[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/02/2003 22:46:21:
> > most of the ghostkill code has already done by me and is available for
a
> > long time on the sf.net gnuworld patches list. You just did the
addition
> > to be able to turn it on/off.
> I just looked at your code(I assume that it is the one und
Py Fivestones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/04/2002 07:13:39:
> Hi,
> Is it possible to add parameters to the /msg x search feature? As
it
> is now, X will not output more than 10 hits. This limit makes the
feature
> self defeating in a way because newbies are the most likely ones to use
The ':o' modifier is just a flag, to save space/bandwidth it only
indicates a change of state. So, if you see a ':o', or ':v' or ':ov'
appended to a numeric, the subsequent numerics will also have that state
(op'd, etc) applied to them. That is until you encounter another change of
state :)
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/03/2002 11:08:44:
> Since an upgrade to a new postgres I get the following issue:
>
> ccontrol.h:25: libpq-int.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from ccontrol.cc:31:
> ccontrol.h: In method `int gnuworld::uworld::cmDatabase::getPID()
const':
> ccontro
The web-interface shouldn't have to set it at all, if a default value is
specified you don't have to explicitly set that field :)
However I just noticed I made a typo in the RELEASE.NOTES, it should read:
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN maxlogins INT4 DEFAULT 1;
and not:
ALTER TABLE users ADD CO
Its missing a new language entry (You may have seen it used on Undernet
warning you not to give out passwords). To fix, run this from the doc/
directory in your gnuworld repository:
psql dbname I don't know if this is just buggy for me or not, I compiled a new
version of
> gnuworld for a "pl
Just for future reference, please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
not everyone likes a few hundred kilobytes of code in their face ;)
Use coder-com for any potential discussion that might arise from use of
the patch ;)
Cheers, Greg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/10/2001 21:01:37:
> Hello, i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/09/2001 19:20:24:
> Why not put a code in that sais if a user is suspended, he can not be
removed.
>
> I presume you know that if you have someone on the userlist that is
close to
> you, and is willig to "betrade" the other ops, he could /msg x remuser
> #channel use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/09/2001 13:52:39:
> hi
>could this be a bug ?i have 498 access in the channel and the ban was
> 499.
> I tried to remove, knowing it couldnt do it, so show the person that i
could
> remove it and got this
>
> X([EMAIL PROTECTED])- You have insufficient access to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/09/2001 07:15:51:
> the point of discussion with this and cfv-165 is that the features have
been
> removed only for users.. not for opers/admins. though arguing with the
> status change is probably as futile as trying to discuss changes to
pl14.
>
Wrong :) opers/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/08/2001 00:03:41:
> /msg x ban #england *!*~@*.net 333 100 Non-Ident Ban. Reduce Abuse -
> Floodnets ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> [00:01] -X- The ban *!*~@*.net is already covered by *!*~@*.*
> [00:01] *** chonchi (~[EMAIL PROTECTED]) has
> joined #england
> [00:02] ***
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/08/2001 00:26:26:
> [11:24] -X- Auth: jcar114 [500] BlakJak [100] crispy [100]
>
> [11:24] -X- Auth: jcar114/dess|afk [500] BlakJak/Blak|Work [100]
> crispy/DodgyUni [100]
>
>
> The difference between these two reports - I wasnt in #auckland for the
> first one,
12 matches
Mail list logo
