Great.
I believe that this difficulty is the reason why asMap(Object[]) was never
included in the JDK, but toMap() was.
Here is my solution:
- Hashing - document the behaviour, stating that the Map will
behave poorly
as its size grows. And that it returns the first matched key.
-
From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am preparing a change to the
org.apache.commons.jelly.Jelly class that will allow
clients to enable XML validation. However I noticed
that the XMLParser.warning(SAXException) method simply
logs warnings without throwing the exception. That
means
[change of plan proposed...]
Thanks for the input Rodney. It sounds like you are convinced that new Interfaces and
wrappers are the way to go. And you seem to be offering to code them :-)
However, I believe that were I to accept them into this release as a rushed quick
code, with little
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Strachan wrote:
Though I am having second thoughts on whether Commons is the right place
for Jelly; maybe it should be a top level Jakarta project? Jelly started
out as a little reusable XML scripting engine that could be embedded
anywhere
Rodney, you are the main instigator of this subpackage [...]
Any objections to the remove primitives from the release plan?
If remove from the release plan simply means you'll exclude
o.a.c.c.primitives.* from the binary and source distributions--i.e., that I
don't have to do anything--then
oglueck 2002/10/15 06:29:42
Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient
HttpMethodBase.java
Log:
Fixed a hang on redirect
Revision ChangesPath
1.64 +8 -4
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13649.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Here's an example of a primitive collections library which uses a separate
class heirarchy and the same method names
http://trove4j.sourceforge.net/
http://trove4j.sourceforge.net/javadocs/
My 0.2 cents,
Janek Bogucki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Option two fits with XP philosophy. Trim features to make the
release, rather than putting something in that doesn't measure up,
or blowing the schedule.
I'm finding this an interesting problem so I would be glad to
interact re design questions. Also, I think Bill Venners would be
interested in
I've implemented and tested WLSLogger with WebLogic
Server 6.1/7.0 - both server (JSP) and client (Java
app) side and would like to donate it to Apache.
Not particularly familiar with the submission process,
I'll have to ask likely a stupid question: Is it
appropriate to suggest adding a
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, James Strachan wrote:
I'll call a vote to promote Jelly to commons proper shortly. If we decide
later on that Jelly should move out of commons to a top level project we can
cross that bridge when we come to it. How's that sound?
Sounds sensible.
James
Craig
--
James,
My suggestion would be to be patient and let Jelly mature a little
more, especially with regards to documentation. When you feel that you
are ready, then you can choose to go with commons or directly
jakarta. Being in a sandbox has advantages because your project can
grow slowly without
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13656.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13656.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
morgand 2002/10/15 12:10:37
Modified:latka/src/java/org/apache/commons/latka/jelly SuiteTag.java
Log:
modified behaviour of default listener to more closely approximate
previous Latka implementation
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +10 -6
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13666.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At 10:55 15.10.2002 -0700, you wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 10:31 15.10.2002 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
Maybe we can do it at a later stage or in a LogFactory2 - so
the code would work even if discovery is not available/used.
I think the current hardcoded discovery, even if duplicated
There is a good body of code here, but the GNU licence rules it out I
believe.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Janek Bogucki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's an example of a primitive collections library which uses a separate
class heirarchy and the same method names
The exclusion plan seems to be OK.
For the primitive design, my first approach would be to start with
IntCollection and IntList interfaces and work out. I think that the
interfaces can be exactly the same as the Collection and List interfaces,
but returning/taking in ints instead of Objects.
Primitives now removed from release plan:
Please advise the list of any essential changes required by Wednesday
midnight UTC.
A vote for release should thus occur on Friday-Sunday.
Release would then follow imminently.
Stephen
release plan
release manager: Stephen Colebourne,
Yeah, what he said. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [collections] Primitive collections
The exclusion plan seems to be OK.
For the primitive design,
scolebourne2002/10/15 14:44:24
Modified:collections STATUS.html
Log:
Add to todo list
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +13 -1 jakarta-commons/collections/STATUS.html
Index: STATUS.html
===
RCS
scolebourne2002/10/15 14:45:17
Modified:collections RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.html
Log:
Delay primitives to 2.2 release
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +0 -29 jakarta-commons/collections/RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.html
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.html
scolebourne2002/10/15 14:51:22
Modified:collections/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections
TestAll.java
Log:
Delay primitives to 2.2 release
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +5 -5
jkeyes 2002/10/15 15:50:46
Modified:cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli OptionBuilder.java
Log:
added URL to builder pattern details, tided javadoc
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +4 -5
jakarta-commons/cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli/OptionBuilder.java
jkeyes 2002/10/15 15:53:33
Modified:cli/xdocs introduction.xml navigation.xml properties.xml
usage.xml
Removed: cli/xdocs ant.xml creation.xml parser.xml
Log:
documentation updates in preperation for the release
Revision ChangesPath
1.3
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Primitives now removed from release plan:
Please advise the list of any essential changes required by Wednesday
midnight UTC.
A vote for release should thus occur on Friday-Sunday.
Release would then follow imminently.
Stephen
release plan
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13676.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13676.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Waldhoff, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16/10/2002
03:03:26 AM:
For what it's worth, I think I'm with Ceki here. Jelly runs a real risk
of
running into the same problems that Ant did with some of the
intermediate
versions--it's so easy to extend, one gets lots of small extensions,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13676.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
32 matches
Mail list logo