On Tuesday 29 October 2002 05:31, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >while implementing the scratchpad blocks...
> >
> >>I am fine with that... So I'll go for
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
&g
Torsten Curdt wrote:
while implementing the scratchpad blocks...
I am fine with that... So I'll go for
...I found some things I like to hear some opinions on before changing the
whole build system ;-)
1. I found that the status="unstable" s
while implementing the scratchpad blocks...
> I am fine with that... So I'll go for
>
>
>
>
...I found some things I like to hear some opinions on before changing the
whole build system ;-)
1. I found that the status="unstable" shoul
Torsten Curdt wrote:
...
Ok?
Please, don't use unstable="true" or unstable="false", what about
status="stable" and status="unstable".
This is interpreted in a stylesheet
anyway, so please make it more readable for a casual user.
I am fine w
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> I am fine with that... So I'll go for
>
>
>
>
>
> ok?
>
Looks good for me :)
J.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, em
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok?
>
> Please, don't use unstable="true" or unstable="false", what about
> status="stable" and status="unstable".
> This is interpreted in a stylesheet
> anyway, so please make it more readable for a casual
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> > > So we could:
> > >
> > > 1) leave everything like it is :-(
> > > 2) have another blocks directory under scratchpad
> > > 3) have a single blocks directory and mark and exclude
> scratchpad stuff
> >
> > 4) have a scratchpad directory in every block that needs it.
> >
> > So we could:
> >
> > 1) leave everything like it is :-(
> > 2) have another blocks directory under scratchpad
> > 3) have a single blocks directory and mark and exclude scratchpad stuff
>
> 4) have a scratchpad directory in every block that needs it.
>
> I'm in favour of 3)
excellent - same he
On 28.Oct.2002 -- 04:29 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> What about having blocks inside the scratchpad? I just wanted to package the
> precept stuff but it should not go into the maintrunk. so...
>
> I think scratchpad blocks would unify the pattern of creating new stuff... it
>
Morrison, John wrote:
From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:tcurdt@;dff.st]
What about having blocks inside the scratchpad? I just wanted
to package the
precept stuff but it should not go into the maintrunk. so...
I think scratchpad blocks would unify the pattern of creating
new stuff... it
also
On Monday 28 October 2002 16:41, Morrison, John wrote:
> > From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:tcurdt@;dff.st]
> >
> > What about having blocks inside the scratchpad? I just wanted
> > to package the
> > precept stuff but it should not go into the maintrunk. so...
> >
> From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:tcurdt@;dff.st]
>
> What about having blocks inside the scratchpad? I just wanted
> to package the
> precept stuff but it should not go into the maintrunk. so...
>
> I think scratchpad blocks would unify the pattern of creating
> new stuf
What about having blocks inside the scratchpad? I just wanted to package the
precept stuff but it should not go into the maintrunk. so...
I think scratchpad blocks would unify the pattern of creating new stuff... it
also would be a piece of cake to move things out of the scratchpad then.
On
13 matches
Mail list logo
