To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-id *no longer* has an issue.
Project State : 'Success'
Full details are
I argued for Apache Math as I believe its this best goal. Remember that size
is not what defines a TLP, community is. However, as none of the main [math]
developers want this at present we need to find a second solution.
I am more convinced of the need now. The proposed new list is in fact not
Kim van der Linde wrote:
I think I am a typical math only user and developer
and I just joined the e-mail lists. The last days, I
seriously contemplated on leaving both lists because
of the use amout of completly irrelevant bullshit that
passes by every morning and during the day on my
computer. I
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
For me, [math] goes beyond the role of a simple library of common code.
IT would be interesting to hear what you (and others) think
about the further evolution of [math]. I also really like
to know what current users of [math] currently do with the
library, and what they
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30597.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
epugh 2004/08/14 04:21:27
Modified:configuration/xdocs changes.xml
configuration/conf test.xml testDigesterConfiguration3.xml
configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration
XMLConfiguration.java
epugh 2004/08/14 04:22:00
Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration
HierarchicalXMLConfiguration.java
Log:
fix for handling comments in xml properly.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4 -4
epugh 2004/08/14 04:23:14
Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration
ConfigurationKey.java
Log:
findbugs is my friend.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -2
epugh 2004/08/14 04:32:06
Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration
XMLConfiguration.java
Log:
Simian cut n paste fix
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +223 -326
epugh 2004/08/14 04:42:46
Modified:configuration/xdocs tasks.xml
Log:
update tasks, move around compelted ones
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +12 -15jakarta-commons/configuration/xdocs/tasks.xml
Index: tasks.xml
epugh 2004/08/14 04:49:01
Removed: configuration/conf MANIFEST.MF
Log:
Not needed, Maven generates this.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
The documentation for Modeler says that Registry itself is an MBean. However, it does
not come up in the list of MBeans for the default domain and more importantly, I could
not find it being registered with the MBeanServer anywhere in the source code. If the
documentation incorrect in
epugh 2004/08/14 05:22:51
Modified:configuration project.xml
Log:
Bump version now that 1.0-RC1 is released
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/configuration/project.xml
Index: project.xml
Finally, 7 months and 3 weeks after configuration was first promoted from
the Sandbox, we finally have a 1.0 Release Candidate 1. Please bear with me
if I made any significant mistakes during this process as it was my first
time attempting to release anything. I want to thank all the people
epugh 2004/08/14 06:06:13
Modified:configuration/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
update date of release
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +1 -1 jakarta-commons/configuration/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
--- matthew.hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim van der Linde wrote:
I think I am a typical math only user and
developer
and I just joined the e-mail lists. The last days,
I
seriously contemplated on leaving both lists
because
of the use amout of completly irrelevant bullshit
Kim van der Linde wrote:
--- matthew.hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I am a typical math only user and developer and I just
joined the e-mail lists. The last days, I seriously contemplated on
leaving both lists because of the use amout of completly irrelevant
bullshit that passes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 06:20:37 -0700 (PDT), Kim van der Linde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- matthew.hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim van der Linde wrote:
I think I am a typical math only user and
developer
and I just joined the e-mail lists. The last days,
I
seriously
+1 to a request for Jakarta-Math-Discuss list. I'd like to be
Apache-Math-Discuss, but that might cause issues, cf the Python mail list
request a while back.
Why I like this: It is not tied to the commons-math code, but to the
community that the commons-math code wants to join. I expect [math]
Henri Yandell wrote:
+1 to a request for Jakarta-Math-Discuss list. I'd like to be
Apache-Math-Discuss, but that might cause issues, cf the Python mail list
request a while back.
Sorry, but I am still -0 to splitting discussion or development of [math]
from j-c.
Why I like this: It is not tied to
tomdz 2004/08/14 12:51:38
Modified:sql/src/java/org/apache/commons/sql/builder
MckoiSqlBuilder.java OracleBuilder.java
SqlBuilder.java MySqlBuilder.java AxionBuilder.java
MSSqlBuilder.java SybaseBuilder.java
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that you are missing the single most
important facet of Jakarta Commons here - community.
Commons is one community,
A community from whom? Whom are in it? Only hard-core
developers? Or the developers and users at large?
Apparently, I have
Kim van der Linde wrote:
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that you are missing the single most
important facet of Jakarta Commons here - community.
Commons is one community,
A community from whom? Whom are in it? Only hard-core
developers? Or the developers and
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Michael McGrady wrote:
Kim van der Linde wrote:
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that you are missing the single most
important facet of Jakarta Commons here - community.
Commons is one community,
A community from whom? Whom
This is the type of discussion I'm referring too. Here is a perfect
example of why commons components would benefit from separate users
lists. Users are not interested in the same discussion issues as
developers, the commons users list is ill adapted to the cross
pollination developer
Again, an excellent example of my point, this is not very civil from a
User Support standpoint and attitude such as this will only drive
users away. Unfortunately, most of us developers are very stoic and
abrupt, something that ultimately undermines any interaction with users
who are not
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the type of discussion I'm referring too. Here is a perfect
example of why commons components would benefit from separate users
lists. Users are not interested in the same discussion issues as
developers, the commons users list is ill
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30088.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26297.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26056.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
This is the type of discussion I'm referring too. Here is a perfect
example of why commons components would benefit from separate users
lists. Users are not interested in the same discussion issues as
developers, the commons users list is ill adapted to the cross
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30082.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bayard 2004/08/14 19:17:13
Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder
HashCodeBuilder.java
Log:
added comment in javadoc for #30328
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +4 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30328.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-08-14T19:19:03
Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: Lang
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Lang
Updated with latest release state for Lang.
Change Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2004-08-14T19:31:25
Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: Lang
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Lang
29294 and 29794 seem DONE
Change Log:
--
@@
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30674.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
For me, [math] goes beyond the role of a simple library of common code.
IT would be interesting to hear what you (and others) think
about the further evolution of [math]. I also really like
to know what current users of
Kim van der Linde wrote:
Hi Mark,
I agree with you. And I have played advocate of the
devil here, as I noticed from the beginning on that
this is a hard-core developers environment. But in
daily life, I work in an environment were people are
the real users of the products that are developed
here.
Date: 2004-08-14T19:57:07
Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: Lang
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Lang
Spawned the parseDate into its own bug, and leaving til 3.0
Change Log:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Phil Steitz wrote:
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
After a great deal of discussion, maybe this subject should be voted on
to bring the subject to completion. Otherwise, it will just get more
heated.
We should not have to resort to a vote on this. I suggest that we
[http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Lang]
Three things are left on the dev work list (unless I've missed something).
* Entities - Needs finishing.
The conversations on this are a year old. When I looked at this I was a
bit worried that it seems to have a lot of optimisations in.
*
It is an MBean (in the sense that
mserver.createMBean(org.apache.modeler.Registry, oname) works), just not
a very useful one. There are too many bugs to try and use a Registry
created this way. It's one of the things that make the current version of
c-m difficult to use in an embedded
48 matches
Mail list logo
