X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.29 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by trek.sbg.org id h5IE9neY011311
>>On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Radium wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I had an idea that would help channel operators fight s
; does at the moment only PART instead of QUIT,
which clients DO see.
Pingu
-Original Message-
From: Jeekay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Radium <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:32:38 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] New
I think he is talking about extending the server-server protocol, so
that *servers* only get/send 1 cycle command instead of 3
JOIN/PART/MODE. On recieving a cycle command each server still sends
out 3 JOIN/PART/MODE to each of the affected clients (but one).
But in reality the bandwidth savings o
Umm... if the clients dont see the user parting/joining the channel, how
exactly are the on-join spammers going to send them a message.. on join?
GK
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Radium wrote:
> Hello,
> I had an idea that would help channel operators fight spamming
> on their channels. I suggest
Hello,
I had an idea that would help channel operators fight spamming
on their channels. I suggest the addition of a new command CYCLE
that would be available to channel operators only (I know that the
functionnality is "somehow" already included in most scripts.. however
it would be much m
