aib628 commented on issue #8848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/8848#issuecomment-1651074254
>
Hi @danny0405 i had try it, and the seem problem reproduced.
```
CREATE TABLE t1(
uuid VARCHAR(20) PRIMARY KEY NOT ENFORCED,
name VARCHAR(10),
age INT,
Zouxxyy closed pull request #7615: [HUDI-5510] Reload active timeline when
commit finish
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/7615
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
SteNicholas commented on code in PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#discussion_r1274428725
##
hudi-flink-datasource/hudi-flink/src/test/java/org/apache/hudi/sink/TestWriteCopyOnWrite.java:
##
@@ -114,10 +116,28 @@ public void testCheckpointFails() throws Exc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HUDI-6592:
-
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Flink insert overwrite should support dynamic partition
SteNicholas opened a new pull request, #9287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9287
### Change Logs
Flink insert overwrite should support dynamic partition instead of the whole
table, which behavior is consistent with the semantics of insert overwrite in
Flink.
### Imp
Nicholas Jiang created HUDI-6592:
Summary: Flink insert overwrite should support dynamic partition
instead of whole table
Key: HUDI-6592
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6592
Project: A
codope opened a new pull request, #9286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9286
### Change Logs
Add rowId field to HoodieRecordIndexInfo in metadata payload. The rowId is
not being read/written right now. Default is 0L. In future, we would want to
map a record to file and rowI
hudi-bot commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650991561
## CI report:
* 463953fa8ffd4e41dcc02c67cf931d894a12848d Azure:
[SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1883
chandu-1101 commented on issue #9141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9141#issuecomment-1650981047
Wow! Wonderful. Thank you once again. I will put the flag check and get
back.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log o
big-doudou commented on PR #9182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9182#issuecomment-1650926469
> Each failed attempt of a subtask would trigger invocation of
`StreamWriteOperatorCoordinator#subtaskFailed`, the original write metadata
would got cleaned,
The StreamWriteOperato
JingFengWang opened a new issue, #9285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9285
**Steps to reproduce the behavior:**
**run command：**
mvn clean package -DskipTests -Dflink1.13 -Dscala-2.11
**exception log：**
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
[INFO] ---
ad1happy2go commented on issue #9143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9143#issuecomment-1650912511
@Sam-Serpoosh In this case we need to maintain global uniqueness , so Global
Index should be the right option. On a large dataset it might have downside,
but as partition value is n
Sam-Serpoosh commented on issue #9143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9143#issuecomment-1650903089
@ad1happy2go IIUC, here are the options:
- Leverage `REPLICA IDENTITY FULL` which has some downsides as mentioned in
PG documentation and the article I shared in my earlier c
danny0405 commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650874179
Okay, a static lock mapping makes sense to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Zouxxyy commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650870862
> Can you elaborate a little more why the table service client can hold a
separate lock ?
Because `InProcessLockProvider` is valid as long as it is in the same JVM
process (see `stati
hudi-bot commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650869802
## CI report:
* 4e64258913f8f19b139ab1407f0c08d812f65669 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1883
hudi-bot commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650864450
## CI report:
* 4e64258913f8f19b139ab1407f0c08d812f65669 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1883
danny0405 commented on code in PR #9229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9229#discussion_r1274291759
##
hudi-utilities/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/utilities/HoodieCompactor.java:
##
@@ -101,6 +104,12 @@ public static class Config implements Serializable {
public
danny0405 commented on PR #9182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9182#issuecomment-1650862935
Each failed attempt of a subtask would trigger invocation of
`StreamWriteOperatorCoordinator#subtaskFailed`, the original write metadata
would got cleaned,
--
This is an automated messa
danny0405 merged PR #9274:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9274
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@hudi.apache
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
danny0405 pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/hudi.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 2a022393388 [MINOR] Fix millis append format er
codope closed issue #8761: [SUPPORT] "Illegal Lambda Deserialization" When
Leveraging PostgresDebeziumSource
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/8761
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
danny0405 commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650853733
> I think about it again, and think that it’s okay to not pass the txtmanger
Can you elaborate a little more why the table service client can hold a
separate lock ?
--
This is an
danny0405 commented on code in PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#discussion_r1274284407
##
hudi-flink-datasource/hudi-flink/src/test/java/org/apache/hudi/sink/TestWriteCopyOnWrite.java:
##
@@ -114,10 +116,28 @@ public void testCheckpointFails() throws Excep
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1650807747
## CI report:
* cf692aeb6c7774b01a236cf058225debb8caff53 UNKNOWN
* da9dd1fc203c01d0a000d49dcbd58a0a1d729354 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1650614871
## CI report:
* cf692aeb6c7774b01a236cf058225debb8caff53 UNKNOWN
* da9dd1fc203c01d0a000d49dcbd58a0a1d729354 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2
kazdy commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1650583696
@hudi-bot run azure
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
hudi-bot commented on PR #9276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9276#issuecomment-1650565195
## CI report:
* 54a4e7e9aeabb42258e0d1f2b6cfa2960275c330 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1883
hudi-bot commented on PR #9276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9276#issuecomment-1650555772
## CI report:
* 37d3b9365a38e8f266c1c486e9d18c9ef34be2a0 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1880
bhasudha opened a new pull request, #9284:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9284
…csearch
### Change Logs
Migrating to new crawler based search
### Impact
can affect website search functionality
### Risk level (write none, low medium or high below)
kkalanda-score closed pull request #9283: CI (Take 2)
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9283
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: comm
kkalanda-score opened a new pull request, #9283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9283
### Change Logs
_Describe context and summary for this change. Highlight if any code was
copied._
### Impact
_Describe any public API or user-facing feature change or any perfo
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
yihua pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/hudi.git
from 42799c0956f [HUDI-6438] Config parameter 'MAKE_NEW_COLUMNS_NULLABLE'
to allow for marking a newly created column as null
yihua merged PR #9136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9136
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@hudi.apache.org
yihua commented on PR #9136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9136#issuecomment-1650381811
CI has passed for
[6b33d37](https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9136/commits/6b33d37bc57d2b5be3649590fee6767f34cccea3).
No need to rerun CI again.
https://github.com/apache/hudi/assets/249
sivabalan narayanan created HUDI-6591:
-
Summary: getAllPartitionPaths perf fix need to account for
parquet/orc partition path meta files
Key: HUDI-6591
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6591
yihua commented on code in PR #9136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9136#discussion_r1273945242
##
.github/workflows/bot.yml:
##
@@ -112,6 +112,61 @@ jobs:
run:
mvn test -Pfunctional-tests -D"$SCALA_PROFILE" -D"$SPARK_PROFILE"
-pl "$SPARK_COMMON_MO
hudi-bot commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650373193
## CI report:
* 4e64258913f8f19b139ab1407f0c08d812f65669 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1883
amrishlal commented on issue #7244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/7244#issuecomment-1650363772
Verified using the latest master using the same model as @ad1happy2go above
and successfully ran the model
**DBT run**
```amrish@Amrishs-MBP github-issue-7244 % dbt run
18
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1650303969
## CI report:
* cf692aeb6c7774b01a236cf058225debb8caff53 UNKNOWN
* da9dd1fc203c01d0a000d49dcbd58a0a1d729354 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2
chattarajoy commented on PR #8795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/8795#issuecomment-1650303459
Is there a place where I can find the timeline on when this can possibly be
released?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
xushiyan commented on code in PR #9221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9221#discussion_r1273870474
##
hudi-sync/hudi-hive-sync/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/hive/HiveSyncConfig.java:
##
@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ public HiveSyncConfig(Properties props) {
public HiveSyncCon
rmnlchh commented on issue #9282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9282#issuecomment-1650228180
> @rmnlchh Just curious, Did you set these configs
>
> ```
> sc.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.nanosAsLong", "false");
> sc.set("spark.sql.parquet.binaryAsString", "false");
ad1happy2go commented on issue #9282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9282#issuecomment-1650223209
@rmnlchh Just curious, Did you set these configs
```
sc.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.nanosAsLong", "false");
sc.set("spark.sql.parquet.binaryAsString", "false");
sc.set(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Goenka updated HUDI-6589:
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.1)
> Upsert failing for array type if value given [null]
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Goenka closed HUDI-6589.
---
Fix Version/s: 0.12.1
(was: 0.15.0)
Resolution: Resolved
> Upsert failin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17747076#comment-17747076
]
Aditya Goenka commented on HUDI-6589:
-
Upon further investigation and debugging, it ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Goenka resolved HUDI-6589.
-
> Upsert failing for array type if value given [null]
> --
bhasudha commented on issue #9282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9282#issuecomment-1650203382
@yihua @ad1happy2go if you can help reproduce and trige this further.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
hudi-bot commented on PR #9105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9105#issuecomment-1650200162
## CI report:
* 6bd80d5ce84b468293bc292f43dd0ca236c646d8 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1883
rmnlchh opened a new issue, #9282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9282
As part of our pipelines, we use tables that are being deltastreamed. Trying
to upgrade to EMR 6.11 (which bring hudi 0.13.0/spark 3.3.2) we started facing
issue which is discussed in
https://github.com/a
hudi-bot commented on PR #9246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9246#issuecomment-1650135501
## CI report:
* c2effa1ea1fdd82828efbf88afbf6cd6be019eb3 Azure:
[SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1883
hudi-bot commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650135633
## CI report:
* 257b18bc9faffdf7d063fb153e5ee1b53d57 Azure:
[SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1879
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1650121068
## CI report:
* d062a4c9cecf2f35a2f07a046a4139c7d0aea301 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
hudi-bot commented on PR #9255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9255#issuecomment-1650120837
## CI report:
* 257b18bc9faffdf7d063fb153e5ee1b53d57 Azure:
[SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1879
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1650105696
## CI report:
* d062a4c9cecf2f35a2f07a046a4139c7d0aea301 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Brown updated HUDI-6590:
Summary: Improve BigQuery Sync Schema and Partition Handling (was: Improve
BigQuery Sync Support)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Brown reassigned HUDI-6590:
---
Assignee: Timothy Brown
> Improve BigQuery Sync Support
> -
>
>
Timothy Brown created HUDI-6590:
---
Summary: Improve BigQuery Sync Support
Key: HUDI-6590
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6590
Project: Apache Hudi
Issue Type: Improvement
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1650029611
## CI report:
* d062a4c9cecf2f35a2f07a046a4139c7d0aea301 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
hudi-bot commented on PR #9212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9212#issuecomment-1650029030
## CI report:
* 32766783236e3f0b5adcc973a77ff9cf782726e5 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1649902580
## CI report:
* d062a4c9cecf2f35a2f07a046a4139c7d0aea301 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
ad1happy2go commented on issue #7244:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/7244#issuecomment-1649877906
@faizhasan @rshanmugam1 Apologies for the delay here. I tried to reproduce
and found out that it is working fine. I tried with 0.12.1 version.
Model I used, exactly like we have i
hudi-bot commented on PR #9246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9246#issuecomment-1649827320
## CI report:
* 136d780d0a9ca38f88c613433f05f868be01d0d5 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1873
hudi-bot commented on PR #9105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9105#issuecomment-1649826685
## CI report:
* 5611851113d971d2f76fe2072ca87c1df0eae6ea Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1840
hudi-bot commented on PR #9246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9246#issuecomment-1649811839
## CI report:
* 136d780d0a9ca38f88c613433f05f868be01d0d5 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1873
hudi-bot commented on PR #9105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9105#issuecomment-1649811247
## CI report:
* 5611851113d971d2f76fe2072ca87c1df0eae6ea Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1840
hudi-bot commented on PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#issuecomment-1649795214
## CI report:
* b6afe889ca6b47f4d1d934bb552cc1c489f9d0af UNKNOWN
* f8607c6bd9ecf09e8da2d6b372a80eff2221108d Azure:
[SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2
lokeshj1703 commented on code in PR #9246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9246#discussion_r1273472332
##
hudi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/common/table/timeline/HoodieDefaultTimeline.java:
##
@@ -277,7 +278,7 @@ public HoodieTimeline getCommitsTimeline() {
zaza commented on issue #6900:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/6900#issuecomment-1649736303
This is definitely still an issue, we were hit by an error that looks
identical to what @umehrot2 reported a while ago:
```
ERROR UpsertPartitioner: Error trying to compute averag
hudi-bot commented on PR #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9280#issuecomment-1649724112
## CI report:
* db146be5542714a978e1d6fcdbd146e2aa834931 Azure:
[SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
hudi-bot commented on PR #9212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9212#issuecomment-1649723729
## CI report:
* f494be8b2b8d4e9d5a6d595eea8bc907602efd35 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
hudi-bot commented on PR #9212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9212#issuecomment-1649706487
## CI report:
* f494be8b2b8d4e9d5a6d595eea8bc907602efd35 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Goenka updated HUDI-6589:
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Upsert failing for array type if value given [null]
> ---
Aditya Goenka created HUDI-6589:
---
Summary: Upsert failing for array type if value given [null]
Key: HUDI-6589
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6589
Project: Apache Hudi
Issue Typ
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1649630856
## CI report:
* 4d363f192f951fb54799602270fb0ca16ce19d39 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1881
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1649620494
## CI report:
* 4d363f192f951fb54799602270fb0ca16ce19d39 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1881
hudi-bot commented on PR #9209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9209#issuecomment-1649620034
## CI report:
* 8f2dc4ec3e26f1908ae5d15f194bf70ca7dab27e UNKNOWN
* a7f8558aaffdaab4850780224e1385c3e682372a Azure:
[SUCCESS](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2
hudi-bot commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1649609922
## CI report:
* 4d363f192f951fb54799602270fb0ca16ce19d39 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1881
hudi-bot commented on PR #9212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9212#issuecomment-1649609463
## CI report:
* f494be8b2b8d4e9d5a6d595eea8bc907602efd35 Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
kazdy commented on PR #9277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9277#issuecomment-1649530790
@hudi-bot run azure
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
SteNicholas commented on PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#issuecomment-1649522478
@danny0405, could you take a look at this pull request?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
hudi-bot commented on PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#issuecomment-1649517541
## CI report:
* b6afe889ca6b47f4d1d934bb552cc1c489f9d0af UNKNOWN
* 278399029bc5dc3ab81d0366b65aaed3cf019b7c Azure:
[CANCELED](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-
hudi-bot commented on PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#issuecomment-1649500610
## CI report:
* b6afe889ca6b47f4d1d934bb552cc1c489f9d0af UNKNOWN
* d8e39cb69480b8eb9014f09f6b84e741b9092a9f Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2
Zouxxyy opened a new pull request, #9281:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9281
### Change Logs
_Describe context and summary for this change. Highlight if any code was
copied._
### Impact
_Describe any public API or user-facing feature change or any performance
stream2000 commented on PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#issuecomment-1649457125
> even if the failed writes clean policy could be inferred from optimistic
concurrent control is enabled, this support has no conflict with the inference.
Do you mean by even if we
adityaverma1997 commented on issue #9257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/9257#issuecomment-1649440527
Correct me if I am wrong here, though I am running async cleaning but
cleaning frequency is controlled by the following hudi configuration, which is:
```
hoodie.clean.max.c
hudi-bot commented on PR #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9280#issuecomment-1649431922
## CI report:
* db146be5542714a978e1d6fcdbd146e2aa834931 Azure:
[PENDING](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1882
hudi-bot commented on PR #9274:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9274#issuecomment-1649431799
## CI report:
* 94d9dbcb05d1505d4a1d5e82dca8a8ba946f47da Azure:
[FAILURE](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-2f42-4a89-8f0e-5f0d7039a0cc/_build/results?buildId=1880
SteNicholas commented on code in PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#discussion_r1273233193
##
hudi-flink-datasource/hudi-flink/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/table/HoodieTableSink.java:
##
@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ public SinkRuntimeProvider getSinkRuntimeProvider(Co
hudi-bot commented on PR #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9280#issuecomment-1649418587
## CI report:
* db146be5542714a978e1d6fcdbd146e2aa834931 UNKNOWN
Bot commands
@hudi-bot supports the following commands:
- `@hudi-bot run azure` re-run the
xushiyan commented on code in PR #9221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9221#discussion_r1273223195
##
hudi-sync/hudi-hive-sync/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/hive/HiveSyncConfig.java:
##
@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ public HiveSyncConfig(Properties props) {
public HiveSyncCon
xushiyan commented on PR #9221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9221#issuecomment-1649394492
> Hi @xushiyan, I noticed the casting from hadoopConf to hiveConf was
introduced by this PR from you(#6202) but I couldn't find any context. Could
you help me learn why we made that change?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HUDI-6587:
-
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Handle hollow commit for time travel query
> ---
xushiyan opened a new pull request, #9280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9280
### Change Logs
Fail time-travel query when the given timestamp covers any hollow commit.
### Impact
Time travel query behavior. Time travel usually won't cover hollow commit,
which
stream2000 commented on code in PR #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9211#discussion_r1273176064
##
hudi-flink-datasource/hudi-flink/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/table/HoodieTableSink.java:
##
@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ public SinkRuntimeProvider getSinkRuntimeProvider(Con
hudi-bot commented on PR #9209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9209#issuecomment-1649344787
## CI report:
* 8f2dc4ec3e26f1908ae5d15f194bf70ca7dab27e UNKNOWN
* c281ded6d554350dfe362cce496d6d72cfe0bbbe Azure:
[CANCELED](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-
ksmou commented on code in PR #9229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9229#discussion_r1273169390
##
hudi-utilities/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/utilities/HoodieCompactor.java:
##
@@ -101,6 +104,12 @@ public static class Config implements Serializable {
public Stri
big-doudou commented on issue #8892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/8892#issuecomment-1649335027
>
What if this is an new task that has not yet had a successful checkpoint
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
hudi-bot commented on PR #9209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/9209#issuecomment-1649331921
## CI report:
* 8f2dc4ec3e26f1908ae5d15f194bf70ca7dab27e UNKNOWN
* c281ded6d554350dfe362cce496d6d72cfe0bbbe Azure:
[CANCELED](https://dev.azure.com/apache-hudi-ci-org/785b6ef4-
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
