SledgeHammer01 opened a new issue, #41063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41063
### Apache Airflow version
2.9.3
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
When attempting to run the simple tutorial
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #41063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41063#issuecomment-2253755140
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
Lee-W opened a new pull request, #41062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41062
The https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39912, we thought `resolve` is an
internal method and added an additional required keyword argument. However, we
found out some existing DAGs broke due to
gyli commented on issue #40974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40974#issuecomment-2253725504
Thanks for the explanation!
There are 3 points that I really agree, and can explore in this issue:
1. It makes more sense to move serde modules to providers, and I also think
it
dolfinus opened a new pull request, #41061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41061
#40377 started reusing in `get_conn()` the same paramiko SSHClient, which
drastically improves performance of sequential execution of SSH commands. But
connection could be already
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #37778: Support adding custom TI Deps
to help DagRun make more flexible TI scheduling decisions
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37778
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
github-actions[bot] closed issue #38127: DataprocCreateClusterOperator doesn't
read softwareConfig properties as it should
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/38127
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #39879: Chart Postgres:15.4.1 and
airflow default version description: 2.9.1 update
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39879
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #38127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/38127#issuecomment-2253667347
This issue has been closed because it has not received response from the
issue author.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #38168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38168#issuecomment-2253667323
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #40087:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40087#issuecomment-2253667279
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for
raphaelauv commented on code in PR #40924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40924#discussion_r1693641088
##
airflow/sensors/base.py:
##
@@ -114,15 +118,33 @@ def _orig_start_date(
)
+class SkipPolicy(str, enum.Enum):
+"""Class with sensor's skip
raphaelauv commented on code in PR #40924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40924#discussion_r1693641088
##
airflow/sensors/base.py:
##
@@ -114,15 +118,33 @@ def _orig_start_date(
)
+class SkipPolicy(str, enum.Enum):
+"""Class with sensor's skip
raphaelauv commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253563168
Okay .Also all the providers are affected , could you confirm me that the
design is okay before I do the big refacto , thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
SledgeHammer01 commented on issue #10388:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10388#issuecomment-2253540208
in subprocess.py, this line in `SubprocessHook::run_command` also causes an
issue.
`cwd = stack.enter_context(TemporaryDirectory(prefix="airflowtmp"))`
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 047d139549 Update VertexAI system tests (#41052)
eladkal merged PR #41052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41052
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c519920661 Make EMR Container Trigger max
vincbeck closed issue #40483: EmrContainerOperator in Async mode doesn't
respect default "infinite" polling number
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40483
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
vincbeck merged PR #41008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41008
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
vincbeck pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 83ca61a501 Fix `RdsStopDbOperator` operator in
vincbeck merged PR #41059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41059
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ferruzzi commented on PR #39908:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39908#issuecomment-2253458521
I'm fine with millis. My main problem is standardizing on the statsd and
breaking everyone else. In fact, after the last Airflow 3 dev call where they
were discussing dropping
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 49b99b5a2b Updating
potiuk commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253402552
The code Ilooks good - just make it into common.compat provider and use it
from there for every provider that is affected (and add dependency to
"apache-airflow-provder-common-compat"
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new f6c7388cfa Create SQLAlchemy engine from
potiuk merged PR #40669:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40669
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #41053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41053#issuecomment-2253347350
Makes sense. But would love other look :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
shubham22 commented on issue #41055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41055#issuecomment-2253340939
@vatsrahul1001 - do we actually document that 0 is unlimited parallelism?
From product point of view, I don't think we need to actually support it. It is
always a good idea to
shahar1 merged PR #41060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41060
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
shahar pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 1ff3717f35 Update "what goes to next release" process (#41058)
add 1def3f151a Change `task_id` from `send_email`
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #41060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41060#issuecomment-2253339517
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to
check our [Issue Tracker](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues) for
additional
jaklan commented on issue #39887:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39887#issuecomment-2253329133
@Taragolis any hints how to resolve that issue? Also encounter that problem
on MWAA because of `assumed-role/` prefix
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
o-nikolas commented on issue #41055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41055#issuecomment-2253322717
Just to add to that, the metrics code will also log this when parallelism is
set to 0. So multiple things need to be fixed if we wish to support this:
> INFO - Executor
o-nikolas commented on issue #41055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41055#issuecomment-2253320678
@ephraimbuddy
I was able to reproduce this with another executor (SequentialExecutor) and
I get the same behaviour. I looked more closely at our docs and configuration
raphaelauv commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253311221
We could create a new DeprecatedAirflowCoreException that we ignore in unit
tests and that get show to users of "old" providers versions
WDYT ?
and if no , does my
potiuk commented on PR #40722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40722#issuecomment-2253302264
> Perfect, thanks for the clarification. I got confused
It happens once every blue moon, so yeah that's easy to understand :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
potiuk commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253289635
> but that mean only operators from official providers of the apache-airflow
projects will show the warnings , is not that a problem ?
Well. It's logically impossible to influence
kacpermuda commented on PR #40722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40722#issuecomment-2253233559
Perfect, thanks for the clarification. I got confused
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
shahar1 commented on code in PR #41054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41054#discussion_r1693417148
##
airflow/providers/apprise/notifications/apprise.py:
##
@@ -52,9 +51,9 @@ def __init__(
*,
body: str,
title: str | None = None,
-
jay-law opened a new pull request, #41060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41060
Renaming the `task_id` within the `EmailOperator` example from `send_email`
to `send_email_notification`. `send_email` is an existing method within
`airflow.utils.email`. Changing the duplicate
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #41060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41060#issuecomment-2253214951
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
raphaelauv commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253199584
but that mean only operators from official providers of the apache-airflow
projects will show the warnings , is not that a problem ?
--
This is an automated message from the
pedro-cf commented on issue #40958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40958#issuecomment-2253154059
> There's currently an open PR (#41039) for solving #34158. When this PR is
merged, will there still be a justification for the suggested feature?
I believe so, these are
shahar1 commented on issue #40958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40958#issuecomment-2253144024
> > 1. Is it a feature suggestion, or a suggestion for improving the
documentation?
> >
> > Please clarify the description - it would also be useful to provide some
code
potiuk commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253142027
You can't do it in BaseOperator. The compatibility code shoudl be
implemented in those operators that gets incompatible (because eventually you
will have - say - 2.7.1 BaseSensor and
potiuk commented on PR #41057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41057#issuecomment-2253115645
Something does not work :(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk merged PR #41058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41058
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 29610ded9f Increase frequency of canary runs to 4xDay (#41056)
add 1ff3717f35 Update "what goes to next release"
pedro-cf commented on issue #40958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40958#issuecomment-2253111744
> 1. Is it a feature suggestion, or a suggestion for improving the
documentation?
>
> Please clarify the description - it would also be useful to provide some
code
raphaelauv commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253111327
thanks @potiuk for the guidance ,but I still don't know how to do that in
the BaseSensorOperator. I'm quit lost :sweat_smile:
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
shahar1 commented on issue #40958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40958#issuecomment-2253103734
1. Is it a feature suggestion, or a suggestion for improving the
documentation?
Please clarify the description - it would also be useful to provide some
code examples that will
akomisarek commented on PR #41008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41008#issuecomment-2253097655
Thanks, a lot it seems it would solve part of our problems! :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
vincbeck opened a new pull request, #41059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41059
The operator `RdsStopDbOperator` when used in deferrable mode does not work
it uses a waiter that does not exist. I also fixed some inconsistencies in RDS
operators
shahar1 closed issue #40948: bigquery_to_postgres performance issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40948
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
shahar1 commented on issue #40948:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40948#issuecomment-2253090278
I have to agree with @raphaelauv - Airflow is not suitable for this scale of
data transfers, and other technologies should be considered, such as Apache
Beam or Apache Spark.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from f0ef69198e Check dataset_alias exists in inlets when use it to
retrieve inlet_events (#41043)
add 29610ded9f
potiuk merged PR #41056:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41056
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
shahar1 commented on code in PR #41058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41058#discussion_r1693308184
##
README.md:
##
@@ -477,17 +477,34 @@ Generally we release `MINOR` versions of Airflow from a
branch that is named aft
`2.7.*` releases are released from
shahar1 commented on code in PR #41058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41058#discussion_r1693299174
##
README.md:
##
@@ -477,17 +477,34 @@ Generally we release `MINOR` versions of Airflow from a
branch that is named aft
`2.7.*` releases are released from
shahar1 commented on code in PR #41058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41058#discussion_r1693299174
##
README.md:
##
@@ -477,17 +477,34 @@ Generally we release `MINOR` versions of Airflow from a
branch that is named aft
`2.7.*` releases are released from
potiuk commented on PR #40722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40722#issuecomment-2253043930
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41058
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
potiuk opened a new pull request, #41058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41058
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
potiuk commented on PR #41058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41058#issuecomment-2253044288
cc: @kacpermuda
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk commented on PR #40722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40722#issuecomment-2253017856
> It won't get lost. Until 9th of August (RC1 for 2.10.0 planned this day)
the v2-10-test branch will continue to be rebased on main. What is going to be
merged till then is going to be
millin commented on issue #40082:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40082#issuecomment-2253016337
I did a research.
This error is the result of multiple dag-processors simultaneously trying to
insert a new `serialized dag` into the table.
After some time, one of the
potiuk commented on PR #40722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40722#issuecomment-2253014349
It won't get lost. Until 9th of August (RC1 for 2.10.0 planned this day) the
v2-10-test branch will continue to be rebased on main. What is going to be
merged till then is going to be
potiuk commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2253005692
Yes. You cannot have a warning for 2.7-2.9 and do not have an option to
remove the warning other than upgrading.
Yes the idea is simple. Check airlfow version and do it
raphaelauv commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2252990180
@potiuk should I make the warning conditional to the minimal airflow-core
compatible version of the package of the super class ?
it yes , do you have an elegant idea how ?
potiuk commented on PR #41056:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41056#issuecomment-2252989789
Related #40925
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk opened a new pull request, #41057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41057
The runners have more disk space which is needed to checkout and build full
documentation.
Related: #40925
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
raphaelauv commented on PR #41047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41047#issuecomment-2252968691
@potiuk what do you recommend to show the warnings only when providers use
at least airflow 2.10.0 ? thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
potiuk opened a new pull request, #41056:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41056
We have not seen a significant increase in a number of FT runners used when
we run Canary builds 2x day, switching it to 4x day will speed up constraints
and cache refresh as well as will allow to
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #40988:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40988#discussion_r1693225577
##
airflow/www/static/js/types/api-generated.ts:
##
@@ -4347,6 +4397,69 @@ export interface operations {
404: components["responses"]["NotFound"];
kacpermuda commented on PR #40722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40722#issuecomment-2252951551
@uranusjr @potiuk Any way we could merge this one, or at least assign
Airflow2.10 milestone to it so it doesn't get lost somewhere?
--
This is an automated message from the
bbovenzi commented on code in PR #40988:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40988#discussion_r1693221007
##
airflow/www/static/js/types/api-generated.ts:
##
@@ -4347,6 +4397,69 @@ export interface operations {
404: components["responses"]["NotFound"];
};
41 UTC] {process_utils.py:191} INFO - 'ds_nodash':
'20240726',
[2024-07-26, 14:57:41 UTC] {process_utils.py:191} INFO -
'expanded_ti_count': None,
[2024-07-26, 14:57:41 UTC] {process_utils.py:191} INFO - 'logical_date':
'2024-07-26T14:57:31.727299+00:00',
[2024-07-26, 14:57:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
weilee pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 277e746fa4 openlineage: update docs on openlineage methods (#41051)
add f0ef69198e Check dataset_alias exists in
Lee-W merged PR #41043:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41043
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Prab-27 commented on issue #40966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40966#issuecomment-225288
I am using WSL2 set up can I work on this issue here OS is Mac ? .If yes ,
I would like to work on this issue as my first contribution.
--
This is an automated message from
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #41055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41055#issuecomment-2252884635
cc @o-nikolas . It seems related to your PR on multi-executors
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40017 and is a breaking change
--
This is an automated message from
jannisko commented on PR #37297:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37297#issuecomment-2252886312
@joycechan-KSO yes this feature was available for the
[TaskFlow](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/tutorial/taskflow.html)
style operators already, but missing for
vatsrahul1001 opened a new issue, #41055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41055
### Apache Airflow version
2.10.0b1
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
Tasks are stuck in the scheduled state
romsharon98 opened a new pull request, #41054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41054
closes: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38593/
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
mobuchowski merged PR #41051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41051
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
mobuchowski pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 592eafa82a openlineage, docs: add missing execution_timeout conf value
(#41042)
add 277e746fa4 openlineage:
kacpermuda opened a new pull request, #41053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41053
Now we are calling `get_listener_manager().hook.on_task_instance_failed`
with `ti` that still has the `RUNNING` state assigned. By using only
`ti.state`, there is no way of knowing
potiuk commented on PR #41049:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41049#issuecomment-2252837815
Unfortunately - this one will have to wait until ASF runners are migrated to
Ubuntu 22.04 - because Ubuntu 20.04 does not have installers for ARM Python.
--
This is an automated
boraberke commented on PR #41050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41050#issuecomment-2252806242
> cc: @boraberke for your information. I guess it would be better if we
rework on the earlier issue peacefully and clear the path for the upcoming
release. Hope you're comfortable
MaksYermak opened a new pull request, #41052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41052
In this PR I have updated the System Tests for VertexAI operators.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch bring-back-arm-image-building
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
discard 950fd83c08 Bring back ARM image building using ASF self-hosted ARM
runners
add
potiuk commented on PR #41039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41039#issuecomment-2252767334
Always Be Rebased - this has been solved in main. Generally when in doubt,
always rebase your PR. Your PR is 10 commits behind already:
pankajkoti commented on PR #41050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41050#issuecomment-2252772660
cc: @boraberke for your information. I guess it would be better if rework on
the earlier issue peacefully and clear the path of the upcoming release. Hope
you're comfortable with
kacpermuda opened a new pull request, #41051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41051
Some clarifications to Ol docs after receiving user feedback.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
josh-fell opened a new issue, #35433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35433
### Body
A few Databricks operators exist which have a `json` parameter that can be a
JSON object which contains any number of API parameters. In the constructors of
these operators, the `json`
potiuk merged PR #41042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41042
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
pankajkoti opened a new pull request, #41050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/41050
This reverts PR #40864 and PR #40471.
Previously, PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40471 was contributed
to address issue https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35433.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 592eafa82a openlineage, docs: add missing
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch bring-back-arm-image-building
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
discard 6e1b432b2a Bring back ARM image building using ASF self-hosted ARM
runners
add
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch bring-back-arm-image-building
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
omit d4363c3be6 Bring back ARM image building using ASF self-hosted ARM
runners
add
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
