PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU<mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I don't imagine that many, if any, people will opt out. But I think the
process is important: How do you say yes when you don't know what you're
agreeing to? And
I don't imagine that many, if any, people will opt out. But I think the
process is important: How do you say yes when you don't know what you're
agreeing to? And how do you know if you have the option to opt out,
unless asked?
Thanks everyone,
Tara
On 2015-01-26, 5:17 PM, Tom Johnson wrote:
Thank you, Tara and Ranti for taking this on. I'm sure even many speakers
who have no problem being filmed will appreciate being notified and given
the opportunity to opt in/out.
- Tom
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus wrote:
> I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing t
I can supply a Macbook.
Thanks Cary, for your offer to bring equipment. My hope is that someone
will step forward to coordinate the stream; it should be something that we
can bring volunteers on board for if we can arrange for a
morning/handoff/afternoon cycle, rather than a multi-day commitment.
] Conference
photography policy)
Correction: We need a Mac, as my encoder is Thunderbolt.
I will try to rebuild my MacBook Pro, if I gat a chance.
> On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, I am providing equipment and will set it up, but I do not
> believe th
Just to be clear, I am providing equipment and will set it up, but I do not
believe that we have a streaming crew at this time.
Riley and I spent almost every moment of the last Con doing this, so while I am
willing to teach and help, I am not going to be the video guy again.
We also need a dec
Correction: We need a Mac, as my encoder is Thunderbolt.
I will try to rebuild my MacBook Pro, if I gat a chance.
> On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, I am providing equipment and will set it up, but I do not
> believe that we have a streaming crew at this t
I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara
has volunteered to be the "paperwork" person and I'm volunteering to help
her out.
I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that
are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of
Monday, January 26, 2015 3:00 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
>
> I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly
> burdensome for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I
> think
Hi Cary,
I appreciate the work you do to make the streaming happen.
I'm trying to better understand the burden--what would you need to make
this work for you? If you were given the schedule with the names of
people who did *not* consent to be streamed highlighted would that work?
Cheers,
Tar
ERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome
for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers
and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded
On 1/26/15 4:43 PM, Salazar, Christina wrote:
> In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would
> require the presentation line up (including whether ALL of the presenters who
> are included on an individual presentation) to be made available to the
> filming crew in ad
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would
require the presentation line up (including whether ALL of the presenters who
are included on an individual presentation) to be made available to the filming
crew in
x27;re uncomfortable with.
Sarah
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:45 +
> From: christina.sala...@csuci.edu
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>
> In order to keep some presenters from being streamed and others not would
&g
Systems Librarian
John Spoor Broome Library
California State University, Channel Islands
805/437-3198
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Sarah
Shealy
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 12:07 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re:
_
From: Tara Robertson<mailto:trobert...@langara.bc.ca>
Sent: 1/26/2015 3:35 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU<mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
If it's too burdensome for the livestream crew, I'd be happy to
volunteer to
If it's too burdensome for the livestream crew, I'd be happy to
volunteer to work with the program committee and streaming committee to
make it happen.
I'd be willing to adapt the plain English consent sheet we used for
Access and the International Evergreen conference. I think it's
important
What more would be required than just putting a sheet of paper in front of the
lens while filming? Honestly curious.
Sarah
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:00:05 -0800
> From: listu...@chillco.com
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>
I think that requiring explicit permission from presenters is overly burdensome
for the crew that is struggling to get the recordings up. I think that speakers
and presenters should be informed that all presentations may be recorded and
made available to the public unless they inform the confere
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> For folks' consideration, here is a draft of the policy, which is
> based on the Evergreen and AdaCamp policies and adapted to C4L's needs
> and the feedback so far in this thread:
>
> https://gist.github.com/gmcharlt/8546dcb0ce2af580a4
I think this is all good stuff too, but my old Hippy soul cringes at
unnecessary paperwork. A consent form means nothing. Situations change. Even
a well-intended agreement sometimes needs to be reneged on. I think it's just
best that the presenters understand what the best hopes for their pr
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Tom Johnson
wrote:
> Maybe someone can help us nail down a good policy and approach for
> communicating it?
For folks' consideration, here is a draft of the policy, which is
based on the Evergreen and AdaCamp policies and adapted to C4L's needs
and the feedba
We would definitely want to both give notice to the presenters that the
plan is to record and to get consent (or dissent) ahead of time, so that we
can plan AV appropriately if someone does not want to be broadcast. It
would be awful to broadcast someone who didn't consent to it; nor would we
want
I love this conversation.
WRT presenters, I think it's good to be explicit that the plan is to
stream and record. It would be good practice to have presenters sign a
consent form agreeing to this.
Tara
On 26/01/2015 10:42 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
Sounds like we've got an established p
Sounds like we've got an established practice in place, then. Awesome.
Wouldn't hurt for us to clarify any policy we decide on to state that
presenters are welcome to not consent to webcast.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William Denton wrote:
> On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
>
On 26 January 2015, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
Not to complicate things: shall (or *how shall*) we accommodate requests
from presenters who might have a "no photo" preference vis-a-vis conference
webcast?
A few years ago a speaker didn't want to be filmed, and someone turned off the
camera and
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Tom Johnson
wrote:
> Maybe someone can help us nail down a good policy and approach for
> communicating it?
Besides putting the final version of the policy on the conference
website, I think mentioning it (and for that matter, the general code
of conduct) dur
isn't meant to restrict your freedom or get people in trouble.
> It's
> > > to protect those who feel they need protection. I wouldn't use a
> > > lanyard/badge/whatnot personally (if voluntary - if you have to choose
> a
> > > color on registrat
in trouble. It's
> > to protect those who feel they need protection. I wouldn't use a
> > lanyard/badge/whatnot personally (if voluntary - if you have to choose a
> > color on registration, obviously I would), but I'm not going to make
> others
> > feel as
e who feel they need protection. I wouldn't use a
> lanyard/badge/whatnot personally (if voluntary - if you have to choose a
> color on registration, obviously I would), but I'm not going to make others
> feel as though they're in the wrong for choosing to do it.
> Did all of t
m not going to make others
> feel as though they're in the wrong for choosing to do it.
> Did all of that make sense?
> Sarah
>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:52:18 -0800
> > From: kyle.baner...@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography pol
o it.
Did all of that make sense?
Sarah
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:52:18 -0800
> From: kyle.baner...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Galen Charlton wrote:
>
> > I w
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Galen Charlton wrote:
> I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent
> be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of
> a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1]
>
As a practical matter, this is functionally
One potential problem with ribbons is that there may be ribbon-fans who
also don't want to be photographed, and a blank ribbon in the midst of a
sea of others might get lost.
One option might be to choose a bright color (red might be a good
mnemonic) and have participants who don't want to be pho
Francis,
Another thing you could do is to buy blank ribbons; see
http://www.pcnametag.com/4-x-1-5-8-custom-name-badge-ribbon-blank-item-sscusb
for an example. These would be more visible, at least, though the green
might conflict with the darker green "First timer" badge ribbons I have for
the con
On 1/26/15 10:06 AM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote:
Thanks, Galen. I'm solidly +1 on this, and I would be very happy to hear if
there were some sort of mechanism in place for the 2015 conference. I do
realize that this might add to the burden of the host committee, so I'd be
happy to help make this happ
Thanks, Galen. I'm solidly +1 on this, and I would be very happy to hear if
there were some sort of mechanism in place for the 2015 conference. I do
realize that this might add to the burden of the host committee, so I'd be
happy to help make this happen.
Mark
Hi,
I would like to propose that C4L adopt a policy requiring that consent
be explicitly given to be photographed or recorded, along the lines of
a policy adopted by the Evergreen Project. [1]
Evergreen's policy was adapted from AdaCamp's photography policy. A
blog post from Ada Initiative outlin
38 matches
Mail list logo
