Author: skitching
Date: Wed May 11 23:15:18 2005
New Revision: 169778
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169778view=rev
Log:
Oops. The sandbox directory under trunk was not the code from
commons-sandbox but
rather an experimental refactoring of the trunk code. I think it should still be
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by SimonKitching:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by SimonKitching:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette
Hi,
The moving from sandbox to proper wiki page needs updating, as it is
all CVS based.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MovingFromSandboxToProper
The main question that needs resolving is:
* should the code be MOVED from sandbox to proper, or COPIED?
Moving the code means that links
Hello!
Due to user request I would like to start a promotion to get commons-vfs
out of the sandbox.
Now I have read the etiquette to see what is needet
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette
The health of the development community. Fellow committers need to be
persuaded
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34886.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Rory,
As I said in an earlier email, I hope you don't mind me getting involved
in preparing for the Discovery release. No-one gave a -1...but I can
back out anything that you disagree with.
* I've checked the website (maven site:generate) and it all looks good.
* The release notes are
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34886.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
SimonKitching wrote:
+ Any Jakarta committer (not just commons committers) has the right ask
for karma (commit access) and have it granted. The right place to ask is
on the commons-dev mailing list.
+ Commit access to the sandbox is unfortunately '''not''' available to
people who are not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34887.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Simon,
Not at all, I appreciate your help. It all sounds good to me. I'm currently
waiting for a final confirmation from Fernando as to whether 0.3 fulfills his
needs, then we can tag and release. The vote has been done already.
Cheers
Rory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rory,
As I
Hi Simon,
Not at all, I appreciate your help. It all sounds good to me. I'm currently
waiting for a final confirmation from Fernando as to whether 0.3 fulfills his
needs, then we can tag and release. The vote has been done already.
Cheers
Rory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rory,
As I
Good question. We did look at doing a sandbox cleanup when it was migrated from
CVS to SVN. I remember doing a list of dead projects that were still in
sandbox. However, I agree that having a sandbox/{project} dir with at the very
least a README pointing to the new location (for promoted
Good question. We did look at doing a sandbox cleanup when it was migrated from
CVS to SVN. I remember doing a list of dead projects that were still in
sandbox. However, I agree that having a sandbox/{project} dir with at the very
least a README pointing to the new location (for promoted
Mario, I'm willing to help out.
On 5/12/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Due to user request I would like to start a promotion to get commons-vfs
out of the sandbox.
Now I have read the etiquette to see what is needet
Good news.
From Guillaume: commons-discovery 0.3 is OK for me. I had used it for
my nightly test, and all is OK
Cheers,
Fernando
Rory Winston wrote:
Hi Simon,
Not at all, I appreciate your help. It all sounds good to me. I'm currently
waiting for a final confirmation from Fernando as to whether
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29203.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: olegk
Date: Thu May 12 10:05:07 2005
New Revision: 169849
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169849view=rev
Log:
PR #34780 (HttpClient should always override the host of HostConfiguration if
an absolute request URI is given)
Contributed by Oleg Kalnichevski
Reviewed by Ortwin Glck
Author: olegk
Date: Thu May 12 10:06:35 2005
New Revision: 169851
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169851view=rev
Log:
PR #34780
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
URL:
Author: imario
Date: Thu May 12 13:09:06 2005
New Revision: 169878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169878view=rev
Log:
Documentation how to setup a VFS testserver.
On the way found some problems with the webdav provider.
Might be due to new apache?
Added:
Author: imario
Date: Thu May 12 13:34:55 2005
New Revision: 169880
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169880view=rev
Log:
Documentation how to setup a VFS testserver.
On the way found some problems with the webdav provider.
Might be due to new apache?
Modified:
Author: imario
Date: Thu May 12 13:35:11 2005
New Revision: 169881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169881view=rev
Log:
Documentation how to setup a VFS testserver.
On the way found some problems with the webdav provider.
Might be due to new apache?
Added:
Hi!
As soon as the site is mirrored we should have the documentation How to
setup a testserver for VFS online - based on Linux (Distribution: SuSE 9.3)
The link is on: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/vfs
Navigation: Commons-VFS/Development
If you are familiar with your linux
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: imario
Date: Thu May 12 13:49:21 2005
New Revision: 169883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169883view=rev
Log:
Documentation how to setup a VFS testserver.
On the way found some problems with the webdav provider.
Might be due to new apache?
Modified:
Ok, it sounds like we need to get another patch, or manually separate
out the checkstyle from the changes.
Eric, would you mind creating another two patches and attaching them
in a post to the list??
Thanks,
On 5/11/05, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just joined the list myself... (for
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by MartinCooper:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette
The comment on the change is:
The Commons Sandbox is open to
I agree with you that breaking existing API's is a bad thing. However,
the project is currently at 1.0-dev and the main page itself states:
* The code is unreleased
* Methods and classes can and will appear and disappear without warning
While changing the API at this point is less than
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu May 12 22:14:04 2005
New Revision: 169943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169943view=rev
Log:
adding new tests, and reports for jcoverage, with any luck I'll have Commons
Resources at 100% test coverage by the end of next month
Modified:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu May 12 22:15:05 2005
New Revision: 169945
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169945view=rev
Log:
adding new tests, and reports for jcoverage, with any luck I'll have Commons
Resources at 100% test coverage by the end of next month
Modified:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu May 12 22:15:41 2005
New Revision: 169946
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169946view=rev
Log:
adding new tests, and reports for jcoverage, with any luck I'll have Commons
Resources at 100% test coverage by the end of next month
Modified:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu May 12 22:15:54 2005
New Revision: 169947
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169947view=rev
Log:
adding new tests, and reports for jcoverage, with any luck I'll have Commons
Resources at 100% test coverage by the end of next month
Modified:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu May 12 22:16:07 2005
New Revision: 169949
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169949view=rev
Log:
adding new tests, and reports for jcoverage, with any luck I'll have Commons
Resources at 100% test coverage by the end of next month
Modified:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu May 12 22:32:41 2005
New Revision: 169951
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=169951view=rev
Log:
adding new tests, and reports for jcoverage, with any luck I'll have Commons
Resources at 100% test coverage by the end of next month
Modified:
34 matches
Mail list logo
