Just go ahead, no objections from me
Phil Steitz wrote:
I was about to close this vote as passed when I got a private email
indicating a small but functionally important bug, which I have now
fixed (PR #32531, ChiSquareTestImpl was incorrectly rejecting tables
containing 0's). Do we need to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32533.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30737.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
And now that you've explained my question my +1 becomes non-tentative, too.
I echo Daniel's thanks, Rory.
On Saturday 04 December 2004 2:57 pm, Rory Winston wrote:
Thanks Daniel! I think that together with my vote, that makes 4 +1's
(with the caveat that Steve's may be tentative) from the core
Oh, and by the way, since I did the last 2 or 3 releases, please feel free to
ask me if you run into a bind. The instructions on the Jakarta site are
pretty good, as I remember it.
On Saturday 04 December 2004 2:57 pm, Rory Winston wrote:
Thanks Daniel! I think that together with my vote,
The Commons community has voted to release Commons Math 1.0, with four
binding +1 votes, one binding +0, one non-binding +0 and no negative
votes. The voting thread can be found here:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=61150
The release itself will be completed shortly.
This vote has passed. There are four binding +1 votes (psteitz,
brentworden, mdiggory, dims), one binding +0 (achou) and one non-binding
+0 (Kim van der Linde). The release will be completed shortly.
Phil Steitz wrote:
There have been no bug reports against commons-math-1.0-RC2, which has
psteitz 2004/12/05 09:21:08
Modified:math/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Updated for 1.0 release.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +16 -5 jakarta-commons/math/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
===
RCS
psteitz 2004/12/05 09:21:30
Modified:math project.xml
Log:
Updated for 1.0 release.
Revision ChangesPath
1.54 +4 -4 jakarta-commons/math/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file:
psteitz 2004/12/05 09:34:27
Modified:math build.xml
Log:
Updated for 1.0 release.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +3 -3 jakarta-commons/math/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
psteitz 2004/12/05 09:42:36
Modified:math/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Eliminate dup entry added by mistake in last commit.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +0 -4 jakarta-commons/math/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
Hi all, being new to digester, I have no clue how to get around my problem.
Here's the story:
I'm trying to parse a config xml that looks like this:
root
a
...
b
.
/b
b
.
/b
/a
a
...
b
Thanks a lot Steve, I've had a look at the instructions and they look
pretty straightforward, so hopefully it should be OK. I may need to get
some help when it comes to deployment time if there are any
karma-related issues, etc.
Cheers,
Rory
Steve Cohen wrote:
Oh, and by the way, since I did
Paul, you're still getting Attempt to use a script that has been garbage
collected. with JDK 1.5?
I added this message when I fixed the big memory leak. I'll take a look.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Libbrecht (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:40 AM
I just discovered that we have some JDK 1.4 dependencies in the 1.0
release code. I would like to make the following changes to allow
compilation on 1.3. Diffs showing the changes are at the bottom of this
message:
1) Eliminate the use of JDK 1.4 exception nesting in
MatrixIndexException,
psteitz 2004/12/05 15:19:11
Removed: math STATUS.html
Log:
Removed STATUS file obsoleted by project.xml, changes.xml
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
psteitz 2004/12/05 15:22:47
Removed: math RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Log:
Removed text file obsoleted by changes.xml.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
psteitz 2004/12/05 15:56:50
Modified:math/xdocs/userguide overview.xml
Log:
Upped advertised JDK compatability level to 1.3.
- Complex equals uses Double.doubletoRawLongBits (fixing would make
equals less sensitive).
- Beta fails compilation (easy to fix)
Revision
This is actually a precedent-setting commit. ;-)
Currently, the Commons charter states that a status file must exist,
and, to date, I believe people have assumed that that file must be
named either STATUS.txt or STATUS.html. Since, as Phil says below,
this status file is obsoleted by the
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Martin Cooper wrote:
This is actually a precedent-setting commit. ;-)
No -- [dbcp], [codec], [launcher] and [pool] all show dead STATUS.html
files in cvs attic. Several others - [configuration], [betwixt], [cli],
[net] do not appear to have ever had a STATUS file.
Currently, the Commons charter
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just discovered that we have some JDK 1.4 dependencies in the 1.0
release code. I would like to make the following changes to allow
compilation on 1.3. Diffs showing the changes are at the bottom of this
message:
1) Eliminate the use of JDK 1.4
I also dropped RELEASE-NOTES.txt and was planning to include a link in
README.html and on the commons download page to the changes.html
generated by maven, similarly to what [configuration] does.
Is that OK, or should I add this file back, putting the links to the
maven-generated report in the
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:54:38 -0500, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
This is actually a precedent-setting commit. ;-)
No -- [dbcp], [codec], [launcher] and [pool] all show dead STATUS.html
files in cvs attic. Several others - [configuration], [betwixt], [cli],
Currently, the Commons charter states that a status file must exist,
and, to date, I believe people have assumed that that file must be
named either STATUS.txt or STATUS.html. Since, as Phil says below,
this status file is obsoleted by the combination of project.xml and
changes.xml, at least for
Sounds fine
Al Chou wrote:
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just discovered that we have some JDK 1.4 dependencies in the 1.0
release code. I would like to make the following changes to allow
compilation on 1.3. Diffs showing the changes are at the bottom of this
message:
1)
Thanks, guys, and sorry I did not catch these 1.4 dependencies earlier.
-Phil
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Sounds fine
Al Chou wrote:
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just discovered that we have some JDK 1.4 dependencies in the 1.0
release code. I would like to make the following changes to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32538.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
psteitz 2004/12/05 21:40:48
Added: math/src/experimental/org/apache/commons/math/util
BeanTransformer.java BeanTransformerTest.java
Removed: math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/util
BeanTransformer.java BeanTransformerTest.java
psteitz 2004/12/05 21:49:44
Modified:math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/linear
InvalidMatrixException.java
MatrixIndexException.java
math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/linear
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32538.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
psteitz 2004/12/05 22:03:01
Modified:math/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Updated to reflect PR# 32538 changes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +5 -0 jakarta-commons/math/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
32 matches
Mail list logo
