Rhino code at cocoondev.org is
more stable than Cocoon itself at this point.
Please understand that my point is not about stability: I'm positive
about the curr
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Syncing rhino
Geoff Howard wrote:
>> This is good news. I understand that it's very difficult, but I hope
>> that it might be easier than you think, and I hope I can somehow help
>> you in that. Any
Geoff Howard wrote:
This is good news. I understand that it's very difficult, but I hope
that it might be easier than you think, and I hope I can somehow help
you in that. Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
interest, I'm starting to think that I'm just being paranoid...
You
At 01:00 PM 6/24/2003, Gianugo wrote:
Christopher Oliver wrote:
OK... I spent some more time with the code and did some steps forward.
Now, unfortunately, I'm stuck due to my ignorance: any further step
would be just a wild bet from my part, and it would take me a lot of
time to get acquainted w
Christopher Oliver wrote:
OK... I spent some more time with the code and did some steps forward.
Now, unfortunately, I'm stuck due to my ignorance: any further step
would be just a wild bet from my part, and it would take me a lot of
time to get acquainted with all the technologies involved (cor
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters
such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I doubt
that the Rhino guys
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I doubt
that the Rhino guys w
ssage-
From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Syncing rhino
I feel that guranteeing a future to the flow has to go through syncing
our patched Rhino version with the official one. If we are unable to
lobby them and l
I feel that guranteeing a future to the flow has to go through syncing
our patched Rhino version with the official one. If we are unable to
lobby them and let it go through their main CVS (which would be of
course the best solution), at a very least we should maintain a set of
patches and keep
24 matches
Mail list logo
