DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37066.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37067.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 28.09.2005, at 11:13, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Equals and HashCodeBuilder are great tools
and usually a straight call to the reflection
based building does what I need.
...but in case there is only a single member
that you want to take out of the picture you have
to explicitly build the full
I have back-ported Commons Proxy to be JDK1.3 compatible (and there was much
rejoicing). However, I have one test case which uses RMI to test the
RmiProvider. It works if I use JDK5, but as soon as I switch to using a
prior JDK, it chokes. I believe that it's not generating the RMI stub
James Carman wrote on Thursday, October 13, 2005 3:16 PM:
I have back-ported Commons Proxy to be JDK1.3 compatible (and
there was much rejoicing). However, I have one test case
which uses RMI to test the RmiProvider. It works if I use
JDK5, but as soon as I switch to using a prior JDK, it
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/proxy/factory/reflect/TestAbstractInvocationHandler.java
URL:
Never mind, I figured it out. I added a maven.xml file and created a
postGoal for test:compile.
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 9:16 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: [proxy] Generate RMI Stubs w/Maven?
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 06:39:25 2005
New Revision: 320769
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320769view=rev
Log:
Supporting 1.3 JVMs.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/project.properties
Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/project.properties
URL:
Now that Commons Proxy supports 1.3+ JVMs, that last point/question is moot.
Any comments on moving proxy to proper?
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 9:34 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: [proxy] Moving
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37019.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37019.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 07:16:53 2005
New Revision: 320777
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320777view=rev
Log:
Fixing long lines.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/proxy/ObjectProvider.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37019.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37019.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37019.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 08:57:23 2005
New Revision: 320786
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320786view=rev
Log:
AOP Alliance API clarification
(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8065814forum_id=33808).
Arguments should not be null, but an empty Object[].
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 08:59:00 2005
New Revision: 320787
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320787view=rev
Log:
Now using global Object[0] and Class[0] references from ProxyUtils.
Modified:
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 09:00:11 2005
New Revision: 320789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320789view=rev
Log:
Refactored to use null rather than an empty array.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37019.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
All,
Is there a standard mock objects implementation that we are supposed to
use? I like both EasyMock and JMock, but I'm starting to lean more towards
JMock for readability. Any thoughts/objections?
James
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 10:01:27 2005
New Revision: 320805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320805view=rev
Log:
Removed unnecessary helper methods.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/proxy/ProxyUtils.java
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 10:01:59 2005
New Revision: 320806
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320806view=rev
Log:
Added LoggingMethodInterceptor (based on HiveMind's similar class).
Added:
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 10:03:31 2005
New Revision: 320808
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320808view=rev
Log:
Reformatted code and made helper methods private.
Modified:
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 10:06:18 2005
New Revision: 320810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320810view=rev
Log:
Added JMock dependency.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/project.xml
URL:
Dear All,
I'm using the commons validator with Struts and want validations to
not stop at the first failure, but to run against all fields and so
return a set of failures, not just the first one (basically, in a form
of 30 fields, if a user gets several wrong, I can see him getting
annoyed
A follow-up after more searching. I found this at
http://junlu.com/msg/82907.html
Looks like I'm not the only one to come across this problem.
I think I forgot to mention, this is for indexed properties that I'm
having this problem.
Array Validation
2004-04-29 - By Robert Leland
Hello,
is there any other place where the 1.1 RCs can be found?
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/math/binaries/
only contains 1.0.
Also, I was looking to get the latest on the 1.1 release.
Is there anything holding up the 1.1 final?
There was a vote about a month ago, which only
Author: imario
Date: Thu Oct 13 11:18:37 2005
New Revision: 320848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320848view=rev
Log:
zip, jar, tar:
close archive if there is no open stream. This avoids locking on the archive.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a large directory and doing getChildren() or findFiles() even if the
includeFile method of the selector returns false it will take 50MB of the
heap.
I tried some things, but didnt found any fault.
Which filesystem do you use? (local file, ftp, ...)
If this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35921.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36398.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: imario
Date: Thu Oct 13 12:11:33 2005
New Revision: 320876
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320876view=rev
Log:
sftp: stip off link file names, though still no link-support.
Should be sufficient to parse such directory listings.
fix: NPE in UriParser
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37081.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35858.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ben Scott wrote:
Looking at the mailing list archives I found this post: http://mail-
archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-httpclient-user/200506.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which suggests
upgrading to version 3 of httpClient to get around the problem,
leaving me back with my version issues.
To ensure binary compatibility of an upcoming 1.2 release I created a
clirr report, which can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/commons-configuration-1.2/clirr.xml
This looks quite good, i.e. it contains only items of type info, no
errors or warnings.
I have now finished my
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I recently downloaded v0.7 of the betwixt. The tool does really a great job
- highly customizable and easy to use.
I do have a suggestion for a small improvement though:
As far as I know currently it is impossible to intercept the process of
descending into the object graph by a custom code.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36915.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I recently downloaded v0.7 of the betwixt. The tool does really a great job
- highly customizable and easy to use.
I do have a suggestion for a small improvement though:
As far as I know currently it is impossible to intercept the process of
descending into the object graph by a custom code.
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:38 -0400, James Carman wrote:
All,
Is there a standard mock objects implementation that we are supposed to
use?
i'm not sure that we're really into this kind of 'standards': but it is
worth asking the community if they have any preferences (and why)...
I
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:56 +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi Dion,
Not yet and I think that's the problem ;-)
You confirm me in my idea !
I'll try to test it.
But if beanutils kept the same API (with only some add-ons), I couldn't have
a ClassCastException ?
it is possible for the
On 10/13/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:38 -0400, James Carman wrote:
Is there a standard mock objects implementation that we are supposed to
use?
i'm not sure that we're really into this kind of 'standards': but it is
worth asking the
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 11:49 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 10/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37028
snap/
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-12 16:28 ---
snip/
BTW, I'd rather not have
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Oct 13 14:39:26 2005
New Revision: 320929
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320929view=rev
Log:
Fixed memory leak with bad singleton. Contributed by John M. Issue #37046.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37046.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 16:56 -0400, Maciek Kolesnik wrote:
Hi,
hi Maciek
I recently downloaded v0.7 of the betwixt. The tool does really a great job
- highly customizable and easy to use.
I do have a suggestion for a small improvement though:
As far as I know currently it is impossible to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37066.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36927.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: tcurdt
Date: Thu Oct 13 16:44:08 2005
New Revision: 320947
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320947view=rev
Log:
reworked the testcases (unfortunately some are currently failing)
Added:
Briefly:
What I'm looking for is a plugable strategy that would allow custom code to
suppress descent into a sub tree of a graph during serialization process
based on custom rules (specified in that strategy). Ideally the strategy
would surround invocation to writeElement(...) sort of like in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37019.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Oh and BTW - i do know that i could accomplish this just by simply using
XSLT transformation after full serialization but my main goal is efficiency.
The object tree i mentioned below is really a hibernated domain model with
lazy-resolved relationships.
I cannot explode the whole graph because it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This should be discussed in a separate ticket against the Complex
class (done now - 37086).
The general policy in [math] is to use NaN consistently with floating
point arithemtic specs (IEEE 754 for real, C99x Annex G for complex
arithmetic) so for statistics such as Sum, Mean, etc. that involve
Author: jcarman
Date: Thu Oct 13 20:47:57 2005
New Revision: 320989
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320989view=rev
Log:
Improving test coverage (a bit).
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/proxy/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/proxy/interceptor/TestLoggingMethodInterceptor.java
On 10/13/05, Mauro Talevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
is there any other place where the 1.1 RCs can be found?
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/math/binaries/
only contains 1.0.
Also, I was looking to get the latest on the 1.1
Ok, that means that the patches for Min and Max should be as follows:
For class Max:
public void increment(final double d)
{
if (!Double.isNaN(d))
value = (d value) ? d : value;
n++;
}
public double evaluate(final double[] values, final int begin,
62 matches
Mail list logo
