cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestConfigurationUtils.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 01:41:56 Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration ConfigurationUtils.java configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestConfigurationUtils.java Log: Added tests

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31329] - [PATCH] Support for evaluating a predicate when determining if a rule is valid for a given element

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestSubsetConfiguration.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 04:37:40 Modified:configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestSubsetConfiguration.java Log: Trivial tests for SubsetConfiguration Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +11 -1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestSubsetConfiguration.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 04:41:06 Modified:configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestSubsetConfiguration.java Log: Trivial tests for SubsetConfiguration Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +51 -27

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestConfigurationUtils.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 04:42:02 Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration ConfigurationUtils.java configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestConfigurationUtils.java Log: Added

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration XMLConfiguration.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 04:43:27 Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration XMLConfiguration.java Log: Added a constructor using a URL Removed set/getFile() Code formating Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +192 -119

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration PropertiesConfiguration.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 04:45:08 Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration PropertiesConfiguration.java Log: Added 2 constructors using a File and an URL Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +44 -2

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestPropertiesConfiguration.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 04:47:57 Modified:configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestPropertiesConfiguration.java Log: More tests: - for the new constructor PropertiesConfiguration(File) - for a file loaded from a jar - for setInclude()

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration AbstractFileConfiguration.java

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 04:49:45 Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration AbstractFileConfiguration.java Log: Implemented setFileName(), getFile(), setURL() More javadoc Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +25 -12

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration project.xml

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 05:05:07 Modified:configuration project.xml Log: Updated the hsqldb dependency to the version 1.7.2 Revision ChangesPath 1.30 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/configuration/project.xml Index: project.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/conf testdb.script

2004-09-23 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/09/23 05:05:33 Modified:configuration/conf testdb.script Log: Cleaning Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -232jakarta-commons/configuration/conf/testdb.script Index: testdb.script ===

HTTP Client File Upload Question

2004-09-23 Thread Nigel Rantor
Hi all, I'm being bitten by a weird bug and I have a feeling it's because I'm not sure about content-transfer encodings vs charsets. I'm using httpclient 2 to upload to a perl CGI. Uploading from a browser works fine. Uploading from my program works fine for text files. Uploading from my program

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp Article.java Threadable.java Threader.java

2004-09-23 Thread rwinston
rwinston2004/09/23 05:12:00 Added: net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp Article.java Threadable.java Threader.java Log: PR: 26282 Added classes to facilitate message threading Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/examples/nntp - New directory

2004-09-23 Thread rwinston
rwinston2004/09/23 05:12:54 jakarta-commons/net/src/java/examples/nntp - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/examples/nntp ExtendedNNTPOps.java MessageThreading.java NNTPUtils.java newsgroups.java post.java

2004-09-23 Thread rwinston
rwinston2004/09/23 05:14:47 Added: net/src/java/examples/nntp ExtendedNNTPOps.java MessageThreading.java NNTPUtils.java newsgroups.java post.java Log: Add a message threading example, and refactor the NNTP examples into their own

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/examples ExtendedNNTPOps.java newsgroups.java post.java

2004-09-23 Thread rwinston
rwinston2004/09/23 05:15:38 Removed: net/src/java/examples ExtendedNNTPOps.java newsgroups.java post.java Log: Moved to examples/nntp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26282] - Addition of message threading functionality to NNTP

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26282. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27437] - FTP get and list tasks fail

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27437] - FTP get and list tasks fail

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27437] - FTP get and list tasks fail

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30269] - add functionality to retrieve files from mainframe

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30269. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23488] - OS400 FTP server directory listing is not being parsed properly in FTPFile class.

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23488. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Math 1.0

2004-09-23 Thread Mark R. Diggory
I think c) covers most everything. +1 for path c). -Mark Phil Steitz wrote: There were not enough +1 votes to proceed with the release. Bug fixes were also applied during the vote. Therefore, we cannot proceed with the release at this time. Three issues were reported with the release package:

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp Threadable.java Threader.java

2004-09-23 Thread rwinston
rwinston2004/09/23 06:41:48 Modified:net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp Threadable.java Threader.java Log: Change to ASL 2.0 Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +13 -52 jakarta-commons/net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp/Threadable.java

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/examples/nntp MessageThreading.java

2004-09-23 Thread rwinston
rwinston2004/09/23 06:42:07 Modified:net/src/java/examples/nntp MessageThreading.java Log: Change to ASL 2.0 Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +16 -0 jakarta-commons/net/src/java/examples/nntp/MessageThreading.java Index: MessageThreading.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31387] New: - TFTPClient.setMaxTimeouts() param check broken

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31387. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/tftp TFTPClient.java

2004-09-23 Thread rwinston
rwinston2004/09/23 07:32:55 Modified:net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/tftp TFTPClient.java Log: PR: 31387 Fixed bug in setMaxTimeout() Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +1 -1 jakarta-commons/net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/tftp/TFTPClient.java Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31387] - TFTPClient.setMaxTimeouts() param check broken

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31387. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27437] - FTP get and list tasks fail

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

j:forEach bug

2004-09-23 Thread Ben Anderson
Hi, I'm new to this list, and developer tasks in Apache projects. I found a bug in jelly's forEach tag, which is not conformant to jstl. I've tried to fix it and am close (I think), but it's not functioning exactly as I suspected it would. Maybe someone could offer some help. I want to check

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read DogBean.java

2004-09-23 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2004/09/23 14:47:28 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read DogBean.java Log: Improved support for derived beans. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read FerretBean.java

2004-09-23 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2004/09/23 14:47:41 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read FerretBean.java Log: Improved support for derived beans. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read CatBean.java

2004-09-23 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2004/09/23 14:47:13 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read CatBean.java Log: Improved support for derived beans. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read PetBean.java

2004-09-23 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2004/09/23 14:48:00 Added: betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read PetBean.java Log: Improved support for derived beans. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31393] New: - SetNestedPropertiesRule causes StackOverflowError

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31393. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: j:forEach bug

2004-09-23 Thread Dion Gillard
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:28:13 -0700, Ben Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm new to this list, and developer tasks in Apache projects. I found a bug in jelly's forEach tag, which is not conformant to jstl. I've tried to fix it and am close (I think), but it's not functioning exactly as

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27437] - FTP get and list tasks fail

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23488] - OS400 FTP server directory listing is not being parsed properly in FTPFile class.

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23488. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22193] - Unable to reference statics

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22193. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [JELLY] Re: j:forEach bug

2004-09-23 Thread Hans Gilde
Well... this would definitely be a nice feature. FYI, Ben, this example/explanation is perfect. The original email about a bug and your patch would have been more concise and easily digested if it included the info in this last email. If the functionality worked properly in XML but didn't

[math] API changes for RC2

2004-09-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Subject line says it all...what changes do we feel are necessary to get 1.0 out the door? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27437] - FTP get and list tasks fail

2004-09-23 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] .org writes: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 15:00 --- Sorry, my bad. I didn't realize that Daniel has an AIX parser in there already . I don't think I wrote any of the parsers other than the original default one

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23488] - OS400 FTP server directory listing is not being parsed properly in FTPFile class.

2004-09-23 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23488 OS400 FTP server directory listing is not being parsed properly in FTPFile cla ss. --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 13:25 --- Should this bug be marked as FIXED? I can see that we have an OS400 parser in

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/telnet TelnetClient.java TelnetInputStream.java

2004-09-23 Thread dfs
dfs 2004/09/23 22:03:01 Modified:net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/telnet TelnetClient.java TelnetInputStream.java Log: Applied fix for issue http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31272 reported by Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31272] - TelnetInputStream zombie thread memory leak, FTPClient TelnetClient

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31272. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[jira] Commented: (JELLY-148) Huge memory leak resulting from the use of ThreadLocal

2004-09-23 Thread commons-dev
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Hans Gilde Created: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:15 PM Body: Putting the thread local stuff in the JellyContext makes the memory leak go away as soon as the context is disposed of. Depending on how you use the context, the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27437] - FTP get and list tasks fail

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [jira] Commented: (JELLY-148) Huge memory leak resulting from the use of ThreadLocal

2004-09-23 Thread Dion Gillard
Maybe caching could be disabled via a context variable? On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:15:32 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Hans Gilde Created: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:15 PM Body: Putting the thread

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31378. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17416] - Send InputStreams instead of files in MultipartPostMethod

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17416. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31378. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31378. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31378. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

2004-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31378. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31378] - Move multipart request to a new RequestEntity type

2004-09-23 Thread Michael Becke
Works for me. Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31378. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.